We performed a comparison between Eggplant Performance and Tricentis Tosca based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Katalon Studio and others in Regression Testing Tools."We don't have a big team of people that can watch the dials and check that everything is okay. We're doing a lot of the monitoring of our website and our product at the side of the desk. We need a solution that does a lot for us, and that's what Eggplant does."
"It is not a conventional test automation tool. It uses optical character recognition (OCR) to identify objects. It makes it the best in the class."
"We find the solution stable and scalable."
"This tool is very easy to use and I think that anyone can come in, having no experience with it, and within four to six months be comfortable with it."
"It is easy to maintain and easy to automate. No coding skills are required to automate. It is also easy in terms of transferring knowledge and skills. Many of my team members shifted over the past one and a half years, and there was no big issue with respect to knowledge sharing. It is a good tool that enables me to re-automate my scripts and update my scripts as quickly as possible. Looking at the amount of rework and maintenance activity that we had done for our scripts, it might have been a nightmare with some other scripting tool."
"Object Identification Wizard."
"The scalability is a valuable feature of Tricentis Tosca."
"Tricentis Tosca is well integrated with other products like Jira."
"The initial setup isn't too difficult."
"This tool has test data management capability along with test management."
"You can quickly build automated testing, manage it, and have it run on a regular basis to ensure that there are no issues."
"Performance is one key area for improvement. It can be slower compared to other tools I've used."
"I'd like to see the ability to integrate the user experience through device forms like AWS device forms or source labs."
"The solution is expensive compared to other tools in the market."
"The integration with mobile testing could be useful."
"The solution needs to improve its simulation of mobile environments. Right now, that aspect is really lacking."
"Very difficult to get information about licensing costs."
"The document object model or some aspects of it has a bit of a learning curve."
"Primarily I'm dealing with customers looking for a cheap solution, and they are willing to try open-source automation solutions. So from this perspective, the price of Tosca is not as competitive."
"The solution should work with the Linux platform. Right now, it only runs on Windows."
"Making it more stable would be good because we get around 90% stability."
Eggplant Performance is ranked 15th in Performance Testing Tools with 4 reviews while Tricentis Tosca is ranked 1st in Regression Testing Tools with 98 reviews. Eggplant Performance is rated 7.8, while Tricentis Tosca is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Eggplant Performance writes "Offers unique object identification, ideal for UI layer regression automation but limited scalability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tricentis Tosca writes "Does not require coding experience to use and comes with productivity and time-saving features ". Eggplant Performance is most compared with Appium, OpenText LoadRunner Professional, Apache JMeter, SmartBear TestComplete and Tricentis NeoLoad, whereas Tricentis Tosca is most compared with Katalon Studio, OpenText UFT One, Worksoft Certify, Postman and Testim.
See our list of best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Regression Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
