Top 10 Google Cloud Bigtable Alternatives

4.4 out of 5

6 reviews
100% willing to recommend

Top Google Cloud Bigtable Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Google Cloud Bigtable based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include MongoDB, Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB, and Amazon DynamoDB. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Google Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Google, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

MongoDB

4.1 out of 5

MongoDB

4.1 out of 5

MongoDB attracts tech buyers with cost efficiency and ease of deployment for small to medium datasets. In comparison, Google Cloud Bigtable appeals for large-scale operations, providing high throughput and low-latency, ideal for enterprises requiring extensive integration and scalability in analytics workloads.

Download Google Cloud Bigtable vs. MongoDB Report

Pricing

MongoDB offers flexible setup costs, while Google Cloud Bigtable typically involves higher initial expenses, highlighting significant differences in initial investment requirements between the two.

View comparison

Pricing

MongoDB offers flexible setup costs, while Google Cloud Bigtable typically involves higher initial expenses, highlighting significant differences in initial investment requirements between the two.

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB

4.1 out of 5

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB

4.1 out of 5

Google Cloud Bigtable is valued for seamless integration within Google services, excelling in high-volume, low-latency workloads. In comparison, Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB offers flexible global distribution and multi-model support, attracting those needing versatile data solutions despite higher costs.

Download Google Cloud Bigtable vs. Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB Report

Pricing

Google Cloud Bigtable setup costs are minimal, making it budget-friendly, while Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB requires a higher initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Google Cloud Bigtable setup costs are minimal, making it budget-friendly, while Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB requires a higher initial investment.

Amazon DynamoDB

4.1 out of 5

Amazon DynamoDB

4.1 out of 5

Google Cloud Bigtable is ideal for large-scale analytics with high scalability and quick response times. In comparison, Amazon DynamoDB offers automatic scaling and multi-region replication, providing excellent flexibility for varied workloads, appealing to tech buyers needing versatile features for diverse applications.

Download Amazon DynamoDB vs. Google Cloud Bigtable Report

Pricing

Google Cloud Bigtable has a setup cost that is consistently lower than Amazon DynamoDB, making it an appealing option for budget-conscious businesses. In contrast, Amazon DynamoDB's setup cost is higher but offers robust integration with other AWS services.

View comparison

Pricing

Amazon Timestream

4.5 out of 5

Amazon Timestream

4.5 out of 5

Google Cloud Bigtable excels in scalability and low-latency data handling for large analytics workloads. In comparison, Amazon Timestream specializes in automatic scaling for time-series data, offering seamless AWS integration and cost-effective management, ideal for IoT and application monitoring with temporal data needs.

Download Amazon Timestream vs. Google Cloud Bigtable Report

Pricing

Google Cloud Bigtable offers a moderate setup cost with straightforward implementation, whereas Amazon Timestream presents a flexible pricing model with minimal initial expenses, providing a cost-efficient solution for those prioritizing flexibility and low upfront investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Related categories

Managed NoSQL Databases

Open Source Databases

NoSQL Databases