Apache JMeter vs Eggplant Performance comparison

Apache and Keysight Technologies are both solutions in the Performance Testing Tools category. Apache is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.2, while Keysight Technologies is ranked #16. Apache holds a 9.3% mindshare in PTT, compared to Keysight Technologies’s 2.2% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Apache users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Keysight Technologies users who would recommend it.

Apache JMeter

Read 97 Apache JMeter reviews

9,096 Views
5,276 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Eggplant Performance

Read 4 Eggplant Performance reviews

1,058 Views
719 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Apache JMeter

Eggplant Performance

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 5, 2025

Apache JMeter and Eggplant Performance compete in the performance testing category. Based on features, Eggplant Performance appears to hold an advantage due to its advanced capabilities and comprehensive insights.

Features: Apache JMeter offers extensive scripting capabilities, open-source flexibility, and integration with various platforms. Its lightweight nature and support for large-scale load testing make it a practical choice for diverse testing needs. Eggplant Performance provides advanced automation features, powerful analytics, and integration with user experience insights, making it ideal for in-depth performance assessments.

Room for Improvement: Apache JMeter's graphical user interface could be more intuitive, and its setup might demand technical expertise. The coordination between its plugins can sometimes challenge stability. Eggplant Performance could benefit from a reduction in licensing costs and improved compatibility with a wider range of technologies. Its reporting could provide easier customization for diverse user needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Apache JMeter requires some technical setup and often relies on community support rather than formal customer service. Eggplant Performance boasts user-friendly installation processes and offers robust support services for users.

Pricing and ROI: Apache JMeter is a cost-effective solution due to its open-source nature, resulting in lower initial expenses and a high ROI. Although Eggplant Performance involves higher upfront costs, its advanced features and analytics justify the expense with potential long-term benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed Apache JMeter vs. Eggplant Performance Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Apache JMeter vs. Eggplant Performance

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,679 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Apache JMeter

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

1st

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Load Testing Tools (1st), API Testing Tools (4th)

Eggplant Performance

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

16th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Performance Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Apache JMeter is 9.3%, down from 19.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Eggplant Performance is 2.2%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Performance Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Apache JMeter	9.3%
Eggplant Performance	2.2%
Other	88.5%

Performance Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Raja Rao Malkari

Principal Performance Architect at Tecnotree Corporation

Have built custom performance test scripts and integrated them into automated pipelines seamlessly

Apache JMeter has its own pros and cons when compared to other tools. It is easy to use the tool and it has open-source capability so we can build our custom scripts and execute them. It provides other capabilities, such as integrating a database and connecting to other application servers for monitoring and related functions. We use dynamic HTML reporting, which helps us in testing analysis by pinpointing the bottlenecks based on the reports. We can identify the specific areas that need attention, troubleshoot them, and report to the development team. The user-friendly GUI for creating and managing tests makes it very easy to drag and drop samplers. For example, if you want the HTTP sampler, you can drag and drop it and use it. For configurations, we have other samplers. For results, we have the view results samplers that we can also drag and drop. The UI is good in comparison with other tools. Regarding integration with CI/CD pipelines, we can create Apache JMeter scripts and use the Docker image. From the image, whatever scripting we have done can be connected. We can use the CI/CD pipelines and connect them with Jenkins tools and GitHub. Then we can create the pipelines and automate the end-to-end flow. For connecting Jenkins to Apache JMeter, JMeter plugins are available, and we have used them. Apache JMeter also has some third-party plugins, which are not native samplers. If we want to use custom test executions, we definitely use all the different plugins available in Apache JMeter. The capability to simulate users has impacted testing resources and outcomes as Apache JMeter is based on Java, which has a limit to the users in a particular load generator. Apache JMeter provides distributed load testing where you can connect multiple PCs in a master and slave concept, allowing you to pump the load with any number of users. In the past, I have done load testing with 10,000 users by connecting the Apache JMeter distributed network in BlazeMeter. There is a cloud version available, the updated BlazeMeter, and I used that. It is very easy to launch load generators in BlazeMeter, and then we can run the test, scaling up beyond 10,000 users.

Read full review

Shyam_Prasad

AVP - Testing & QA at Laminaar Aviation

Offers unique object identification, ideal for UI layer regression automation but limited scalability

Performance is one key area for improvement. It can be slower compared to other tools I've used. Secondly, we have a very limited resource pool that uses this tool in India. So, finding resources familiar with Eggplant in India is challenging due to lack of affiliation programs and so on.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We find the load testing feature valuable."

"JMeter's open-source nature allows us to create scripts easily, add any number of users during load tests, and handle large volumes of data without additional cost."

"It is cost-effective and simple to use."

"It is easy to set up."

"They found that JMeter has more capabilities and specificity than the tools they were using."

"It's easy to use and free, a huge community, and it offers a risk free to start, so use it for application performance testing."

"It's open source, so I like that about the product. And there's a lot of community support for it."

"When someone in our organization wants to test web applications, they use Apache JMeter since they face no hurdles while using the solution."

More Apache JMeter pros

"We find the solution stable and scalable."

"We don't have a big team of people that can watch the dials and check that everything is okay. We're doing a lot of the monitoring of our website and our product at the side of the desk. We need a solution that does a lot for us, and that's what Eggplant does."

"Customer Service: Excellent and very personal."

"It is not a conventional test automation tool. It uses optical character recognition (OCR) to identify objects. It makes it the best in the class."

"We've been really fortunate in that we've had virtually zero downtime in all the time we've been using Eggplant."

"It's been a revelation to us in terms of its ability to assist us in exploratory testing and to integrate with our current model-driven architecture."

Cons

"Automation is difficult in JMeter."

"There could be improvements in terms of memory utilization. We are going to migrate away from JMeter in the near future."

"Documentation is not comprehensive, making it difficult to find the right answers."

"To the best of my knowledge, the documentation could be improved. It should be enhanced to better support newcomers. Currently, only people with some experience can easily understand the content. Including more sample programs, applications, and use cases would help many more people adapt to using the solution."

"For UI automation, it is limited and therefore rates a one."

"JMeter is lagging when it comes to GUI performance testing because we need to install some third-party plugins for recording the GUI script, and the performance isn't very reliable."

"One of the drawbacks of JMeter is that it can't handle a large amount of load, which forces us to switch to other tools when we need to load more than a 5,000 or 10,000 user load."

"Reporting feature can be improved to provide better test results."

More Apache JMeter cons

"Performance is one key area for improvement. It can be slower compared to other tools I've used."

"One area I can think of to improve is the usability of the reports that we get."

"I'd like to see the ability to integrate the user experience through device forms like AWS device forms or source labs."

"Bugs occur fairly frequently, but they are very responsive in identifying them and scheduling them for fixes in future releases."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Free"

"Since it's free, there's no need for extensive support or improvements in pricing."

"I haven't looked into it. Most of our projects are nonprofit or grant-based. Everything is public commons, so we don't really have to worry about that so much."

"The price of Apache JMeter is good. The selling rate is quite effective and the limited users with a multi-region-related execution."

"We are using the free version, and if required, we can easily switch to the other version."

"The solution is open source with no user fees or licenses."

"JMeter is open source, so there are no licensing costs associated with it."

"There are operational costs related to using Amazon Cloud, but the tool itself."

More Apache JMeter pricing and cost advice

"Eggplant came out as the most competitive in terms of commercials (terms and conditions) which was positive. When we did the initial negotiations, Eggplant started at a price but they were open to negotiations and we did negotiate a discount. That was really important to us because it showed a level of commitment to us."

"The pricing is competitive in India."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

16%

Construction Company

10%

Energy/Utilities Company

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	27
Midsize Enterprise	24
Large Enterprise	61

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Postman compare with Apache JMeter?

Postman lets you easily define variables, which then get updated automatically. This is a huge time-saver and makes processes very efficient. We can also export the test cases we create and share t...

See all answers

How does BlazeMeter compare with Apache JMeter?

Blazemeter is a continuous testing platform that provides scriptless test automation. It unifies functional and performance testing, enabling users to monitor and test public and private APIs. We ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apache JMeter?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that the cost and license are free because Apache JMeter is open source.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Tricentis NeoLoad vs Apache JMeter

Compared 10% of the time

BlazeMeter vs Apache JMeter

Compared 6% of the time

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs Apache JMeter

Compared 5% of the time

Postman Enterprise vs Apache JMeter

Compared 5% of the time

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs Apache JMeter

Compared 5% of the time

More Apache JMeter Competitors

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs Eggplant Performance

Compared 11% of the time

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs Eggplant Performance

Compared 10% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Eggplant Performance

Compared 9% of the time

Appium vs Eggplant Performance

Compared 8% of the time

ReadyAPI vs Eggplant Performance

Compared 8% of the time

More Eggplant Performance Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Apache JMeter

August 2026

Download Apache JMeter product report

Buyer's Guide

Performance Testing Tools

August 2026

Download Eggplant Performance product report

Also Known As

JMeter

TestPlant eggPlant Performance

Overview

Apache JMeter is a versatile, open-source tool designed for performance and load testing, widely recognized for its user-friendly interface and robust test automation capabilities. It supports a range of protocols and integrates seamlessly into various environments, making it ideal for high-load scenarios.

Apache JMeter stands out in performance testing for its ability to handle high transactions per second and perform distributed load testing effectively. Its open-source nature and cost-effectiveness are enhanced by its user-friendly GUI, which simplifies the testing process. Despite memory consumption concerns, Apache JMeter remains a top choice due to its large community support, comprehensive scripting capabilities, and easy integration with CI/CD pipelines, allowing for continuous automated testing. Its robust protocol support meets diverse testing needs.

What are Apache JMeter's key features?

User-Friendly GUI: Simplifies test creation and management.
Open-Source: Offers flexibility and community support.
Protocol Support: Handles multiple protocols effectively.
Integration: Works seamlessly with tools like Jenkins.
Scripting: Extensive scripting abilities for custom tests.
Platform Independence: Operates on various operating systems.

Which benefits should users consider in reviews?

Cost-Effectiveness: No licensing fees due to open-source status.
Community Support: Access to a large user base for help and updates.
Scalability: Effective in high-load scenarios with distributed testing capabilities.
Automation: Integration with CI/CD for continuous testing.
Comprehensive Reporting: Provides detailed performance insights.

In industries like finance and banking, Apache JMeter is used extensively for performance validation to ensure system robustness under heavy user loads. It's integrated into CI/CD pipelines for automated testing processes, allowing organizations to simulate real-world scenarios and ensure high-performance standards.

Apache

Eggplant Performance is a powerful tool for load testing and monitoring, enabling businesses to ensure their applications perform optimally under stress. It focuses on providing comprehensive insights into application performance to help optimize user experience and productivity.

Eggplant Performance offers a robust platform designed to test applications under simulated real-world conditions. It provides in-depth analysis and reporting capabilities, which allow teams to understand how their applications behave under load. This testing solution focuses on facilitating a thorough evaluation of network performance, resource utilization, and user interactions. It is known for its capacity to scale tests across various protocols and platforms, ensuring compatibility and reliability.

What are the key features of Eggplant Performance?

Protocol Support: Offers extensive support for multiple protocols, ensuring diverse testing environments.
Scalable Load Testing: Allows for testing under large loads to replicate real-world scenarios.
Comprehensive Reporting: Delivers detailed reports with actionable insights for optimal performance tuning.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly integrates with CI/CD tools to streamline testing workflows.

What benefits and ROI should users look for in Eggplant Performance reviews?

Improved Application Reliability: Leads to more stable applications by identifying weak points early.
Enhanced User Satisfaction: Delivers better user experiences by ensuring smooth application functionality.
Time Efficiency: Reduces time spent on manual testing through automation and integration.

Eggplant Performance is widely used in industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail, where it ensures critical applications perform effectively without interruptions. Its ability to integrate with multiple systems makes it a versatile option for businesses in fast-paced and critical environments.

Keysight Technologies

Sample Customers

AOL, Orbitz, Innopath Software, PrepMe, Sapient, Corporate Express Australia, CSIRO, Ephibian, Talis, DATACOM, ALALOOP, eFusion, Panter, Sourcepole, University of Western Cape

Cisco

Buyer's Guide

Apache JMeter vs. Eggplant Performance

August 2026

Free Report: Apache JMeter vs. Eggplant Performance

Find out what your peers are saying about Apache JMeter vs. Eggplant Performance and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Apache JMeter vs. Eggplant Performance report.

See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.