Fortinet FortiToken Reviews

We use the product for multifactor authentication. 

The solution is simple and similar to Google Authenticator. It follows time-based authentication. We use it for hardware and software in one environment. The tool offers simple and fast authentication for SSL. 

Fortinet FortiToken should improve its push notifications. 

I have been using the product for three years. 

I rate the tool's stability a ten out of ten. 

I rate the tool's scalability a ten out of ten. My company has 50 users. 

My experience with Fortinet FortiToken's technical support is good. 

Positive

When I compare Fortinet FortiToken to similar products like Google Authenticator, I see differences, especially with Microsoft Authenticator, which also uses push notifications. Google Authenticator is free. 

Fortinet FortiToken's deployment is simple. 

I did the deployment myself. 

I rate the tool's pricing a five out of ten. 

I rate the overall solution a ten out of ten. 

We use Fortinet FortiToken to do a double authentication for people who work out of the company.

The most valuable feature of Fortinet FortiToken is security. Some companies have people belonging to other companies working with their core software or main applications. Fortinet FortiToken provides security and authenticates that the right external people are working with a company's system. Since Fortinet FortiToken provides a second authentication mode, it's vital for cybersecurity.

The solution could introduce a mobile application instead of a physical product.

The solution’s initial setup is very easy.

On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten.

Fortinet FortiToken has been very reliable for our daily authentication needs. Fortinet FortiToken is a very good product that improves a company's security. I think that every company that has people managing critical information should use the solution.

Overall, I rate Fortinet FortiToken ten out of ten.

We use FortiToken to authenticate many of the applications we and our clients use. We use, integrate, and resell the solution.

We like the mobile FortiToken. 

I have used FortiToken for four or five years.

FortiToken is stable.

I rate Fortinet support nine out of 10. We pay for a support contract that entitles us to dedicated resources for our problems. In fact, we are not using basic technical support. With standard support, it can take a while for the engineers to understand the problem. We don't ask frivolous questions. Typically, we have our information ready to make the process smoother. 

Positive

I rate FortiToken 10 out of 10 for ease of setup. The setup time depends on the number. FortiToken is sold in a box of at least five, and it usually takes half an hour or so.

The price isn't an issue for most clients, but they complain that it's increasing each quarter. At the same time, all companies are raising their prices because we're in a dynamic period. 

The problem is that our customers create budgets annually based on the figures at the beginning of the fiscal year. Our customers get annoyed when the price is adjusted in the middle of the year. I understand that it's a difficult time, and price increases make sense for hardware devices. However, FortiToken is a software product, so it shouldn't be affected by factors like chip shortages or supply chain issues. Software solutions should have more transparent and predictable pricing.

I rate FortiToken 10 out of 10. 

We are using this solution for administrator access to firewalls. We have its latest version.

FortiToken is just there to do the administration of the firewalls. For two-factor authentication, we like Duo more.

The integrated Fortinet security with the app that allows you to easily do the two-factor authentication is most valuable.

The app could be improved so that you don't have to actually type in the code. It would be great if you can just do a prompt or push similar to the way Duo does.

We have been using it for three years in our organization.

It is stable.

It is good. We have a very small use case for it. If I want to roll it out for a larger use case, I don't think it would have any issues. We currently have got only got four firewall administrators who use this solution.

I have not interacted with them for FortiToken.

It was straightforward.

I just did it myself.

Overall, it has provided an ROI. It is included as part of our firewall license.

It is included as part of our firewall license. 

I would advise others to make sure that they have cellular phones that are company-owned or they have employees who are willing to use their own in order to use it.

I would rate Fortinet FortiToken a six out of ten.

Its ease of use is most valuable. It is simple to use and can be deployed out-of-the-box. It is quite a mature product with all the required features.

It needs a lot of coupling with their other Fortinet products. To implement FortiToken, I most probably need to couple it with FortiAuthenticator for full implementation. An RSA token can be used with many devices, whereas Fortinet FortiToken is always linked to only one FortiGate device. If I want to reuse the token across five or six FortiGates, I would have to get the FortiAuthenticator product. I can't use one token to connect to different FortiGates, and I need to get another product to enable this functionality.

They should also improve the support for their mobile client. There should be a more detailed roadmap for the operating systems being supported. Some of our users were using an old iOS iPhone, and they were forced to get a newer phone because FortiToken didn't support that version of iOS. Similarly, there may be a version of Android that is not supported, so the users need to change the phone. This was one of the reasons why our deployment took longer.

I have been using this solution for three years.

It is stable.

It is not scalable because it is attached to one device.

Their technical support is quite good. The product itself is quite simple to use, and there have been very few times when I had to call the support. Basically, in the past three years, we didn't log any tickets for support.

We have used RSA tokens. Fortinet FortiToken is much easier to use than RSA tokens. In terms of our experience with day-to-day management, it is very good as compared to RSA.

It was quite straightforward. We deployed it for about 500 users, and it took about a month. The deployment is quite fast. You can just get it done within two weeks, but it took time in getting feedback on whether the phones and the OS versions that were being used by our users were supported. It took us longer to iron out all such issues and to get the phones that were supported with this solution.

I would recommend this solution to others, but they need to know what it is used for. Because this is a 2FA, where you implement it will actually matter. If you want to deploy it globally and you have many FortiGates, you would need additional products, such as FortiAuthenticator. If you're deploying it to only a single site and everybody is connecting to that site and using it as a 2FA, it is the right solution. 

I would rate Fortinet FortiToken an eight out of ten.

Fortinet FortiToken could be lower for some markets. 

I have been using the product for two and a half years. 

I rate Fortinet FortiToken's stability a nine out of ten. 

I rate the tool's scalability a nine out of ten. 

The tool's support is the best. 

Fortinet FortiToken's deployment is simple. 

I rate the product a ten out of ten. 

We are using it for VPN. We have its latest version.

It has improved the way our organization functions.

Its ease of installation is most valuable. It took me five minutes, and it was up and running. It didn't take me that long. The installation on the cell phones is pretty simple.

Its reporting should be better. The reporting feature is missing. I don't have any reporting of who has done what, what has failed, and what didn't work. 

I have been using this solution for about a year.

It is stable. There are no stability issues.

Its scalability is pretty good. We only have 100 to 150 FortiTokens. We're not that big. All people in our organization are using it. It goes from CFO, CEO to the basic call center.

We didn't need to use it so far.

We do use Cisco Duo for another 2FA solution. We don't really use any other solution now. It is pretty much FortiToken.

It was easy. It took me five minutes, and it was up and running.

If you're looking for a fast installation, easy deployment, and not much maintenance, this is the solution to go for, but the only thing is that it is good for Fortinet. It is not good for anything else.

I would rate Fortinet FortiToken an eight out of ten.

I'm a solution provider who sells FortiToken and helps customers implement it. Most of my clients use Fortinet solutions like FortiClient VPN and FortiGate firewalls for remote work. They also use FortiToken for authentication. 

Bangladesh is a price-sensitive market, and FortiToken is popular because it's more affordable than the Palo Alto and Cisco authentication solutions. Fortinet has a local director for Bangladesh, so they can deliver solutions to customers quickly. 

I have sold FortiToken for three years.

I rate FortiToken seven out of 10 for stability.

I rate FortiToken eight out of 10 for scalability. It's suitable for mid-sized customers, not large enterprises. 

Support is a pain point in Bangladesh because there aren't many experienced Fortinet engineers in this country. It's easier to find one certified in Cisco, Palo Alto, or Juniper. 

Palo Alto is good compared to Fortinet. I like the dashboard better. 

The deployment process is straightforward. I've never had any issues. 

I rate FortiToken seven out of 10 for pricing. 

I rate FortiToken six out of 10. I recommend it for small and medium-sized companies.