Top 10 IBM Streams Alternatives

Vendor: IBM

4.1 out of 5

5 reviews
100% willing to recommend

340 followers

Top IBM Streams Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to IBM Streams based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Confluent, Azure Stream Analytics, and Amazon Kinesis. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

IBM Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with IBM, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Confluent

4.1 out of 5

Confluent

4.1 out of 5

Confluent offers advantages in integration and scalability at a competitive price, appealing to budget-conscious businesses. In comparison, IBM Streams, with its richer analytics and processing capabilities, is suitable for enterprises investing in comprehensive real-time insights despite its higher upfront costs and complex deployment.

Download Confluent vs. IBM Streams Report

Pricing

Confluent offers competitive setup costs, focusing on scalability and integration, whereas IBM Streams positions itself with a comprehensive setup approach, emphasizing analytics and real-time data processing.

View comparison

Pricing

Azure Stream Analytics

4.0 out of 5

Azure Stream Analytics

4.0 out of 5

Azure Stream Analytics offers cost-effective solutions with strong Azure integration, ideal for quick setups. In comparison, IBM Streams provides advanced analytical tools and customization, making it suitable for those who prioritize extensive capabilities over cost in complex environments.

Download Azure Stream Analytics vs. IBM Streams Report

Pricing

Azure Stream Analytics offers a lower setup cost, appealing to budget-conscious users, while IBM Streams tends to have a higher initial cost, providing more extensive features for enterprises seeking robust solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Amazon Kinesis

4.0 out of 5

Amazon Kinesis

4.0 out of 5

IBM Streams offers powerful analytics and scalability for complex event processing, ideal for integration with IBM infrastructure. In comparison, Amazon Kinesis focuses on easy scalability and real-time streaming, with strong AWS integration suitable for scalable, cost-effective cloud deployments.

Download Amazon Kinesis vs. IBM Streams Report

Pricing

IBM Streams offers a complex setup process, potentially leading to higher initial costs, while Amazon Kinesis provides a more straightforward setup, resulting in lower initial expenses.

View comparison

Pricing

IBM Streams offers a complex setup process, potentially leading to higher initial costs, while Amazon Kinesis provides a more straightforward setup, resulting in lower initial expenses.

Apache Flink

3.8 out of 5

Apache Flink

3.8 out of 5

IBM Streams offers advanced analytics integration within IBM's ecosystem and reliable support. In comparison, Apache Flink provides open-source flexibility and strong distributed data processing suited for complex event handling. Flink's lower costs can appeal to those seeking faster ROI without extensive licensing.

Download Apache Flink vs. IBM Streams Report

Pricing

IBM Streams setup cost is higher with comprehensive enterprise features, while Apache Flink offers a more cost-effective setup suitable for open-source environments.

View comparison

Pricing

IBM Streams setup cost is higher with comprehensive enterprise features, while Apache Flink offers a more cost-effective setup suitable for open-source environments.

Amazon MSK

3.7 out of 5

Amazon MSK

3.7 out of 5

IBM Streams is valued for its strong analytics and complex event processing, ideal for detailed data analysis. In comparison, Amazon MSK offers Kafka integration with seamless data streaming. IBM Streams provides personalized customer service, while Amazon MSK ensures cost-efficient setup and management.

Download Amazon MSK vs. IBM Streams Report

Pricing

IBM Streams setup involves intricate configuration leading to high initial costs, while Amazon MSK offers a streamlined process with lower setup expenses, making MSK a more budget-friendly option.

View comparison

Pricing

IBM Streams setup involves intricate configuration leading to high initial costs, while Amazon MSK offers a streamlined process with lower setup expenses, making MSK a more budget-friendly option.

Google Cloud Dataflow

3.9 out of 5

Google Cloud Dataflow

3.9 out of 5

Google Cloud Dataflow offers scalability and seamless integration with Google services, making it ideal for businesses needing auto-scaling and quick deployment. In comparison, IBM Streams is preferred for its robust real-time analytics and advanced features, suiting organizations that prioritize in-depth data analysis.

Download Google Cloud Dataflow vs. IBM Streams Report

Pricing

Google Cloud Dataflow's setup cost is higher than IBM Streams, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Google Cloud Dataflow's setup cost is higher than IBM Streams, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment.

Dell Streaming Data Platform

4.0 out of 5

Dell Streaming Data Platform

4.0 out of 5

Dell EMC Streaming Data Platform, an innovative enterprise-grade software
platform, empowers organizations by harnessing their real-time and historical
data in a single, auto-scale infrastructure and programming model. Using the
Streaming Data Platform, organizations can achieve improvement towards
innovation throughout their entire ecosystem and harness the power of every
piece of their massive data set.

Pricing

The pricing is good. With PowerScale, purchasing involves upfront usable capacity, typically with a price per terabyte.

View comparison

Pricing

The pricing is good. With PowerScale, purchasing involves upfront usable capacity, typically with a price per terabyte.

Related categories

Streaming Analytics