Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Smarsh Enterprise Archive vs Trellix Collaboration Security comparison

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Smarsh Enterprise Archive
Average Rating
10.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Instant Communications Security and Compliance (1st)
Trellix Collaboration Security
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
Email Security (19th), Secure Email Gateway (SEG) (8th)
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2590137 - PeerSpot reviewer
Enhanced eDiscovery capabilities and streamlined compliance with helpful support
I do recommend Smarsh to our clients for its enhanced features and ability to meet regulatory requirements efficiently. Smaller shops have become more inclined to switch to Smarsh due to these capabilities. Smarsh has the ability to archive a wide variety of communication channels. I'd rate the solution ten out of ten.
Amey Darekar - PeerSpot reviewer
Has an easy implementation phase to deal with for users
I primarily use the product in our daily security operations since it is implemented in all of our company's systems and is used in our environment. Normally, email security tools like FireEye or Trellix help to protect ourselves from spam, malware, and other email-oriented threats. The tool is used extensively in our company's environment. It is more like a collaboration email security that is used in our company. Whether my company plans to increase the number of users of the product or not is something that depends on the growth of the organization. I recommend the product to those who plan to use it. The product is stable and reliable, considering the results my company gets out of it. When it comes to Trellix or FireEye Endpoint Security (HX), the tools offer antivirus as well as the modern real-time security feature, which is used to automate the detection and protection of the endpoints against all the security threats that are currently there in the industry. I don't see any challenges with the integration part of the product, but since a different team manages it, I don't have visibility into it. In terms of the value offered by the product, the solution does help our company protect data and the complete infrastructure. I rate the tool a nine out of ten.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"One of the most valuable features of Smarsh Enterprise Archive is its eDiscovery capabilities."
"One of the valuable features of the product stems from the fact that it is easy to implement the tool in our environment."
"FireEye is good for malware depicting and security."
"We can control this solution from the cloud and are able to access it from wherever we are."
"FireEye Email Security is easy to use."
"Before installing, consider potential challenges with system performance, especially when integrating multiple tools, which could slow down performance."
"The solution's most valuable feature is its simplicity. It's very user-friendly."
"We have had very good results from the use of FireEye Email Security. We are very comfortable with this technology, but I don't know if it's necessary to move into the cloud, we will check other technologies and study them. Additionally, the solution has good integration."
"One of the most valuable features is the protection against vulnerabilities, particularly through virtual patching."
 

Cons

"Sometimes the automated reports do not show the organization’s name, which can be confusing."
"In general, our company should make the tool more robust to protect our systems."
"FireEye needs single sign-on. They say it's on their roadmap. They should also implement support for Microsoft Authenticator app for 2FA."
"The solution needs better support."
"Sometimes, integration can be challenging, impacting its stability, which is why I rate it a five out of ten."
"I would like to see this solution become more flexible."
"The spam detection feature could be better."
"I would like the solution to be able to automatically quarantine the malicious emails before getting to the user's mailbox and continue with regular email operations. This could result in the user clicking the email before the purge operation is completed."
"Sometimes especially zero-day spam emails can be passed to the user's inbox."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The solution requires a license to be purchased for every user."
"The cost is very high."
"The licensing is on a yearly basis."
"I rate the product price as nine out of ten, where ten is the most expensive, and one is the cheapest. There is no need to pay any extra charges apart from the licensing costs."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Instant Communications Security and Compliance solutions are best for your needs.
849,335 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Manufacturing Company
16%
Computer Software Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Government
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Smarsh Enterprise Archive?
I am not directly involved with the pricing or licensing aspects, however, I have seen fee sheets and invoices sent to clients.
What needs improvement with Smarsh Enterprise Archive?
Being a compliance consultant working with multiple firms, I would like more customizable reporting options. Sometimes the automated reports do not show the organization’s name, which can be confus...
What is your primary use case for Smarsh Enterprise Archive?
We use Smarsh Enterprise Archive for record retention and surveillance. It allows us to journal all communications, ensuring that electronic communications are captured and retained for the require...
What do you like most about FireEye Email Security?
One of the valuable features of the product stems from the fact that it is easy to implement the tool in our environment.
What needs improvement with FireEye Email Security?
I would like to see the addition of email digital protection features, such as anti-spam and antivirus, not just sandboxing, in the on-premises solution.
What is your primary use case for FireEye Email Security?
I have worked on Email Security ( /categories/email-security ) both on-premises and in the cloud, Web Security, and also on MDR, which is called HX endpoint security for Trellix Collaboration Secur...
 

Also Known As

No data available
FireEye Email Security
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

McLaughlin Ryder, Schanna Financial , Standard Life Investments, Lucien, Stirling & Gray
Northshore Utility District, Luz Technologies, Air Academy Federal Credit Union, Bank Gutmann, Bank of Thailand, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, State of Missouri, City and County of San Francisco, Denver Public Schools, Vodafone, Go Auto, Stater Bros. Market