Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Softinventive Lab Total Network Inventory vs System Center comparison

Softinventive Lab and Microsoft are both solutions in the Software Asset Management category. Softinventive Lab is ranked #4, while Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.3. Softinventive Lab holds a 3.3% mindshare in SAM, compared to Microsoft’s 36.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution.
Softinventive Lab Total Net...
  • 57 Views
  • 4 Comparison Views
System Center
Read 6 System Center reviews
  • 58 Views
  • 27 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Softinventive Lab Total Net...
Ranking in Software Asset Management
4th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
System Center
Ranking in Software Asset Management
1st
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Software Asset Management category, the mindshare of Softinventive Lab Total Network Inventory is 3.3%, down from 6.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of System Center is 36.7%, up from 24.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Software Asset Management
 

Featured Reviews

Use Softinventive Lab Total Network Inventory?
Share your opinion
Hossam Hussein - PeerSpot reviewer
Easy to manage, high availability, and scales well
We are using System Center for integration and deployment The most valuable feature of the System Center is the easy management of everything. The integration could improve in the future. Additionally, a single reporting feature for databases would be useful. I have been using System Center for…
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Asset Management solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
831,020 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about System Center?
System Center helps us manage everything in the company.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for System Center?
SCCM is expensive for me personally. However, I don't think it's unreasonable for a company.
See all answers
What needs improvement with System Center?
I don't have administrator access, so I can't fully explore all the features, and it's hard for me to say what needs to be improved at this time.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

No data available
No data available
 

Product Reports

No data available
Buyer's Guide
ManageEngine AssetExplorer vs. System Center
January 2025
System Center reportDownload System Center product report
 

Learn More

Softinventive Lab
Microsoft
 

Overview

Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD, and ESX/ESXi-based computers and servers can be scanned without preinstalled agents – you just need to know the administrator's password. Scan single nodes, network address ranges, or Active Directory structure.

Integrated management platform that helps you efficiently manage your data centers, client devices, and hybrid cloud IT environments.
 

Sample Customers

NASA, IBM, Disney, Sony, HP
PKP Energetyka S.A., Florida Atlantic University, Bank Alfalah Ltd., Dimension Data, Liquor Control Board of Ontario, Wªrth Handelsges.m.b.H
See our list of best Software Asset Management vendors.

We monitor all Software Asset Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.