Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Trellix Endpoint Security vs Wazuh comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
Wazuh's customer service is highly rated, with excellent paid support and active community forums for troubleshooting assistance.
We use the open-source version of Wazuh, which does not provide paid support.
 

Room For Improvement

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
5.1
Wazuh's interface is complex, lacking integration, scalability, AI capabilities, and requires better support, efficiency, and automated features.
The integration modules are insufficiently developed, necessitating the creation of custom integration solutions using tools like Logstash and PubSub.
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.1
Wazuh's scalability is mixed, requiring technical expertise, with feedback ranging from four to ten, noting resource challenges.
Scalability depends on the configuration and the infrastructure resources like compute and memory we allocate.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
Wazuh is cost-effective but includes support and infrastructure expenses, appealing to smaller organizations despite scalability limitations.
Totaling around two lakh Indian rupees per month.
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.2
Wazuh is generally stable with minor glitches, suitable for small to mid-level businesses, often affected by configuration issues.
The stability of Wazuh is strong, with no issues stemming from the solution itself.
 

Valuable Features

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.9
Wazuh provides cost-effective, open-source security with integration, compliance, monitoring, and vulnerability assessment for diverse systems and platforms.
We found the MITRE framework mapping and the agent enrollment service to be the most valuable features of Wazuh.
 

Categories and Ranking

Trellix Endpoint Security
Ranking in Extended Detection and Response (XDR)
12th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
97
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (11th)
Wazuh
Ranking in Extended Detection and Response (XDR)
4th
Average Rating
7.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
44
Ranking in other categories
Log Management (2nd), Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Extended Detection and Response (XDR) category, the mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Security is 2.6%, down from 3.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Wazuh is 11.2%, up from 3.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Extended Detection and Response (XDR)
 

Featured Reviews

AhmedEl-Tayeb - PeerSpot reviewer
Good user behavioral analysis and helpful patching but needs better support services
Some of our products have a first and second line owned by us. We are giving support services to the customers instead of the vendor. Some other products are supported directly by the technology vendor, however. Technical support from the vendor is very bad. Usually, when the customer submits a ticket, they put a severity level on the case. Whenever the case is very important, and there is a real malfunction in the product on the customer side, and there is something down that needs someone to have a look immediately, it takes more time than it should to even engage with the customer. When someone has to contact the customer and have a remote session within the customer environment, they sometimes lack in terms of communication with the customer. The support centers are located in the East and not all have an acceptable level of English in order to communicate directly with the customer.
Vikrant Puranik - PeerSpot reviewer
It integrates seamlessly with AWS cloud-native services
I worked with Splunk, Curator, ArcSight, and some legacy solutions that no longer exist. They became obsolete or transitioned to a different product. Cost-effectiveness was one reason we switched. We had to decide whether to spend $500,000 on a commercial product or rely on our skills to deploy an open-source solution. The big difference between Wazuh and other solutions is maturity and customization. Wazuh's scalability and out-of-the-box functionality are slightly lagging behind, but Wazuh has improved a lot since the first time we saw it. Others have more search capabilities, whereas Wazuh depends on Elasticsearch. Searching is a bit slower in Wazuh.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Extended Detection and Response (XDR) solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
41%
Government
9%
Computer Software Company
7%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Computer Software Company
16%
University
7%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?
The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deploy various components as desired with McAfee Endpoint Security, whereas many othe...
What do you like most about McAfee Endpoint Security?
It provides a robust defense against cybersecurity threats while offering user-friendly features like notifications and approval prompts.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for McAfee Endpoint Security?
The solution is not an expensive tool. Compared to other options, it's mostly average-priced. I've deployed it for customers ranging from 100 nodes to over 5,000 nodes. Its renewal prices are very ...
What do you like most about Wazuh?
Integrates with various open-source and paid products, allowing for flexibility in customization based on use cases.
What needs improvement with Wazuh?
The latest version, 4.9, has improved the interface significantly. I am yet to explore more about the update to identify further areas for improvement. So far, the recent updates have addressed mos...
What is your primary use case for Wazuh?
We use Wazuh for our Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) needs. It serves as a log aggregator and provides us the capability to monitor our servers for brute force attacks and other se...
 

Also Known As

McAfee Endpoint Security, McAfee Complete Endpoint Protection, McAfee Endpoint Protection, Total Protection for Endpoint, Intel Security Total Protection for Endpoint, MCAFEE Complete Endpoint Protection
No data available
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

inHouseIT, Seagate Technology
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Trellix Endpoint Security vs. Wazuh and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.