Workday Business Process Framework vs webMethods.io comparison

"It is good for communicating between the systems and for publishing and subscribing. We can easily retrieve data. It is good in terms of troubleshooting and other things."

"One of the most important features is that it gives you the possibility to do low-level integration. It provides a lot of features out of the box, and over the years, it has matured so much that any problem that is there in the market can be solved with this product. We can meet any requirements through customizations, transformations, or the logic that needs to be put in. Some of the other products struggle in this aspect. They cannot do things in a certain way, or they have a product limitation, whereas, with webMethods, I have never faced this kind of problem."

"Clients choose webMethods.io API for its intuitive interface, promoting seamless interaction and quick communication between systems."

"It's easy to construct new interfaces like apps and client portals."

"How simple it is to create new solutions."

"It frankly fills the gap between IT and business by having approval and policy enforcement on each state and cycle of the asset from the moment it gets created until it is retired."

"webMethods Trading Networks is a stable solution."

"The Software AG Designer has been great. It's very intuitive."

"It is efficient to fine-tune some of our organizational processes and policies."

"The tool helps to do multiple things like assigning tasks, approvals, report creation, and communications."

"I find it easy to navigate, especially when it comes to tasks like extending offer letters. Everything is configured into a single template, eliminating the need to create multiple offer letters for different positions. The effectiveness, user-friendliness, and adaptability to new features are key strengths of Workday. It's also convenient for sourcing, allowing us to revisit candidates who performed well but didn't pass the interview. Workday's harmonized platform brings everything together in one place, making it efficient and streamlined."

"I am not satisfied with the solution because it takes too much effort to migrate and add new information. The migration could be easier."

"With respect to the API gateway, the runtime component, the stability after a new release is something that can be improved."

"webMethods Integration Server needs to add more adapters."

"The learning curve is a little steep at first."

"Support is expensive."

"This is a great solution and the vendor could improve the marketing of the solution to be able to reach more clients."

"The orchestration is not as good as it should be."

"A potential drawback of webMethods.io API is its adaptability to legacy systems, which can vary in compatibility."

"At times, I've heard from our technical team that configuring or implementing certain requests from senior leadership can be challenging. There seem to be constraints in fulfilling specific requirements. Unfortunately, I don't have detailed information as it's what I've gathered from discussions with the technical team. There might be limitations in what can be achieved, but I can't provide specific examples without more context. Certainly, there's room for enhancement, especially in terms of regular upgrades. I've noticed that there aren't many updates, and it would be beneficial to have improvements. Regular upgrades and the introduction of new, innovative solutions could make our work more efficient and easier to manage."

"We encountered delays with the tool."

"There could be more automation included."

"The pricing and licensing costs for webMethods are very high, which is the only reason that we might switch to another product."

"webMethods.io Integration's pricing is high and has yearly subscription costs."

"Based on our team discussions and feedback, it is pretty costly because they charge us for each transmission."

"Most of my clients would like the price of the solution to be reduced."

"It's a good deal for the money that we pay."

"webMethods.io is expensive. We have multiple components, and you need to pay for each of them."

"The pricing is a yearly license."

"I signed a three-year deal with them. It is a yearly locked-in price for the next three years."

"I find it reasonably priced, even for startups. The cost is minimal and depends on what features you want to add. Workday allows customization and personalization, and it operates like a cloud solution, making it affordable as long as you know what you need."