Splunk Enterprise Security vs Wazuh comparison

Splunk Enterprise Security

Read 45 Wazuh reviews

33,920 Views
20,289 Comparison Views

79% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 5, 2025

Splunk Enterprise Security and Wazuh are key competitors in the security information and event management (SIEM) arena. Splunk appears to have the upper hand with its advanced data processing and robust enterprise capabilities, making it suitable for complex environments.

Features: Splunk Enterprise Security is known for its real-time data collection, powerful search capabilities, and operational intelligence which supports rapid issue diagnosis across a wide range of data sources. Users find its analytics and visualization tools particularly valuable. Wazuh, on the other hand, offers effective log monitoring, intrusion detection, and vulnerability assessments, focusing on compliance and being a cost-effective, open-source option.

Room for Improvement: Splunk can improve its operational workflows, visualization, and user access control while reducing technical complexity and enhancing integration with external ticketing systems. Wazuh could improve its threat detection capabilities and scalability to better handle enterprise-level environments, as well as integrate better threat intelligence for real-time monitoring and automation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Splunk provides robust support across various environments, including clouds, but requires professional expertise for large-scale deployments. Wazuh is typically deployed on-premises with community-driven support, making it user-friendly and suitable for smaller infrastructure deployments.

Pricing and ROI: Splunk Enterprise Security has higher pricing, making it suitable for organizations with the budget to take advantage of its comprehensive features, offering a high ROI due to its extensive capabilities. Wazuh, being open-source, offers essential security features without licensing fees, making it a favorable option for budget-conscious organizations despite lacking some advanced features found in Splunk.

To learn more, read our detailed Splunk Enterprise Security vs. Wazuh Report (Updated: January 2025).

Splunk Enterprise Security vs. Wazuh

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 831,020 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Splunk Enterprise Security

Ranking in Log Management

1st

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

1st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

303

Ranking in other categories

IT Operations Analytics (1st)

Wazuh

Ranking in Log Management

2nd

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

2nd

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of Splunk Enterprise Security is 8.7%, down from 12.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Wazuh is 16.8%, up from 13.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management

Featured Reviews

ROBERT-CHRISTIAN

CTO Security & Resilience at Kyndryl

Has many predefined correlation rules and is brilliant for investigation and log analysis

It is very complicated to write your own correlation rules without the help of Splunk support. What Splunk could do better is to create an API to the standard SIEM tools, such as Microsoft Sentinel. The idea would be to make it less painful. In ELK Stack, Kibana is the query language with which you can search log files. I believe Splunk has also a query language in which they search their log files, but once you have identified the log file that you want to use for further security correlation, you want to very quickly transport that into your SIEM tool, such as Microsoft Sentinel. That is something that Splunk could make a little bit less painful because it is a lot of effort to find that log file and forward it. An API with Microsoft Sentinel or a similar SIEM tool would be a good idea.

Read full review

Sandip_Patel

Student at Dakota State University

Evaluating robust file monitoring with insights for community support improvements

Wazuh's most valuable features include file monitoring and compliance reporting, which do not require excessive costs. These aspects are vital as they provide alerts for changes and facilitate the monitoring of compliance. The platform is also relatively easy to set up and operate. Reports are straightforward to extract and prove useful for compliance requirements.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The incident review pane is the best part of it because that is where the SOC lives. It is the heartbeat of what the SOC needs to do. You are able to start the investigative process. As you are sitting in the incident review pane, you see the alert, and from that one alert, which is called a notable alert, you can drill in and see all the different specific details that are tied to that."

"It definitely does help with both auditing and as well as regular monitoring. SOC does more monitoring, but ES also gives you other features that are auditing-related. The dashboards are also beneficial."

"The most valuable function is the notable events. When I joined the team, I asked them what they could currently see, and they said nothing. I was pretty shocked. I know for a fact that they're using Enterprise Security or at least they had purchased it. I told them that there are several dashboards within Splunk that we can leverage. There is also notable events where we can see potential incidents or potential alerts about the infrastructure and the network itself."

"Overall, Splunk is among the top three SIEM tools due to its capabilities and agility in bridging business analytics with security needs."

"The best part of Splunk Enterprise Security is its customizable settings."

"The ability to rapidly diagnose problems in production and non-production, across hundreds of log files, is the most valuable feature."

"The metrics and trends that Splunk Enterprise Security generates using all the data points we send allow customers to understand better what their users are doing."

"We have found all the features useful. However, the dashboarding and logging have been very helpful. Additionally, the log analysis does a great job."

More Splunk Enterprise Security pros

"Good for monitoring, active response, and for vulnerabilities."

"I like that the solution is on top of the Kubernetes stack."

"Wazuh's most valuable features include file monitoring and compliance reporting, which do not require excessive costs."

"It's very easy to integrate Wazuh with other environments, cloud applications, and on-prem applications. So, the advantage is that it's easy to implement and integrate with other solutions."

"It is excellent in terms of visualization and indexing services, making it a powerful tool for malware detection."

"Wazuh has very flexible and robust features."

"Its cost-effectiveness is the most valuable aspect."

"We use it to find any aberration in our endpoint devices. For example, if someone installs a game on their company laptop, Wazuh will detect it and inform us of the unauthorized software or unintended use of the devices provided by the company."

More Wazuh pros

Cons

"Splunk isn't appropriate for smaller companies. It's too expensive."

"The GUI can be improved. Splunk has always suffered from having a kind of goofy UI, it needs some updating."

"Splunk Enterprise Security would benefit from a more robust rule engine to reduce false positives."

"The case management area of the ES could be improved. The ability to move cases through various stages and states. The ability to close a case would be key improvement."

"I'd like to see more integration with more antivirus systems."

"It can be tough to get a hold of somebody in technical support depending on the complexity of the issue."

"In the next release, they should include machine learning-based rules that would streamline the process of finding anomalies."

"Splunk does not provide any default threat intelligence like Microsoft Sentinel, but you can integrate any third-party threat intelligence with Splunk. By default, no threat intelligence suite is there, whereas, with IBM QRadar or Microsoft Sentinel, the default feature of threat intelligence is there. It is free. If Splunk can provide a default threat intelligence suite, it would be better."

More Splunk Enterprise Security cons

"The computing resources are consuming and do not make sense."

"The product's configuration part and lack of AI capabilities are some of the major concerns associated with Wazuh."

"Wazuh doesn't cover sources of events as well as Splunk. You can integrate Splunk with many sources of events, but it's a painful process to take care of some sources of events with Wazuh."

"One area where Wazuh could use some improvement is in its reporting mechanism, especially for high-level management like CSOs and CEOs."

"I have yet to find the same capability in Wazuh to get logs from different sources into the system"

"I want more support for regional compliance standards to serve my ANZ region customers better."

"The tool does not provide CTI to monitor darknet."

"The deployment is a bit complex."

More Wazuh cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It can be cost-prohibitive when you start to scale and have terabytes of data. Its cost model is based on how much data it processes a day. If they're able to create scaled-down niche or custom package offerings, it may help with the cost. Instead of the full-blown features, if they can narrow the scope where it can only be used for a specific purpose, it would kind of create that market for the product, and it may help with the costing. When you start using it as a central aggregator and you're pumping tons of logs at it, pretty soon, you'll start hitting your cap on what it can process a day. Once you've got that, you're kind of defeating the purpose because you're going to have to scale back."

"The pricing is based on the volume of data fed into it, which can lead to substantial costs. This pricing model is complex and unpredictable, making cost management difficult."

"Splunk Enterprise Security's pricing is based on data volume, which generally suits large enterprises."

"The licensing is good, but the pricing absolutely needs some work. It is very high."

"While Splunk is more expensive than other solutions, we would still choose it because of its capabilities."

"I think we recently switched to the SVC pricing compared to the ingest pricing."

"The pricing seems good relative to the other vendors that we have had here. However, they need to find ways to be more flexible with the licensing and be able to deal with situations where we start generating more logs. Maybe having some controls in the Splunk interface to turn it off, so we don't have to change anything in our application."

"The price of Splunk Enterprise Security is high."

More Splunk Enterprise Security pricing and cost advice

"Wazuh is open-source, so I think it's an option for a small organization that cannot go for enterprise-grade solutions like Splunk."

"Wazuh is open-source, but you must consider the total cost of ownership. It may be free to acquire, but you spend a lot of time and effort supporting the product and getting it to a point where it's useful."

"There is not a license required for Wazuh."

"The product is cheaper compared to other tools."

"The solution's cost is above the average."

"Wazuh is totally free and open source. There are no licensing costs, only support costs if you need them."

"It is a free-of-cost solution."

"The product price is neither too high nor too low."

More Wazuh pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

831,020 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

Vinod Shankar

Manager, Enterprise Risk Consulting at Deloitte & Touche

Feb 26, 2015

HP ArcSight vs. IBM QRadar vs. McAfee Nitro vs. Splunk vs. RSA Security vs. LogRhythm

We at Infosecnirvana.com have done several posts on SIEM. After the Dummies Guide on SIEM, we are following it up with a SIEM Product Comparison – 101 deck. So, here it is for your viewing pleasure. Let me know what you think by posting your comments below. The key products compared here are…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

16%

Comms Service Provider

University

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What SOC product do you recommend?

For tools I’d recommend: -SIEM- LogRhythm -SOAR- Palo Alto XSOAR Doing commercial w/o both (or at least an XDR) is asking to miss details that are critical, and ending up a statistic. Also, rememb...

What is a better choice, Splunk or Azure Sentinel?

It would really depend on (1) which logs you need to ingest and (2) what are your use cases Splunk is easy for ingestion of anything, but the charge per GB/Day Indexed and it gets expensive as log ...

How does Splunk compare with Azure Monitor?

Splunk handles a high amount of data very well. We use Splunk to capture information and as an aggregator for monitoring information from different sources. Splunk is very good at alerting us if we...

What do you like most about Wazuh?

Integrates with various open-source and paid products, allowing for flexibility in customization based on use cases.

What needs improvement with Wazuh?

I am investigating more about the community support for Wazuh. I can't provide a definitive answer yet. An issue I noticed is with tag values in certain rules not functioning properly. It's unclear...

What is your primary use case for Wazuh?

I am currently evaluating and using Wazuh for file monitoring and compliance reporting. We are in the process of conducting a POC to understand how the rules work. I lead this effort to explore and...

IBM Security QRadar vs Splunk Enterprise Security

Comparisons

Compared 9% of the time

Dynatrace vs Splunk Enterprise Security

Compared 8% of the time

Datadog vs Splunk Enterprise Security

Compared 5% of the time

Sentinel vs Splunk Enterprise Security

Compared 4% of the time

AppDynamics vs Splunk Enterprise Security

Compared 4% of the time

More Splunk Enterprise Security Competitors

Security Onion vs Wazuh

Compared 16% of the time

Elastic Stack vs Wazuh

Compared 10% of the time

AlienVault OSSIM vs Wazuh

Compared 9% of the time

Elastic Security vs Wazuh

Compared 8% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Wazuh

Compared 4% of the time

More Wazuh Competitors

Product Reports

Splunk Enterprise Security

December 2024

Download Splunk Enterprise Security product report

Download Wazuh product report

December 2024

Learn More

Splunk

Overview

Splunk Enterprise Security is widely used for security operations, including threat detection, incident response, and log monitoring. It centralizes log management, offers security analytics, and ensures compliance, enhancing the overall security posture of organizations.

Companies leverage Splunk Enterprise Security to monitor endpoints, networks, and users, detecting anomalies, brute force attacks, and unauthorized access. They use it for fraud detection, machine learning, and real-time alerts within their SOCs. The platform enhances visibility and correlates data from multiple sources to identify security threats efficiently. Key features include comprehensive dashboards, excellent reporting capabilities, robust log aggregation, and flexible data ingestion. Users appreciate its SIEM capabilities, threat intelligence, risk-based alerting, and correlation searches. Highly scalable and stable, it suits multi-cloud environments, reducing alert volumes and speeding up investigations.

What are the key features?

Comprehensive Dashboards: Provide a holistic view of security operations.
Flexible Data Ingestion: Supports various data sources for better analysis.
Robust Log Aggregation: Centralizes log management for easier monitoring.
Machine Learning Toolkit: Enhances threat detection and prediction capabilities.
SIEM Capabilities: Integrates security information and event management.
Threat Intelligence: Utilizes external information to improve security measures.
Risk-Based Alerting: Prioritizes alerts based on the risk they pose.
Correlation Searches: Identifies and correlates security events effectively.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Enhanced Visibility: Improves monitoring across endpoints, networks, and users.
Faster Incident Response: Speeds up identification and resolution of security issues.
Reduced Alert Volumes: Lowers false positives and enhances signal-to-noise ratio.
Scalability: Adapts to growing and changing security needs.
Improved Security Operations: Integrates multiple security facets into one platform.

Splunk Enterprise Security is implemented across industries like finance, healthcare, and retail. Financial institutions use it for fraud detection and compliance, while healthcare organizations leverage its capabilities to safeguard patient data. Retailers deploy it to protect customer information and ensure secure transactions.

Wazuh is an enterprise-ready platform used for security monitoring. It is a free and open-source platform that is used for threat detection, incident response and compliance, and integrity monitoring. Wazuh is capable of protecting workloads across virtualized, on-premises, containerized, and cloud-based environments.

It consists of an endpoint security agent and a management server. Additionally, Wazuh is fully integrated with the Elastic Stack, allowing users the ability to navigate through security alerts via a data visualization tool.

Wazuh’s agent can run on many different platforms, and is lightweight. It can successfully perform the tasks needed to detect threats in order to trigger responses automatically.
Wazuh manages the agents, can analyze agent data, and can scale horizontally.
Elastic Stack is where alerts are indexed and stored.

Wazuh Capabilities

Some of Wazuh’s most notable capabilities include:

Intrusion detection: Wazuh’s agents can detect hidden files, cloaked processes, or unregistered network listeners, as well as inconsistencies in system call responses. Wazuh’s server component uses a signature-based approach to intrusion detection, using its regular expression engine to analyze collected log data and look for indicators of compromise.
Log data analysis: Wazuh can read operating system and application logs, and securely forward them to a central manager for rule-based analysis and storage.
Integrity monitoring: File integrity monitoring can help identify changes in content, ownership, permissions, and attribute of files. Wazuh’s file integrity monitoring can be used in conjunction with threat intelligence.
Vulnerability detection: Wazuh agents can identify well-known vulnerable software so you can see where your weak spots are and take action before an attack can exploit them.
Configuration assessment: System and application configurations are monitored to make sure they are compliant with security policies. Periodic scans are used to detect applications that are known to be vulnerable, insecurely configured, or unpatched.
Incident response: Wazuh responds actively when active threats need to be addressed. It can perform countermeasures like blocking access to a system when a threat source is identified.
Regulatory compliance: Wazuh includes the security controls required to be compliant with industry regulations and standards.
Cloud security: Wazuh’s light-weight and multi-platform agents are commonly used to monitor cloud environments at the instance level. In addition, Wazuh helps monitor cloud infrastructure at an API level.
Security for containers: With Wazuh, you have increased security visibility into hosts and containers, allowing for easier detection of threats, anomalies, and vulnerabilities.

Wazuh Benefits

Some of the most valued benefits of Wazuh include:

No vendor lock-in
No license costs
Uses lightweight, multi-platform agents
Free community support

Wazuh Offers

Annual support and maintenance
Assistance with deployment and configuration
Training and instructional hands-on courses

Reviews From Real Users

"It's very easy to integrate Wazuh with other environments, cloud applications, and on-prem applications. So, the advantage is that it's easy to implement and integrate with other solutions." - Robert C., IT Security Consultant at Microlan Kenya Limited

“The MITRE ATT&CK correlation is most valuable.” - Chief Information Security Officer at a financial services firm

Sample Customers

Splunk has more than 7,000 customers spread across over 90 countries. These customers include Telenor, UniCredit, ideeli, McKenney's, Tesco, and SurveyMonkey.

Information Not Available