Top 10 SAP IQ Alternatives

Vendor: SAP

3.9 out of 5

23 reviews
80% willing to recommend

Top SAP IQ Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to SAP IQ based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include SQL Server, Teradata, and Snowflake. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

SAP IQ surpasses its competitors by offering high-performance analytics, exceptional scalability, and efficient data compression, ensuring rapid query processing and storage cost reduction. Its advanced columnar architecture enhances data management, aiding businesses in swift decision-making.

SAP Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with SAP, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

SQL Server

4.2 out of 5

SQL Server

4.2 out of 5

SQL Server excels in varied workloads with integration and deployment flexibility, but faces installation challenges. In comparison, SAP IQ offers strong analytics and storage efficiency, though it requires better marketing and documentation. SQL Server is cost-effective overall whereas SAP IQ supports strong long-term performance.

Download SAP IQ vs. SQL Server Report

Pricing

SQL Server highlights its lower setup cost as a key advantage, while SAP IQ's higher initial investment targets more extensive data warehousing capabilities. Comparing setup costs, SQL Server is cost-efficient, whereas SAP IQ demands a greater initial financial commitment.

View comparison

Pricing

Teradata

4.1 out of 5

Teradata

4.1 out of 5

SAP IQ appeals for its cost-effective pricing and ease of setup, focusing on high-performance analytics with query speed and data compression. In comparison, Teradata supports extensive analytics with parallel processing, excelling in complex data warehousing, justifying its higher cost for large enterprises.

Download SAP IQ vs. Teradata Report

Pricing

SAP IQ has higher setup costs compared to Teradata, which features a more affordable initial implementation.

View comparison

Pricing

SAP IQ has higher setup costs compared to Teradata, which features a more affordable initial implementation.

Snowflake

4.2 out of 5

Snowflake

4.2 out of 5

SAP IQ, with its columnar architecture, enhances data compression and query speed for analytics, making it suitable for on-premises deployments. In comparison, Snowflake emphasizes cloud-native features like dynamic scaling and efficient cloud deployment, appealing to tech buyers seeking flexible, managed services.

Download SAP IQ vs. Snowflake Report

Pricing

SAP IQ has a lower initial setup cost, making it potentially more cost-effective upfront, while Snowflake can entail higher initial expenses but offers scalable architecture for extensive data needs.

View comparison

Pricing

SAP IQ has a lower initial setup cost, making it potentially more cost-effective upfront, while Snowflake can entail higher initial expenses but offers scalable architecture for extensive data needs.

Oracle Database

4.3 out of 5

Oracle Database

4.3 out of 5

Oracle Database is chosen for its high availability, security, and scalability, supporting large enterprises. In comparison, SAP IQ excels in high-speed data retrieval and efficient handling of ad-hoc queries. Oracle's advanced tools aid management, while SAP IQ's pricing remains competitive for data warehousing.

Download Oracle Database vs. SAP IQ Report

Pricing

Oracle Database often incurs higher setup costs, while SAP IQ is typically viewed as more cost-effective in initial deployment.

View comparison

Pricing

Oracle Database often incurs higher setup costs, while SAP IQ is typically viewed as more cost-effective in initial deployment.

Oracle Exadata

4.3 out of 5

Oracle Exadata

4.3 out of 5

SAP IQ offers high performance and data compression for business intelligence, though it requires better backup and marketing. In comparison, Oracle Exadata enhances SQL operations with smart technology but is complex and costly. SAP IQ is cost-effective; Oracle Exadata suits large-scale enterprises.

Download Oracle Exadata vs. SAP IQ Report

Pricing

SAP IQ offers a more cost-effective setup compared to Oracle Exadata, which tends to have higher initial setup expenses.

View comparison

Pricing

SAP IQ offers a more cost-effective setup compared to Oracle Exadata, which tends to have higher initial setup expenses.

IBM Db2 Database

4.1 out of 5

IBM Db2 Database

4.1 out of 5

SAP IQ focuses on column-based architecture optimizing query speed and storage efficiency for business intelligence. In comparison, IBM Db2 offers robust scalability and cross-platform support, appealing to enterprises needing integration with IBM's ecosystem and extensive deployment flexibility.

Download IBM Db2 Database vs. SAP IQ Report

Pricing

SAP IQ's setup cost is typically higher compared to IBM Db2 Database, which offers a more cost-effective initial setup.

View comparison

Pricing

SAP IQ's setup cost is typically higher compared to IBM Db2 Database, which offers a more cost-effective initial setup.

OpenText Analytics Database (Vertica)

4.1 out of 5

OpenText Analytics Database (Vertica)

4.1 out of 5

SAP IQ offers high query speeds and data compression with a focus on business intelligence and data warehousing. In comparison, Vertica provides parallel data processing, extensive integrations, and flexible deployment, appealing to large-scale analytics needs with its advanced features and pricing predictability.

Download OpenText Analytics Database (Vertica) vs. SAP IQ Report

Pricing

SAP IQ has a relatively high setup cost, whereas OpenText Analytics Database (Vertica) offers a more budget-friendly initial expenditure, appealing to cost-conscious buyers seeking efficient database solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Apache Hadoop

3.9 out of 5

Apache Hadoop

3.9 out of 5

SAP IQ excels in data compression and scalability with its columnar database optimized for analytics. In comparison, Apache Hadoop provides powerful distributed processing through HDFS and MapReduce, ideal for unstructured data, offering flexibility with its open-source nature for large-scale enterprises.

Download Apache Hadoop vs. SAP IQ Report

Pricing

SAP IQ shows a higher setup cost compared to Apache Hadoop, emphasizing its premium positioning, while Hadoop provides a more cost-effective installation, appealing to those prioritizing initial investment savings.

View comparison

Pricing

Oracle Database In-Memory

4.4 out of 5

Oracle Database In-Memory

4.4 out of 5

SAP IQ offers cost-effective licensing and high compression for large-scale analytics with fast query speeds. In comparison, Oracle Database In-Memory excels in real-time analytics, supporting complex SQL queries and stability, though it is more expensive and requires significant resources.

Download Oracle Database In-Memory vs. SAP IQ Report

Pricing

SAP IQ has a lower setup cost compared to Oracle Database In-Memory, offering cost efficiency. Alternatively, Oracle Database In-Memory may provide potential users with enhanced performance features justifying its higher initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Exasol Data Warehouse

4.0 out of 5

Exasol Data Warehouse

4.0 out of 5

SAP IQ offers robust performance and scalability with competitive pricing, excelling in data compression and transactional workloads. In comparison, Exasol, with higher initial costs, delivers superior processing speed and analytics, making it ideal for businesses prioritizing rapid queries and high ROI.

Download Exasol Data Warehouse vs. SAP IQ Report

Pricing

SAP IQ has relatively higher setup costs compared to Exasol Data Warehouse, which offers more budget-friendly initial pricing.

View comparison

Pricing

SAP IQ has relatively higher setup costs compared to Exasol Data Warehouse, which offers more budget-friendly initial pricing.

Show 1 more products

Related categories

Relational Databases Tools

Data Warehouse

Customer Experience Management