Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
COO at Floating-Dot Technology LTD
Real User
Free software to prevent malware and viruses that is bundled with the operating system
Pros and Cons
  • "It's free. There is no additional cost. It's part of Windows."
  • "Microsoft Windows Defender doesn't have a game mode."

What is our primary use case?

Our primary use case for Windows Defender is to prevent malware and viruses. Security is the main purpose that it is used for by our organization.

How has it helped my organization?

We are no longer buying a separate antivirus with Windows 10 Server Enterprise. We are no longer buying antivirus solutions where there is no compatibility with Windows 10.

What is most valuable?

The malware features are most valuable for us because if you have an application that attacks, it is defended. It gives you a prompt and doesn't allow you to launch that app. 

If there's an application that has suspicious malware you downloaded from the internet, it gives you a prompt to prevent the application from launching.

Microsoft Windows Defender moves it to the recycle bin automatically.

What needs improvement?

Microsoft Windows Defender doesn't have a game mode. Other antivirus software (like BitDefender) have something known as a game mode. 

If you want to play a game, just enable the game mode to allow certain traffic without needing to configure it. Windows Defender doesn't have that.

There's no Windows Server edition for Windows Defender as part of the distribution.

Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
December 2024
Learn what your peers think about Microsoft Defender for Endpoint. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2024.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

For how long have I used the solution?

Personally it has been about a year and a half, but in the office are we using it seven months.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

In my experience, Microsoft Windows Defender has never caused any issues in operation. It is very stable. It doesn't affect the system.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Since it's a Microsoft product, scalability is top-notch. This shouldn't be an issue.

How are customer service and support?

I have never had a problem with technical support. I didn't use it. I have never had any performance issues with it.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We used Bitdefender, McAfee, and Norton antivirus software previously. Those are the main experiences that we have. We used all of those at various times.

How was the initial setup?

Microsoft Windows Defender installs automatically. There's no setup procedure. When you install Windows Suite or Enterprise on your machine, it installs quickly. 

There's nothing that might disturb it being activated. It installs with the operating system.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

It's free because it comes with Windows. It's a free solution. We're not paying any license.

That's why it's better than Bitdefender, McAfee, or Norton. It's free.

What other advice do I have?

For Windows Defender, there's no server edition for it. It's free. There is no additional cost. It's part of Windows, i.e. if you have issues with compatibility using other products. 

If you paid for Windows, it already comes with Windows Pro and Windows Enterprise automatically. It's better to go with it than pay the additional expense of deploying other solutions.

On a scale from 1 to 10, I would rate this product a nine. It doesn't have all the features that it needs to be perfect.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
reviewer1600098 - PeerSpot reviewer
Chief Technology Officer at a financial services firm with 1-10 employees
Real User
Easy to use, good support, but more visibility is needed
Pros and Cons
  • "The most valuable features of Microsoft Defender for Endpoint are the ease of use and it was available within the operating system."
  • "The biggest issue I had with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint was the antivirus and ransomware. I wanted central visibility over all the machines that we operate."

What is our primary use case?

We use Microsoft Defender for Endpoint for threat protection.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable features of Microsoft Defender for Endpoint are the ease of use and it was available within the operating system.

What needs improvement?

The biggest issue I had with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint was the antivirus and ransomware. I wanted central visibility over all the machines that we operate.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have used Microsoft Defender for Endpoint within the past 12 months.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

We have approximately 10 to 15 people using the solution in my organization.

How are customer service and support?

The technical support from Microsoft is good.

How was the initial setup?

The initial installation could have been easier.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

There is an annual license required.

What other advice do I have?

I rate Microsoft Defender for Endpoint a seven out of ten.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
December 2024
Learn what your peers think about Microsoft Defender for Endpoint. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2024.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Systems Administrator at The Port Authority of Jamaica
Real User
It's a cost-effective solution for Microsoft shops
Pros and Cons
  • "We are a Microsoft shop, and Defender is a Microsoft solution that provides some security at a reasonable cost."
  • "I want Microsoft Defender to have the ability to deal with some issues automatically, so I don't need to address that issue manually."

What is our primary use case?

We use Defendor for endpoint monitoring. It alerts us when a machine has issues, and we take the necessary steps to resolve them.

What is most valuable?

We are a Microsoft shop, and Defender is a Microsoft solution that provides some security at a reasonable cost.

What needs improvement?

I want Microsoft Defender to have the ability to deal with some issues automatically, so I don't need to address that issue manually.

For how long have I used the solution?

We started testing our endpoints and preparing to deploy Microsoft Defender about two months ago. 

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I would say yes, it is.

How are customer service and support?

Microsoft support is excellent.

How was the initial setup?

Deploying Microsoft Defender took some time because we had to push it through. You can install Symantec using the GUI, but we have to use the GPO to push the agent. It would be nice if Defender streamlined that.

Defender isn't 100 percent deployed yet, but it's working for some employees. When a machine comes on board, Defender will deploy an agent on that device when the script runs. A person logs on, the agent installs, and the device is onboarded.

What other advice do I have?

I rate Microsoft Defender for Endpoint eight out of 10. It's a cost-effective solution for Microsoft shops.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
IT RM at KNV
Real User
It runs in the background
Pros and Cons
  • "Defender works in the background monitoring the traffic for viruses."
  • "Defender could be more secure and stable."

What is our primary use case?

Defender is an antivirus solution deployed on all Microsoft PCs. Thousands of employees at my company use it. 

What is most valuable?

Defender works in the background monitoring the traffic for viruses.  

What needs improvement?

Defender could be more secure and stable.

For how long have I used the solution?

We've been using Microsoft Defender for a couple of years.

How was the initial setup?

Setting up Defender is straightforward. My administrator takes care of all that. 

What other advice do I have?

I rate Microsoft Defender eight out of 10. 

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
reviewer1781595 - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Operations Lead at a energy/utilities company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Real User
Basic protection, better central management needed, but simple setup
Pros and Cons
  • "The solution has good performance, I have not seen a problem."
  • "Microsoft Defender for Endpoint could provide us with a more holistic approach, such as collaboration. They can provide us with an environment from where we can manage all the endpoints from one central location, such as overall management."

What is our primary use case?

I use Microsoft Defender for Endpoint for an antivirus solution.

What needs improvement?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint could provide us with a more holistic approach, such as collaboration. They can provide us with an environment from where we can manage all the endpoints from one central location, such as overall management.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have used Microsoft Defender for Endpoint within the last 12 months.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The solution has good performance, I have not seen a problem.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I have used ClowdStrike previously.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is easy.

What about the implementation team?

I did the implementation of Microsoft Defender for Endpoint.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The price of Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is reasonable. Other solutions are more expensive, such as ClowdStrike.

What other advice do I have?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint only provides a basic level of security. I don't find it overly useful or appealing. I can trade it with another endpoint security solution. It's an addition to other endpoint security solutions.

I rate Microsoft Defender for Endpoint a five out of ten.

Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: partner
PeerSpot user
Admin at IEC (Electoral Commission of South Africa)
Real User
It has all the basic features you need, but the support could be more knowledgeable
Pros and Cons
  • "Defender should be fine for home use. It has all the basic functionality you need. I can't speak to how well it works as an enterprise solution because I'm not in the space."
  • "Microsoft support could be more knowledgeable."

What is our primary use case?

I'm using Defender at home for antivirus protection.

What is most valuable?

Defender should be fine for home use. It has all the basic functionality you need. I can't speak to how well it works as an enterprise solution because I'm not in the space. 

What needs improvement?

I have limited knowledge of Defender, so I can't comment on what the product needs because I'm not a security expert. I'm not in that space to say what components are missing compared to competitors.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been using Defender for a couple of years now.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Defender is a highly stable product.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Defender is scalable.

How are customer service and support?

Microsoft support could be more knowledgeable.

How was the initial setup?

Defender is an easy product to set up, and it takes less than 3 minutes.

What other advice do I have?

I rate Defender seven out of 10. 

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
RaynielBadiola - PeerSpot reviewer
Technical Manager at Secur Links
Real User
Reliable, good performance, and scalable
Pros and Cons
  • "The performance of Microsoft Defender for Endpoint has been a valuable feature."
  • "Microsoft Defender for Endpoint could improve by adding more security features."

What is our primary use case?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is used for system security.

What is most valuable?

The performance of Microsoft Defender for Endpoint has been a valuable feature.

What needs improvement?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint could improve by adding more security features.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Microsoft Defender for Endpoint for approximately five years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The stability of Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is good.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is scalable.

We have approximately 30 people using the solution in my organization.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We have used eScan Endpoint Security.

How was the initial setup?

The initial installation of Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is straightforward. After the operating system was installed the solution only took a few minutes to install.

What about the implementation team?

We did the implementation ourselves.

We have a local team of ten engineers that provide support to the solution.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The solution is included with Microsoft Windows.

What other advice do I have?

If anyone is looking for an antivirus instantly, they can enable Microsoft Defender for Endpoint on their Windows operating system. If they are still thinking of buying endpoint security in the future. They can use the Microsoft Defender for Endpoint in the meantime.

I rate Microsoft Defender for Endpoint a nine out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
reviewer1642203 - PeerSpot reviewer
Cyber Security Engineer at a manufacturing company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Real User
Not a secure product but it comes included with the Windows licensing fee
Pros and Cons
  • "It comes included with the Windows license."
  • "This solution is not secure, which is why I have moved to Linux."

What is our primary use case?

We use this solution to protect and blocks any threats. We use it for protection.

What needs improvement?

This solution is not secure, which is why I have moved to Linux.

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint could be more secure.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Microsoft Defender for Endpoint for two years.

How are customer service and technical support?

I have not yet used technical support.

How was the initial setup?

It comes preinstalled with the OS. There is no need for any deployment. There is no installation or any other steps needed.

The installation of the host OS was easy.

What about the implementation team?

I installed the OS myself.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

There is no licensing fee. It comes included with the Windows license.

What other advice do I have?

I don't recommend this solution.

I would rate Microsoft Defender for Endpoint a five out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
Updated: December 2024
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.