Microsoft Defender for Business vs Seqrite Endpoint Security comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Microsoft and Seqrite are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. Microsoft is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.1, while Seqrite is ranked #44. Microsoft holds a 1.3% mindshare in EPP, compared to Seqrite’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 82% of Seqrite users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 25, 2026

Seqrite Endpoint Security and Microsoft Defender for Business compete in the cybersecurity solutions category. Microsoft Defender for Business appears to have the upper hand due to robust threat detection and AI-powered analysis.

Features: Seqrite Endpoint Security offers asset management, ransomware backup, and data loss protection, appealing to users for innovation and utility. Microsoft Defender for Business provides threat detection, AI-powered analysis, and seamless integration within the Microsoft ecosystem, valued for its comprehensive security suite.

Room for Improvement: Seqrite Endpoint Security can enhance ransomware detection, stability, and user management while improving integration with other security products. Microsoft Defender for Business could reduce false positives in threat detection and improve integration with non-Microsoft environments, as well as enhance support responsiveness and cost-effectiveness for smaller businesses.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Seqrite Endpoint Security supports on-premises and private cloud deployments, with varied experiences in customer support. Microsoft Defender for Business offers on-premises, hybrid, and public cloud configurations, simplifying deployment through integration in the Microsoft ecosystem, though with inconsistent support experiences.

Pricing and ROI: Seqrite Endpoint Security is seen as economical, often cheaper than Trend Micro and Symantec, attractive for small to medium enterprises. Microsoft Defender for Business is included in Office 365 subscriptions, providing a comprehensive suite but some users express concerns about cost for smaller businesses, despite its competitive pricing.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Defender for Business vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Defender for Business vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,043 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is 3.8%, up from 3.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Defender for Business is 1.3%, down from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Seqrite Endpoint Security is 0.9%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks	3.8%
Microsoft Defender for Business	1.3%
Seqrite Endpoint Security	0.9%
Other	94.0%

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

ABHISHEK_SINGH

Senior Process Expert at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Gained full visibility and streamlined threat detection through behavior-based insights and AI integration

Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth. We have fine-tuned our security policies and allowed different levels of policies to get rid of those false positives. Currently, we are getting a fairly good amount of incidents that are not false positives or benign, but actionable items. The process is streamlined. In the initial days, the operations used to get involved in a lot of benign and other activities, but now the process is streamlined. We are leveraging the auto-detection and remediation plans. The operations teams are now more involved in other business roles as well, not just looking into the logs and fetching out what's happening there. They have fixed a lot of things. Initially, they didn't have IAC code drift detection, cloud posture management, or security posture management, but they have those now. They purchased different vendors and did a merger with that. They have now Prisma Cloud that gets integrated and now they are working with Cortex Cloud. Everything that was negative has now been addressed, and the product altogether looks to be in a very better and mature shape now. Currently, it's more or less detecting the workloads with AI-based best practices. Since most organizations are consuming AI agents and other things, we are looking forward to seeing what other feature enhancements Palo Alto can support in that.

Read full review

YusufBuhari

Head Of IT Security at Dangote Industries Limited

Unified defenses have strengthened threat hunting and automated incident disruption

I see room for improvement in Microsoft Defender for Business, particularly regarding the consolidation of all security solutions in one place and the integration of AI and data security into the same platform. I want to see more organized asset inventory, including identities, cloud resources, and various network devices. While there has been innovation from Microsoft, I am concerned about the lack of risk quantification across all major security solutions, including Microsoft's. Risk quantification is essential for CISOs to assess, communicate, and translate security risks into financial impacts, which is a challenge for many security leaders today. I would like to see a clear path for prioritization of risks within Microsoft Defender for Business, especially around vulnerability management. Even though there are features to prioritize remediation of risks based on exploitability, it could be more organized. A clearer structure for prioritizing remediation of risks would help manage them more effectively, as it is impractical to address all risks simultaneously.

Read full review

ManishKumar14

DGM IT at Seth Anandram Jaipuria Group of Educational Institutions

Centrally managed, easy to configure, and easy to use

Seqrite Endpoint Security protects individual machines, servers, and emails against malware, viruses, and spam attacks The solution is centrally managed, easy to configure, and easy to use. It allows you to patch your required reports. The solution provides central deployment, remote deployment,…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We use it for malicious connections from malicious websites, to identify payloads that might be inside the traffic, to identify malicious processes or bugs that are running on the network, and any activities that tend to lead to data infiltration."

"Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is specifically designed to prevent zero-day attacks and is part of an ecosystem of Palo Alto, providing customers with a long-term vision to modify and redesign how security is applied in their company."

"If you are looking for security, mainly for advanced threat prevention from ransomware and malware attacks, I would recommend Cortex."

"My advice for others looking into using Cortex is that it is very easy to use and very useful for the customer environment, whether it's a public or private one."

"Traps has drastically reduced our endpoint attack surface via advanced detection capabilities, sandboxing of never before seen programs, and by drastically limiting where executables can launch in the first place."

"I have found the solution to be very easy in respect of the integration and configurable."

"The stability of this product is very good."

"The initial setup is easy."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pros

"The security features in Microsoft Defender for Business that have been most effective for our company include the way it's built-in and intertwined into all the operating systems, giving us a good opportunity to holistically block things for the organization using that tenant."

"I recommend Microsoft Defender for Business to startup organizations looking for a plug-and-play solution."

"Because Microsoft Defender for Business is a native solution to Microsoft 365, it has contributed to my organization's proactive defense strategies by saving time on integration."

"The most effective features of Microsoft Defender for Business include its threat detection and response capabilities in managing vulnerabilities and ransomware attacks."

"If you're an Intune user, you can bring in certain capabilities like system-hardening policies, which further enhances the security."

"Defender's main strength is its integration with Microsoft Sentinel, offering valuable insights."

"The best features of Microsoft Defender for Business include it coming as an XDR solution which provides automated investigations, remediations, and endpoint detection and response."

"Microsoft Defender for Business stands out due to its ease of use, particularly due to the fact that many of my customers already use Microsoft and Azure."

More Microsoft Defender for Business pros

"Endpoint Security's best features are inventory, asset management, and quick scanning."

"The setup process was easy for our remote clients and us as well."

"The solution is centrally managed, easy to configure, and easy to use."

"Seqrite Endpoint Security provides external protection in terms of hard drives."

"The most valuable features of the solution are DLP, XDR, and EDR functionalities."

"We found the DLP to be innovative and useful."

"With Seqrite, it is completely protected, and we have full control over what is happening on the end user's laptop."

"The only thing that I have found useful is that I have an overview of my systems in the networks."

More Seqrite Endpoint Security pros

Cons

"A better pricing plan would make this product more competitive."

"The MAC agent is not as robust feature-wise as the PC version."

"While using Cortex, I noticed some aspects that could be improved, such as increasing the synchronization speed between XDR and Xnor."

"We have found that there are times Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks does not detect some of the viruses, we have to use another protection solution called Kaspersky."

"It automatically detects security issues. It should be able to protect our network devices while operating autonomously."

"It is an enterprise-level solution. Its price could be less expensive."

"In the next release, I would like to see more UI improvements. Their UI is a bit basic. When we are speaking about Palo Alto Networks they are the big company, so they can improve the UI a little bit. The UI, the reports, the log system can all be improved."

"Technology evolves every day, so it would be nice if it gets more secure. It can also have more integration with other platforms."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks cons

"Talking with the tool's technician about any problem is very complicated."

"The areas where Microsoft Defender for Business could improve include the support, installation process, and wiki. I should be able to find solutions to issues quickly without having to delve too deep."

"I have an open case for close to two months with no responses or updates, except for an email response, and I've made four or five phone calls regarding the Microsoft Interconnect for AD and cloud tenant."

"I see room for improvement in Microsoft Defender for Business, particularly regarding the consolidation of all security solutions in one place and the integration of AI and data security into the same platform."

"Microsoft should provide batch management solutions with the application, integrating pass management with roles."

"The tool's support is an area of concern where improvements are needed."

"The pricing of Microsoft Defender for Business has a long way to go since people are still preferring solutions such as CrowdStrike and Palo Alto."

"The technical support from Microsoft is very poor. I would rate it a one, as their technical staff are very junior and take a long time to respond to simple questions."

More Microsoft Defender for Business cons

"The solution's integration capabilities are moderate and could be improved."

"The solution could integrate with other products to provide a comprehensive protection strategy."

"The solution could improve by providing better security and a cloud base version."

"The pricing could be a bit lower."

"The stability is zero, Seqrite doesn't work, and the company doesn't accept the problems."

"The interface is slow."

"The support offered by the tool is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"Endpoint Security would be improved by adding DLP."

More Seqrite Endpoint Security cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's way too expensive, but security is expensive. You pay for your licensing, and then you pay for someone to monitor the stuff."

"Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is quite an expensive solution."

"Cortex XDR’s pricing is very reasonable."

"Its pricing is kind of in line with its competitors and everybody else out there."

"Our license will require renewal in August, after which the maintenance will continue as usual."

"I don't like that they have different types of licenses."

"It is present, but when compared to other competitive products, I would say it is not less expensive; however, when all of the other added values are considered, the price is reasonable."

"Licensing for Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR can be costly, especially when it comes to a hundred users. A license is required for each user, and the subscription must be renewed on a yearly basis."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

"Defender for Business is included by default with an Office 365 premium subscription."

"The tool's cost has been a little high, but I do not think it was terrible."

"It has to get more competitive because we are starting to see some of the competitors providing better pricing, and some of it, of course, is to gain market share. The Defender product pricing is probably a little higher than the competitors."

"Since we're a nonprofit, we get pretty good discounts on the tool."

"The tool is cheap, while some other solutions are more expensive. I remember the tool cost about five euros for a workstation or for a user on a monthly basis."

"We get the tool for around 1200 rupees for a three-year subscription. I rate its pricing a nine out of ten."

"We pay approximately $1,500 for licenses for the solution."

"Licensing fees are on a yearly basis. Compared to other solutions, this solution is cheaper."

"There is no option to refund the money and unfortunately, we bought a three-year license, seeing that Quick Heal is a long-established player in the market."

"It is a cheaply priced product."

"My company needs to purchase a yearly subscription for the licensing costs for Seqrite Endpoint Security."

"I give the cost of the solution a seven out of ten."

"Though I don't think that this is a cheaply priced product, I feel that it is an affordable solution."

More Seqrite Endpoint Security pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,043 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

14%

Outsourcing Company

12%

Construction Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

12%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	49
Midsize Enterprise	21
Large Enterprise	57

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	1

Questions from the Community

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. ...

See all answers

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions th...

See all answers

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface,...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Defender for Business?

Our thoughts on the pricing for Microsoft Defender for Business are that we wish it could be better. If the pricing w...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Defender for Business?

I see room for improvement in Microsoft Defender for Business, particularly regarding the consolidation of all securi...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Microsoft Defender for Business?

I would rate this product an eight out of ten.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 16% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

HP Wolf Security vs Microsoft Defender for Business

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Office 365 vs Microsoft Defender for Business

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Microsoft Defender for Business

Compared 5% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security Complete vs Microsoft Defender for Business

Compared 4% of the time

More Microsoft Defender for Business Competitors

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs Seqrite Endpoint Security

Compared 11% of the time

Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum vs Seqrite Endpoint Security

Compared 10% of the time

TrendAI Vision One – Endpoint Security vs Seqrite Endpoint Security

Compared 9% of the time

Intercept X Endpoint vs Seqrite Endpoint Security

Compared 7% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Seqrite Endpoint Security

Compared 6% of the time

More Seqrite Endpoint Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

October 2026

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Defender for Business

October 2026

Download Microsoft Defender for Business product report

Buyer's Guide

Seqrite Endpoint Security

October 2026

Download Seqrite Endpoint Security product report

Also Known As

Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps

No data available

Seqrite End Point Security, Seqrite EPS

Overview

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.

Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Cortex XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses AI and machine learning for proactive threat identification.
Multi-layered Security: Combines various security measures for comprehensive protection.
Endpoint Protection: Safeguards against malware and exploits.
Behavioral Analysis: Monitors suspicious activity for early detection.
Automatic Threat Response: Automates responses to neutralize threats.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with intuitive design.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes impact on system resources.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with existing security setups.
Reduced Analyst Workload: Automates processes to decrease manual intervention.

Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.

Palo Alto Networks

Microsoft Defender for Business offers comprehensive endpoint protection with features like AI-driven predictive analysis and integration with Microsoft services. It caters to businesses in the Microsoft and Azure ecosystems, enhancing cybersecurity strategies with real-time alerts and automated threat hunting.

Targeting enterprise environments, Microsoft Defender for Business provides extensive security measures for desktops, laptops, and virtual desktop infrastructure. Its seamless integration with Microsoft Sentinel allows for enhanced insight and threat mitigation. The central console aids in configuration and management, but areas such as URL filtering, reporting, and integration with non-Microsoft systems require improvement. Users often demand advanced threat detection and a quicker response to emerging threats, as managing security across platforms can present challenges.

What are the key features of Microsoft Defender for Business?

Vulnerability Management: Offers extensive analysis of potential vulnerabilities.
Predictive Analysis: Utilizes AI to anticipate threats before they materialize.
Seamless Integration: Works well with Microsoft services for enhanced protection.
Threat Detection & Response: Provides real-time alerts and quick responses to threats.
Endpoint Security: Comprehensive security for all endpoints in an organization.
Data Loss Prevention: Protects sensitive data from unauthorized access and leaks.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Enhanced Security: Real-time alerts and automated threat hunting improve protection.
Ease of Use: Central console facilitates configuration and management.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with existing security frameworks and Microsoft systems.
Comprehensive Protection: Extends security to identity, email, and cloud environments.

In sectors like finance and healthcare, Microsoft Defender for Business is implemented to secure sensitive data and maintain compliance. Managed service providers and resellers leverage its capabilities to offer robust security frameworks for clients, ensuring protection of digital assets and reducing risks associated with cyber threats.

Microsoft

Seqrite Endpoint Security provides comprehensive endpoint protection with features like inventory management, antivirus defense, and ransomware prevention. It ensures seamless device and application control, offering centralized management for hybrid environments across Windows, Mac, and Linux.

Seqrite Endpoint Security, known for its centralized management system, is designed to safeguard endpoints with advanced antivirus, malware detection, and ransomware prevention capabilities. It facilitates effective governance for hybrid work environments, providing robust inventory and asset management. While offering advanced device and application control across Windows, Mac, and Linux, Seqrite integrates XDR and EDR functionalities along with web protection and policy implementation.

What are the key features of Seqrite Endpoint Security?

Inventory and Asset Management: Track and manage hardware and software assets effectively.
Ransomware Backup: Provides backups to secure data against ransomware attacks.
Advanced EDR and XDR: Offers extended and endpoint detection and response.
File Monitoring: Monitors file activities to ensure data integrity.
External Device Control: Manages device usage and access.
Web Protection: Safeguards against online threats with secure browsing.
DLP Features: Monitors data access and usage to prevent data loss.

What benefits should be looked for?

Ease of Management: Streamlined management with a user-friendly interface.
Policy Implementation: Fast and effective application of security policies.
Cost-Effective Plans: Provides affordable options for varied businesses.
Centralized Management: Simplifies the management of multiple devices.

In industries like IT, healthcare, and finance, Seqrite Endpoint Security finds usage for securing endpoint devices and ensuring compliance with industry standards. Its centralized cloud-based management supports robust access control and governance, suitable for both small businesses and large enterprises in managing endpoint security challenges.

Seqrite

Sample Customers

CBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank

Information Not Available

Gadre, Bharat Vikas Group, Fernandez Hospital, Fabtech Projects & Engineering, KIMS Hospital, National Steel And Agro Industries, Sardar Patel University, Sterling Wilson, Chowgule Industries

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Defender for Business vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security

September 2026

Free Report: Microsoft Defender for Business vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Defender for Business vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,043 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Defender for Business vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.