OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) is renowned for its comprehensive performance testing capabilities, supporting a broad range of protocols with a user-friendly interface, making it ideal for global test execution and project management efficiency.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) | 6.2% |
| Apache JMeter | 12.1% |
| OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) | 12.1% |
| Other | 69.6% |
| Type | Title | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Performance Testing Tools | Feb 15, 2026 | Download |
| Product | Reviews, tips, and advice from real users | Feb 15, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs Apache JMeter | Feb 15, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs BlazeMeter | Feb 15, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs Tricentis NeoLoad | Feb 15, 2026 | Download |
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apache JMeter | 3.9 | 12.1% | 88% | 96 interviewsAdd to research |
| Tricentis NeoLoad | 4.1 | 10.1% | 95% | 66 interviewsAdd to research |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 12 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 6 |
| Large Enterprise | 57 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 97 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 31 |
| Large Enterprise | 153 |
OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering offers a robust platform designed to streamline performance testing for organizations across various industries. Its ability to manage scripts easily, support wide protocols, and maintain a scalable and centralized platform proves valuable for conducting global tests. The tool excels in generating virtual users with customizable environments and offers extensive analytics and reporting features. Despite some users seeking better integration with third-party tools and cloud support, as well as enhanced AI and DevOps integration, LoadRunner Enterprise remains a sought-after solution for performance testing. Its interface and tech support improvements, along with browser compatibility and cost concerns, are acknowledged areas for growth.
What are the essential features?In banking, healthcare, and retail, organizations employ LoadRunner Enterprise to ensure their applications remain stable and performant during high user loads. The tool is critical for testing web services, APIs, and in-house applications, providing insights that help predict performance outcomes during key phases such as go-live, platform upgrades, and data center migrations. By confirming scalability, it ensures seamless application operation under increased user demand.
OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) was previously known as Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise, Performance Center, HPE Performance Center.
Hexaware, British Sky Broadcasting, JetBlue
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Founder & Chief Executive Officer at a tech vendor with 11-50 employees | 4.0 | I've used LoadRunner Enterprise since the early 2000s; it's a stable, scalable, and versatile performance testing tool with easy scripting and broad platform support, though its analytics and reporting could benefit from modern AI enhancements. |
| Performance Test Lead at Xilligence Ltd | 4.5 | I've used LoadRunner Enterprise for two years and found its analytics, reporting, and scalability highly valuable for performance testing, although it's expensive. It's stable, support is decent, and I use it selectively alongside JMeter for enterprise projects. |
| Chief Executive Officer at iqst | 5.0 | I use OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise for comprehensive performance testing across various domains. Its runtime settings and real-time analysis are valuable, though resource optimization is needed. Despite its cost, it offers a strong ROI by preventing system failures. |
| Senior Performace Engineer at Yolandi,miller@multichoice.co.za | 4.0 | I use OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise for performance testing our applications, valuing its reporting and real-time monitoring. It's user-friendly but scripting demands coding skills. TruClient is memory-intensive, posing challenges. I've only used LoadRunner, without integrating other tools. |
| Test Manager at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees | 4.0 | I've used LoadRunner across various domains like banking, insurance, and healthcare. It provides user-friendly scripting and comprehensive reports but is costly. I've also used RPT and JMeter, with JMeter preferred for smaller projects due to its free cost. |
| Deputy Manager at _VOIS | 4.0 | We use OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise for performance testing, leveraging its features to configure multiple users and analyze response times. It efficiently schedules scripts and provides insights, though it occasionally experiences controller crashes and script generation issues. |
| Senior systems engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees | 4.0 | We use OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise for testing our e-commerce website's APIs and frontend, finding it efficient for executing tests and analyzing results. While there's reduced scripting time compared to JMeter, recording issues and support could be improved. |
| Lead solutions architect at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees | 5.0 | My team leverages OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise for automated testing, ensuring efficient test coverage and performance evaluation. Its integration into OpenText's suite facilitates faster deployment and valuable synergy, aiding in problem identification and providing significant time and cost savings. |
