Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Oracle Database as a Service Logo

Top 10 Oracle Database as a Service Alternatives

Vendor: Oracle
4.3 out of 5
425 followers
Post review

Top Oracle Database as a Service Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Oracle Database as a Service based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Amazon RDS, Microsoft Azure SQL Database, and Google Cloud SQL. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Oracle Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Oracle, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Oracle Database as a Service Logo
Amazon RDS
4.2 out of 5
Oracle Database as a Service Logo
Amazon RDS
4.2 out of 5
Amazon RDS is valued for ease of deployment and cost-effectiveness, ideal for small to medium enterprises. In comparison, Oracle Database as a Service offers advanced features and superior performance, justifying its higher price for larger enterprises. Both provide strong customer service and notable reliability.
Download Amazon RDS vs. Oracle Database as a Service Report
Amazon RDS has a lower initial setup cost, while Oracle Database as a Service requires a higher upfront investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Amazon RDS has a lower initial setup cost, while Oracle Database as a Service requires a higher upfront investment.
Oracle Database as a Service Logo
Oracle Database as a Service Logo
Microsoft Azure SQL Database
4.3 out of 5
Microsoft Azure SQL Database is renowned for seamless integration with Microsoft services and ease of use. In comparison, Oracle Database as a Service excels in advanced features and scalability. Buyers might prefer Microsoft Azure for pricing flexibility and support, while Oracle is valued for complex enterprise needs despite its cost.
Download Microsoft Azure SQL Database vs. Oracle Database as a Service Report
Microsoft Azure SQL Database has a lower setup cost compared to Oracle Database as a Service, making it a more budget-friendly option. However, Oracle Database as a Service offers a wider range of advanced features for enterprises willing to invest more upfront.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Azure SQL Database has a lower setup cost compared to Oracle Database as a Service, making it a more budget-friendly option. However, Oracle Database as a Service offers a wider range of advanced features for enterprises willing to invest more upfront.
Oracle Database as a Service Logo
Google Cloud SQL
4.2 out of 5
Oracle Database as a Service Logo
Google Cloud SQL
4.2 out of 5

Google Cloud SQL is favored for its pricing and support. In comparison, Oracle Database as a Service impresses with its comprehensive features. Google Cloud SQL is ideal for those prioritizing cost-effectiveness, while Oracle Database as a Service is suited for those needing advanced analytics and extensive features.

Download Google Cloud SQL vs. Oracle Database as a Service Report
Google Cloud SQL has an initial setup cost that is generally lower compared to Oracle Database as a Service, which requires a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Google Cloud SQL has an initial setup cost that is generally lower compared to Oracle Database as a Service, which requires a higher initial investment.
Oracle Database as a Service Logo
MongoDB Atlas
4.2 out of 5
Oracle Database as a Service Logo
MongoDB Atlas
4.2 out of 5
Oracle Database as a Service offers robust data management with automated backups and enterprise support. In comparison, MongoDB Atlas provides flexibility and scalability for diverse data types. While Oracle offers advanced features, MongoDB Atlas is known for its ease of deployment and competitive pricing.
Download MongoDB Atlas vs. Oracle Database as a Service Report
Oracle Database as a Service requires significant initial costs, while MongoDB Atlas offers a more cost-effective setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Oracle Database as a Service requires significant initial costs, while MongoDB Atlas offers a more cost-effective setup.
Oracle Database as a Service Logo
Oracle Database as a Service Logo
Google Cloud Spanner
4.5 out of 5
Oracle Database as a Service offers comprehensive data management and strong security. In comparison, Google Cloud Spanner excels in horizontal scalability and global consistency. Oracle's cost-effective pricing appeals to budget-conscious buyers, while Google Cloud Spanner's advanced features justify its higher cost.
Download Google Cloud Spanner vs. Oracle Database as a Service Report
Oracle Database as a Service has a higher setup cost compared to Google Cloud Spanner.
View comparison
Pricing
Oracle Database as a Service has a higher setup cost compared to Google Cloud Spanner.

Related categories

Database as a Service (DBaaS)
Managed NoSQL Databases