Top 10 Panasas ActiveStor Alternatives

4.5 out of 5

2 reviews
100% willing to recommend

769 followers

Top Panasas ActiveStor Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Panasas ActiveStor based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Dell PowerScale (Isilon), IBM FlashSystem, and NetApp FAS Series. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Panasas Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Panasas, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Dell PowerScale (Isilon)

4.4 out of 5

Dell PowerScale (Isilon)

4.4 out of 5

Panasas ActiveStor excels in pricing and personalized customer service, appealing to those seeking cost-effective high-performance storage with easy management. In comparison, Dell PowerScale offers advanced features and scalability, attracting enterprises needing comprehensive data protection and long-term value despite higher initial costs.

Download Dell PowerScale (Isilon) vs. Panasas ActiveStor Report

Pricing

Panasas ActiveStor offers a cost-effective setup, while Dell PowerScale (Isilon) involves a higher initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Panasas ActiveStor offers a cost-effective setup, while Dell PowerScale (Isilon) involves a higher initial investment.

IBM FlashSystem

4.1 out of 5

IBM FlashSystem

4.1 out of 5

Panasas ActiveStor offers scalability and parallel file systems enhancing high-performance computing, ideal for cost-effective deployment. In comparison, IBM FlashSystem appeals with advanced data reduction and AI integration, providing long-term efficiency. Panasas's ease contrasts IBM's complex but customizable support options.

Download IBM FlashSystem vs. Panasas ActiveStor Report

Pricing

Panasas ActiveStor offers a lower setup cost, making it an affordable choice, whereas IBM FlashSystem requires a higher initial investment, reflecting its advanced features.

View comparison

Pricing

Panasas ActiveStor offers a lower setup cost, making it an affordable choice, whereas IBM FlashSystem requires a higher initial investment, reflecting its advanced features.

NetApp FAS Series

4.4 out of 5

NetApp FAS Series

4.4 out of 5

Panasas ActiveStor offers cost-effectiveness and ease of support with its parallel data access, appealing for simpler tasks. In comparison, NetApp FAS Series provides robust data management and cloud integration, making it ideal for complex environments needing advanced features and long-term value.

Download NetApp FAS Series vs. Panasas ActiveStor Report

Pricing

Panasas ActiveStor setup costs are considered straightforward and efficient, while NetApp FAS Series might involve higher initial expenses due to its complexity. Panasas ActiveStor offers a simpler setup, contrasting with the potentially more costly and intricate implementation of NetApp.

View comparison

Pricing

Huawei OceanStor 9000

4.3 out of 5

Huawei OceanStor 9000

4.3 out of 5

Panasas ActiveStor offers high-performance parallel file systems and simplicity, appealing to those seeking cost-effective, scalable solutions with strong customer support. In comparison, Huawei OceanStor 9000 attracts tech buyers with its extensive features and robust data protection, justifying its higher costs.

Download Huawei OceanStor 9000 vs. Panasas ActiveStor Report

Pricing

Panasas ActiveStor has straightforward setup with cost efficiency, while Huawei OceanStor 9000 involves higher initial costs but offers robust scalability.

View comparison

Pricing

Panasas ActiveStor has straightforward setup with cost efficiency, while Huawei OceanStor 9000 involves higher initial costs but offers robust scalability.

Related categories

NAS

File and Object Storage

Modular SAN (Storage Area Network)