Top 10 Redpanda Alternatives

Name: Redpanda
Brand: Redpanda Data
Rating: 4.6 (4 reviews)

Vendor: Redpanda Data

4.6 out of 5

4 reviews
100% willing to recommend

Leave a review

Top Redpanda Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Redpanda based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Databricks, Confluent, and Apache Kafka. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Redpanda surpasses its competitors by offering low-latency streaming, high-throughput capacity, and seamless integration with existing Kafka ecosystems, ensuring superior performance, efficiency, and scalability for real-time data processing and analytics.

Redpanda Data Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Redpanda Data, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Databricks

4.1 out of 5

Databricks

4.1 out of 5

Databricks offers seamless data optimization and supports machine learning, while Redpanda emphasizes performance and simplicity. In comparison, Redpanda's cost-effectiveness and speed attract users seeking high throughput, whereas Databricks excels in scalable analytics and integration across environments.

Download Databricks vs. Redpanda Report

Pricing

Databricks has a higher setup cost, emphasizing comprehensive capabilities, while Redpanda offers a lower setup expense, appealing to budget-conscious users.

View comparison

Pricing

Databricks has a higher setup cost, emphasizing comprehensive capabilities, while Redpanda offers a lower setup expense, appealing to budget-conscious users.

Confluent

4.1 out of 5

Confluent

4.1 out of 5

Confluent appeals to enterprises needing extensive integration and enterprise-level functions. In comparison, Redpanda provides simplicity and cost efficiency with an innovative architecture. Tech buyers might choose Confluent for scalability and security, while others prefer Redpanda for its streamlined setup and minimal upkeep.

Download Confluent vs. Redpanda Report

Pricing

Confluent has a higher setup cost compared to Redpanda, which offers a more cost-effective solution.

View comparison

Pricing

Confluent has a higher setup cost compared to Redpanda, which offers a more cost-effective solution.

Apache Kafka

4.1 out of 5

Apache Kafka

4.1 out of 5

Apache Kafka excels in handling distributed processing with features like replication and partitioning, benefiting large-scale applications. In comparison, Redpanda's C++ architecture delivers high performance, providing faster deployment and ease of configuration, appealing to those needing efficient client support.

Download Apache Kafka vs. Redpanda Report

Pricing

Apache Kafka typically has a higher initial setup cost while Redpanda offers a simplified deployment with potentially lower upfront expenses, highlighting a difference in cost-effectiveness that may impact budgeting decisions depending on complexity and scale requirements.

View comparison

Pricing

Amazon Kinesis

4.0 out of 5

Amazon Kinesis

4.0 out of 5

Amazon Kinesis excels at integrating with AWS services, enhancing its data processing capabilities. In comparison, Redpanda offers a lightweight, on-premise option founded on C++, providing resource efficiency. Kinesis's pricing reflects its seamless integration, whereas Redpanda offers cost-effective support options.

Download Amazon Kinesis vs. Redpanda Report

Pricing

Amazon Kinesis has a setup cost structure that accommodates scaling demands, while Redpanda offers a more simplified and predictable setup cost.

View comparison

Pricing

Amazon Kinesis has a setup cost structure that accommodates scaling demands, while Redpanda offers a more simplified and predictable setup cost.

PubSub+ Platform

4.3 out of 5

PubSub+ Platform

4.3 out of 5

PubSub+ Platform excels in protocol support and diverse feature sets, ideal for enterprises needing flexibility and advanced filtering. In comparison, Redpanda offers cost-effective high performance with simple deployments, appealing to businesses seeking resource-efficient solutions without extensive protocol diversity.

Download PubSub+ Platform vs. Redpanda Report

Pricing

PubSub+ Platform requires lower initial setup costs, offering budget-friendly entry, while Redpanda has higher setup costs, reflecting its advanced features.

View comparison

Pricing

PubSub+ Platform requires lower initial setup costs, offering budget-friendly entry, while Redpanda has higher setup costs, reflecting its advanced features.

Amazon MSK

3.6 out of 5

Amazon MSK

3.6 out of 5

Amazon MSK provides seamless AWS integration with managed Kafka solutions, emphasizing security and scalability. In comparison, Redpanda offers high performance with minimal latency, ideal for non-cloud environments. Tech buyers may prefer Amazon MSK for integration or Redpanda for performance and cost efficiency.

Download Amazon MSK vs. Redpanda Report

Pricing

Amazon MSK involves a comprehensive setup cost, whereas Redpanda offers a straightforward initial cost structure, highlighting their distinct approaches to pricing and implementation.

View comparison

Pricing

Amazon MSK involves a comprehensive setup cost, whereas Redpanda offers a straightforward initial cost structure, highlighting their distinct approaches to pricing and implementation.

Apache Pulsar

4.0 out of 5

Apache Pulsar

4.0 out of 5

Apache Pulsar is a cloud-native, distributed messaging and streaming platform originally created at Yahoo! and now a top-level Apache Software Foundation project

View comparison

StreamNative

1 out of 5

StreamNative

1 out of 5

StreamNative effectively supports data streaming use cases with features like scalability and real-time analytics. Users appreciate its flexibility but suggest improvements in documentation and integration capabilities to enhance the experience for diverse business needs.

View comparison

Related categories

Streaming Analytics

Cloud Data Warehouse

Data Science Platforms