Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Globalscape EFT Logo

Top 10 Globalscape EFT Alternatives

Vendor: Fortra
4.2 out of 5
Start review

Top Globalscape EFT Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Globalscape EFT based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Control-M, webMethods.io, and IBM Sterling File Gateway. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Globalscape EFT surpasses its competitors by offering robust security features, efficient file transfer capabilities, and seamless integration options, ensuring data protection and streamlined operations for businesses of all sizes.

Fortra Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Fortra, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Globalscape EFT Logo
Control-M
4.4 out of 5
Globalscape EFT Logo
Control-M
4.4 out of 5
Control-M offers robust automation across platforms, ideal for complex schedules in industries like banking. In comparison, Globalscape EFT emphasizes secure file transfers with efficient deployment. Control-M provides extensive features with higher costs, while Globalscape EFT offers a cost-effective option with competitive pricing.
Download Control-M vs. Globalscape EFT Report
Control-M involves a higher setup cost compared to Globalscape EFT, indicating a difference in initial financial commitment required for deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
Control-M involves a higher setup cost compared to Globalscape EFT, indicating a difference in initial financial commitment required for deployment.
Globalscape EFT Logo
webMethods.io
4.0 out of 5
Globalscape EFT Logo
webMethods.io
4.0 out of 5
webMethods.io offers strong B2B integration capabilities with flexible deployment. In comparison, Globalscape EFT excels in managing file transfers with simple deployments. Tech buyers may prefer webMethods.io for integration flexibility, while Globalscape EFT appeals with straightforward pricing and robust file transfer management.
Download Globalscape EFT vs. webMethods.io Report
webMethods.io offers competitive setup costs, highlighting affordability for small to medium businesses, while Globalscape EFT requires higher initial investment, appealing to larger enterprises seeking advanced features.
View comparison
Pricing
webMethods.io offers competitive setup costs, highlighting affordability for small to medium businesses, while Globalscape EFT requires higher initial investment, appealing to larger enterprises seeking advanced features.
Globalscape EFT Logo
Globalscape EFT Logo
IBM Sterling File Gateway
3.9 out of 5
IBM Sterling File Gateway excels in handling large file volumes with strong security protocols, ideal for enterprises prioritizing secure transfers. In comparison, Globalscape EFT offers competitive pricing and ease of management, appealing to organizations valuing cost efficiency and comprehensive features.
Download Globalscape EFT vs. IBM Sterling File Gateway Report
IBM Sterling File Gateway has a higher setup cost compared to Globalscape EFT, which offers a more affordable initial investment, highlighting the significant pricing difference between these two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM Sterling File Gateway has a higher setup cost compared to Globalscape EFT, which offers a more affordable initial investment, highlighting the significant pricing difference between these two solutions.
Globalscape EFT Logo
MOVEit
4.1 out of 5
Globalscape EFT Logo
MOVEit
4.1 out of 5
MOVEit is favored for cost-effective large file transfer and automation, offering detailed logging. In comparison, Globalscape EFT enhances security with advanced workflows and cross-platform consistency, making it suitable for regulatory environments, despite higher costs. Both solutions cater to diverse managed file transfer needs.
Download Globalscape EFT vs. MOVEit Report
MOVEit setup costs may be more substantial than Globalscape EFT, which offers a more economical option. This distinction highlights cost differences between the two, potentially influencing budget-conscious decisions.
View comparison
Pricing
MOVEit setup costs may be more substantial than Globalscape EFT, which offers a more economical option. This distinction highlights cost differences between the two, potentially influencing budget-conscious decisions.
Globalscape EFT Logo
Kiteworks
4.3 out of 5
Globalscape EFT Logo
Kiteworks
4.3 out of 5
Kiteworks offers a cost-effective solution with robust compliance features. In comparison, Globalscape EFT provides superior automation tools, justifying its price with advanced functionality. Kiteworks's integration support suits budget-conscious buyers while Globalscape EFT caters to organizations needing complex workflows and feature-rich environments.
Download Globalscape EFT vs. Kiteworks Report
Kiteworks has a higher setup cost compared to Globalscape EFT, which provides a more budget-friendly initial investment. However, Kiteworks may offer greater long-term value through its extensive features and security benefits.
View comparison
Pricing
Kiteworks has a higher setup cost compared to Globalscape EFT, which provides a more budget-friendly initial investment. However, Kiteworks may offer greater long-term value through its extensive features and security benefits.
Globalscape EFT Logo
Globalscape EFT Logo
Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct
4.0 out of 5
Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct appeals with competitive pricing and dependable security, attracting cost-conscious tech buyers. In comparison, Globalscape EFT's advanced features and seamless integration make it ideal for those prioritizing comprehensive functionality despite higher initial costs.
Download Globalscape EFT vs. Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct Report
Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct has a higher setup cost compared to Globalscape EFT, offering a straightforward pricing structure, while Globalscape EFT provides a more affordable initial investment, appealing to businesses seeking cost-effective solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct has a higher setup cost compared to Globalscape EFT, offering a straightforward pricing structure, while Globalscape EFT provides a more affordable initial investment, appealing to businesses seeking cost-effective solutions.
Globalscape EFT Logo
Globalscape EFT Logo
BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer
4.4 out of 5
BMC Control-M excels in integration and alerting, ideal for complex environments. In comparison, Globalscape EFT offers robust security and compliance, suitable for security-focused organizations. BMC provides flexible deployment; Globalscape fits Windows environments. Pricing favors Globalscape's straightforward model, while BMC justifies higher costs with features.
Download BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer vs. Globalscape EFT Report
BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer has a higher setup cost, while Globalscape EFT offers more affordable initial implementation. Key differences highlight the cost-effective entry point of Globalscape EFT compared to the higher setup investment required for BMC Control-M.
View comparison
Pricing
BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer has a higher setup cost, while Globalscape EFT offers more affordable initial implementation. Key differences highlight the cost-effective entry point of Globalscape EFT compared to the higher setup investment required for BMC Control-M.
Globalscape EFT Logo
JSCAPE by Redwood
4.5 out of 5
Globalscape EFT Logo
JSCAPE by Redwood
4.5 out of 5
JSCAPE excels with protocol diversity, scalability, and security. In comparison, Globalscape EFT offers robust automation and integration simplicity. Tech buyers might choose JSCAPE for speed and flexibility, while preferring Globalscape EFT for streamlined automation and centralized management.
Download Globalscape EFT vs. JSCAPE by Redwood Report
JSCAPE by Redwood offers a lower setup cost compared to Globalscape EFT, highlighting its cost-effectiveness. However, Globalscape EFT may include broader feature access, justifying its higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
JSCAPE by Redwood offers a lower setup cost compared to Globalscape EFT, highlighting its cost-effectiveness. However, Globalscape EFT may include broader feature access, justifying its higher initial investment.
Globalscape EFT Logo
WS_FTP Server
1 out of 5
Globalscape EFT Logo
WS_FTP Server
1 out of 5
WS_FTP Server appeals to enterprises with its secure transfer and competitive pricing for standard needs. In comparison, Globalscape EFT's advanced features and automation offer superior ROI, suiting organizations with complex requirements, despite higher costs.
WS_FTP Server's setup cost is lower, offering budget-friendly initial investment, while Globalscape EFT presents higher upfront costs, potentially reflecting advanced features or enhanced security measures, thus catering to different priorities in terms of setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
WS_FTP Server's setup cost is lower, offering budget-friendly initial investment, while Globalscape EFT presents higher upfront costs, potentially reflecting advanced features or enhanced security measures, thus catering to different priorities in terms of setup expenses.

Related categories

Managed File Transfer (MFT)
Process Automation
Workload Automation