Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo

Top 10 Splunk Enterprise Security Alternatives

Vendor: Splunk
4.2 out of 5
Badge Ranked 1
9,799 followers
Post review

Top Splunk Enterprise Security Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Splunk Enterprise Security based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include CrowdStrike Falcon, Wazuh, and Microsoft Sentinel. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Splunk Enterprise Security surpasses its competitors by providing advanced threat detection, customizable dashboards, and real-time monitoring, empowering organizations with comprehensive security insights and rapid response capabilities to effectively manage and mitigate complex cybersecurity threats.

Splunk Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Splunk, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security excels in advanced analytics, supporting multi-cloud environments with strong data analysis, while facing challenges in integration and pricing. In comparison, CrowdStrike Falcon's strength lies in real-time protection and efficient threat hunting through its cloud-native architecture, despite needing improved integration capabilities.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security involves significant setup expenses, contrasting with CrowdStrike Falcon’s more streamlined initial cost. The detailed implementation for Splunk may increase expenses, while CrowdStrike offers a less complex and potentially more budget-friendly setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security involves significant setup expenses, contrasting with CrowdStrike Falcon’s more streamlined initial cost. The detailed implementation for Splunk may increase expenses, while CrowdStrike offers a less complex and potentially more budget-friendly setup.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Wazuh
3.7 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Wazuh
3.7 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security impresses with its rapid search and advanced data management, suitable for complex IT infrastructures. In comparison, Wazuh offers flexibility and open-source security monitoring, ideal for cost-sensitive projects. Tech buyers choose based on deployment scale and feature needs.
Download Splunk Enterprise Security vs. Wazuh Report
Splunk Enterprise Security typically incurs higher setup costs, offering a robust, centralized infrastructure, while Wazuh provides a more affordable solution with open-source flexibility. Their cost variance highlights differing strengths in scalability and initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security typically incurs higher setup costs, offering a robust, centralized infrastructure, while Wazuh provides a more affordable solution with open-source flexibility. Their cost variance highlights differing strengths in scalability and initial investment.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Microsoft Sentinel
4.1 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Microsoft Sentinel
4.1 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security excels in custom searches and operational insights through its Search Processing Language, ideal for compliance-focused businesses handling vast data. In comparison, Microsoft Sentinel offers seamless Azure integration with robust AI-driven automation, appealing to organizations leveraging Microsoft's cloud ecosystem.
Download Microsoft Sentinel vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security typically involves higher setup costs due to its comprehensive features, while Microsoft Sentinel offers a more cost-effective setup, making it appealing for businesses seeking powerful security capabilities at a lower initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security typically involves higher setup costs due to its comprehensive features, while Microsoft Sentinel offers a more cost-effective setup, making it appealing for businesses seeking powerful security capabilities at a lower initial investment.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
IBM Security QRadar
4.0 out of 5
IBM Security QRadar integrates well with various platforms, making it scalable and user-friendly. In comparison, Splunk Enterprise Security excels in handling extensive data sources and offers powerful search capabilities. IBM QRadar is cost-effective for enterprises, while Splunk provides high value with advanced features.
Download IBM Security QRadar vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
IBM Security QRadar generally involves moderate setup costs, while Splunk Enterprise Security often has higher setup expenses. This difference highlights the potential cost savings in initial implementation when considering IBM Security QRadar.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM Security QRadar generally involves moderate setup costs, while Splunk Enterprise Security often has higher setup expenses. This difference highlights the potential cost savings in initial implementation when considering IBM Security QRadar.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Elastic Security
3.8 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Elastic Security
3.8 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security offers strong log management and scalability, ideal for enterprise-scale environments. In comparison, Elastic Security prioritizes flexibility and cost-effectiveness through open-source access and customization. Each solution addresses different operational needs, appealing to diverse technical and budgetary priorities.
Download Elastic Security vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security is often noted for its relatively high setup cost, contrasting with Elastic Security, which typically offers a more cost-effective initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security is often noted for its relatively high setup cost, contrasting with Elastic Security, which typically offers a more cost-effective initial setup.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
LogRhythm SIEM
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
LogRhythm SIEM
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security excels in real-time alerts and wide data integration for robust operational intelligence. In comparison, LogRhythm SIEM leverages strong AI for compliance focus and user behavior analytics. A tech buyer may choose Splunk for scalability; LogRhythm offers cost-effective options with competitive pricing.
Download LogRhythm SIEM vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security typically requires higher setup costs compared to LogRhythm SIEM, which offers a more cost-effective implementation, highlighting distinct pricing strategies that could influence the preferences for enterprises considering these security solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security typically requires higher setup costs compared to LogRhythm SIEM, which offers a more cost-effective implementation, highlighting distinct pricing strategies that could influence the preferences for enterprises considering these security solutions.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Rapid7 InsightIDR
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Rapid7 InsightIDR
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security offers log aggregation and machine learning with versatile deployment options. In comparison, Rapid7 InsightIDR provides efficient endpoint monitoring and user behavior analytics, featuring a simpler cloud-based setup, making it suitable for smaller organizations seeking quick deployment and intuitive threat detection.
Download Rapid7 InsightIDR vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security has higher setup costs compared to Rapid7 InsightIDR, which tends to offer more affordable initial investment. The cost difference is a key consideration for organizations when weighing their security solution options.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security has higher setup costs compared to Rapid7 InsightIDR, which tends to offer more affordable initial investment. The cost difference is a key consideration for organizations when weighing their security solution options.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Sumo Logic Security
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security excels with machine learning and custom dashboards for large data but faces cost and setup complexity. In comparison, Sumo Logic Security is cost-effective with easy setup, yet it has limitations in API integration and lacks some advanced features.
Download Splunk Enterprise Security vs. Sumo Logic Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security involves higher setup costs compared to Sumo Logic Security, which offers an easier initial setup. Splunk's comprehensive features may justify its expense, while Sumo Logic provides a more cost-effective entry point.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security involves higher setup costs compared to Sumo Logic Security, which offers an easier initial setup. Splunk's comprehensive features may justify its expense, while Sumo Logic provides a more cost-effective entry point.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Fortinet FortiSIEM
3.8 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Fortinet FortiSIEM
3.8 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security excels in scalability and data visualization, with robust analytics and integration capabilities ideal for large environments. In comparison, Fortinet FortiSIEM offers cost-effective pricing and smoother deployment for mid-sized businesses, emphasizing comprehensive monitoring and flexible subscription models.
Download Fortinet FortiSIEM vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security generally incurs higher setup costs compared to Fortinet FortiSIEM, which is often perceived as more budget-friendly. The difference in setup expenses may impact budgeting decisions for organizations considering these solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security generally incurs higher setup costs compared to Fortinet FortiSIEM, which is often perceived as more budget-friendly. The difference in setup expenses may impact budgeting decisions for organizations considering these solutions.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Cortex XSIAM
4.5 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Cortex XSIAM
4.5 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security handles diverse data sources with scalability and real-time alerting. In comparison, Cortex XSIAM offers machine learning-driven threat detection and modern integration. Splunk's flexible schema-on-read is notable, while Cortex's automation and AI capabilities cater to sophisticated cybersecurity needs.
Download Cortex XSIAM vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security's setup cost is high, focusing on extensive capabilities, while Cortex XSIAM offers a more affordable setup, emphasizing streamlined implementation and efficiency.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security's setup cost is high, focusing on extensive capabilities, while Cortex XSIAM offers a more affordable setup, emphasizing streamlined implementation and efficiency.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
AlienVault OSSIM
3.7 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
AlienVault OSSIM
3.7 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security excels in log management and operational intelligence, appealing to large organizations. In comparison, AlienVault OSSIM attracts small to midsize enterprises with its integrated threat intelligence and open-source flexibility, despite needing improvements in scalability and cloud integration.
Download AlienVault OSSIM vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security's setup cost is notably higher compared to AlienVault OSSIM. AlienVault OSSIM is preferred for its lower initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security's setup cost is notably higher compared to AlienVault OSSIM. AlienVault OSSIM is preferred for its lower initial investment.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM
4.3 out of 5
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM excels in user behavior analytics and threat detection with adaptable cloud integration. In comparison, Splunk Enterprise Security offers comprehensive data analytics and rapid log processing, appealing to enterprises valuing holistic security insights despite its higher price and complex setup.
Download Securonix Next-Gen SIEM vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM has a lower setup cost, making it a more budget-friendly option compared to Splunk Enterprise Security, which requires a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM has a lower setup cost, making it a more budget-friendly option compared to Splunk Enterprise Security, which requires a higher initial investment.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Exabeam
3.9 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Exabeam
3.9 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security's robust data searching and real-time alerts suit large enterprises despite premium pricing and setup complexity. In comparison, Exabeam offers user-friendly analytics and competitive pricing, appealing to budget-conscious organizations seeking efficient SIEM solutions.
Download Exabeam vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security has a higher setup cost compared to Exabeam, which offers a more cost-effective implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security has a higher setup cost compared to Exabeam, which offers a more cost-effective implementation.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Google Chronicle Suite
4.0 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security excels in integration and data analytics, appealing to those valuing robust analysis and support. In comparison, Google Chronicle Suite offers exceptional scalability and cost-effectiveness, attracting buyers focused on cloud-native architecture and efficient scalability for their security solutions.
Download Google Chronicle Suite vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security involves upfront setup costs, whereas Google Chronicle Suite generally incurs lower initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security involves upfront setup costs, whereas Google Chronicle Suite generally incurs lower initial expenses.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
ManageEngine Log360
3.7 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security offers extensive customization and scalability with centralized log analytics and operational intelligence. In comparison, ManageEngine Log360 emphasizes file integration monitoring and threat response for smaller enterprises, making it an affordable and simpler deployment option with essential capabilities for budget-conscious users.
Download ManageEngine Log360 vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security involves a significant setup cost, emphasizing its robust features, while ManageEngine Log360 offers a more budget-friendly setup cost, highlighting its cost-effective approach.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security involves a significant setup cost, emphasizing its robust features, while ManageEngine Log360 offers a more budget-friendly setup cost, highlighting its cost-effective approach.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
USM Anywhere
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
USM Anywhere
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security offers comprehensive scalability and custom solutions for large enterprises with robust analytics. In comparison, USM Anywhere provides a unified solution combining SIEM features, asset discovery, and vulnerability assessment, appealing to smaller teams with simpler needs and budget-friendly pricing.
Download Splunk Enterprise Security vs. USM Anywhere Report
Splunk Enterprise Security has a higher setup cost, while USM Anywhere offers more affordable initial deployment, highlighting a key difference in their pricing structures.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security has a higher setup cost, while USM Anywhere offers more affordable initial deployment, highlighting a key difference in their pricing structures.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Devo
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Devo
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security excels in risk-based alerting and real-time dashboards, valuable for large enterprises needing robust analytics. In comparison, Devo offers a simpler deployment and intuitive interface, appealing to analysts seeking fast data insights and efficient cost management based on data ingestion.
Download Devo vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security involves a substantial setup cost, whereas Devo presents a more budget-friendly alternative with lower initial expenses. This cost difference is significant for organizations prioritizing affordability in their choice of security solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security involves a substantial setup cost, whereas Devo presents a more budget-friendly alternative with lower initial expenses. This cost difference is significant for organizations prioritizing affordability in their choice of security solutions.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Sentinel
3.8 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Sentinel
3.8 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security manages large datasets with scalability and log management suited for compliance needs. In comparison, Microsoft Sentinel integrates with Microsoft tools for smart analytics, offering advanced threat detection enhanced by machine learning, suitable for organizations operating in multi-cloud environments.
Download Sentinel vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security may entail higher setup costs compared to Sentinel, which could present a more budget-friendly option. Such cost differences are pivotal when aligning technology investments with organizational budgets.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security may entail higher setup costs compared to Sentinel, which could present a more budget-friendly option. Such cost differences are pivotal when aligning technology investments with organizational budgets.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer
3.7 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security offers robust data analysis, machine learning, and customizable dashboards for complex environments. In comparison, ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer provides simplicity with affordability, suitable for smaller IT teams needing basic log management and integration with other ManageEngine products.
Download ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security involves a high initial setup cost, contrasting with ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer, which offers a more budget-friendly setup. This cost disparity highlights a significant financial commitment difference between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security involves a high initial setup cost, contrasting with ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer, which offers a more budget-friendly setup. This cost disparity highlights a significant financial commitment difference between the two solutions.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM)
3.9 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security excels in data integration and advanced security management. In comparison, ArcSight ESM offers strong log management with robust correlation capabilities. Splunk is ideal for large enterprises seeking comprehensive features, while ArcSight suits organizations needing extensive data connections and security functionality.
Download ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security has a high setup cost, making it suitable for organizations with significant budgets, while ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) offers a more cost-effective setup, appealing to companies seeking lower initial investment expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security has a high setup cost, making it suitable for organizations with significant budgets, while ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) offers a more cost-effective setup, appealing to companies seeking lower initial investment expenses.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Cribl
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Cribl
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security excels in log management with comprehensive data insights and a flexible deployment model but requires workflow and integration improvements. In comparison, Cribl offers cost-effective data transformation and log reduction, though smaller firms may face integration challenges and documentation needs.
Download Cribl vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security has a higher setup cost, while Cribl offers a more cost-effective initial setup. Splunk provides comprehensive features justifying its expense, whereas Cribl focuses on affordability, appealing to budget-conscious organizations.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security has a higher setup cost, while Cribl offers a more cost-effective initial setup. Splunk provides comprehensive features justifying its expense, whereas Cribl focuses on affordability, appealing to budget-conscious organizations.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Stellar Cyber Open XDR
1 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security provides robust data analytics, offering deep insights through customizable dashboards. In comparison, Stellar Cyber Open XDR emphasizes advanced threat detection within a unified platform. Splunk's strength lies in scalability, whereas Stellar Cyber offers agility with faster deployment and integration.
Splunk Enterprise Security has notably higher setup costs, while Stellar Cyber Open XDR offers a more budget-friendly alternative. This price difference highlights the varied initial investment required for users considering these cybersecurity solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security has notably higher setup costs, while Stellar Cyber Open XDR offers a more budget-friendly alternative. This price difference highlights the varied initial investment required for users considering these cybersecurity solutions.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Logpoint
3.8 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Logpoint
3.8 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security excels in managing vast machine data with schema-on-read technology, offering scalability and versatile data analysis. In comparison, Logpoint, noted for cost-effectiveness, includes user-friendly interfaces and built-in UEBA and SOAR capabilities, appealing to budget-conscious businesses.
Download Logpoint vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security's setup cost is more expensive, while Logpoint offers a more budget-friendly option, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security's setup cost is more expensive, while Logpoint offers a more budget-friendly option, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
NetWitness Platform
3.7 out of 5
NetWitness Platform appeals to buyers with straightforward deployment and deep packet inspection, while its pricing offers quick ROI. In comparison, Splunk Enterprise Security attracts those needing robust analytics and broad integration, despite higher costs and more complex deployment.
Download NetWitness Platform vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
NetWitness Platform often incurs higher setup costs compared to the relatively budget-friendly initial setup of Splunk Enterprise Security.
View comparison
Pricing
NetWitness Platform often incurs higher setup costs compared to the relatively budget-friendly initial setup of Splunk Enterprise Security.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Trellix ESM
3.7 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Trellix ESM
3.7 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security offers centralized analytics and flexible API capabilities, ideal for deep data correlation, but the high cost and complexity are drawbacks. In comparison, Trellix ESM provides user-friendly monitoring with affordable pricing, though it lacks advanced customizability and extensive cloud integration.
Download Splunk Enterprise Security vs. Trellix ESM Report
Splunk Enterprise Security has a straightforward setup cost, while Trellix ESM involves more complex pricing tiers, highlighting notable differences in initial investment between the solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security has a straightforward setup cost, while Trellix ESM involves more complex pricing tiers, highlighting notable differences in initial investment between the solutions.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
SolarWinds Security Event Manager
3.9 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security excels with flexible data management and strong operational intelligence. In comparison, SolarWinds Security Event Manager offers simpler setup and cost-effective solutions. Tech buyers might prefer Splunk for scalability, while SolarWinds suits those seeking budget-friendly and quick deployment options.
Download SolarWinds Security Event Manager vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security incurs higher setup costs, while SolarWinds Security Event Manager offers a more budget-friendly option.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security incurs higher setup costs, while SolarWinds Security Event Manager offers a more budget-friendly option.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Trellix Helix
4.4 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Trellix Helix
4.4 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security is ideal for managing large data volumes with flexibility in data integration. In comparison, Trellix Helix emphasizes real-time threat detection and cloud-native architecture, appealing to buyers prioritizing simplicity and AI-powered security features.
Download Splunk Enterprise Security vs. Trellix Helix Report
Splunk Enterprise Security typically involves a higher setup cost compared to Trellix Helix, which offers a more economical initial installation. This difference significantly affects budget allocation and investment strategy.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security typically involves a higher setup cost compared to Trellix Helix, which offers a more economical initial installation. This difference significantly affects budget allocation and investment strategy.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Logz.io
4.1 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Logz.io
4.1 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security offers comprehensive support and advanced analytics, ideal for complex environments needing deep threat detection. In comparison, Logz.io provides cost-effective, scalable solutions with cloud-native architecture, appealing to teams prioritizing agility and modern infrastructures.
Download Logz.io vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security involves a significant setup cost, while Logz.io offers a more budget-friendly setup, making it an economical choice for many businesses.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security involves a significant setup cost, while Logz.io offers a more budget-friendly setup, making it an economical choice for many businesses.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Seceon Open Threat Management Platform
4.1 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security offers deep insights with advanced analytics, appealing to organizations seeking customizable threat monitoring. In comparison, Seceon Open Threat Management Platform emphasizes real-time interventions with automated threat detection, appealing to buyers prioritizing streamlined setup and cost-effective rapid value realization.
Download Seceon Open Threat Management Platform vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security involves significant setup costs, while Seceon Open Threat Management Platform offers a more cost-effective setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security involves significant setup costs, while Seceon Open Threat Management Platform offers a more cost-effective setup.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Snare
4.0 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Snare
4.0 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security excels in advanced threat detection suitable for complex environments. In comparison, Snare is ideal for efficient log management with quicker deployment and lower costs. Splunk offers comprehensive features, while Snare supports straightforward security needs with real-time monitoring.
Download Snare vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security incurs higher setup costs, while Snare offers a more cost-effective initial setup. Users should consider these differences when comparing the financial commitment required for each solution.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security incurs higher setup costs, while Snare offers a more cost-effective initial setup. Users should consider these differences when comparing the financial commitment required for each solution.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
DNIF HYPERCLOUD
3.8 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
DNIF HYPERCLOUD
3.8 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security excels in handling diverse data with rapid searching and visualization, appealing to large operations. In comparison, DNIF HYPERCLOUD offers economical log management and SIEM capabilities, attracting budget-conscious clients and smaller organizations with comprehensive features.
Download DNIF HYPERCLOUD vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security has a higher setup cost compared to DNIF HYPERCLOUD, highlighting a significant cost difference between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security has a higher setup cost compared to DNIF HYPERCLOUD, highlighting a significant cost difference between the two solutions.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Logsign Next-Gen SIEM
3.8 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security offers comprehensive integration capabilities and scalable deployment, appealing to those seeking robust solutions despite higher initial costs. In comparison, Logsign Next-Gen SIEM provides more affordable setup with advanced automation features, attracting buyers focused on efficiency and cost-effective threat management.
Download Logsign Next-Gen SIEM vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security often has higher setup costs, while Logsign Next-Gen SIEM offers a more budget-friendly initial investment, highlighting a key financial difference between these SIEM solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security often has higher setup costs, while Logsign Next-Gen SIEM offers a more budget-friendly initial investment, highlighting a key financial difference between these SIEM solutions.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
ArcSight Intelligence
4.0 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security excels in user-friendly design and customer support, ideal for organizations seeking seamless integration. In comparison, ArcSight Intelligence provides robust features and analytical depth, appealing to buyers with strong security frameworks and a need for advanced automated threat detection.
Download ArcSight Intelligence vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security requires a significant setup cost, while ArcSight Intelligence offers a more affordable setup. This key difference highlights the distinct pricing structures between Splunk and ArcSight.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security requires a significant setup cost, while ArcSight Intelligence offers a more affordable setup. This key difference highlights the distinct pricing structures between Splunk and ArcSight.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
RSA enVision
3.6 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
RSA enVision
3.6 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security offers flexibility and scalability, appealing to those prioritizing customization and data analytics. In comparison, RSA enVision provides a predictable cost with strong log management, suitable for traditional security operations needing an all-in-one solution with straightforward pricing.
Download RSA enVision vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security has a higher setup cost compared to RSA enVision, which offers a more budget-friendly initial implementation, highlighting a crucial difference in initial financial commitment for potential users.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security has a higher setup cost compared to RSA enVision, which offers a more budget-friendly initial implementation, highlighting a crucial difference in initial financial commitment for potential users.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
IBM Watson for Cyber Security
4.0 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security emphasizes log management and threat detection with high customization options. In comparison, IBM Watson for Cyber Security utilizes AI for enhanced threat intelligence and analysis. Splunk offers easier deployment and cost-effectiveness, whereas Watson's AI capabilities appeal to enterprises seeking advanced analytics.
Download IBM Watson for Cyber Security vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security involves a complex setup cost, while IBM Watson for Cyber Security offers a streamlined initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security involves a complex setup cost, while IBM Watson for Cyber Security offers a streamlined initial investment.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
LogLogic
3.0 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
LogLogic
3.0 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security offers extensive threat detection, robust analytics, and real-time monitoring, ideal for advanced threat intelligence. In comparison, LogLogic excels in efficient log data management and compliance reporting, appealing to those seeking cost-effective solutions with straightforward log analysis.
Download LogLogic vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security involves a higher setup cost compared to LogLogic, making it potentially less accessible. In contrast, LogLogic offers a more cost-effective setup, which may benefit organizations with budget constraints.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security involves a higher setup cost compared to LogLogic, making it potentially less accessible. In contrast, LogLogic offers a more cost-effective setup, which may benefit organizations with budget constraints.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Blumira Cloud SIEM
1 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security offers in-depth analytics and visualization for large-scale operations, attracting buyers requiring comprehensive insights. In comparison, Blumira Cloud SIEM provides streamlined threat detection and automated response, appealing to those prioritizing ease of deployment and straightforward, value-driven pricing.
Splunk Enterprise Security requires a significant initial setup cost, whereas Blumira Cloud SIEM offers a more budget-friendly setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security requires a significant initial setup cost, whereas Blumira Cloud SIEM offers a more budget-friendly setup.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Masergy
1 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Masergy
1 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security offers scalable deployment and advanced analytics, appealing to businesses seeking extensive threat management solutions. In comparison, Masergy's comprehensive feature set and real-time intelligence attract tech buyers prioritizing cost-effective security with managed services and ongoing assistance.
Splunk Enterprise Security involves a substantial setup cost, while Masergy offers a more budget-friendly installation, highlighting distinct financial considerations for organizations comparing these solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security involves a substantial setup cost, while Masergy offers a more budget-friendly installation, highlighting distinct financial considerations for organizations comparing these solutions.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
NNT Log Tracker Enterprise
4.1 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security, with its comprehensive threat detection and custom alerts, suits organizations needing detailed security analyses. In comparison, NNT Log Tracker Enterprise, focusing on compliance and ease, attracts those valuing straightforward deployment and cost-effectiveness while ensuring robust log integrity management.
Download NNT Log Tracker Enterprise vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security generally involves higher setup costs, offering robust analytics and security features, while NNT Log Tracker Enterprise tends to be more cost-effective with a focus on compliance and log management, highlighting distinct priorities in pricing and capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security generally involves higher setup costs, offering robust analytics and security features, while NNT Log Tracker Enterprise tends to be more cost-effective with a focus on compliance and log management, highlighting distinct priorities in pricing and capabilities.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
SenSage AP
1 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
SenSage AP
1 out of 5
SenSage AP offers scalable data collection and compliance reporting, appealing to those seeking affordability and straightforward deployment. In comparison, Splunk Enterprise Security is preferred for its advanced threat detection and correlation capabilities, attracting organizations with dedicated IT resources despite higher costs.
SenSage AP offers a more competitive setup cost compared to Splunk Enterprise Security, which is known for higher initial investment requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
SenSage AP offers a more competitive setup cost compared to Splunk Enterprise Security, which is known for higher initial investment requirements.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Securonix Unified Defense SIEM
1 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security offers comprehensive support with cost-effective pricing, appealing to budget-conscious organizations. In comparison, Securonix Unified Defense SIEM features superior threat detection and flexible architecture, attracting those prioritizing advanced capabilities despite higher costs.
Splunk Enterprise Security incurs significant initial setup costs, while Securonix Unified Defense SIEM offers a more cost-effective setup solution.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security incurs significant initial setup costs, while Securonix Unified Defense SIEM offers a more cost-effective setup solution.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
ClearSkies SaaS NG SIEM
3.8 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security offers extensive features like advanced threat detection and real-time monitoring for complex needs. In comparison, ClearSkies SaaS NG SIEM focuses on cost-effective, easy deployment with solid support. Tech buyers may prefer Splunk for customization or ClearSkies for affordability.
Download ClearSkies SaaS NG SIEM vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security has a higher setup cost, while ClearSkies SaaS NG SIEM offers a more cost-effective initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security has a higher setup cost, while ClearSkies SaaS NG SIEM offers a more cost-effective initial setup.

Related categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
Log Management
IT Operations Analytics