Eggplant Performance vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) comparison

Keysight Technologies and OpenText are both solutions in the Performance Testing Tools category. Keysight Technologies is ranked #12 with an average rating of 7.0, while OpenText is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.6. Keysight Technologies holds a 1.3% mindshare in PTT, compared to OpenText’s 5.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Keysight Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Eggplant Performance

Read 4 Eggplant Performance reviews

292 Views
227 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Enterprise Perform...

Read 83 OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) reviews

2,340 Views
1,242 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Eggplant Performance

OpenText Enterprise Perform...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 13, 2025

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering and Eggplant Performance are competitors in performance testing. OpenText has an edge in features, while Eggplant stands out for deployment and integration ease.

Features: OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering offers extensive test plan capabilities, scalability for complex environments, and integration with enterprise tools. Eggplant Performance provides advanced analytics, automation features, and a robust feature set worth its cost.

Room for Improvement: OpenText could enhance user interface intuitiveness, reduce setup complexity, and expand protocol support. Eggplant could improve scalability for large environments, offer more comprehensive customer support, and enhance reporting functionalities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText offers a comprehensive deployment model with strong customer support, assisting seamless integration into existing infrastructures. Eggplant is valued for its straightforward deployment process and user-friendly documentation, ensuring quicker setup.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText presents a cost-effective setup with attractive ROI for large enterprises, focusing on scalability. Eggplant, though with higher initial costs, promises high ROI through efficient automation, offering long-term returns with advanced functionalities.

To learn more, read our detailed Eggplant Performance vs. OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Eggplant Performance vs. OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 847,862 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Eggplant Performance

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

12th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText Enterprise Perform...

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

5th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Load Testing Tools (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Performance Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Eggplant Performance is 1.3%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) is 5.3%, down from 7.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Performance Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Shyam_Prasad

AVP - Testing & QA at Laminaar Aviation

Offers unique object identification, ideal for UI layer regression automation but limited scalability

Performance is one key area for improvement. It can be slower compared to other tools I've used. Secondly, we have a very limited resource pool that uses this tool in India. So, finding resources familiar with Eggplant in India is challenging due to lack of affiliation programs and so on.

Read full review

VictorHorescu

Chief Executive Officer at iqst

Ability to test almost every tool in the companies I enter and performs well in a distributed environment

It would be beneficial if LoadRunner could optimize resource usage, especially for protocols that require significant resources, like TrueClient, which interacts directly with the UI. If they could improve resource usage, like ingest or for the load generator, using less CPU or RAM memory, that would be great. That's where I have problems. In real time, when they ask for 5,000 or 10,000 concurrent users, I have to provision a lot of virtual machines to define this load. Then there are situations with certain platforms, especially document management platforms, where the technology is so weird that normal LoadRunner protocols cannot detect it. So, in that case, I have to use that special TruClient protocol. I have to use the TruClient protocol, which actually clicks on the object. Despite the SQL technology, I can still create a script and test for performance. So what I would appreciate a lot is if this protocol would require less resources on a normal virtual machine. I can use fewer concurrent users with TruClient protocols as opposed to almost one hundred with HTTP/HTML. As opposed to many more with HTTP/HTML from, let's say, JMeter. So, optimization at that level for resource consumption by OpenText would be much appreciated.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is not a conventional test automation tool. It uses optical character recognition (OCR) to identify objects. It makes it the best in the class."

"We find the solution stable and scalable."

"We don't have a big team of people that can watch the dials and check that everything is okay. We're doing a lot of the monitoring of our website and our product at the side of the desk. We need a solution that does a lot for us, and that's what Eggplant does."

"Probably its prime advantage, it provides a centralized location for testing."

"The product is good, and the concept is good as well."

"The host performance testing of any application using a host/controller is the most valuable feature."

"I think the number one feature everybody likes is the capability to easily generate virtual users as well as the reporting."

"LoadRunner Enterprise's best feature is the detailed reporting structure."

"We are delivering fine performance results and performance recommendations using Performance Center."

"We can book load generators."

"For me, LoadRunner stands out, especially with its reporting capabilities, the graphs that can be generated, and the unique feature of measuring our application's response alongside our infrastructure metrics, such as CPU, memory, or disk usage, all presented in graph form. This is something other applications struggle to match."

More OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) pros

Cons

"Performance is one key area for improvement. It can be slower compared to other tools I've used."

"I'd like to see the ability to integrate the user experience through device forms like AWS device forms or source labs."

"Lacks the option of carrying out transaction comparisons."

"The solution is expensive."

"Dashboard creation should be implemented, so we can get the results in a desired format."

"Many of my customers have had to switch to different tools due to the cost of LoadRunner, despite its advantages, leading them to alternatives like JMeter and RPT."

"We'd like the product to include protocol identifiers whenever a tester wants to test a new application."

"I know there are integrations with continuous testing. It's got tie-ins to some of the newer tools to allow continuous testing. I'd love to see us not have to customize it, but for it to be out of the box."

"I have seen some users report some issues, but I have personally not had any issues."

"It would be good if we could look forward at the future technology needs we have. I would like to see Micro Focus provide more customer awareness around how LoadRunner can fulfill requirements with Big Data use cases, for example, where you do performance testing at the scale of data lakes... when it comes to technologies our company has yet to adopt, I would like to see an indication from Micro Focus of how one does performance testing and what kinds of challenges can we foresee. Those kinds of studies would really help us."

More OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is competitive in India."

"Eggplant came out as the most competitive in terms of commercials (terms and conditions) which was positive. When we did the initial negotiations, Eggplant started at a price but they were open to negotiations and we did negotiate a discount. That was really important to us because it showed a level of commitment to us."

"We used the Professional version and then moved to the enterprise version. We have subscribed to 1000 user licenses. The tool will be super expensive if we take up 5,000 user licenses. We have to limit ourselves on testing."

"The price is okay. You're able to buy it, as opposed to paying for a full year."

"I have not been directly involved in price negotiations but my understanding is that while the cost is a little bit high, it provides good value for the money."

"We got a very good deal. We are happy with that. We have 5,000 licenses."

"It does everything you could hope for in a performance testing solution. It's not cheap."

"LoadRunner Enterprise's price is high."

"It is a bit expensive, especially for smaller organizations, but over-all it can save you money."

"For Performance Center, you have to add additional load generators, and then you can do more. I think it is a matter of the price, in terms of how many machines you can buy."

More OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

847,862 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Energy/Utilities Company

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

23%

Computer Software Company

18%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Eggplant Performance?

It is not a conventional test automation tool. It uses optical character recognition (OCR) to identify objects. It makes it the best in the class.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Eggplant Performance?

The pricing is competitive in India.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Eggplant Performance?

See all answers

What do you like most about Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise?

Now that LoadRunner integrates with Dynatrace and other monitoring tools, it simplifies the process of integration into a company, taking merely five minutes to set up. This ease of integration a...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise?

In 2019, I was dealing with the costs of LoadRunner. While I don't remember the exact figures, JMeter being free and RPT being cheaper makes them attractive. The high cost of LoadRunner, in contras...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise?

While I don't see any issues with LoadRunner's functionality, the cost of the tool is a major factor. Many of my customers have had to switch to different tools due to the cost of LoadRunner, despi...

See all answers

Comparisons

Appium vs Eggplant Performance

Compared 29% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Eggplant Performance

Compared 24% of the time

Apache JMeter vs Eggplant Performance

Compared 22% of the time

OpenText LoadRunner Professional vs Eggplant Performance

Compared 13% of the time

Tricentis NeoLoad vs Eggplant Performance

Compared 12% of the time

More Eggplant Performance Competitors

OpenText LoadRunner Cloud vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Compared 35% of the time

OpenText LoadRunner Professional vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Compared 21% of the time

Tricentis NeoLoad vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Compared 8% of the time

Apache JMeter vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText ALM / Quality Center vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Compared 7% of the time

More OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Performance Testing Tools

March 2025

Download Eggplant Performance product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

March 2025

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) report

Download OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) product report

Also Known As

TestPlant eggPlant Performance

Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise, Performance Center, HPE Performance Center

Overview

eggPlant Performance provides sophisticated performance testing and load testing tools that can test the widest range of technology and can scale up to simulate any load you need, but are still easy-to-use. eggPlant Performance has been designed to cleanly manage the difficult stuff so you spend more of your time looking at what really matters – improving the user experience of your application. It ensures that your cloud and server based applications will continue to work, perform, and provide an excellent user experience with hundreds or thousands of simultaneous users. eggPlant Performance consists of three main components: Studio, Test Controller, and Analyzer. Studio is used to create the different components of a load test (including scripts, test data, test definitions, and monitoring targets). Test Controller is used subsequently to execute the tests and monitor them during runtime. Analyzer is then used to view completed test runs and their results, as well as generate a wide variety of charts and tables to analyze the data. eggPlant Performance supports a variety of virtual user types for different automation options, depending on the performance or load testing requirements and objectives. — Web HTPP/S: For protocol-level web scripting — Rich clients/UI-based: This includes Citrix VUs (for automating any desktop app published over Citrix), eggPlant Functional VUs (for integration with TestPlant’s functional UI testing tool), WinDriver VUs(for driving the interface of any Windows-based rich client application through a combination of object- and image-based approaches), Selenium VUs (for automating the user experience of browsers). — TCP/UDP: For recording network traffic

Keysight Technologies

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) provides robust performance testing capabilities with scalable and user-friendly tools. It supports multiple protocols for diverse applications, ensuring reliable and comprehensive performance metrics for organizations.

Designed for extensive performance testing, OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering offers advanced integration features and global testing capabilities. Users value its ease of scheduling, detailed analysis, and efficient resource management. It simulates real-world scenarios to deliver valuable metrics across industries. Its intuitive interface, while needing smoother navigation, aligns with its flexibility and versatility. Enhanced reporting and cloud-based integration, especially with AWS, are potential growth areas alongside improved third-party tool integration and technical support.

What are the key features of OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering?

Reporting Capabilities: Offers detailed and customizable reports for insightful data analysis.
Scalability: Supports testing with thousands of concurrent users for robust application performance validation.
Integration Features: Provides seamless integration options for a cohesive testing environment.
Global Execution: Enables worldwide test execution with ease and flexibility.
Protocol Support: Accommodates a wide range of protocols for versatile application testing.

What benefits should users expect from using OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering?

Improved Performance Metrics: Detailed insights into application stability and performance.
Cost Management: Particularly with enhanced AWS integration, helps manage infrastructure costs.
Industry Versatility: Applicable across sectors like banking, healthcare, and retail.
Flexibility: Adapts to cloud, web, and ERP applications with robust scripting and testing options.

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering is implemented in banking, healthcare, and retail industries, assisting in load, stress, and performance testing. Organizations utilize its capabilities for validating web, API, cloud, ERP, and Citrix applications, ensuring reliability with comprehensive metrics for large-scale user handling.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Cisco

Hexaware, British Sky Broadcasting, JetBlue

Buyer's Guide

Eggplant Performance vs. OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

April 2025

Free Report: Eggplant Performance vs. OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Find out what your peers are saying about Eggplant Performance vs. OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

847,862 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Eggplant Performance vs. OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) report.

See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.