Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Nutanix Flow Network Security Logo

Top 10 Nutanix Flow Network Security Alternatives

Vendor: Nutanix
4.6 out of 5
106 followers
Post review

Top Nutanix Flow Network Security Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Nutanix Flow Network Security based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, VMware NSX, and Illumio. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Nutanix Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Nutanix, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Nutanix Flow Network Security Logo
Nutanix Flow Network Security Logo
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks
4.2 out of 5

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is a cloud security solution used for cloud security posture management, cloud workload protection, container security, and code security. It provides visibility, monitoring, and alerting for security issues in multi-cloud environments. 

Download Nutanix Flow Network Security vs. Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Report
The purchasing process was easy and quick. It is a very economical solution.
Our licensing fees are $18,000 USD per year.
View comparison
Pricing
The purchasing process was easy and quick. It is a very economical solution.
Our licensing fees are $18,000 USD per year.
Nutanix Flow Network Security Logo
VMware NSX
4.0 out of 5
Nutanix Flow Network Security Logo
VMware NSX
4.0 out of 5
VMware NSX provides advanced networking with extensive security features like microsegmentation and multi-tier segmentation across clouds. In comparison, Nutanix Flow is user-friendly with straightforward deployment, appealing to those seeking essential security features and efficient network visibility. NSX targets complex infrastructures, while Flow suits simpler environments.
Download Nutanix Flow Network Security vs. VMware NSX Report
VMware NSX has a considerable initial setup cost while Nutanix Flow Network Security offers more affordable deployment options, making Nutanix an economically attractive choice for budget-conscious companies.
View comparison
Pricing
VMware NSX has a considerable initial setup cost while Nutanix Flow Network Security offers more affordable deployment options, making Nutanix an economically attractive choice for budget-conscious companies.
Nutanix Flow Network Security Logo
Illumio
4.0 out of 5
Nutanix Flow Network Security Logo
Illumio
4.0 out of 5
Illumio offers adaptive segmentation and visibility for workload isolation, enhancing security. In comparison, Nutanix Flow Network Security integrates effectively within the Nutanix ecosystem, offering seamless micro-segmentation. A tech buyer may prioritize Illumio for visibility or choose Nutanix for integration.
Download Illumio vs. Nutanix Flow Network Security Report
Illumio involves a complex initial setup with higher costs, while Nutanix Flow Network Security offers a simpler and more cost-effective setup process.
View comparison
Pricing
Illumio involves a complex initial setup with higher costs, while Nutanix Flow Network Security offers a simpler and more cost-effective setup process.
Nutanix Flow Network Security Logo
Nutanix Flow Network Security Logo
Akamai Guardicore Segmentation
4.1 out of 5
Akamai Guardicore Segmentation excels in advanced micro-segmentation and centralized firewall management, ideal for complex infrastructures. In comparison, Nutanix Flow's simplicity and deployment ease make it best suited for virtual networking, offering strong scalability for cloud environments at a competitive price.
Download Akamai Guardicore Segmentation vs. Nutanix Flow Network Security Report
Akamai Guardicore Segmentation offers a straightforward setup process with minimal costs, while Nutanix Flow Network Security implies a more complex installation, potentially leading to higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Akamai Guardicore Segmentation offers a straightforward setup process with minimal costs, while Nutanix Flow Network Security implies a more complex installation, potentially leading to higher initial expenses.
Nutanix Flow Network Security Logo
Meraki SD-WAN
4.2 out of 5
Nutanix Flow Network Security Logo
Meraki SD-WAN
4.2 out of 5

Software-defined WAN is a new approach to network connectivity that lowers operational costs and improves resource usage for multi-site deployments, allowing network administrators to use bandwidth more efficiently and ensure the highest possible level of performance for critical applications without sacrificing security or data privacy. For more information on deploying and configuring SD-WAN on the Meraki MX Security Appliance, see the Meraki SD-WAN Deployment Guide.

The licensing fees are approximately $1,000 USD annually.
The pricing is fair, but if they can make it less it would be even more attractive.
View comparison
Pricing
The licensing fees are approximately $1,000 USD annually.
The pricing is fair, but if they can make it less it would be even more attractive.
Nutanix Flow Network Security Logo
Nutanix Flow Network Security Logo
Cisco Secure Workload
4.3 out of 5
Cisco Secure Workload's strong security policies and micro-segmentation appeal to enterprises focused on compliance and analytics. In comparison, Nutanix Flow Network Security's seamless integration and enhanced traffic control attract Nutanix platform users seeking efficient network visualization and simple deployment.
Download Cisco Secure Workload vs. Nutanix Flow Network Security Report
Cisco Secure Workload has a straightforward setup cost structure, whereas Nutanix Flow Network Security tends to have a more complicated setup cost. Cisco's simplicity contrasts with Nutanix's complexity, highlighting a key difference in their implementation processes.
View comparison
Pricing
Cisco Secure Workload has a straightforward setup cost structure, whereas Nutanix Flow Network Security tends to have a more complicated setup cost. Cisco's simplicity contrasts with Nutanix's complexity, highlighting a key difference in their implementation processes.

Related categories

Microsegmentation Software
Web Application Firewall (WAF)
Container Security