Eggplant Performance vs Tricentis Tosca comparison

Keysight Technologies and Tricentis are both solutions in the Regression Testing Tools category. Additionally, 100% of Keysight Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Tricentis users who would recommend it.

Eggplant Performance

Read 4 Eggplant Performance reviews

764 Views
489 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Tricentis Tosca

Read 113 Tricentis Tosca reviews

19,388 Views
7,367 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Eggplant Performance

Tricentis Tosca

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Eggplant Performance and Tricentis Tosca based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Katalon Studio, OpenText and others in Regression Testing Tools.

To learn more, read our detailed Regression Testing Tools Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Regression Testing Tools

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 886,932 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Eggplant Performance

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Performance Testing Tools (16th)

Tricentis Tosca

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

113

Ranking in other categories

Service Virtualization (2nd), Functional Testing Tools (1st), Mobile App Testing Tools (1st), Regression Testing Tools (1st), API Testing Tools (2nd), Test Automation Tools (1st)

Featured Reviews

Shyam_Prasad

AVP - Testing & QA at Laminaar Aviation

Offers unique object identification, ideal for UI layer regression automation but limited scalability

Performance is one key area for improvement. It can be slower compared to other tools I've used. Secondly, we have a very limited resource pool that uses this tool in India. So, finding resources familiar with Eggplant in India is challenging due to lack of affiliation programs and so on.

Read full review

reviewer2740515

Senior Software Engineer 2 at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Automation test development becomes accessible and effective for functional testers

Tricentis Tosca is a codeless tool, making it easy for everyone to understand the transition of how to develop scenarios or test cases. In Tricentis Tosca, analyzing failures is straightforward because every time it fails somewhere, I get the screenshot, which helps me analyze how and why it failed. It has all the modules, including some pre-built ones that can be reused efficiently. Compared to other code tools such as Selenium, where I used to develop one script in one day, with Tricentis Tosca I can easily develop one script in four hours or three hours, saving four to five hours in a day.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We find the solution stable and scalable."

"We don't have a big team of people that can watch the dials and check that everything is okay. We're doing a lot of the monitoring of our website and our product at the side of the desk. We need a solution that does a lot for us, and that's what Eggplant does."

"It is not a conventional test automation tool. It uses optical character recognition (OCR) to identify objects. It makes it the best in the class."

"It's been a revelation to us in terms of its ability to assist us in exploratory testing and to integrate with our current model-driven architecture."

"We've been really fortunate in that we've had virtually zero downtime in all the time we've been using Eggplant."

"Customer Service: Excellent and very personal."

"Overall, everything is reusable simply via drag and drop, and you will always have a single point of maintenance (e.g. in a future release of your SUT a button was added, you just need adapt the module. Linked test cases and execution lists are updated automatically)."

"Tricentis Tosca is different and better, because it has a reusable model, whereas the others do not."

"It is easy to automate tasks, highly flexible, straightforward to learn, and easy to maintain."

"I like how the modules are set up, particularly how you can use the screens you're automating. This automation helps save both time and money because we use less test capacity regarding personnel."

"I face no challenges or stability issues."

"The XScan was great because it was a handy way to automate on a surface which made it very easy and simple."

"The tool can be handled without any knowledge in parameterisation, especially the TestCaseDesign which makes the tool mighty and stable."

"I rate the overall solution a ten out of ten as I am satisfied with it."

More Tricentis Tosca pros

Cons

"Performance is one key area for improvement. It can be slower compared to other tools I've used."

"One area I can think of to improve is the usability of the reports that we get."

"I'd like to see the ability to integrate the user experience through device forms like AWS device forms or source labs."

"Bugs occur fairly frequently, but they are very responsive in identifying them and scheduling them for fixes in future releases."

"In terms of areas for improvement, Tricentis has a variety of tools, even its test management tool called qTest. Tricentis Tosca does have integration with different Tricentis tools, but the integration is geared towards a larger organization perspective. For very small organizations that have minimal licenses, the integration needs to be improvised. For example, I belong to a smaller organization that has only one license, so the capability that the tool provides for integration isn't sufficient because my company needs to have separate workspaces. When Tricentis Tosca is going to be running, it is going to use that license, but my company wants another separate workspace to record, relay, and test. This is what my team has been struggling with, and the mechanism is probably there, but that needs more time and investigation, so I can't say that I'm one hundred percent certain that Tricentis Tosca, in terms of integration for a smaller organization is insufficient. Another area for improvement is that Tricentis Tosca is currently just a Windows-based tool which affects the market because nowadays, Windows isn't the only operating system, for example, there's also Apple or IOS that's moving much faster than Windows."

"The tool lags in client-based applications. We have also encountered issues with the features in integrations."

"Tricentis Tosca’s technical support could be improved."

"What needs to be improved in Tricentis Tosca is its centralized repository mechanism because it's not as flexible. The repository in the solution where you store the data and the script for test automation is quite an old-fashioned mechanism that could be improved."

"It can be quite expensive."

"Tricentis Tosca could improve on the ease of use. There is a steep learning curve. The reporting section could be better and some of the new features could be simplified. Additionally, the user management of the client and the server are confusing. There should not be two."

"At the time I was using the product, the reporting function was lacking in usability and detail."

"Tricentis Tosca's performance could be better. Sometimes when we are remapping or when it is loading it can take a lot of time."

More Tricentis Tosca cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is competitive in India."

"Eggplant came out as the most competitive in terms of commercials (terms and conditions) which was positive. When we did the initial negotiations, Eggplant started at a price but they were open to negotiations and we did negotiate a discount. That was really important to us because it showed a level of commitment to us."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is very cheap and ten is very expensive, I rate the pricing a ten. The licensing model is based on a yearly basis."

"The price of the tool is a problem for a lot of Brazilian clients or Latino clients, as it is expensive. Where I work, if one is low price and ten is high price, I rate the tool's price as a ten out of ten."

"Tricentis Tosca may be relatively on the higher side in terms of pricing, but their sales rep can give pretty decent deals when asked."

"I give the cost of Tricentis Tosca a six out of seven."

"The tool's pricing is lower than that of other automation tools."

"Pricing could be better."

"There are two licenses: single user and multiple user. A multiple-user license means that several people can work together on one project and collaborate on code stored in a central location. A single-user license is for people working alone on a one particular application. It's much cheaper than a multi-user workspace. If you are getting a large volume of licenses for an enterprise, you can probably negotiate a discount, but I'm not sure about that."

"It is expensive. There is also the training cost, but it does speed up the process. So, you get a return on investment."

More Tricentis Tosca pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Regression Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

886,932 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Energy/Utilities Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	24
Large Enterprise	72

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?

We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing. MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well...

See all answers

How does Tricentis Tosca compare with Worksoft Certify?

Tosca fulfills our business needs better because it is an end-to-end solution across technologies. We like that it is scriptless, so even non-experienced staff can use it. To put it simply, with To...

See all answers

What do you like most about Tricentis Tosca?

For beginners, the product is good, especially for those who are interested in the quality side of software testing.

See all answers

Comparisons

Apache JMeter vs Eggplant Performance

Compared 12% of the time

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs Eggplant Performance

Compared 10% of the time

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs Eggplant Performance

Compared 10% of the time

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs Eggplant Performance

Compared 9% of the time

Appium vs Eggplant Performance

Compared 9% of the time

More Eggplant Performance Competitors

SmartBear TestComplete vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 9% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 8% of the time

Worksoft Certify vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 6% of the time

Eggplant Test vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 4% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 4% of the time

More Tricentis Tosca Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Performance Testing Tools

April 2026

Download Eggplant Performance product report

Buyer's Guide

Tricentis Tosca

March 2026

Download Tricentis Tosca product report

Also Known As

TestPlant eggPlant Performance

Orchestrated Service Virtualization

Overview

eggPlant Performance provides sophisticated performance testing and load testing tools that can test the widest range of technology and can scale up to simulate any load you need, but are still easy-to-use. eggPlant Performance has been designed to cleanly manage the difficult stuff so you spend more of your time looking at what really matters – improving the user experience of your application. It ensures that your cloud and server based applications will continue to work, perform, and provide an excellent user experience with hundreds or thousands of simultaneous users. eggPlant Performance consists of three main components: Studio, Test Controller, and Analyzer. Studio is used to create the different components of a load test (including scripts, test data, test definitions, and monitoring targets). Test Controller is used subsequently to execute the tests and monitor them during runtime. Analyzer is then used to view completed test runs and their results, as well as generate a wide variety of charts and tables to analyze the data. eggPlant Performance supports a variety of virtual user types for different automation options, depending on the performance or load testing requirements and objectives. — Web HTPP/S: For protocol-level web scripting — Rich clients/UI-based: This includes Citrix VUs (for automating any desktop app published over Citrix), eggPlant Functional VUs (for integration with TestPlant’s functional UI testing tool), WinDriver VUs(for driving the interface of any Windows-based rich client application through a combination of object- and image-based approaches), Selenium VUs (for automating the user experience of browsers). — TCP/UDP: For recording network traffic

Keysight Technologies

Tricentis Tosca offers model-based testing that supports both technical and non-technical users through a user-friendly interface, enabling scriptless automation and seamless integration with UI and non-UI applications.

Tosca's modular approach enhances test maintenance and reuse while delivering comprehensive automation for diverse testing environments. Backed by risk-based testing and automated data management, it supports end-to-end testing across API, SAP, and desktop applications. Tosca's integration capabilities extend to environments like Salesforce, PHP webshops, and mobile apps, effectively enhancing Agile team workflows. Despite its strengths, room remains for improved reporting, object recognition, and more efficient upgrade processes. Enhancing documentation and mobile testing support could further elevate its functionality for many.

What key features does Tricentis Tosca offer?

User-friendly interface: Simplifies interactions for non-technical users.
Model-based testing: Facilitates the easy creation of automated test cases.
Scriptless automation: Enables quick test development without coding.
Integration capabilities: Supports connections with multiple platforms like SAP and Salesforce.
Modular approach: Enhances the reuse and maintenance of test components.

What benefits to expect from Tricentis Tosca?

Efficiency: Streamlines the testing process for faster release cycles.
Versatility: Suitable for diverse application environments including web and desktop.
Productivity: Boosts Agile team integration for comprehensive testing.
Risk-based testing: Prioritizes testing efforts based on potential impact.

In retail, Tricentis Tosca automates inventory and transaction testing, ensuring efficient system updates. Financial services employ it for regulatory compliance through automated test scenarios in mainframe and PDF environments. Telecommunication companies utilize Tosca for API testing, aligning services across network platforms seamlessly.

Tricentis

Sample Customers

Cisco

HBO, AMEX, BMW Group, ING, Bosch, Austrian Airlines, Deutsche Bank, Henkel, Allianz, Bank of America, UBS, Orange, Siemens, Swiss Re, Vodafone

Buyer's Guide

Regression Testing Tools

March 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Katalon Studio, OpenText and others in Regression Testing Tools. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

886,932 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Regression Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.