Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Devo pros and cons

Vendor: Devo

4.2 out of 5

22 reviews
95% willing to recommend

403 followers

Pros & Cons summary

Devo streamlines analyst workflows by enabling on-the-fly dashboard creation and timeline building using multiple data sources, significantly saving time. Devo enhances security analysis with high-speed, real-time search capabilities, enabling users to respond quickly to network threats. Devo's multi-tenant, cloud-native architecture is suitable for managed service providers or multinational corporations, ensuring efficient data consolidation and access control. Devo supports extensive data ingestion with over 450 parsers, allowing comprehensive log data integration and analysis.

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

Devo allows analysts to build and modify dashboards efficiently, greatly reducing the time required for log analysis and data correlation across multiple sources.

Devo offers high-speed search capabilities essential for real-time security analysis, enabling rapid data retrieval and analysis to respond to network attacks effectively.

Devo supports extensive data ingestion capabilities with over 450 parsers, facilitating the integration of various types of log data easily.

Devo's architecture supports multi-tenancy and cloud-native features, making it suitable for managed service provider environments or multinational organizations, allowing for consolidated but separate data access controls.

Devo excels in retaining data in its original format while offering powerful querying and log retention capabilities, enhancing data analysis and operational efficiency.

CONS

Documentation could be improved, especially to cover technical aspects and recent updates.

Activeboards feature lacks customization options for graphics, such as changing font size and style.

Ability to parse different log types, including logs from major vendors, needs enhancement.

Time taken to develop supported parsers for common log sources is inadequate, affecting onboarding and customer relationships.

Security Operations module lacks advanced features for content creation, correlation, and aggregation of data, as well as native ingestion of CTI.

Devo Pros review quotes

EM

Elizabeth Manemann

Cyber Security Engineer at H&R Block, Inc.

Jun 23, 2021

The most valuable feature is definitely the ability that Devo has to ingest data. From the previous SIEM that I came from and helped my company administer, it really was the type of system where data was parsed on ingest. This meant that if you didn't build the parser efficiently or correctly, sometimes that would bring the system to its knees. You'd have a backlog of processing the logs as it was ingesting them.

Read full review

JH

Director at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Nov 3, 2020

The real-time analytics of security-related data are super. There are a lot of data feeds going into it and it's very quick at pulling up and correlating the data and showing you what's going on in your infrastructure. It's fast. The way that their architecture and technology works, they've really focused on the speed of query results and making sure that we can do what we need to do quickly. Devo is pulling back information in a fast fashion, based on real-time events.

Read full review

reviewer1287654

Security Analyst at Telefonica

Dec 18, 2020

The user interface is really modern. As an end-user, there are a lot of possibilities to tailor the platform to your needs, and that can be done without needing much support from Devo. It's really flexible and modular. The UI is very clean.

Read full review

Free Report: Devo Reviews and More

Learn what your peers think about Devo. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2024.

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

CB

CISO at SentinelOne

Feb 16, 2021

The thing that Devo does better than other solutions is to give me the ability to write queries that look at multiple data sources and run fast. Most SIEMs don't do that. And I can do that by creating entity-based queries. Let's say I have a table which has Okta, a table which has G Suite, a table which has endpoint telemetry, and I have a table which has DNS telemetry. I can write a query that says, 'Join all these things together on IP, and where the IP matches in all these tables, return to me that subset of data, within these time windows.' I can break it down that way.

Read full review

JM

Jordan Mauriello

SVP of Managed Security at CRITICALSTART

Sep 23, 2021

The ability to have high performance, high-speed search capability is incredibly important for us. When it comes to doing security analysis, you don't want to be doing is sitting around waiting to get data back while an attacker is sitting on a network, actively attacking it. You need to be able to answer questions quickly. If I see an indicator of attack, I need to be able to rapidly pivot and find data, then analyze it and find more data to answer more questions. You need to be able to do that quickly. If I'm sitting around just waiting to get my first response, then it ends up moving too slow to keep up with the attacker. Devo's speed and performance allows us to query in real-time and keep up with what is actually happening on the network, then respond effectively to events.

Read full review

KG

Director of World Wide Security Services at Open Text

Dec 7, 2021

Devo helps us to unlock the full power of our data because they have more than 450 parsers, which means that we can ingest pretty much any type of log data.

Read full review

reviewer1689402

Product Director at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees

Oct 7, 2021

Those 400 days of hot data mean that people can look for trends and at what happened in the past. And they can not only do so from a security point of view, but even for operational use cases. In the past, our operational norm was to keep live data for only 30 days. Our users were constantly asking us for at least 90 days, and we really couldn't even do that. That's one reason that having 400 days of live data is pretty huge. As our users start to use it and adopt this system, we expect people to be able to do those long-term analytics.

Read full review

JG

Manager of Security Services at OpenText

Jan 7, 2020

Being able to build and modify dashboards on the fly with Activeboards streamlines my analyst time because my analysts aren't doing it across spreadsheets or five different tools to try to build a timeline out themselves. They can just ingest it all, build a timeline out across all the logging, and all the different information sources in one dashboard. So, it's a huge time saver. It also has the accuracy of being able to look at all those data sources in one view. The log analysis, which would take 40 hours, we can probably get through it in about five to eight hours using Devo.

Read full review

GM

CEO at Analytica 42

Nov 30, 2021

Devo provides a multi-tenant, cloud-native architecture. This is critical for managed service provider environments or multinational organizations who may have subsidiaries globally. It gives organizations a way to consolidate their data in a single accessible location, yet keep the data separate. This allows for global views and/or isolated views restricted by access controls by company or business unit.

Read full review

JB

Security Engineer at Kforce

Oct 7, 2022

The most useful feature for us, because of some of the issues we had previously, was the simplicity of log integrations. It's much easier with this platform to integrate log sources that might not have standard logging and things like that.

Read full review

Show 10 more reviews (out of 22)

Devo Cons review quotes

EM

Elizabeth Manemann

Cyber Security Engineer at H&R Block, Inc.

Jun 23, 2021

From our experience, the Devo agent needs some work. They built it on top of OS Query's open-source framework. It seems like it wasn't tuned properly to handle a large volume of Windows event logs. In our experience, there would definitely be some room for improvement. A lot of SIEMs on the market have their own agent infrastructure. I think Devo's working towards that, but I think that it needs some improvement as far as keeping up with high-volume environments.

Read full review

JH

Director at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Nov 3, 2020

Devo has a lot of cloud connectors, but they need to do a little bit of work there. They've got good integrations with the public cloud, but there are a lot of cloud SaaS systems that they still need to work with on integrations, such as Salesforce and other SaaS providers where we need to get access logs.

Read full review

reviewer1287654

Security Analyst at Telefonica

Dec 18, 2020

The Activeboards feature is not as mature regarding the look and feel. Its functionality is mature, but the look and feel is not there. For example, if you have some data sets and are trying to get some graphics, you cannot change anything. There's just one format for the graphics. You cannot change the size of the font, the font itself, etc.

Read full review

Free Report: Devo Reviews and More

Learn what your peers think about Devo. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2024.

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

CB

CISO at SentinelOne

Feb 16, 2021

There's room for improvement within the GUI. There is also some room for improvement within the native parsers they support. But I can say that about pretty much any solution in this space.

Read full review

JM

Jordan Mauriello

SVP of Managed Security at CRITICALSTART

Sep 23, 2021

There is room for improvement in the ability to parse different log types. I would go as far as to say the product is deficient in its ability to parse multiple, different log types, including logs from major vendors that are supported by competitors. Additionally, the time that it takes to turn around a supported parser for customers and common log source types, which are generally accepted standards in the industry, is not acceptable. This has impacted customer onboarding and customer relationships for us on multiple fronts.

Read full review

KG

Director of World Wide Security Services at Open Text

Dec 7, 2021

We only use the core functionality and one of the reasons for this is that their security operation center needs improvement.

Read full review

reviewer1689402

Product Director at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees

Oct 7, 2021

One major area for improvement for Devo... is to provide more capabilities around pre-built monitoring. They're working on integrations with different types of systems, but that integration needs to go beyond just onboarding to the platform. It needs to include applications, out-of-the-box, that immediately help people to start monitoring their systems. Such applications would include dashboards and alerts, and then people could customize them for their own needs so that they aren't starting from a blank slate.

Read full review

JG

Manager of Security Services at OpenText

Jan 7, 2020

Their documentation could be better. They are growing quickly and need to have someone focused on tech writing to ensure that all the different updates, how to use them, and all the new features and functionality are properly documented.

Read full review

GM

CEO at Analytica 42

Nov 30, 2021

Some basic reporting mechanisms have room for improvement. Customers can do analysis by building Activeboards, Devo’s name for interactive dashboards. This capability is quite nice, but it is not a reporting engine. Devo does provide mechanisms to allow third-party tools to query data via their API, which is great. However, a lot of folks like or want a reporting engine, per se, and Devo simply doesn't have that. This may or may not be by design.

Read full review

JB

Security Engineer at Kforce

Oct 7, 2022

Some of the documentation could be improved a little bit. A lot of times it doesn't go as deep into some of the critical issues you might run into. They've been really good to shore us up with support, but some of the documentation could be a little bit better.

Read full review

Show 10 more reviews (out of 22)

Related questions

37

When evaluating Log Management tools and software, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?

4,270

Datadog vs ELK: which one is good in terms of performance, cost and efficiency?

127

Which Windows event log monitoring tool do you recommend?

370

What is the difference between log management and SIEM?

43

Splunk vs. Elastic Stack

77

How can Cloudtrail logs be used effectively to improve log monitoring?

435

Why hot data and cold data differences in SIEM solutions are not discussed sufficiently?

67

When evaluating Log Management solutions, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?

13

When evaluating Log Management solutions, what aspects do you think are the most important to look for?

15

Why are Log Management tools important for companies?