Sr. Quality Assurance Project Manager at iLAB LLC.
Reseller
2023-02-21T20:25:51Z
Feb 21, 2023
Both are quality products. ALM QC was originally designed to support a Waterfall approach. ALM Octane was designed to support more of an Agile approach, but can also be used for Waterfall projects. ALM Octane provides the benefits of more options to connect and work with Automation tools outside of the UFT family. Micro Focus looks to be shifting towards ALM Octane and Value Edge as their focus for the future so I would normally recommend those products but for a specific use case or requirement, it could be better to use ALM QC.
OpenText ALM / Quality Center and OpenText ALM Octane both compete in the application lifecycle management category. OpenText ALM Octane may have the upper hand due to its modern architecture and enhanced support for Agile and DevOps environments.Features: OpenText ALM / Quality Center offers extensive customization and integration capabilities. It provides unlimited storage for testing artifacts, enabling advanced traceability across testing stages. OpenText ALM Octane excels with Agile and...
Both are quality products. ALM QC was originally designed to support a Waterfall approach. ALM Octane was designed to support more of an Agile approach, but can also be used for Waterfall projects. ALM Octane provides the benefits of more options to connect and work with Automation tools outside of the UFT family. Micro Focus looks to be shifting towards ALM Octane and Value Edge as their focus for the future so I would normally recommend those products but for a specific use case or requirement, it could be better to use ALM QC.