Fortinet FortiToken Reviews

All users who can log in on Fortinet have Token. We have 15 FortiTokens for the managers who are connected to the VPN and also for those who are connected to the software. It is mobile, not a hard token. That said, I have the hardware token, which is related to the administrator, me, and my assistant. It's used on software and hardware. We use it at an administrator level and at a user level. 

The solution is great for security. It's for two-factor identification.

It is easy to implement. The deployment is quick and simple. 

It is stable and reliable. 

The cost isn't too high.

The solution works well. We have nothing to complain about. 

I've been using the solution for five years. 

The stability is ecellent. I would rate it five out of five. It is reliable, and the performance is good. We do not have any issues at all. 

We have 15 FortiTokens.

We did not previously use a different solution. This was the first solution we selected. 

It is an easy product to implement. From the software or the hardware itself, from the options, we can apply FortiToken for the user and just add the hot token serial number and go.

We only need one person to deploy the solution. I tend to manage it myself. 

The deployment takes about 45 minutes for the software. It might take about ten days for the hardware to arrive from Fortigate. After that, I just install the serial key, and everything is done. 

We have not noted an ROI.

We deal with a subcontractor in Saudi Arabia to pay everything in one bill yearly. Everything is a separate license fee, and we use different Fortinet solutions. However, we pay for everything yearly, all at once.

Generally, it is an affordable product. We do not find it to be overly expensive. 

I'd rate it a five out of five in terms of affordability. 

We did not explore other options. We chose the first option we looked at, FortiToken.

We are not partners. We use it internally in the company. We are end-users. We use a lot of Fortinet products. 

Nothing has to be done from the end-user perspective; they just add the username and password, and a code appears on the Fortitoken software or hardware. 

I'd rate the solution ten out of ten. 

I'd recommend the solution to other users and companies. 

We're aiming to provide every user with mobile token-based two-factor authentication (2FA) to enhance security.

It's for internal security.

It aligns well with your overall identity and access management (IAM) strategy.

We already have IAM policies in place, and this tool strengthens them by implementing 2FA.

The token-based authentication is good and modern aspect.

The management configuration seems a bit complex and could benefit from user guides or better support resources. It could be improved in terms of user-friendliness. 

Not like the other FortiGate products. Maybe not many people have a real community for this. The lack of community support is a major concern. 

Context-sensitive online support instead of just a general user manual would be very helpful. Currently, clicking "help" on any topic simply directs you to the entire manual.

We're currently in the middle of installing it.

As it's a virtual machine (VM), we haven't encountered any stability issues so far.

The support itself is good, but it mainly comes through email responses, which can be slow.

Email support is good, but we would appreciate faster response times.

We had internal authentication systems but not a product-based system from a security company.

Most of our previous authentication systems were internal. This is the first one that integrates with network and server equipment, and it can even be implemented for SSL. It's the first security system software we've used.

We chose Fortinet FortiToken because it integrates well with our existing Fortinet FortiGate firewall UTM appliance. Since the token is a VM, it doesn't require additional hardware, which would have been an unnecessary expense. In terms of manageability and integration, it seemed like a good fit alongside FortiGate and FortiMail, all from the same Fortinet ecosystem.

It is not very easy to set up and configure 2FA with different needs.

Configuration can be confusing due to the lack of community and context-sensitive help. We've had to rely on technical support, which slows down the setup process.

Token's validity is either renewal or perpetual, which determines its return on investment (ROI), which is higher over time. It's not a subscription-based model.

From an Indian perspective, it's definitely costlier. Converted to dollars, it might seem smaller internationally. But commercially in India, it is expensive.

Overall, I would rate the solution a six out of ten because some improvements are required feature-wise. For example, before FortiToken disappears from the mobile phone, it should display our logo, not the FortiToken logo. App customization is needed so users know when FortiToken is implemented. My organization, for instance, would prefer our logo for assurance instead of the FortiToken logo.

The platform's main use case is to facilitate authentication when connecting outside of the organization, particularly when using Fortinet VPN. It ensures secure access to our network resources, especially when working remotely.

The primary benefit of using FortiToken is its cost-effectiveness. It provides a reliable authentication solution without requiring significant financial investment.

One of the product's most valuable features is its ease of use. The soft token offering simplifies the authentication process, making it convenient for users. Additionally, its straightforward installation and configuration contribute to its value.

They could enhance synchronization with mobile applications, and addressing minor issues with authentication could further improve user experience.

I've been using FortiToken for about three years now.

I rate the product stability an eight out of ten. While it's generally reliable, there have been occasional instances where multiple authentication attempts were required.

Approximately 200 users are currently using FortiToken within our organization. It is scalable, and additional licenses can be easily acquired to accommodate more users as our organization grows.

The initial setup was straightforward. Onboarding and initial testing typically take about a day before the system is fully operational within our organization.

The platform's licensing cost is reasonable for our organization. We opted for a yearly subscription, which aligns well with our budgetary requirements.

FortiToken is integrated with our FortiFirewall and FortiWeb systems. This integration enhances security, especially when employees access organizational resources remotely, such as working from home.

I advise others to consider using the product to explore its token offering for simplified authentication.

I rate it a ten overall. It meets our authentication needs effectively and is a valuable asset to our organization's security infrastructure.

We only use FortiToken for authentication purposes, like logging into SSL VPN or plugging into firewalls.

I like how easy it is to configure and assign tokens. It's readily available through our application-based system.

The problem comes when we have to migrate tokens to new phones. There's no backup option or import/export feature, so you have to redo the entire process manually, adding tokens one by one, which is quite tedious.

The migration process is definitely a major area for improvement. Imagine losing your phone and having to set everything up again from scratch and add everything individually.  

In future releases, push notifications would be good! Instead of opening the app and entering the token manually, what if we received an approval or denial prompt directly on the phone as a notification? Just a tap to log in, that would be nice.

I have been using it for three years now. 

I would rate the stability a nine out of ten. It's been very reliable for my customers. 

I would rate the scalability a seven out of ten. The migration issue definitely brings it down a bit.

Moreover, if FortiToken could improve that, maybe introduce push notifications or even eliminate the need for manually entering token keys, it could easily reach a ten out of ten.

Replacing the token key entry with a simple notification and selection option to accept/deny would be very handy and useful. Now, we have to scroll down and search for the correct FortiToken by name. 

I recommend FortiToken for all companies, especially when they connect to sensitive servers. That's why I suggest them to use it.

There haven't been any emergencies, but the response times and everything were good when I needed help.

Positive

Before FortiToken, I used Okta for authentication. For firewalls and network devices specifically, I recommend FortiToken.

The initial setup is easy. You receive a QR code via email, scan it, and add it. No complicated procedures involved.

The deployment model depends on the customers. We have different customer setups, but most are on-premises, device-based deployments.

We typically require our assistance with deployment. We manage their hardware and infrastructure, so deployment falls under our responsibility.

The pricing is not very high, so I'd rate it around six out of ten, where one is high and ten is low.

I can compare it with Microsoft's 365 authentication or other Microsoft authentication solutions, but they have different features.

Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten. I recommend FortiToken to all our clients who purchase Fortinet devices, especially within banking and payment systems. 

The name of the authenticator is from the user's site. It's sufficient for that to provide you with a number when you need to access a protected resource, which is the site. This is two-factor authentication. You have two layers of authentication. The first layer is provided by the name and password, and the second layer is provided by the authenticator. 

So you have to be attentive to that when the app prompts you, or at least the app prompts you, which advises you about the directive that someone is attempting to access this technology. And you can confirm by saying yes. It's directly linked to the internal access attempt to the site.

I appreciate that it provides comprehensive security. It is tailored to this specific purpose, and it excels in fulfilling this purpose.

On the Fortinet side, it is already well integrated with Android devices, simple devices, and PCs.

Maybe the price could be improved, and the integration could be better. But the integration is different from the authenticator side.

I have been using this solution for more than three years. We use the latest version as it updates automatically. 

I would rate the stability a ten out of ten. I haven't encountered any issues with this solution's stability

It is very scalable. It can manage thousands of users. We plan to expand our customer base.

We have around 250 users. We all rely on it for our authentication needs. It's in active operation.

We used Fortinet FortiAuthenticator. 

From the customer's perspective, the setup is flexible. You have the liberty to configure it according to your preferences. It took minutes to set up. 

We can do it in-house. Simply load the installation and compute user, and then you can use it.

The technical personnel involved in deployment and maintenance are developers.

The ROI is quite high because the consistent part of it originates from any directive of credentials or end-user passwords. It's a solution that significantly improves the authentication phase. This makes it less likely that a malicious actor would be able to gain unauthorized access to the network and launch the attack.

FortiToken hardware itself does not require a license. However, the FortiAuthenticator software does require a license. The cost of the license depends on the number of users. We pay it on a yearly basis. But you can also find agreements with other options.

There are no additional costs. It is not too expensive.

Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten. I would definitely recommend using the solution. There are not many functionalities. However, it is a great solution for multifactor authentication.

I am using it with FortiClient so that I can authenticate.

It provides me with the token so that I can do the Multi-Factor Authentication. I'm not sure if there's anything more to say about that.

I'm not sure if it's already available, however, I wonder if there's an option to have it sent to my email address instead of having it on the mobile app. Currently, I need to carry that single device that is already registered with a token. If I can receive it on email, it would be more flexible. 

I'm using other types of authenticators, and some of them provide a code to access the application. I'm not sure if that's already available, as I am not using it at the moment. If it's not there, it could be a nice feature to have optionally.

I have used the solution for four years, five years, something like that.

I don't know if scalability is applicable. It's only meant to be doing one thing, to be honest. I've already got, what, three or four tokens, four tokens. It's scalable enough for my purpose.

We get support through a partner, and we've had good support so far. However, it wasn't directly with Fortinet staff. 

Positive

The initial setup is simple.

I use Microsoft Authenticator as I can incorporate many functions there. With the FortiToken app, it's only compatible with its own tokens. So, I need to use one more app for what I need to do. Authenticator is for everything else, however, for Fortinet, I use only the FortiToken app.

The product is working fine for me after all these years.

Overall, I give the product a nine out of ten.

The primary use cases of Fortinet FortiToken for my customers typically involve adding multi-factor authentication (MFA) for remote access. This is often required for remote workers or external providers. For instance, in industrial environments where external companies provide services, this solution helps manage secure access. Another common use case includes providing an external captive portal and self-registration.

The most valuable feature of the solution is its mobile application. It is particularly beneficial as it eliminates the need for hardware management. Users do not have to worry about managing or replacing physical tokens, which can be advantageous if the token is lost or damaged.

I would like to see the product improvements in dynamic VLAN pooling. Specifically, when users are assigned different VLANs based on their SSID, ensuring no unintended lateral traffic between users would enhance security and efficiency.

Sometimes, SMS messages do not reach recipients correctly due to country-specific limits on SMS character length. 

I rate the stability a seven. 

The platform easily scales from a few users to thousands by adjusting the licensing and configuration. I rate the scalability an eight. 

The support team is generally responsive and helpful, but resolution times can vary.

The initial setup requires understanding the platform's approach, licensing, and the correct version selection based on the customer's context.

The deployment time depends on the functionality required by the customer. I would rate the process as a seven.

Although the platform is relatively expensive, it offers significant value. I rate the pricing a nine out of ten. 

The critical feature for ensuring secure access is the solution's comprehensive functionality, which secures the user identity of those attempting to connect. The integration of all features collectively ensures high security.

The integration process is relatively straightforward, which is beneficial when deploying the platform. It is often integrated with third-party tools. For example, it can be combined with a management system that handles tokens and supports external keys such as YubiKey for additional multi-factor authentication.

I rate it an eight out of ten. 

We are using Fortinet FortiToken for token-based mobile applications.

The solution comes with two firewalls as a bundle. In that bundle, most of the individual users can be assigned to mobile users. However, in cases of technical difficulties, users may accidentally remove the mobile application. In normal scenarios, we get back to the activation key and assign it again.

In one instance, we had to call back Fortinet service providers to reactivate the token and access the system. If they could provide a managed portal for the token, then reassigning tokens can be easy.

I would also like to see some mobile-level application update. It would be easy for our team if we can have all the features in one place.

I have been using the solution since 2019. We implemented the demo piece for the PED staff and internal staff team. We deployed the solution as a case of factorization since there was a high-risk claim. We needed the solution for our critical business cases.

I would give eight out of ten for the stability of the solution.

I would rate the scalability of the solution an eight out of ten. There are about 150 users for the mobile token application in our company.

I would rate the tech support a seven out of ten. I have contacted support only once since 2019– for an activation error message. They resolved the issue within two days.

Neutral

I have been using Google Authenticator and Microsoft Authenticator. I am happy with FortiToken because it makes it very easy to install and manage tokens.

The setup of Fortinet FortiToken was very easy because the license of the solution was assigned by the vendor. Once initiated, we were able to access the tokens and assign them to the required users.

I would rate the pricing as an eight out of ten. We purchased the solution at a reasonable price in 2019.

I would rate the overall solution an eight out of ten. The solution is a smart product that anyone can easily access and manage. The solution is a good product for multi-factor authentication and to secure remote authentication in the corporate environment.

Hybrid Cloud