Qualys Multi-Vector EDR pros and cons

4.0 out of 5

1 review
100% willing to recommend

Pros & Cons summary

Qualys Multi-Vector EDR provides comprehensive threat detection and response capabilities, ensuring real-time visibility across endpoints. It integrates seamlessly with other security tools and offers robust automation features for incident response. Although it scales efficiently for enterprises of all sizes, high resource consumption, occasional false positives, and a steep learning curve are noted drawbacks. Complexity in configuration and limited integration options with some third-party tools can also pose challenges for new users.

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.

Get the category report

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

Efficient threat detection and response capabilities

Comprehensive coverage across multiple vectors

Seamless integration with existing security infrastructure

Automated incident analysis and reporting

High scalability for large deployments

CONS

Limited integration with third-party tools

High false positive rate

Complicated setup process

Expensive compared to alternatives

Subpar customer support

Qualys Multi-Vector EDR Pros review quotes

reviewer1668453

Director, Security Innovation at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees

Nov 24, 2021

They can provide you very contextual alerts on if something bad is happening—coming into your network or going out of your network. As part of that, they gather a lot of threat intelligence and map your connections against that. The larger benefit is that they give you a risk rating on their findings.

Read full review

Qualys Multi-Vector EDR Cons review quotes

reviewer1668453

Director, Security Innovation at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees

Nov 24, 2021

My challenge is actually comparing offerings from different vendors across a threat spectrum that is very large. We are talking about millions of threats. How are you confident that Blue Hexagon is catching all one million of them and Palo Alto is doing the same thing? They all have their strengths. Within that, Blue Hexagon might cover 990,000 of them. Palo Alto might cover another 990,000. It's a bit difficult to compare them and say, "Oh, are they catching the same 990,000?" I don't know.

Read full review