We are a cloud provider and we are giving cloud services via Nutanix Acropolis AOS, such as core virtual services. This is why we implemented Nutanix Acropolis AOS into our data center.
Enterprise Solutions Executive (AWS Certified Solutions Architect) at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Simple to manage, excellent support, and highly reliable
Pros and Cons
- "The most valuable features of Nutanix Acropolis AOS are ease of management, hyper-convergence platform, and it has robust operations."
- "There are other services that Nutanix has that could be improved, but I'm not very familiar with the other services of Nutanix, such as Era and Flow. However, they seem a bit hard for us to implement and integrate with the Nutanix Acropolis AOS and other Nutanix tools. We would not dare to implement those other Nutanix solutions into Nutanix Acropolis AOS right now. The implementation of that tool could be the problem, I am a bit hesitant to implement the other tools into Nutanix Acropolis AOS."
What is our primary use case?
How has it helped my organization?
Nutanix Acropolis AOS has improved our organization because of the ease of management. We don't have to deal with any other solutions besides Nutanix Acropolis AOS. If it was a three-tiered architecture, we would have to struggle with the HBA cards from the upgrade, storage area, networks, switches, and other hardware. We only need to deal with the physical servers and the Nutanix on top of it. This is why it's very easy to manage, and that is saving us a lot of time for our technical operations.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable features of Nutanix Acropolis AOS are ease of management, hyper-convergence platform, and it has robust operations.
What needs improvement?
There are other services that Nutanix has that could be improved, but I'm not very familiar with the other services of Nutanix, such as Era and Flow. However, they seem a bit hard for us to implement and integrate with the Nutanix Acropolis AOS and other Nutanix tools. We would not dare to implement those other Nutanix solutions into Nutanix Acropolis AOS right now. The implementation of that tool could be the problem, I am a bit hesitant to implement the other tools into Nutanix Acropolis AOS.
Nutanix could integrate all of its solutions into one package to allow one implementation, such as Nutanix Acropolis AOS and the other related ecosystem solutions. You should be able to integrate them all in one step. The current method is to first install Nutanix Acropolis AOS then you need to install Prism, Era, and Flow. I would like to see a setup that implements all of those Nutanix tools at once.
Buyer's Guide
Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI)
December 2024
Learn what your peers think about Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI). Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2024.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Nutanix Acropolis AOS for approximately three years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The stability of Nutanix Acropolis AOS is very high. We have only had one or two problems in our cluster over the past two years. The problems that we did have were solved very quickly by Nutanix and by our technical service engineers together. I would say that it's robust and problem-free.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
In our cluster, we have more than 50 servers and as the cluster gets larger, there are some stability issues sometimes, but they are not critical. They can improve on the scalability because when one or two servers are down in our cluster, Nutanix Acropolis AOS struggles to balance the load to the other server clusters and it can take some time. In the time it is attempting to balance the clusters some of our customers are affected by the delay problem. It is not critical, but it could be made better to avoid this in the future.
We have approximately 16 people that are using this solution in my company on a daily basis.
How are customer service and support?
The technical support is very good, they solved some problems we had and they worked with our team well.
The team from Nutanix focuses on the problem and they don't let us go before the problem has been solved. They are very interested in problematic cases and their resolutions.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I have used VMware and Hyper-V. We have different customers using these other solutions.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup of Nutanix Acropolis AOS is straightforward. The whole process took no more than one day.
We have added a couple of servers each month onto our platform and it's very straightforward.
What about the implementation team?
We have a department in my company that handles the implementation and maintenance of Nutanix Acropolis AOS. We have 15 technicians but we only have two that handle this solution.
What was our ROI?
We have seen a return on investment because it's a robust platform. We do not have to deal with Nutanix Acropolis AOS related problems every day or from time to time. It gives a return on investment within a year or two.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
When we purchase a new physical server or a couple of physical servers into our cluster, we always purchase it with Nutanix licensing. We are receiving the license from Nutanix directly and not from the vendor. In the way we're dealing, with the licenses it is a bit costly for us but as the company is getting larger, day by day or year by year, those licensing costs become lower each time for us. We are purchasing the licenses for three years for some of our clusters and for some others for five-year licenses and the licenses are still costly. We have good discounts for the licenses, but it is still expensive.
What other advice do I have?
My advice to those wanting to implement Nutanix Acropolis AOS is to know the solution well before they do the implementation. They will have to receive some training about Nutanix Acropolis AOS. It's not easy to implement, but once you get used to it, it is very easy to do the implementation in the later phases. I would recommend people to get the training it is important.
I rate Nutanix Acropolis AOS an eight out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
Director of Information Technology at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Stable with streamlined management and an impressive migration tool
Pros and Cons
- "The initial setup was quite straightforward."
- "We did have some integration issues."
What is our primary use case?
We migrated over our AD finance applications, HR applications, DFS, et cetera. We used the product for a whole lot of different purposes.
What is most valuable?
One of the nicest features was the migration tool. Being able to take any application and migrate it over even while it was in use, and then cut it over without any downtime was very helpful.
Everything ran pretty smoothly, from what I recall.
The initial setup was quite straightforward.
The solution was very stable.
I found the pricing to be very reasonable.
What needs improvement?
I'd always like to see a bit of a drop in pricing. Everyone would.
I only worked with the product for roughly a year, and it worked well. I don't have any thoughts on improvements at the moment.
We did have some integration issues. We did have a problem with a Veeam integration. We ended up using Wasabi instead.
For how long have I used the solution?
I used the solution at my previous job, less than a year ago. I only worked with it for about a year.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
We found the stability to be quite good. Any performance issues were tied to our network and bandwidth, however, we resolved all of that. It was never an issue with the product itself.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We never hit the edge of the scalability potential. My understanding is that the product is plug-and-play. We could add more modules if we needed to. The expansion was never an issue.
We had around 200 users at our organization using the product.
How are customer service and support?
We did use technical support when we needed help with a couple of questions regarding our forest environment. We were a little outdated in some areas. They were a very useful resource.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
They had used VMware and it became outdated and we couldn't get it to the latest version. The pricing was also a little high, which was why they wanted to switch.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was not overly complex or difficult. It was a straightforward process and easy to manage.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The pricing is very reasonable. In contrast, VMware's Smartnet contract is rather expensive.
What other advice do I have?
I was just a customer and an end-user. I used it at my previous organization.
We were using the latest version of the solution at the time, however, I am unsure of the exact version number. It was a brand new install. The included new servers and a new environment. Everything was new.
I'd rate the product at an eight out of ten.
I would recommend the solution to others. It worked well. Installation was quick or very helpful. Management was pretty streamlined. And most importantly, that migration tool was very impressive.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Buyer's Guide
Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI)
December 2024
Learn what your peers think about Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI). Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2024.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Managing Consultant with 51-200 employees
Nutanix vs. VMware EVO:RAIL vs. FlexPod
Originally posted at www.storagegaga.com/dont-get-too-drunk-on-hyper-converged/
I hate the fact that I am bursting the big bubble brewing about Hyper Convergence (HC). I urge all to look past the hot air and hype frenzy that are going on, because in the end, the HC platforms have to be aligned and congruent to the organization’s data architecture and business plans.
The announcement of Gartner’s latest Magic Quadrant on Integrated Systems (read hyper convergence) has put Nutanix as the leader of the pack as of August 2015. Clearly, many of us get caught up because it is the “greatest feeling in the world”. However, this faux feeling is not reality because there are many factors that made the pack leaders in the Magic Quadrant (MQ).
First of all, the MQ is about market perception. There is no doubt that the pack leaders in the Leaders Quadrant have earned their right to be there. Each company’s revenue, market share, gross margin, company’s profitability have helped put each as leaders in the pack. However, it is also measured by branding, marketing, market perception and acceptance and other intangible factors.
Secondly, VMware EVO: Rail has split the market when EMC has 3 HC solutions in VCE, ScaleIO and EVO: Rail. Cisco wanted to do their own HC piece in Whiptail (between the 2014 MQ and 2015 MQ reports), and closed down Whiptail when their new CEO came on board. NetApp chose EVO: Rail and also has the ever popular FlexPod. That is why you see that in this latest MQ report, NetApp and Cisco are interpreted independently whereas in last year’s report, it was Cisco/NetApp. Market forces changed, and perception changed.
The most glaring gap of the Gartner MQ is, it does not measure how good each technology is against the competitors, and therefore, boxes like Nutanix and Simplivity, and also the motley crew of so-called EVO:Rail partners, are simply betting on how good they pitch to get into the MQ Leaders Quadrant as part of their agenda.
It is not common that a vendor would do a bake-off against a competitor because one might fall flat on his/her face if they lose the bake-off. Recently we witnessed the big shouting match between Nutanix and VMware, each trying to out-boast the other with claims and counter claims of how good their performance was. Here is VMware’s Chuck Hollis’ piece and here is Nutanix’s piece (part 4 anyway). It was hounding the blogosphere with so much *bleep* that it felt like a game of Kabaddi. (Look up the game of Kabaddi).
The dare, double-dare and triple-dare went on for a few weeks between VMware and Nutanix until Storage Review, an online “independent” storage articles and news aggregator, probably got sick of this undignified spat. Storage Review ran the Nutanix’s tests (and blogged about it) and came up with some unexpected results. Nutanix got disillusioned and started to dictate what should be in the performance tests and went through some “innocent” and “hilarious” acts to justify the results. You can read about them here. Page 2 of that article started the “We ask you not to …” comments to Storage Review, which I thought was really funny.
That’s just it. The Hyper Converged vendors spend a lot of the resource and marketing on hypping up performance, and little of everything else. It is true that storage performance is needed for 25-30% of the active data. However, in any organization, we know very well that 70-75% of the data in the entire data lifecycle is non-active, Tier-3 or archived data. Hyper Converged systems and platforms ignore this passive data space. They do not play with inactive data landscape because the $/GB or $/TB is too expensive.
Furthermore, if we look at the entire HC thingy more close, it is just Software-Defined because it is just a wonderful piece of proprietary software running on an ODM (original design manufacturer) x86 platform. EMC VSPEX is rumoured to be running on the Quanta systems and Nutanix on Supermicro. Why do we need to pay a premium price for a piece of whitebox hardware?
We must overcome the hype and read beyond the messages that vendors, partners who tend to oversell their technology. We must look at what is required in our business, in our operations and look at our data requirements. I constantly share that we must look at our data landscape and use the 7 points that I always use to consider a technology – Availability, Performance, Protection, Accessibility, Management, Security and Compliance. Is the HC technology and the solution relevant to your organization’s business?
So, if you want to Hyper Converged, please Hyper Converge responsibly. Your data landscape architecture will thank you for it.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Solution Consultant at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
It controls data sets and metadata well with local read/write access and real-time distribution to other hosts, but it slows down in systems with large block sizes in random write.
What is most valuable?
- Shadow clone
- Deduplication fingerprint on ingest
How has it helped my organization?
The beauty of this product is that it is very intelligent in controlling the data set and metadata. It fully utilizes the memory, hard disk, and CPU, and leverage big data components such as a Cassandra database as a metadata database to hold each of the nodes for a redundancy issue if there's a node or disk failure.
Each of the applications can perform data access in read and write locally, and also distribute a second copy of data to other hosts in real time, which ensures data will not be lost if there is a hard disk failure, and this avoids storage I/O bottleneck issues.
What needs improvement?
When operating a system which has a large capacity and large block sizes in random write, the performance will slow down a little bit.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've used it for two and a half years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
No issues encountered.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
No issues encountered.
How are customer service and technical support?
Customer Service:
7/10.
Technical Support:10/10 as Nutanix support provides all our hypervisor support.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
No, because no one is similar to Nutanix in using 100% software define storage.
How was the initial setup?
It's very straightforward. It makes a complete workflow and software for operation. In fact, it's so easy it will make implementation engineers obsolete.
What about the implementation team?
I implemtented it myself.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
It's very simple and cost effective.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
- VMware vSAN
- HP CS200
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
Very cool system.
system administrator at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees
Knowledgeable support, simple deployment, and one click cluster operations
Pros and Cons
- "Nutanix Acropolis AOS is easy to use, it is a great platform."
- "In the future, I would like to see multi-tenancy in Nutanix Acropolis AOS."
What is most valuable?
Nutanix Acropolis AOS is easy to use, it is a great platform.
What needs improvement?
In the future, I would like to see multi-tenancy in Nutanix Acropolis AOS.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have used Nutanix Acropolis AOS for approximately six years.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The scalability is very easy. You plug in another node and that's it.
How are customer service and support?
The support provided for Nutanix Acropolis AOS is very good. They know the products well, if you have any error on a cluster or any problem with workloads on Nutanix, the engineer's support is great.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was very simple. You only need to deploy the clusters and Nutanix configures all the clusters. In one day we were in production. When comparing the process to the VMware solution, it is less complex.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The solution could be a little less expensive.
If you want to run Nutanix on Windows, you have to pay for a license and if you want to have an Oracle Database, you have to pay a license for Oracle.
What other advice do I have?
With the simplicity of the deployment and the one-click operations over the cluster, Nutanix Acropolis AOS is a good solution. You have to have cloud experience.
I rate Nutanix Acropolis AOS a ten out of ten.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Global Manager at a mining and metals company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Flexible, stable, and simple installation
Pros and Cons
- "Nutanix Acropolis AOS is flexible and has helped people to work from home during the pandemic."
- "The productivity and work efficiency of Nutanix Acropolis AOS could improve."
What is most valuable?
Nutanix Acropolis AOS is flexible and has helped people to work from home during the pandemic.
What needs improvement?
The productivity and work efficiency of Nutanix Acropolis AOS could improve.
In the future, the solution could improve by having more cloud features.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Nutanix Acropolis AOS for two and a half years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Nutanix Acropolis AOS has been stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I have found Nutanix Acropolis AOS to be scalable.
We have approximately 400 users using this solution in my organization.
How are customer service and support?
We have never had any major critical issues, we have not had the need to use the support.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I have previously used VxRail and it is very similar to Nutanix Acropolis AOS.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was client-based and it was easy.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The cost of Nutanix Acropolis AOS is reasonable.
What other advice do I have?
By deploying this solution you will receive the best results compared to other HCI solutions.
I rate Nutanix Acropolis AOS an eight out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Consulting Solutions Architect at a tech services company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Easy to use and manage from a single pane of glass, but they need to focus more on integration
Pros and Cons
- "It has a single pane of glass and you don't have to jump around various toolsets."
- "This product would be improved if it included a hybrid cloud solution."
What is our primary use case?
Our primary use case is for VDI.
What is most valuable?
The tool for operations is pretty easy to use. It has a single pane of glass and you don't have to jump around various toolsets.
What needs improvement?
This product would be improved if it included a hybrid cloud solution.
Better integration with various solutions with Citrix would be helpful, as well as perhaps working with VMware on Workspace ONE.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Acropolis AOS for approximately six months.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
AOS is pretty stable and I know that they are continuing to invest, so it is improving.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
This is a scalable product.
How are customer service and technical support?
I have been in contact with technical support and they are okay. I wouldn't say anything bad.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We had another solution prior to this one, and it was a corporate, executive decision to switch.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was straightforward. The deployment took less than two weeks.
What about the implementation team?
Yes had some assistance from a consulting firm for the deployment.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
This product is less expensive than some of the competing HCI solutions.
What other advice do I have?
My advice for anybody who is looking into Nutanix Acropolis AOS is to have a look at the other solutions on the market because the suitability of one over the other might depend on your business requirements and what it is that you are trying to do.
This is a good product but in the future, I would like to see them focus on integration and simplicity because it would help to make it more user-friendly.
I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
Senior System Engineer at a comms service provider with 201-500 employees
Scalable, reliable, easy to setup, and it has wonderful support
Pros and Cons
- "What I like the most are the high-availability and scalability."
- "In the next release, I would like better and more competitive pricing."
What is our primary use case?
The primary use case is for software-defined storage, central storage, virtualization, and hyper-converged infrastructures.
Also, for an on-premises cloud experience.
What is most valuable?
What I like the most are the high-availability and scalability.
I am comfortable with all of the features.
What needs improvement?
In the next release, I would like better and more competitive pricing.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using this solution since 2016, almost four years.
We are using the latest version.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It's a stable product.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It's a scalable product.
We have many deployments; one of them has approximately 1000 employees. Some have 30 employees, and others that I have implemented have 500 users.
How are customer service and technical support?
Technical support is very cooperative, and wonderful in their support.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Previously, I did not use another similar solution.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was straightforward and it took a few hours to deploy.
What about the implementation team?
I am an integrator and completed the installation myself.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The licensing costs are a bit expensive but when you compare the features, it's reasonable.
What other advice do I have?
I would recommend this solution to others and I will continue to integrate this solution into the future.
I would rate Nutanix Acropolis AOS solution a nine out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Integrator.
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI) Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: December 2024
Product Categories
HCI Software Defined Storage (SDS) Software Defined Data Center (SDDC) Hybrid Cloud Computing PlatformsPopular Comparisons
StarWind Virtual SAN
HPE SimpliVity
Dell PowerFlex
Sangfor HCI - Hyper Converged Infrastructure
HPE Alletra dHCI
DataCore SANsymphony
HPE Hyper Converged
Dell vSAN Ready Nodes
StorMagic SvSAN
Lenovo ThinkAgile VX Series
Scale Computing Platform
Huawei FusionCube Hyper-Converged Infrastructure
StarWind HyperConverged Appliance
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI) Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- I am looking to compare Nutanix and VMware vSAN. Which one is better in terms of functionality and management?
- What unique aspects of HCI does Nutanix provide that other HCI solutions do not?
- Nutanix and vSAN: Which is best for cloud services?
- I would like to compare Nutanix and HPE SimpliVity. On what basis should I decide?
- What Is The Biggest Difference Between NetApp HCI and Nutanix?
- What Is The Biggest Difference Between Nutanix And VMware vSAN?
- What Is The Biggest Difference Between Nutanix And VxRail?
- Which is your recommended HCI solution in 2022: Nutanix Acropolis AOS, VMware vSAN or anything else?
- What is the biggest difference between Nutanix Acropolis and VMware vSphere?
- What is best for use with vSphere 7: VxRail or Nutanix nodes?
Brian - I think your analogy of buying a car is perfect..... for the average driver. I run all season tires on 2 of my 3 vehicles - they perform *adequately* in *most* conditions. However, when I want to drive in harsh conditions, or at a higher performance level, I equip my car with tires that are designed for the conditions. Thus while I happily drive in the blizzard, I pass the GLKs, the Jeeps, etc., because my winter tires are designed for the cold and the snow, while they are sitting in the ditch spinning with their OEM tires.
I'd like to thank you for pointing out that Nutanix is geared to the "get in and drive" consumer, rather than those who know and understand their processing needs. For those of us who still need a higher performing system, we will continue to assess, design, and implement systems that meet and exceed those needs.