Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Trellix Endpoint Security vs Wazuh comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
9.2
Trellix Endpoint Security delivers strong ROI, cost savings, and effective protection, especially for firms with smaller security teams.
Sentiment score
3.5
Wazuh offers rapid detection and response, reducing costs and ensuring high ROI for small to medium businesses without security compromises.
We have observed tremendous return on investment after implementing Trellix Endpoint Security as it is a more cost-effective solution compared to other products.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.7
Trellix Endpoint Security's customer service is praised for skill and responsiveness, yet varies in regional consistency and escalation processes.
Sentiment score
4.3
Wazuh's support is praised, but response times vary; satisfaction ranges from 7 to 9 out of 10.
I would rate their customer service nine out of ten.
The response time is a notable issue.
There is no dedicated technical support for Wazuh as it is open source.
The documentation is good and provides clear instructions, though it's targeted at those with technical backgrounds.
We use the open-source version of Wazuh, which does not provide paid support.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.7
Trellix Endpoint Security efficiently scales for organizations globally, receiving high ratings for flexibility and ease in diverse environments.
Sentiment score
7.4
Wazuh is scalable and adaptable but requires technical expertise for setup and may struggle with massive data handling.
I would rate the scalability of the solution as a six out of ten, indicating some challenges due to downtime requirements.
Trellix Endpoint Security is scalable.
It can accommodate thousands of endpoints on one instance, and multiple instances can run for different clients.
Scalability depends on the configuration and the infrastructure resources like compute and memory we allocate.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.2
Trellix Endpoint Security is stable, reliable, and efficient, though performance may vary with outdated versions or resource constraints.
Sentiment score
7.0
Wazuh is generally stable and reliable for small to mid-level businesses, though updates and configuration errors can cause issues.
I would rate its stability as nine out of ten.
The stability of Wazuh is largely dependent on maintenance.
The stability of Wazuh is strong, with no issues stemming from the solution itself.
 

Room For Improvement

Trellix Endpoint Security needs improvements in speed, interface, resource use, technical support, and compatibility with Mac and Linux.
Wazuh needs scalability, user interface improvements, better AI, cloud integration, Unix support, and efficient threat detection features.
What needs improvement in Trellix Endpoint Security is the reduction of resource consumption by the scanning feature.
Artificial intelligence also requires improvement to further enhance the product.
The integration modules are insufficiently developed, necessitating the creation of custom integration solutions using tools like Logstash and PubSub.
An issue I noticed is with tag values in certain rules not functioning properly.
There is room for improvement by integrating more AI into Wazuh.
 

Setup Cost

Trellix Endpoint Security offers flexible licensing with competitive prices, value-for-money, and discounts, appealing to enterprises.
Wazuh provides cost-effective, open-source security with free software but may incur costs for support, storage, and Wazuh Cloud enhancements.
Trellix Endpoint Security is cost-effective and provides excellent value for money.
The license costs are very reasonable, around 1,000 to 1,200 rupees per year.
Totaling around two lakh Indian rupees per month.
Since Wazuh is open source, the pricing for support could be applicable to medium-sized companies without much issue.
 

Valuable Features

Trellix Endpoint Security offers centralized management, advanced threat prevention, and seamless integration providing robust, scalable protection without system performance compromise.
Wazuh provides comprehensive security features, scalability, and cost-effectiveness, supporting diverse environments and regulatory compliance with strong community support.
Trellix Endpoint Security is a proven, robust, and cost-effective solution that protects the organization from different types of ransomware and attacks.
The most valuable features of Trellix Endpoint Security include its protection capabilities such as DNS and endpoint security, DNS threat prevention, as well as advanced threat prevention.
Wazuh is a SIEM tool that is highly customizable and versatile.
Wazuh's most valuable features include file monitoring and compliance reporting, which do not require excessive costs.
We found the MITRE framework mapping and the agent enrollment service to be the most valuable features of Wazuh.
 

Categories and Ranking

Trellix Endpoint Security
Ranking in Extended Detection and Response (XDR)
13th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
99
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (10th)
Wazuh
Ranking in Extended Detection and Response (XDR)
3rd
Average Rating
7.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.3
Number of Reviews
46
Ranking in other categories
Log Management (1st), Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Extended Detection and Response (XDR) category, the mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Security is 1.8%, down from 2.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Wazuh is 13.0%, up from 10.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Extended Detection and Response (XDR)
 

Featured Reviews

AhmedEl-Tayeb - PeerSpot reviewer
Good user behavioral analysis and helpful patching but needs better support services
Some of our products have a first and second line owned by us. We are giving support services to the customers instead of the vendor. Some other products are supported directly by the technology vendor, however. Technical support from the vendor is very bad. Usually, when the customer submits a ticket, they put a severity level on the case. Whenever the case is very important, and there is a real malfunction in the product on the customer side, and there is something down that needs someone to have a look immediately, it takes more time than it should to even engage with the customer. When someone has to contact the customer and have a remote session within the customer environment, they sometimes lack in terms of communication with the customer. The support centers are located in the East and not all have an acceptable level of English in order to communicate directly with the customer.
Sandip_Patel - PeerSpot reviewer
Evaluating robust file monitoring with insights for community support improvements
Wazuh's most valuable features include file monitoring and compliance reporting, which do not require excessive costs. These aspects are vital as they provide alerts for changes and facilitate the monitoring of compliance. The platform is also relatively easy to set up and operate. Reports are straightforward to extract and prove useful for compliance requirements.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Extended Detection and Response (XDR) solutions are best for your needs.
844,944 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
44%
Government
9%
Computer Software Company
7%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Computer Software Company
16%
Comms Service Provider
8%
University
7%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?
The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deploy various components as desired with McAfee Endpoint Security, whereas many othe...
What do you like most about McAfee Endpoint Security?
It provides a robust defense against cybersecurity threats while offering user-friendly features like notifications and approval prompts.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for McAfee Endpoint Security?
Trellix Endpoint Security is cost-effective and provides excellent value for money, with no need for extra expenses for premium support.
What do you like most about Wazuh?
Integrates with various open-source and paid products, allowing for flexibility in customization based on use cases.
What needs improvement with Wazuh?
There is room for improvement by integrating more AI into Wazuh. It requires constant nurturing, as I have to provide it with code and specific requirements. This maintenance can be quite labor-int...
What is your primary use case for Wazuh?
We use Wazuh as a SIEM solution because it is open source, highly customizable, and continually expanding. Our clients can request various solutions for their issues, which Wazuh is able to address.
 

Also Known As

McAfee Endpoint Security, McAfee Endpoint Protection, Intel Security Total Protection for Endpoint, McAfee Complete Endpoint Protection
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

inHouseIT, Seagate Technology
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Trellix Endpoint Security vs. Wazuh and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
844,944 professionals have used our research since 2012.