

Splunk Enterprise Security and Devo are competing in the security and data analytics category. Splunk Enterprise Security seems to have the upper hand with its extensive security features and broader market presence.
Features: Splunk Enterprise Security includes extensive threat detection and response tools, advanced analytics for processing large data sets, and deep security integration. Devo is recognized for real-time data analytics with scalability and flexibility to manage large data volumes seamlessly to offer real-time insights.
Room for Improvement: Splunk Enterprise Security could improve on its learning curve and setup time, which remains high. It might also benefit from simplifying its complex pricing model. On the other hand, Devo could enhance its accessibility and provide more intuitive user interfaces to cater to wider audiences. Additionally, Devo might focus on improving support documentation and tutorials for better user onboarding.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Splunk Enterprise Security has a significant setup time and a steep learning curve, though it has broad technical resources available. Devo is known for its easier deployment process and offers strong, responsive customer support that enhances user experience.
Pricing and ROI: Splunk Enterprise Security's high upfront costs associated with its extensive features may impact ROI considerations. Devo offers a more cost-effective alternative with lower setup costs and favorable ROI through agile deployment and effective data utilization.
Devo gives value to the end user and is saving compared to other products in the same category.
In terms of return on investment with Devo, I'd say it has been costly due to the need for support and the overtime required for issues experienced at the beginning of the project.
We achieve early identification of security incidents that could potentially breach the customer environment, which would have been costly.
The documentation for Splunk Enterprise Security is outstanding. It is well-organized and easy to access.
We couldn't calculate what would have been the cost if they had actually gotten compromised; however, they were in the process, so every investment was returned immediately.
On average, my SecOps team takes probably at least a quarter of the time, if not more, to remediate security incidents with Splunk Enterprise Security compared to our previous solution.
I rate the customer support a nine out of ten because of their timely technical guidance and responsiveness during the deployment and troubleshooting periods.
Both response time and support quality need attention.
Technical support from Devo is helpful.
We have paid for Splunk support, and we’re not on the free tier hoping for assistance; we are a significant customer and invest a lot in this service.
I have had nothing but good experiences with Splunk support, receiving timely and helpful replies.
We've had great customer success managers who have helped us navigate scaling from 600 gigs to 30 terabytes.
Devo is a unified SIEM solution designed to handle growing log volumes and enterprise-scale monitoring requirements.
Devo's scalability has its challenges.
Regarding Devo's scalability, its horizontal scalability is quite good with no significant hassle.
We currently rely on disaster recovery and backup recovery, which takes time to recover, during which you're basically blind, so I'm pushing my leadership team to switch over to a clustering environment for constant availability.
It is one of the things that separates it from other tooling, and if not, it is the most scalable solution out there.
We have found no negative impact from scaling.
It is stable and reliable for our security operations.
They test it very thoroughly before release, and our customers have Splunk running for months without issues.
Splunk has been very reliable and very consistent.
We need more SMEs, and there is no mechanism to tell us about indexer or search head issues.
It's hard for us to keep pace since our original use case was 250 to 500 megabytes a day, and then it became two terabytes a day.
Integrating custom parsing and mapping for non-standard logs is essential due to compatibility challenges with various technologies.
This is particularly evident when dealing with failed login attempts and determining true versus false positives.
Improving the infrastructure behind Splunk Enterprise Security is vital—enhanced cores, CPUs, and memory should be prioritized to support better processing power.
Splunk Enterprise Security is not something that automatically picks things; you have to set up use cases, update data models, and link the right use cases to the right data models for those detections to happen.
For any future enhancements or features, such as MLTK and SOAR platform integration, we need more visibility, training, and certification for the skilled professionals who are working.
The pricing could be simpler, and while the initial setup cost for a new instance is a bit expensive, the licensing can currently be user-based or driven by log volume, which is better if there is expansion of our user base.
The pricing of the product is reasonable if we compare it with other Gartner leading products like Splunk, LogRhythm, Microsoft Sentinel, Google SecOps.
I saw clients spend two million dollars a year just feeding data into the Splunk solution.
The platform requires significant financial investment and resources, making it expensive despite its comprehensive features.
I find it to be affordable, which is why every industry uses it.
When they see a spike in a line chart for a failed login, which could be a true or false attempt, they can click that spike, and a table widget on the same active board instantly populates with raw logs of data for those specific failed logins.
When the analyst uses queries to search, it pulls the data quickly, in a second, which aids us greatly with the investigation.
It utilizes 400 days of hot data, allowing queries to run very fast and yield results quicker than other tools in terms of security and SIEM capability.
This capability is useful for performance monitoring and issue identification.
I assess Splunk Enterprise Security's insider threat detection capabilities for helping to find unknown threats and anomalous user behavior as great.
Splunk Enterprise Security provides the foundation for unified threat detection, investigation, and response, enabling fast identification of critical issues.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Splunk Enterprise Security | 8.2% |
| Devo | 1.2% |
| Other | 90.6% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 11 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 6 |
| Large Enterprise | 15 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 135 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 74 |
| Large Enterprise | 320 |
Devo offers powerful visual analytics, real-time data querying, and log integration capabilities within a cloud-native, multi-tenant architecture, supporting extended data retention ideal for long-term analysis and compliance.
Devo is recognized for its Activeboards, which facilitate visual analytics. High-speed search capabilities and real-time analytics enable efficient data manipulation and querying. Its multi-tenant architecture supports effective data segregation and customization tailored to distinct business needs, enhancing its value for handling complex log integrations. With extended data retention of 400 days and a cloud-native architecture, Devo is a robust platform for long-term analysis and compliance requirements. Though opportunities exist to improve browser stability on large searches, SOAR integrations, and its parser capabilities, Devo remains essential for incident response and security monitoring, offering centralized data storage and analysis.
What are Devo's most important features?Devo is extensively used in industries focused on incident response and digital forensics, centralizing data for security monitoring across hybrid environments. Organizations benefit from its ability to store and analyze aggregated logs, creating alerts and dashboards to enhance visibility for network and endpoint activities in multi-domain settings.
Splunk Enterprise Security integrates diverse security tools and data sources to deliver real-time alerting and machine learning-driven threat detection. Its centralized log management and customizable dashboards enhance incident response and reporting capabilities.
Offering real-time threat detection and AI-driven insights, Splunk Enterprise Security centralizes log management while providing risk-based alerting and customizable dashboards. Organizations benefit from improved incident detection and resolution, alongside enhanced visibility and reporting. Integrations with third-party tools optimize threat management and reduce alert fatigue. Users note areas for improvement, expressing the need for enhanced API management, accurate data model alignment, and interface refinement. The platform's complexity and resource-intensive configuration are challenges, with community feedback seeking reduced false positives, improved correlation rules, and competitive pricing models.
What are the key features of Splunk Enterprise Security?Splunk Enterprise Security is actively used across industries for threat detection, phishing protection, and log aggregation. Organizations employ its capabilities for monitoring systems and incident response, particularly in Security Operation Centers for managing cybersecurity incidents. Features like correlation searches are vital for identifying threats and unusual behaviors, aiding in compliance and proactive monitoring of potential security risks. It's a critical tool for managing events and insights in corporate environments.
We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.