ScienceLogic vs Splunk Enterprise Security comparison

ScienceLogic and Splunk are both solutions in the IT Operations Analytics category. ScienceLogic is ranked #8 with an average rating of 7.4, while Splunk is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.4. ScienceLogic holds a 5.0% mindshare in IOA, compared to Splunk’s 28.8% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of ScienceLogic users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Splunk users who would recommend it.

ScienceLogic

Read 42 ScienceLogic reviews

389 Views
293 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Splunk Enterprise Security

Read 301 Splunk Enterprise Security reviews

2,408 Views
1,897 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

ScienceLogic

Splunk Enterprise Security

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 29, 2024

Splunk Enterprise Security and ScienceLogic are both leading solutions for security and IT operations management. Users are generally happier with the pricing and support of Splunk Enterprise Security, but ScienceLogic's feature set seems to offer a superior value.

Features: Reviews highlight machine learning-powered threat detection as a key feature of Splunk Enterprise Security. Users of ScienceLogic value its comprehensive monitoring capabilities. Splunk excels in advanced security analytics, while ScienceLogic is praised for its robust infrastructure monitoring. Splunk's focused security features stand out, but ScienceLogic offers a more diversified toolset.

Room for Improvement: Users suggest Splunk Enterprise Security needs improvement in scalability and integration capabilities. For ScienceLogic, reviewers call for enhancements in reporting tools and user experience. Splunk needs to address performance issues, whereas ScienceLogic should enhance its usability and reporting functionality.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Splunk Enterprise Security is noted for its complex deployment process, requiring significant technical expertise and time. Users appreciate ScienceLogic's simpler and faster deployment model. Customer service reviews are mixed for both products, though ScienceLogic's support is considered more responsive. ScienceLogic offers a more user-friendly deployment experience and quicker customer service response times.

Pricing and ROI: Splunk Enterprise Security is often mentioned as having higher setup costs with a varying ROI dependent on usage scale. ScienceLogic is seen as more cost-effective with a quicker, clearer ROI. Splunk's pricing is higher but justified by its depth in security analytics, while ScienceLogic offers a quicker, more predictable ROI with a lower initial cost.

To learn more, read our detailed ScienceLogic vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

ScienceLogic vs. Splunk Enterprise Security

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,067 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

ScienceLogic

Ranking in IT Operations Analytics

8th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Event Monitoring (8th), Unified Communications Monitoring (1st), Network Monitoring Software (32nd), Server Monitoring (12th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (26th), Cloud Monitoring Software (21st), AIOps (9th)

Splunk Enterprise Security

Ranking in IT Operations Analytics

1st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

301

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (1st), Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the IT Operations Analytics category, the mindshare of ScienceLogic is 5.0%, down from 5.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Splunk Enterprise Security is 28.8%, down from 35.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Operations Analytics

Featured Reviews

GauravSingh4

CEO at Parker Digital

Great integrations, power flow, and good support

They need a little more self-service. Some of the places where there's still a dependency on defense logic. If those could be eliminated, that would be ideal. They've done a fantastic job eliminating a lot of those dependencies and there's a lot of self-service. However, some of the areas where we could have it connect to, for example, Splunk or ServiceNow, in a self-care version versus having to go back to their engineers, that's an area where they could do a little more. There are still a lot of engineers who get involved versus if it's a little more API-driven and self-served dashboard connections. Doing it the other way would just make life easier for users.

Read full review

Avinash Gopu.

Associate VP & Cyber Security Specialist at US Bank

Offers good visibility into multiple environments, significantly reduces our alert volume, and speeds up our security investigations

There are limitations with Splunk not detecting all user activity, especially on mainframes and network devices. This is because Splunk relies on agents, which cannot access certain workstations. In these cases, we have to rely on application data. For example, with mainframes, manual reports are generated and sent to Splunk, limiting visibility to what's manually reported. This lack of automation for specific platforms needs improvement from Splunk. Additionally, API access is limited for other applications that rely on API calls and requests. This requires heavy customization on Splunk's end. These are the main challenges we've encountered. Monitoring multiple cloud platforms, like Azure, GCP, and AWS, with Splunk Enterprise Security presents some challenges. While Splunk provides different connectors for each provider, consolidating data from two domains across distinct cloud environments can be complex. However, leveraging pre-built templates and Splunk's data collation capabilities can help overcome these hurdles. Despite initial difficulties, I believe Splunk can effectively address this task, earning it an eight out of ten rating for its multi-cloud monitoring capabilities. While Splunk Enterprise Security offers insider threat detection capabilities, its effectiveness could be enhanced by integrating with additional tools, such as endpoint security solutions. This integrated approach is particularly crucial for financial institutions, which often require dedicated endpoint security teams. While using multiple tools is valuable, further improvements within Splunk itself are also necessary. Considering both external integration and internal development, I would rate its current insider threat detection capabilities as three out of ten. Threat detection is where Splunk falls behind. While it offers tools, other use cases require additional work. PAM is an enterprise tool that centralizes information about users, servers, and everything else. It needs real-time monitoring, which I haven't seen in any of the companies I've worked for. They only rely on Splunk for alerting, but real-time monitoring should be handled by the endpoint security team's tools. This means there's no detection or analysis at the machine or endpoint level. Additionally, threat analysis reporting is also absent.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features of ScienceLogic are AI and machine learning."

"When it comes to features, the power pack is the most valuable."

"Its ITSM and EMS combination is really amazing. There is no need to purchase two products, one for ITSM and a second for EMS/NMS."

"It is very easy to configure because we are using an agent-less version. You can very quickly implement a collector for monitoring device servers."

"One of the valuable features is rapid dashboards."

"It is simple."

"Provides agentless monitoring so there's no need to install the agent on each server."

"The solution provides good infra-monitoring features."

More ScienceLogic pros

"Integrity with many vendors: This simplifies the implementation and integration with different devices"

"We can present to our management in real time the security of the batch management for the PCs, security regarding the network equipment. We're currently working in the Azure Cloud project, so we can send any logs from the cloud to Splunk. We can monitor them and we can present to the managers and customers. It's a very good solution for reporting. We use Splunk for reporting and monitoring of any solution in the company."

"The best part of Splunk Enterprise Security is its customizable settings."

"The stock analysts and security people use one single dashboard (one single location) to check our logs."

"The ability to ingest different log types from many different products in our environment is most valuable."

"We are using Microsoft 365 and we're using the Exchange Mail Service. It's good for monitoring that in particular."

"It's basically one of the best SIEM products on the market."

"The risk-based alerting (RBA) is one of the valuable features."

More Splunk Enterprise Security pros

Cons

"They should improve database issues in HA and Failover mode, and provide documentation for all users , even if they are not customers."

"ScienceLogic could improve the implementation, it could be made easier."

"They should add CLI command modes and scripts for high performance."

"One important area we feel could be improved is the UI. It takes a lot of clicks to do very simple tasks."

"I would like to see out-of-the-box standard dashboards for common services."

"Addressing duplicate IPs: There is the ability to edit the DB and fix this, but adding some logic to understand them would be a plus."

"From a performance perspective, it needs to improve a lot."

"The product's reporting functionalities have certain shortcomings, making it an area where improvements are required."

More ScienceLogic cons

"I find that the learning curve for Splunk is relatively lengthy."

"Being a SIEM solution with a centralized dashboard, we would like to have more options to customize it."

"One issue is that we are getting a lot of false positives. We are trying to reduce them by customizing the default rules, changing thresholds, and using white-listing and black-listing. It's getting better and better as a result. But they need to build components that would reduce the false positives."

"It can be tough to determine if you are getting all of the value out of your investment at times."

"We are waiting for Dashboard Studio to mature a little bit more. There are some things that we are using with Classic Dashboards which have not yet made it to Dashboard Studio. We are waiting for that."

"Search head clustering is often temperamental in its current state and should be improved, replaced by something better, or be reverted to search head pooling."

"I would like to have fraud detection features. Fraud is within the same turf as with security operations. Fraud and cybersecurity work hand in hand. I would like to have detection capabilities, or at least dashboards in Enterprise Security for fraud."

"It's difficult to set up initially, and their billing model is also a bit complicated."

More Splunk Enterprise Security cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing model for ScienceLogic could improve."

"It comes with the OS built in, so no need to purchase an OS license or DB license."

"The solution is license-based. It's between $8 and $15, depending on what you need from the product."

"Its price could be lower, but for what you pay, you got a lot of value from its features and functionalities. Customers always want a discount or a cheaper solution."

"The license of ScienceLogic is based on how many endpoints are used. The number of monitoring points you want to have."

"Pricing between the two is quiet large therefore you can save some money if you don't require to collect all info on each device."

"Decide what you want to monitor and only monitor those items. Absorb other elements as you grow."

"My company has an enterprise-level contract with ScienceLogic, so it is available to my organization at a good price."

More ScienceLogic pricing and cost advice

"It's more expensive than the other tools, but it's worth it. Every penny is worth it."

"I am fine with the licensing, but in terms of the cost, it is expensive for the data that we have. We have an open discussion with our account rep about this."

"The pricing model is based on the number of gigabytes that you ingest into the Splunk system. So it can be an expensive solution."

"From what I have seen so far, Splunk has multiple cost models. The one that we are using is pretty good when it comes to ingesting data into the environment. It has worked out pretty well."

"I think the price could be improved."

"In addition to the licensing fee, there is also a support and maintenance charge."

"ROI is estimated at saving my team roughly 10 to 12 man hours per week in troubleshooting for our company as well as what our profits had been from our services of installing, configuring, and supporting other clients with the product."

"Expensive compared to other options."

More Splunk Enterprise Security pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Operations Analytics solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

Vinod Shankar

Manager, Enterprise Risk Consulting at Deloitte & Touche

Feb 26, 2015

HP ArcSight vs. IBM QRadar vs. McAfee Nitro vs. Splunk vs. RSA Security vs. LogRhythm

We at Infosecnirvana.com have done several posts on SIEM. After the Dummies Guide on SIEM, we are following it up with a SIEM Product Comparison – 101 deck. So, here it is for your viewing pleasure. Let me know what you think by posting your comments below. The key products compared here are…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ScienceLogic?

The tool is quite easy to deploy, and it offers very good support.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ScienceLogic?

My company has an enterprise-level contract with ScienceLogic, so it is available to my organization at a good price.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ScienceLogic?

The product's reporting functionalities have certain shortcomings, making it an area where improvements are required. The tool is more or less good. The tool needs to improve its APM capabilities.

See all answers

What SOC product do you recommend?

For tools I’d recommend: -SIEM- LogRhythm -SOAR- Palo Alto XSOAR Doing commercial w/o both (or at least an XDR) is asking to miss details that are critical, and ending up a statistic. Also, rememb...

See all answers

What is a better choice, Splunk or Azure Sentinel?

It would really depend on (1) which logs you need to ingest and (2) what are your use cases Splunk is easy for ingestion of anything, but the charge per GB/Day Indexed and it gets expensive as log ...

See all answers

How does Splunk compare with Azure Monitor?

Splunk handles a high amount of data very well. We use Splunk to capture information and as an aggregator for monitoring information from different sources. Splunk is very good at alerting us if we...

See all answers

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs ScienceLogic

Compared 15% of the time

Zabbix vs ScienceLogic

Compared 10% of the time

Datadog vs ScienceLogic

Compared 9% of the time

LogicMonitor vs ScienceLogic

Compared 9% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs ScienceLogic

Compared 9% of the time

More ScienceLogic Competitors

Wazuh vs Splunk Enterprise Security

Compared 10% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Splunk Enterprise Security

Compared 9% of the time

Dynatrace vs Splunk Enterprise Security

Compared 8% of the time

Datadog vs Splunk Enterprise Security

Compared 5% of the time

Sentinel vs Splunk Enterprise Security

Compared 4% of the time

More Splunk Enterprise Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ScienceLogic

November 2024

Download ScienceLogic product report

Buyer's Guide

Splunk Enterprise Security

November 2024

Download Splunk Enterprise Security product report

Learn More

ScienceLogic

Splunk

Overview

ScienceLogic is a comprehensive IT infrastructure monitoring solution that supports networks, servers, cloud environments, and applications, suitable for private cloud and on-premises deployments.

Organizations leverage ScienceLogic for its robust capabilities in monitoring IT infrastructures of all sizes. It offers granular discovery, integration with CMDB, and ticketing systems. Valued for its flexibility, incident automation, remediation, and real-time relationship mapping, it supports hybrid environments with scalable and efficient monitoring functionalities. AI and machine learning enhance its feature set, while ease of deployment and strong support are crucial benefits.

What are ScienceLogic's most important features?

Agentless Configuration: Ensures easy deployment without the need for agents.
Third-Party Integration: Seamlessly integrates with various tools.
Dynamic Component Mapping: Offers real-time relationship and dependency mapping.
Flexible Graphs: Allows custom visual representation of data.
Role-Based Access: Provides tiered access for different user roles.
Infrastructure and Event Management: Efficiently monitors hybrid environments.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Scalability: Handles environments of all sizes efficiently.
AI and Machine Learning: Enhances automation and incident management.
Ease of Deployment: Streamlines initial setup and reduces time to value.
Customization: Custom dashboards and reports cater to specific needs.
Comprehensive Support: Access to excellent support services.

ScienceLogic is implemented across multiple industries, including large enterprises, for its capability to handle complex IT ecosystems. Its integration with CMDB and ticketing systems ensures it fits within existing workflows. Organizations use it to monitor diverse infrastructure landscapes, ensuring seamless performance and quick incident resolution.

Splunk Enterprise Security is widely used for security operations, including threat detection, incident response, and log monitoring. It centralizes log management, offers security analytics, and ensures compliance, enhancing the overall security posture of organizations.

Companies leverage Splunk Enterprise Security to monitor endpoints, networks, and users, detecting anomalies, brute force attacks, and unauthorized access. They use it for fraud detection, machine learning, and real-time alerts within their SOCs. The platform enhances visibility and correlates data from multiple sources to identify security threats efficiently. Key features include comprehensive dashboards, excellent reporting capabilities, robust log aggregation, and flexible data ingestion. Users appreciate its SIEM capabilities, threat intelligence, risk-based alerting, and correlation searches. Highly scalable and stable, it suits multi-cloud environments, reducing alert volumes and speeding up investigations.

What are the key features?

Comprehensive Dashboards: Provide a holistic view of security operations.
Flexible Data Ingestion: Supports various data sources for better analysis.
Robust Log Aggregation: Centralizes log management for easier monitoring.
Machine Learning Toolkit: Enhances threat detection and prediction capabilities.
SIEM Capabilities: Integrates security information and event management.
Threat Intelligence: Utilizes external information to improve security measures.
Risk-Based Alerting: Prioritizes alerts based on the risk they pose.
Correlation Searches: Identifies and correlates security events effectively.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Enhanced Visibility: Improves monitoring across endpoints, networks, and users.
Faster Incident Response: Speeds up identification and resolution of security issues.
Reduced Alert Volumes: Lowers false positives and enhances signal-to-noise ratio.
Scalability: Adapts to growing and changing security needs.
Improved Security Operations: Integrates multiple security facets into one platform.

Splunk Enterprise Security is implemented across industries like finance, healthcare, and retail. Financial institutions use it for fraud detection and compliance, while healthcare organizations leverage its capabilities to safeguard patient data. Retailers deploy it to protect customer information and ensure secure transactions.

Sample Customers

Kellogg Company, Booz Allen, Cisco, Red Bull, Fidelus, Telstra, Comcast, CSC, Peak 10, HughesNet, Hosting, Datapipe, US Army, Equinix, Rite Aid, Carbonite, Sybase, Carpathia, AT&T, ePlus, Dimension Data, Virtustream, Boeing, Honeywell

Splunk has more than 7,000 customers spread across over 90 countries. These customers include Telenor, UniCredit, ideeli, McKenney's, Tesco, and SurveyMonkey.

Buyer's Guide

ScienceLogic vs. Splunk Enterprise Security

December 2024

Free Report: ScienceLogic vs. Splunk Enterprise Security

Find out what your peers are saying about ScienceLogic vs. Splunk Enterprise Security and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ScienceLogic vs. Splunk Enterprise Security report.

See our list of best IT Operations Analytics vendors.

We monitor all IT Operations Analytics reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.