Swarm64 vs Windows Server Failover Clustering comparison

Swarm64 and Microsoft are both solutions in the High Availability Clustering category. Swarm64 is ranked #8, while Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.0. Swarm64 holds a 1.5% mindshare in HAC, compared to Microsoft’s 31.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution.

Swarm64

45 Views
20 Comparison Views

Windows Server Failover Clu...

Read 8 Windows Server Failover Clustering reviews

1,402 Views
532 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Swarm64

Windows Server Failover Clu...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Swarm64 and Windows Server Failover Clustering based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Veritas, IBM and others in High Availability Clustering.

To learn more, read our detailed High Availability Clustering Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

High Availability Clustering

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 816,406 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Swarm64

Ranking in High Availability Clustering

8th

Average Rating

0.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Windows Server Failover Clu...

Ranking in High Availability Clustering

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the High Availability Clustering category, the mindshare of Swarm64 is 1.5%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Windows Server Failover Clustering is 31.3%, down from 35.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

High Availability Clustering

Featured Reviews

Use Swarm64?

Share your opinion

Barry Liou

Project Manager at IDPoints Ltd.

An affordable solution for warehousing but lacks scalability

We use the solution for warehouse purposes. We built an SQL server on the solution The solution has a hot-swap feature. If one of the servers fails, we’ll still have a running system. It takes a few seconds to swap to the other server. The system has no interruption and is highly available. The…

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which High Availability Clustering solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Windows Server Failover Clustering?

The product is stable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Windows Server Failover Clustering?

There is no extra charge except a service fee for some professional work. I rate the product’s pricing a five out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Windows Server Failover Clustering?

The solution uses external storage, while third-party solutions don't use external storage. They're using a mirror to create a partition on each server and synchronize the data in the background. I...

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Veritas InfoScale Availability vs Windows Server Failover Clustering

Compared 41% of the time

DRBD vs Windows Server Failover Clustering

Compared 22% of the time

IBM PowerHA System Mirror vs Windows Server Failover Clustering

Compared 19% of the time

HPE Serviceguard vs Windows Server Failover Clustering

Compared 18% of the time

More Windows Server Failover Clustering Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

High Availability Clustering

October 2024

Download Swarm64 product report

Buyer's Guide

Windows Server Failover Clustering

October 2024

Windows Server Failover Clustering report

Download Windows Server Failover Clustering product report

Learn More

Video not available

Swarm64

Microsoft

Overview

Swarm64 seamlessly combines hard- and software into an engineered solution for greater business efficiency and performance. The S64DA is the out of the box solution to add analytical power to your relational databases.

Windows Server Failover Clustering provides infrastructure features that support the high-availability and disaster recovery scenarios of hosted server applications such as Microsoft SQL Server and Microsoft Exchange. If a cluster node or service fails, the services that were hosted on that node can be automatically or manually transferred to another available node in a process known as failover.

Sample Customers

Alliance Venture, Target Partners, Investinor

Karl-Franzens-Universit_t Graz, NAV CANADA, Magnachip, ólectricit_ de France, Cambridgeshire Constabulary, Bank Alfalah Ltd., Local Government Association of Queensland

Buyer's Guide

High Availability Clustering

October 2024

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Veritas, IBM and others in High Availability Clustering. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best High Availability Clustering vendors.

We monitor all High Availability Clustering reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.