Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) Logo

Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) pros and cons

Vendor: Nutanix
4.4 out of 5
Badge Leader
205 followers
Post review

Pros & Cons summary

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.
Get the report

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

Full features of Nutanix on-premises applications are available in the cloud.
Scalability aspects are strong, supporting business-critical workloads effectively.
Disaster recovery capabilities are significantly enhanced, providing recovery in a matter of hours.
Redundancy at all levels ensures high resilience and uptime.
Quick configuration and installation streamline operations.

CONS

Customers don't know enough about Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2), leading to low adoption rates.
Pricing can be better.
Technical support for Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) could be improved.
Documentation around Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) could be improved.
Customers often need to open support tickets about bugs when upgrading, such as issues with static IPs switching to DHCP in Azure.
 

Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) Pros review quotes

MZ
May 21, 2024
We spent a year on this ASR project and had so many issues when we attempted to do a failover. It took four to 24 hours to failover a couple of SQL VMs. During our first test deployment of NC2, it only took three or four minutes to failover and recover our VMs. This blew the Microsoft platform out of the water.
NM
May 24, 2023
In terms of dealing with our business-critical workloads, Nutanix is a highly scalable, highly resilient, and very high-performing solution.
LB
May 21, 2024
We can do anything throughout the infrastructure from one console. This is the best for us.
Learn what your peers think about Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2). Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.
reviewer2183865 - PeerSpot reviewer
May 13, 2023
Having a single pane of glass where you can have both your on-prem and anything else that you spin up within AWS is useful.
GO
May 21, 2024
Our previous solution was inconsistent and took a long time to recover. NC2 consistently delivers full disaster recovery in a few hours. That was a huge selling point. We need to know that our business can be up and running in hours, not days. We didn't have a real disaster recovery plan before NC2. That's a goal we've been trying to achieve, and Nutanix gives us what we need to make that a reality
reviewer2183748 - PeerSpot reviewer
May 13, 2023
I've been very pleased with their support overall.
RA
May 22, 2024
There is ease of use. It is very important for our customers to have one centralized management console. Scalability is also very important for our customers.
JH
May 23, 2024
Its performance and speed are valuable. Its performance has helped me reduce costs.
Benjamin Bodenehim - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 14, 2021
The scalability is good.
SA
May 21, 2024
The most valuable feature of the solution is the redundancy on all levels.
 

Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) Cons review quotes

MZ
May 21, 2024
Our biggest complaint is that we constantly need to open support tickets about bugs when we upgrade to the latest version. For example, our static IPs failover into Azure but switch to DHCP.
NM
May 24, 2023
Perhaps the one thing that could be improved is the documentation around the solution.
LB
May 21, 2024
I don't have the expertise to build a hybrid cloud. We are starting to build one and haven't tried that part yet. I want to try because that is the most critical part for us. I want to see what, if anything, could be improved. The product is fantastic locally. Now, I want to try it in the cloud. My problem is not in the infrastructure; it is in the application, a different thing.
Learn what your peers think about Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2). Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.
reviewer2183865 - PeerSpot reviewer
May 13, 2023
We've had some challenges with the implementation.
GO
May 21, 2024
In the current version, we've noticed many false positives when we check the alerts in the morning. For example, it told us that services stopped working, but there was nothing wrong when we checked it out. We've already raised the issue with support. They told us it's a bug in the version we use. We're about to upgrade to the recommended version, so it should be fine.
reviewer2183748 - PeerSpot reviewer
May 13, 2023
I'd like more flexible options to get in and out of migration modes.
RA
May 22, 2024
The interface organization can be better. If we can, for example, organize virtual machines by groups, folders, and sub-folders, it will be easier to administer and monitor.
JH
May 23, 2024
It should not be so expensive. Its price is high, but at the same time, it does give the results it offers.
Benjamin Bodenehim - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 14, 2021
The pricing can be better.
SA
May 21, 2024
The most significant improvement would be to streamline the starting point so that we could kick off the deployment with one node and then scan out that deployment without a need to restructure or reformat anything.