Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
LizardFS Logo

Top 10 LizardFS Alternatives

Vendor: LizardFS
4.3 out of 5
858 followers
Post review

Top LizardFS Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to LizardFS based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Red Hat Ceph Storage, StarWind Virtual SAN, and Red Hat Gluster Storage. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

LizardFS Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with LizardFS, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
LizardFS Logo
LizardFS Logo
Red Hat Ceph Storage
4.1 out of 5
Red Hat Ceph Storage offers scalability and integration with cloud platforms, which appeals to enterprises needing robust support and security features. In comparison, LizardFS excels in simplicity and rapid deployment, ideal for organizations seeking a straightforward storage solution with easy data recovery.
Download LizardFS vs. Red Hat Ceph Storage Report
Red Hat Ceph Storage typically involves higher setup costs, focusing on enterprise solutions, while LizardFS offers more budget-friendly pricing, appealing to organizations with limited resources. These differences reflect distinct approaches to cost and scalability.
View comparison
Pricing
Red Hat Ceph Storage typically involves higher setup costs, focusing on enterprise solutions, while LizardFS offers more budget-friendly pricing, appealing to organizations with limited resources. These differences reflect distinct approaches to cost and scalability.
LizardFS Logo
LizardFS Logo
StarWind Virtual SAN
4.8 out of 5
LizardFS's open-source flexibility and distributed architecture suit enterprises seeking cost-efficiency and scalability. In comparison, StarWind Virtual SAN's robust features and high performance attract businesses needing seamless integration with Windows-based infrastructures, prioritizing quick deployment and strong customer service for mission-critical applications.
Download LizardFS vs. StarWind Virtual SAN Report
LizardFS offers cost-effective setup, while StarWind Virtual SAN provides a comprehensive solution with potentially higher initial investment. LizardFS's pricing structure is suitable for budget-conscious users, contrasting with StarWind's robust enterprise features justifying their set...
View comparison
Pricing
LizardFS offers cost-effective setup, while StarWind Virtual SAN provides a comprehensive solution with potentially higher initial investment. LizardFS's pricing structure is suitable for budget-conscious users, contrasting with StarWind's robust enterprise features justifying their set...
LizardFS Logo
LizardFS Logo
Red Hat Gluster Storage
4.1 out of 5
LizardFS offers ease of use and cost-effectiveness, ideal for flexible, budget-conscious organizations. In comparison, Red Hat Gluster Storage provides advanced features, high availability, and performance, making it suitable for enterprises needing comprehensive solutions despite higher initial costs.
Download LizardFS vs. Red Hat Gluster Storage Report
LizardFS offers lower setup costs, making it more budget-friendly, while Red Hat Gluster Storage may involve higher initial expenses due to its advanced features.
View comparison
Pricing
LizardFS offers lower setup costs, making it more budget-friendly, while Red Hat Gluster Storage may involve higher initial expenses due to its advanced features.
LizardFS Logo
LINBIT SDS
1 out of 5
LizardFS Logo
LINBIT SDS
1 out of 5

LINBIT keeps Linux systems up and running. As the developers of DRBD® software (www.linbit.com), LINBIT has led the way in high availability since 2001. DRBD has been included in the Linux kernel since version 2.6.33 (2009), has been deployed on all major Linux distributions and is fully compatible with systems, applications, devices and services.

View comparison

Related categories

Software Defined Storage (SDS)
File and Object Storage
HCI