Sr. Quality Assurance Project Manager at iLAB LLC.
Reseller
2023-02-21T20:25:51Z
Feb 21, 2023
Both are quality products. ALM QC was originally designed to support a Waterfall approach. ALM Octane was designed to support more of an Agile approach, but can also be used for Waterfall projects. ALM Octane provides the benefits of more options to connect and work with Automation tools outside of the UFT family. Micro Focus looks to be shifting towards ALM Octane and Value Edge as their focus for the future so I would normally recommend those products but for a specific use case or requirement, it could be better to use ALM QC.
OpenText ALM/Quality Center and OpenText ALM Octane compete in the application lifecycle management category. OpenText ALM Octane seems to have the upper hand due to its flexibility and user-friendly interface, particularly appealing to agile environments.Features: OpenText ALM/Quality Center offers robustness in data handling, comprehensive test management, and high customizability, making it a reliable choice for larger organizations. It integrates well with various tools and maintains...
Both are quality products. ALM QC was originally designed to support a Waterfall approach. ALM Octane was designed to support more of an Agile approach, but can also be used for Waterfall projects. ALM Octane provides the benefits of more options to connect and work with Automation tools outside of the UFT family. Micro Focus looks to be shifting towards ALM Octane and Value Edge as their focus for the future so I would normally recommend those products but for a specific use case or requirement, it could be better to use ALM QC.