Seqrite Endpoint Security Reviews

We primarily use the solution for security purposes. 

The overall performance of the server and the dashboard are the most interesting aspects of the solution. 

It is stable and reliable. 

The pricing could be a bit lower. It needs to be less expensive so that smaller companies would be able to afford it.

It needs to offer more customization capabilities. 

I've only used the solution for a couple of months. I'm testing some things out for my organization. While this is a new solution, I do have 13 years of experience in the IT profession. 

The product is stable and reliable. There are no bugs or glitches, and it doesn't crash or freeze. 

I have used Trend Micro in the past. That was at a different company. We are using something else at this company. 

We are still in the process of testing the solution. It is not fully installed. 

The pricing could always be lowered for smaller companies. It would help them find room for it in their budgets. 

We are end-users and are just testing the product to see if it is a good fit. 

The solution automatically updates so that it is always on the latest version.

I'd rate the product eight out of ten.  

Endpoint Security's best features are inventory, asset management, and quick scanning.

Endpoint Security would be improved by adding DLP.

I've been using Seqrite Endpoint Security for more than three years. 

Endpoint Security is stable and performs well.

Endpoint Security is scalable.

Seqrite's technical support is satisfactory.

Positive

I've also used Apex One, but Endpoint Security is more user-friendly.

The initial setup was straightforward, and deployment took around thirty minutes.

We had assistance from a vendor team.

Endpoint Security is cheaper than Trend Micro - I'd rate it 4.5 out of five on price.

I would give Endpoint Security a rating of nine out of ten.

Seqrite Endpoint Security is a good solution. 

The solution needs to improve stability. 

I have been using the solution for three years. 

I rate Seqrite Endpoint Security's stability an eight out of ten. 

The product is scalable. We have around 75 users for it. 

The tool's deployment was easy and took only half an hour to complete. One resource is enough to handle the deployment and maintenance process. 

We deployed the tool in-house. 

I rate Seqrite Endpoint Security a ten out of ten. 

Seqrite Endpoint Security's focus on the SMB sector is well-suited for companies without static IPs or VPNs, as it allows for effective internal traffic monitoring and control. The categorization feature is handy for managing website access, and the point-to-point VPN option provides additional security for specific scenarios.

The solution is easy to manage, and applying rules is very easy. Also, the UI is very user-friendly.

The solution’s processing is slow. There are a lot of load performance issues when we load the stacker at low NPC. The solution could be made light.

Seqrite Endpoint Security offers comprehensive protection for all endpoints, including Android and Mac devices. This is becoming increasingly important as more schools and businesses adopt these platforms. Additionally, Seqrite Endpoint Security is easy to implement and manage, making it an ideal solution for organizations of all sizes.

I have been using Seqrite Endpoint Security as a system integrator for three to four years.

The product is stable.

The solution is highly scalable. You need to purchase an additional license.

The application is suitable for small and medium businesses.

Support is locally managed in a call center in India. Once an issue is submitted, they are very proactive in addressing it. They are constantly working on complaints, so there are no issues in support for anything else. It is easy to maintain, install, and run, with readily available support.

Positive

Seqrite offers local HR personnel through which we can quickly get guys' numbers whenever needed.

The initial setup is easy.

The deployment takes about 15 to 20 minutes, whereas the client can be deployed within two to three minutes.

The solution is cheaper compared to Zoho and other multinational products. It's cheaper.

The solution has a yearly license, which covers all features.

The solution’s maintenance is easy. It can be centrally loaded. Centralized installation enables a single setup for all devices. The solution provides comprehensive protection across your entire network with a single gateway.

There is a general lack of awareness about firewalls in India, even among IT professionals and businesses. This lack of understanding hinders the implementation and utilization of firewalls to their full potential. To address this issue, we need to raise awareness about the functionalities and capabilities of firewalls among users, businesses, and IT professionals. Once people know the benefits of firewalls, the demand for firewall training and GUI enhancements will naturally increase.

Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

I use this solution for the advanced device control features, application control features, filter policies, DLP solutions, and to schedule internet access.

The solution is deployed on-premises.

There are 150 people using this solution in my organization. We don't have plans to increase usage.

The most valuable features are the file activity monitors, DLP solutions, and application controls.

We are using Apple devices, and the advanced device control service doesn't work for M1 chips devices, like Apple MacBooks.

It should be more compatible with other devices.

I have used this solution for five years.

It's stable.

It's scalable, but not for Mac devices.

Setup is very easy. It can be deployed in two hours.

It can be accessed by a console system. I have a primary and secondary server, but I have merged both sides to make a single primary server.

I deployed the solution myself.

The license isn't expensive.

I would rate this solution as six out of ten.

It's basically for remote work management. We are still operating in a hybrid mode. Whatever restrictions we have to apply on the end-user laptops, we do it through Seqrite. 

There are a lot of client IT restrictions that we have to deal with. We cannot share the laptop screen, for example, or there cannot be media storage devices connected to the laptop. So all of these access controls and the endpoint governance policies are running through Seqrite.

The convenience has been great. That is the most beneficial thing, especially when we onboard someone new. 

Earlier, the IT team had to set up everything from scratch on every laptop, and even then, there was a chance of the end user being able to bypass some of those controls. 

With Seqrite, it is completely protected, and we have full control over what is happening on the end user's laptop.

As we're using the serverless version, the fully managed offering, we are able to control and change the access permissions remotely. Whenever someone has to get temporary access or anything, we do not have to install the application on our server and maintain it. We have one single login, an admin login, and from there, we can change the permissions and access controls for a number of end-user devices.

The deployment was fast.

The solution is stable so far.

It's pretty affordable. 

User management could be improved. For example, if you have to create different types of user groups based on what kind of access they would need, that should be easier. We keep standard rules for certain profiles. The user management is not that good currently, and so we have trouble with handling user management.

Once the client is installed, then we can control it. However, the initial setup should be managed completely in mobile mode. For example, if a laptop is delivered directly from the vendor to an employee and we can trigger the command from a central place to install the client and run the standard installations as well, that would make things easier.

I'm a bit concerned about the responsiveness of support.

I've been using the solution for 1.5 years. 

So far, the solution looks stable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. 

It is too early to tell how well the solution will scale. We have not yet scaled it to a lot of users. Only five people are using it right now. That includes developers and project managers. We do plan to increase usage as our developer base expands. 

We have yet to escalate questions to technical support. However, during the procurement cycle, we did find the responsiveness lacking to some extent. They were slower than we expected. I worry that they may not be proactive if we do run into issues. 

While we did not directly use the solution, we did explore a Dell product. We read about the features, and it was very similar. We went with this solution based on the price point, and we were getting a fully managed version. Also, the IT person who was implementing it had prior experience and knew the product well. 

The solution has a short deployment cycle. It wasn't very long. In one month, we assessed different solutions available in the market, and then after comparing the price and the features available, we deployed it. The procurement time was roughly 10 days, and we implemented it in about one week. We had one person working on it full-time with guidance from me. It doesn't take many people to deploy and maintain it. This is the serverless version we're using, so we do not have a lot of maintenance to worry about.

Price-wise, it is quite reasonable.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten in terms of affordability.

They offer one standard license as part of a package that covers an admin and X number of users. 

Earlier, I was working with a services company. There we were resellers and distributors of these solutions. Now, I'm working with a company where we are using these tools in-house. I'm helping with the implementation in-house. Right now, the company I'm associated with is not a registered reseller.

We are using the solution. We're using the SaaS version.

The tool is still new to us, and we are taking a chance on it. However, in general, it looks good overall. 

I'd rate the solution seven out of ten.

We use the solution for managing our main product, antivirus, and device locking.

There are many features available in this solution, such as asset management.

The solution could improve by providing better security and a cloud base version.

I have been using this solution for approximately three years.

The stability is good.

We have approximately 250 users using this solution and we plan to increase usage to 300. 

We have not needed to use technical support, we were able to handle everything ourselves.

The installation of Seqrite Endpoint Security is straightforward, but when comparing it to Sophos, they have a more sophisticated and easier deployment.

We pay approximately $1,500 for licenses for the solution.

I have been looking for a pure endpoint solution with better security to replace Seqrite Endpoint Security. We have been evaluating Sophos' solutions.

I rate Seqrite Endpoint Security a seven out of ten.