This solution is absolutely easy to scale.

We had almost 6,000 endpoints in one of the MSPs that I worked for, and I didn't find any issues with that at all.

Right now, we're hovering around 1,000 endpoints, with no issues.

In the larger MSP that I worked for, my remote team consisted of 20+ individuals, and this product went through the paces, but I've never heard anybody say, "Hey, you know what? This is just too slow. I'm going to wait until somebody's off to continue because it's unusable."

The scalability is good. I would rate it at an eight out of ten. It expands well. 

We'll continue to use this product for the foreseeable future.

I rate ConnectWise ScreenConnect ten out of ten for scalability.

It is not an easily scalable solution. No maintenance is required for the product since everything is handled in the cloud.

Only I use the product in my company.

We have 15 users who are on it on a daily basis and using it to assist customers. 

We haven't tried to expand it. We had a rather small installation and have no plans to increase usage right now. At the outset, we didn't really look into its scalability as we knew we didn't have plans to grow beyond what we initially planned for. 

The amount of users varies. We currently have about 80 customers that we support. We've got about six engineers that are using the system, and they are supporting 80 customers. The combined number of users among all our customers is probably almost 100,000.

The system is incredibly scalable. We've never encountered any performance issues whatsoever as the system has been growing. There's absolutely no problem with scalability. I'd rate scalability ten out of ten. 

I think that it's pretty scalable. We've increased our license count since we first purchased it.

I've got seven people total using it, including our service desk staff and our tier-two, or desktop support. Our level three engineers use it because they enjoy the flexibility of connecting to servers with it, versus using a remote desktop.

We only use it on a handful of systems, so I couldn’t answer this. I would assume it should scale fine.

Scalability is fine.

No issues with scalability.

I did not encounter any issues with scalability. The product supports about 30 networks covering about 250 users.

No scalability issues.

No scalability issues.

No scalability issues at all. We're only a small team. 

There were no scaling issues. However, when using the tool and connecting to multiple monitor setups, you usually need to adjust the connect screen to compensate, as it keeps their native resolution.

The solution scales well. 

What we like about this system is that we can scale up and down.  You can increase your concurrent agent license requirement automatically online and it's effective immediately. That way, you can support more agents quickly. It also works the other way. Once any spike in workload is going away, you can reduce your license account again. It's really very scalable. 

At the moment, we're supporting about 40 different clients and that encompasses about 300,000 users.

We are constantly using the solution 24 hours per day.

We have three accounts and have three or four people on the solution currently. We're still early in the process. I wouldn't be able to describe how scalable it is.

I have not noticed any scalability issues.

No scalability issues.

I use it so rarely that I have not had a scalability problem, nor have I noticed my IT guy complaining about the inability to do certain things.

We haven't had any problems with scalability.

No issues with scalability.

I haven't scaled it at all.

We have not had any scalability issues.

It's been able to scale it for our needs.

It's scaled for our needs.

Scalability is great. I can add users as they are added to our system.

No issues have been encountered to date.

The services scales very easily and adding additional seats is, thankfully, very simple.

No.

No scalability issues.

No.