ZAPTEST and UiPath Test Cloud compete in test automation solutions. UiPath Test Cloud has an upper hand with its extensive features, providing a worthwhile investment.
Features: ZAPTEST automates testing across multiple platforms with a single script, offering high flexibility. It also provides effective OCR for object detection. Additionally, ZAPTEST supports integration with various tools like JIRA and ALM. UiPath Test Cloud, however, provides AI-driven features, strong integration capabilities, and enhanced automation possibilities. Such a feature set makes UiPath's offering more robust for extensive automation tasks.
Room for Improvement: ZAPTEST could enhance its AI capabilities and user interface for improved usability. It can also work on expanding its feature set to compete with solutions offering comprehensive automation. Furthermore, better cloud integration would be beneficial. On the other hand, UiPath Test Cloud could improve initial deployment times and work on reducing its high initial setup costs. Enhancing customer training and documentation would also aid new users during the initial learning phase. Making its platform more lightweight would reduce resource consumption.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: UiPath Test Cloud offers a streamlined cloud-based deployment model that aligns well with existing workflows, supported by strong customer service. This ensures operational transitions are smoother for clients. ZAPTEST, while also easy to deploy, provides efficient support that facilitates the setup process, though it may not match UiPath's seamless integration capabilities.
Pricing and ROI: ZAPTEST is attractive with competitive pricing and lower setup costs, offering a satisfactory return on investment. However, UiPath Test Cloud, while requiring a higher initial investment, offers a scalable solution that promises substantial long-term ROI through advanced capabilities. The main consideration is balancing initial costs with future gains, where UiPath's scalability and ROI potential stand out.
Support should be free, especially for product-related issues.
Proper knowledge of Orchestrator and CI/CD processes makes the product truly scalable.
UiPath Test Suite has matured over the years and is now quite stable.
UiPath should introduce compatibility so existing processes in Selenium or other tools can work seamlessly with UiPath Test automation.
The pricing of UiPath tends to be on the higher side, which can restrict smaller companies from adopting it.
What I really like about UiPath Test Suite is its ability to ensure that any changes made do not affect other functionalities.
UiPath Test Cloud revolutionizes testing through advanced AI agents, enhancing productivity in software assessment.
UiPath Test Cloud, with its AI-augmented automation, offers testers enterprise-grade capabilities for over 190 technologies. Featuring seamless integration with tools like Orchestrator and CI/CD pipelines, it streamlines testing processes and cuts maintenance costs. While users value its functionalities, the need for enhancements in mobile automation and third-party integration, particularly with Jira, is recognized. Efficient test organization through Test Manager and simplified process management via the cloud are noteworthy. Enhancements in reporting and file management are sought, highlighting areas for development.
What are the key features of UiPath Test Cloud?Organizations across industries utilize UiPath Test Cloud for testing types such as origination, smoke, and web application testing. Common implementations include testing in supply chain management, regression testing, and integrating workflows. Teams find it beneficial for ensuring functionality and efficiency in mobile app testing, enabling cross-platform support for RPA and applications like Oracle and SAP.
We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.