Splunk Enterprise Security and ScienceLogic both compete in the domain of IT monitoring and analytics, focusing on log management and device monitoring respectively. Splunk holds the upper hand in log management due to its comprehensive data ingestion and powerful search capabilities, while ScienceLogic excels with its customizable dashboards and multi-tenant functionality.
Features: Splunk Enterprise Security offers exceptional log management, rapid search capabilities, and powerful data visualization. Its scalability allows data ingestion from multiple sources for effective performance monitoring. ScienceLogic provides customizable dashboards, event management capabilities, and multi-tenant support for device monitoring across varied environments.
Room for Improvement: Splunk could improve by simplifying integration, making data visualization more intuitive, and reducing complexity in cluster setup and permissions management. ScienceLogic needs to enhance SNMP trap processing, simplify its interface for better usability, and improve the backend for a more user-friendly experience.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Splunk offers diverse deployment options across cloud environments with strong support channels, though response times could improve. ScienceLogic delivers a solid implementation experience with technical support but would benefit from increased usability and administrator training.
Pricing and ROI: Splunk's pricing is perceived as expensive, with models based on data ingestion that might limit smaller organizations, yet the flexible features justify the cost for larger enterprises. ScienceLogic offers tier-based pricing, remaining on the higher side as device numbers grow. Both platforms provide significant ROI by enhancing operational efficiency and reducing troubleshooting time.
The return on investment is fair but often challenged by medium-sized businesses who may question its adequacy.
For smaller organizations, other products may provide better value for money.
Problems with Skylar may require longer wait times due to limited resource expertise.
If you want to write your own correlation rules, it is very difficult to do, and you need Splunk's support to write new correlation rules for the SIEM tool.
The technical support for Splunk met my expectations.
They struggle a bit with pure virtual environments, but in terms of how much they can handle, it is pretty good.
Stability should relate to whether the platform fails, stops working, or breaks.
It provides a stable environment but needs to integrate with ITSM platforms to achieve better visibility.
It is very stable.
While some other companies have easier APIs, using this solution demands significant expertise.
Integrating observability and APM monitoring into the overall portfolio would be beneficial.
An API with Microsoft Sentinel or a similar SIEM tool would be a good idea.
Splunk Enterprise Security would benefit from a more robust rule engine to reduce false positives.
It could be cheaper.
I saw clients spend two million dollars a year just feeding data into the Splunk solution.
Splunk is priced higher than other solutions.
The solution excels in three areas: application monitoring, server monitoring, and network performance monitoring.
The CMDB update and the automatic CMDB update are valuable.
The Splunk Enterprise Security's threat-hunting capabilities have been particularly useful in later releases.
They have approximately 50,000 predefined correlation rules.
ScienceLogic is a comprehensive IT infrastructure monitoring solution that supports networks, servers, cloud environments, and applications, suitable for private cloud and on-premises deployments.
Organizations leverage ScienceLogic for its robust capabilities in monitoring IT infrastructures of all sizes. It offers granular discovery, integration with CMDB, and ticketing systems. Valued for its flexibility, incident automation, remediation, and real-time relationship mapping, it supports hybrid environments with scalable and efficient monitoring functionalities. AI and machine learning enhance its feature set, while ease of deployment and strong support are crucial benefits.
What are ScienceLogic's most important features?ScienceLogic is implemented across multiple industries, including large enterprises, for its capability to handle complex IT ecosystems. Its integration with CMDB and ticketing systems ensures it fits within existing workflows. Organizations use it to monitor diverse infrastructure landscapes, ensuring seamless performance and quick incident resolution.
Splunk Enterprise Security is widely used for security operations, including threat detection, incident response, and log monitoring. It centralizes log management, offers security analytics, and ensures compliance, enhancing the overall security posture of organizations.
Companies leverage Splunk Enterprise Security to monitor endpoints, networks, and users, detecting anomalies, brute force attacks, and unauthorized access. They use it for fraud detection, machine learning, and real-time alerts within their SOCs. The platform enhances visibility and correlates data from multiple sources to identify security threats efficiently. Key features include comprehensive dashboards, excellent reporting capabilities, robust log aggregation, and flexible data ingestion. Users appreciate its SIEM capabilities, threat intelligence, risk-based alerting, and correlation searches. Highly scalable and stable, it suits multi-cloud environments, reducing alert volumes and speeding up investigations.
What are the key features?Splunk Enterprise Security is implemented across industries like finance, healthcare, and retail. Financial institutions use it for fraud detection and compliance, while healthcare organizations leverage its capabilities to safeguard patient data. Retailers deploy it to protect customer information and ensure secure transactions.
We monitor all IT Operations Analytics reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.