Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
OpenText Application Quality Management Logo

OpenText Application Quality Management Reviews

Vendor: OpenText
4.0 out of 5
Badge Ranked 1
Leave a review

What is OpenText Application Quality Management?

OpenText Application Quality Management offers centralized data management, traceability, and integration capabilities. It aids in handling requirements, test planning, and defect tracking while supporting both manual and automated testing. Challenges exist in deployment and browser compatibility.

Get the OpenText Application Quality Management Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Application Quality Management, Microsoft Azure DevOps, Jira and more!
OpenText Application Quality Management is the #1 ranked solution in top Quality Management Software, #1 ranked solution in top Quality Management Tools, and #4 ranked solution in top Application Lifecycle Management Suites. PeerSpot users give OpenText Application Quality Management an average rating of 8.0 out of 10. OpenText Application Quality Management is most commonly compared to Microsoft Azure DevOps: OpenText Application Quality Management vs Microsoft Azure DevOps. OpenText Application Quality Management is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 57% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a manufacturing company, accounting for 16% of all views.
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Application Quality Management
January 2026
Get the report
Helped 881,036 peers since 2012

Featured OpenText Application Quality Management reviews

Read more reviews

OpenText Application Quality Management mindshare

Product category:
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM...
As of January 2026, the mindshare of OpenText Application Quality Management in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category stands at 4.6%, down from 5.6% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
OpenText Application Quality Management4.6%
Jira13.3%
Microsoft Azure DevOps10.3%
Other71.8%
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

PeerResearch reports based on OpenText Application Quality Management reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryApplication Lifecycle Management (ALM) SuitesJan 25, 2026Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersJan 25, 2026Download
ComparisonOpenText Application Quality Management vs JiraJan 25, 2026Download
ComparisonOpenText Application Quality Management vs Microsoft Azure DevOpsJan 25, 2026Download
ComparisonOpenText Application Quality Management vs Nutanix Cloud Manager (NCM)Jan 25, 2026Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Microsoft Azure DevOps4.110.3%95%137 interviewsAdd to research
Jira4.113.3%91%277 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers
Last updated Jan 25, 2026

Valuable Features

OpenText Application Quality Management is valued for end-to-end traceability, robust customization, scalability, and integration with various tools. It offers flexible licensing, integrates with automation and defect tracking tools, and manages requirements and test artifacts centrally. The intuitive interface supports comprehensive test management, defect tracking, and customizable reporting, while aiding larger organizations with efficient project management through dashboards and APIs. Automation capabilities and manual testing integration enhance overall functionality.
  • "Test management helps to streamline the quality assurance process through the process I put in place on how to use the tool."
  • "From my service provider perspective, the best features of the product are real-time tracking and reporting capabilities, which help with project management by enabling real-time tracking and reporting."
  • "I would rate the product a seven out of ten."

Room for Improvement

Reporting features are lacking in flexibility and are often considered inadequate, with many requiring manual workarounds. The interface is dated and not intuitive, making navigation cumbersome for users. License costs are high, and the system does not support modern browser compatibility, limiting accessibility. Integration with Agile processes and other tools is insufficient, hindering efficient workflows. Enhancements are needed in performance and usability, particularly in handling large volumes of test cases and supporting a broader range of methodologies.
  • "The reporting is still awful. We normally do a lot of manual reporting."
  • "As for the scalability of OpenText ALM _ Quality Center, there are limitations, particularly in agile methodologies, which is currently my main concern."
  • "The initial setup was not straightforward."

ROI

OpenText Application Quality Management streamlines performance testing, improves project visibility, and enhances collaboration. Users report significant time savings and better project tracking, although specific ROI figures are often not calculated. Cost savings, reduced defects, and increased testing efficiency are commonly noted. Effectiveness varies with company size and application, with some emphasizing its value in large projects. While monetary ROI is hard to quantify, the benefits in terms of time and resource management are frequently acknowledged.

Pricing

Enterprise users report OpenText Application Quality Management as costly, with licensing expenses impacting ROI. Pricing is considered high compared to competitors, leading some businesses to explore alternatives like open source or lower-cost tools. While flexible licensing options exist, such as concurrent licensing, negotiation is often necessary to optimize cost. For larger organizations, the comprehensive feature set may justify the investment. However, smaller enterprises might find the expense prohibitive, especially with the availability of competitive market solutions.
  • "We pay around $30,000 for thirty users, translating to approximately $6,000 to $10,000 per user, which is high."
  • "It is an expensive tool. I think one needs to pay 10,000 USD towards the perpetual licensing model."
  • "The pricing is expensive nowadays."

Popular Use Cases

OpenText Application Quality Management is used for test management, including creating, storing, and executing test cases, both manual and automated. Users track defects, manage requirements, and leverage centralized reporting for analytics and metrics. It supports regression and performance testing, integrates with tools like JIRA and ALM Octane, and allows for reusability of test cases. Many organizations in diverse sectors use it for integration and verification of complex systems, involving real and simulated scenarios.

Service and Support

OpenText Application Quality Management exhibits varied service and support experiences. Users describe customer service as responsive, good, or excellent, with some noting slower response times. Technical assistance ranges from excellent and prompt to requiring persistent follow-ups. Customer feedback mentions knowledgeable staff, but variability in first-line response proficiency. Many value higher-tier engagement for effective issue resolution. Some note improved satisfaction over past experiences, while others express dissatisfaction and highlight the need for more qualified personnel.

Deployment

Many users found OpenText Application Quality Management's initial setup straightforward and simple. However, some experienced complexities due to hardware requirements and network security. Experienced teams found it easier, while those lacking prior experience faced challenges. Customization for regulated environments could complicate the process, as could upgrades and migrations. Assistance from support or vendor partners often helped simplify the process. Users with enterprise software deployment experience typically found installation manageable.

Scalability

OpenText Application Quality Management demonstrates strong scalability across diverse organizational needs. Users report it efficiently supports thousands of clients and projects, handling various numbers without significant performance issues. While some note occasional performance slowdowns and licensing complexities, many appreciate its ability to expand usage and customize configurations. Challenges arise in agile contexts and large-scale implementations, but users find it adaptable and resource-efficient.

Stability

OpenText Application Quality Management exhibits strong stability, with many users noting consistent reliability and minimal downtime. Few issues are related primarily to infrastructure, network, or specific advanced configurations. Occasional performance dips are tied to user load, version upgrades, or environmental setups. Some users report rare crashes or memory-related issues, often resolved through patches or hardware adjustments. Stability has improved significantly over time, with modern versions maintaining high performance levels and user satisfaction.
These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.
Download our OpenText Application Quality Management Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business29
Midsize Enterprise28
Large Enterprise111
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business290
Midsize Enterprise86
Large Enterprise500
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Performing Arts
9%
Government
6%
Computer Software Company
6%
Healthcare Company
6%
Educational Organization
5%
Insurance Company
3%
Media Company
3%
Real Estate/Law Firm
3%
University
3%
Energy/Utilities Company
3%
Retailer
2%
Transportation Company
2%
Outsourcing Company
2%
Comms Service Provider
2%
Wholesaler/Distributor
2%
Consumer Goods Company
2%
Construction Company
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Marketing Services Firm
1%
Leisure / Travel Company
1%
Non Profit
1%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
Legal Firm
1%
Museum Or Institution
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Hospitality Company
1%

Compare OpenText Application Quality Management with alternative products

Go!

Learn more about OpenText Application Quality Management

Known for its robust reporting and flexibility, OpenText Application Quality Management is tailored for large organizations requiring a comprehensive solution supporting lifecycle coverage and seamless tool integration. Users can consolidate testing processes, manage requirements, and centralize reporting across manual and automated testing. While some face issues with project tracking, outdated interfaces, and limited browser compatibility beyond Internet Explorer, it remains widely used for regression and performance testing. Integration with tools like JIRA and support for tools such as UFT and ALM PC underscore its utility.

What are the key features of OpenText Application Quality Management?
  • Centralized Data Management: Consolidates and organizes testing data efficiently.
  • Traceability: Ensures traceability across all stages of the testing lifecycle.
  • Integration Capabilities: Connects seamlessly with automation and other essential tools.
  • Test Planning and Execution: Supports both manual and automated tests in a streamlined manner.
  • Advanced Reporting: Provides robust options to generate insightful test reports.
  • Customization: Offers tailored solutions to fit specific organizational needs.
What benefits should users look for in reviews?
  • Efficiency: Increases test management efficiency across projects.
  • Scalability: Adapts to the varying scope of large-scale projects.
  • Lifecycle Coverage: Comprehensive management from requirement to defect tracking.
  • User-Friendly Interface: Designed for ease of use despite needing updates.
  • Cost-Effectiveness: Balances high initial costs with long-term savings through efficient testing management.

In industries such as finance and healthcare, OpenText Application Quality Management is implemented to ensure rigorous testing standards. It supports test case creation and execution, defect tracking, and requirements management. Integration with JIRA and performance testing tools make it suitable for organizations needing synchronized testing environments.

OpenText Application Quality Management was previously known as Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, HPE ALM, Quality Center, Quality Center, Micro Focus ALM, OpenText Quality Manager.

OpenText Application Quality Management customers

Airbus Defense and Space, Vodafone, JTI, Xellia, and Banco de Creìdito e Inversiones (Bci)

Related questions

  • 156
Has anyone tried integrating HP ALM and JIRA ?
  • 7
Do you have any feedback on the HPE ALM Octane release that came out in June 2016?
  • 154
What is the biggest difference between JIRA and Micro Focus ALM?
  • 5
Has anyone tried QC - JIRA Integration using HPE ALM Synchronizer ?
  • 22
Integration between HP ALM and Confluence
  • 70
Which product do you prefer: Micro Focus ALM Octane or Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?
  • 21
When evaluating Application Lifecycle Management suites, what aspects do you think are the most important to look for?
  • 16
Looking for suggestions - we need a test management and defect tracking tool which can be integrated with an automation tool.
  • 25
Looking for a Comparison of JIRA, TFS & HP ALM as a Test Management Tool
  • 7
Do you have any feedback on the HPE ALM Octane release that came out in June 2016?

Product Categories

Product Categories
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
Quality Management Software
Test Management Tools

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
Microsoft Azure DevOps vs OpenText Application Quality Management Logo
Microsoft Azure DevOps vs OpenText Application Quality Management
Jira vs OpenText Application Quality Management Logo
Jira vs OpenText Application Quality Management
Codebeamer vs OpenText Application Quality Management Logo
Codebeamer vs OpenText Application Quality Management
Jama Connect vs OpenText Application Quality Management Logo
Jama Connect vs OpenText Application Quality Management
Rally Software vs OpenText Application Quality Management Logo
Rally Software vs OpenText Application Quality Management
Polarion ALM vs OpenText Application Quality Management Logo
Polarion ALM vs OpenText Application Quality Management
TFS vs OpenText Application Quality Management Logo
TFS vs OpenText Application Quality Management
OpenText Software Delivery Management vs OpenText Application Quality Management Logo
OpenText Software Delivery Management vs OpenText Application Quality Management
PTC Integrity vs OpenText Application Quality Management Logo
PTC Integrity vs OpenText Application Quality Management
Tricentis qTest vs OpenText Application Quality Management Logo
Tricentis qTest vs OpenText Application Quality Management
IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) vs OpenText Application Quality Management Logo
IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) vs OpenText Application Quality Management
Panaya Test Dynamix vs OpenText Application Quality Management Logo
Panaya Test Dynamix vs OpenText Application Quality Management
TestRail vs OpenText Application Quality Management Logo
TestRail vs OpenText Application Quality Management
Digital.ai Agility vs OpenText Application Quality Management Logo
Digital.ai Agility vs OpenText Application Quality Management
Visual Studio Test Professional vs OpenText Application Quality Management Logo
Visual Studio Test Professional vs OpenText Application Quality Management
See all alternatives
 
OpenText Application Quality Management Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Independant Consultant at Reckitt3.5I've used OpenText Application Quality Management for 25 years; while its test management and customizable dashboards are useful, reporting is poor, setup was easy, and the tool is expensive but effective when paired with the right testing process.
Partner at IS Nordic AS4.5As a partner in a smaller Danish company, I've seen OpenText ALM offer significant advantages like managing multiple releases and enhanced test visibility. Despite lacking detailed ROI data, it's a valued tool among large enterprises in Denmark.
Senior Test Analyst at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees3.5I work extensively with OpenText ALM/Quality Center, utilizing features like ping, CVC, and automation across servers, although clients are exploring alternatives due to pricing concerns. While its UI is excellent, management often shifts to tools like Jira.
Technical Solution Architect at Vodafone4.5I use OpenText ALM Quality Center for recording user cases and tracking defects. The real-time tracking and reporting features are valuable for project management. However, I find its integration with development tools and agile support limited.
President at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees3.5I manage testing projects with OpenText ALM Quality Center, which is highly customizable and integrates with internal applications. It effectively handles both manual and automated testing, though extracting data is difficult, and the interface needs improvement.
Senior Manager, Connected Home Product Management and Strategy at VWR Funding, Inc.4.5Our experience with OpenText ALM/Quality Center was positive, especially for test case and requirement management. However, we eventually switched to Jira due to cost and the desire for a streamlined, open-source solution with simpler reporting capabilities.
Sap Fico Consultant at Avient Corporation4.0We use OpenText ALM for recording testing results during our SAP implementation. It's useful for managing testing data and integrates with Excel for easy report downloads. However, the reporting functionality needs improvement due to issues with user-specific process requirements.
Testing and change management at WestLotto4.0We use OpenText ALM Quality Center for defect tracking and test management, valuing its customizability and comprehensive features. However, it lacks a browser-based interface, difficult user administration, and costly licenses, affecting its overall accessibility and ease of use.