Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
IBM XIV Logo

IBM XIV pros and cons

Vendor: IBM
3.8 out of 5
542 followers
Post review

Pros & Cons summary

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.
Get the category report

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

IBM XIV is widely regarded as the easiest storage platform to manage.
The performance and robustness of IBM XIV systems are highly praised.
The 1MB data distribution across all spindles enhances performance.
Reporting, provisioning, and remote mirroring are fast and straightforward.
NVME features, including de-duplication and compression, are particularly valuable.

CONS

Until a drive is replaced, pool resizing is locked.
XIV was not able to meet IO and latency demands for latency-sensitive applications.
Changing from synchronous mirroring to asynchronous requires reconfiguration from scratch.
Stability issues occur during enclosure or disk rebuild and power supply malfunctions.
XIV's scalability is limited in meeting larger requirements due to its modular nature.
 

IBM XIV Pros review quotes

it_user735234 - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 12, 2017
Hands down, this is the easiest storage platform on the market to manage.
it_user649086 - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 10, 2017
Very easy to produce reporting data (Snaps). Very easy and fast for provisioning devices and Remote mirroring.
it_user736191 - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 13, 2017
The performance and robustness of the systems are very good.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Dell Technologies and others in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network). Updated: February 2025.
838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.
SystemsE659e - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 25, 2017
As it spreads, a chuck of 1MB across the board means using all available spindles on the backend.
Ajith Kandaramage - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 11, 2022
IBM XIV's most valuable features are NVME, especially when it comes to de-duplication, compression, and responsiveness.
 

IBM XIV Cons review quotes

it_user735234 - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 12, 2017
I would rather have a web GUI served directly from the unit, and a CLI accessible directly through SSH.
it_user649086 - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 10, 2017
The change form synchronous mirroring to asynchronous (and vice versa) without reconfiguration from scratch would be helpful.
it_user736191 - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 13, 2017
Until the drive is replaced, the pool_resizing is locked.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Dell Technologies and others in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network). Updated: February 2025.
838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.
SystemsE659e - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 25, 2017
This product was not a good fit for our organization as we have a ton of latency sensitive applications and XIV was not able to keep up with IO + latency demand.
Ajith Kandaramage - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 11, 2022
IBM XIV's scalability is adequate for our requirements, but because it's modular, you can't scale to larger requirements.

Product Categories

Popular Comparisons

Product Categories

Popular Comparisons