Sr. Quality Assurance Project Manager at iLAB LLC.
Reseller
2023-02-21T20:25:51Z
Feb 21, 2023
Both are quality products. ALM QC was originally designed to support a Waterfall approach. ALM Octane was designed to support more of an Agile approach, but can also be used for Waterfall projects. ALM Octane provides the benefits of more options to connect and work with Automation tools outside of the UFT family. Micro Focus looks to be shifting towards ALM Octane and Value Edge as their focus for the future so I would normally recommend those products but for a specific use case or requirement, it could be better to use ALM QC.
OpenText ALM Quality Center and OpenText ALM Octane are two prominent application lifecycle management tools. Octane seems to have an advantage due to its advanced features, which appeal to users despite its higher cost.Features:Quality Center provides robust test management capabilities and solid integrations, supporting established processes. Octane, on the other hand, offers agile and DevOps support, dynamic dashboards, and collaborative functionalities, which make it well-suited for...
Both are quality products. ALM QC was originally designed to support a Waterfall approach. ALM Octane was designed to support more of an Agile approach, but can also be used for Waterfall projects. ALM Octane provides the benefits of more options to connect and work with Automation tools outside of the UFT family. Micro Focus looks to be shifting towards ALM Octane and Value Edge as their focus for the future so I would normally recommend those products but for a specific use case or requirement, it could be better to use ALM QC.