Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
reviewer1965030 - PeerSpot reviewer
Software Developer at a computer software company with 11-50 employees
User
Sep 21, 2022
Plug and play with a great support and lots of space saving
Pros and Cons
  • "Having this all backed up by pro-active support gives us good peace of mind."
  • "Maybe they could have a support portal that you can have direct access to a current support representative."

What is our primary use case?

We were looking to replace aging hardware in our environment. We had the classic two physical hosts with a SAN set up with VMware as our hypervisor. We actually had two SANs since we needed more space.  

The SANs were not redundant. They were se tup as a pool. We wanted to simplify this setup and also reduce the single point of failure. Being a SMB, we have a small office and rack space is at a premium. We could not fit more than a few more servers on our rack without purchasing a new rack and finding a spot for it.

How has it helped my organization?

StarWind, with all SSDs and directly attached servers, gave us far superior performance than our previous setup. We can now have vMotion VMs in a matter of seconds rather than minutes. 

Although we haven't removed the previous equipment yet, I'm looking forward to removing all the cables running through all the switches. Also, having all the extra space on the rack is going to be nice. This will substantially reduce the amount of noise in the datacenter. 

Having this all backed up by pro-active support gives us good peace of mind.

What is most valuable?

The solution is plug and play. I was very happy that everything was delivered all tested and setup ready to go. I simply racked the servers, plugged them in and called for setup. It's so simple.

The simple two 1U server setup with all flash disks connected together with an ultrafast redundant Mellanox nics is great. It has saved us space and increased performance. It also reduced the noise pollution and energy costs.

The proactive support is a very valuable feature. I have not yet had to use support for anything major, however, I have asked a few questions and there is always a prompt reply.

What needs improvement?

Maybe they could have a support portal that you can have direct access to a current support representative. 

During setup we had a bit of a tricky situation that had to do with switching. The StarWind engineer recognized the possible problem with migration before it happened.  

During test migration when things went down it would have been nice to be able to reach out directly rather then send an email to support and wait for a reply.  It was not a long wait, however, it can feel like forever when in a tough situation.

Buyer's Guide
StarWind HyperConverged Appliance
December 2025
Learn what your peers think about StarWind HyperConverged Appliance. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2025.
880,315 professionals have used our research since 2012.

For how long have I used the solution?

We've used the solution for six months.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
reviewer1936401 - PeerSpot reviewer
Systems Administrator at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees
User
Aug 14, 2022
Reliable with excellent uptime and helpful support
Pros and Cons
  • "Reliability and overall uptime are key as we're also hosting client environments in addition to our own."
  • "The response time is usually several hours after the issue occurred."

What is our primary use case?

We use the solution as a high availability failover cluster in our data center.

How has it helped my organization?

StarWind HCA is much more reliable than our original failover cluster solution. Not even just by being more modern hardware, the virtual SAN allowed us to dramatically decrease our footprint and power consumption in our data center and is much simpler to manage. 

Any issues we've had along the way have been Windows issues as opposed to problems with the StarWind vSAN software.

What is most valuable?

Reliability and overall uptime are key as we're also hosting client environments in addition to our own. Bumps along the way have been resolved with the help of StarWind's fantastic support, and, as previously mentioned, pretty much any and all issues we've had have been Windows issues as opposed to their software, which their support has been happy to help troubleshoot and is refreshing to see

What needs improvement?

The proactive monitoring is nice. Knowing that they're watching for issues simultaneously with us. 

However, the response time is usually several hours after the issue occurred. Any disruption is felt immediately by the users, so we're already troubleshooting within a few minutes, and we reach out to support if needed before the proactive alert comes through to us.  

For how long have I used the solution?

We've used the solution between three and four years.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
StarWind HyperConverged Appliance
December 2025
Learn what your peers think about StarWind HyperConverged Appliance. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2025.
880,315 professionals have used our research since 2012.
reviewer1684866 - PeerSpot reviewer
CIO at a renewables & environment company with 11-50 employees
Real User
May 10, 2022
Reduced management and improved redundancy with competitive pricing
Pros and Cons
  • "The redundancy of two identical nodes that can run alone allows us to have truly "no single point of failure" in our computing and primary storage infrastructure."
  • "The overall product documentation and knowledgebase articles could use some rewriting and clarification."

What is our primary use case?

We use this as our primary data center computing and storage cluster for small/medium businesses. The StarWind HCA serves our domain, email, SQL,  storage, files, and other miscellaneous analytics and automation needs.  

We run VMware on our nodes and we host Windows and Linux VMs. This cluster is a priority-one infrastructure component, it cannot fail or go down. We require quick compute as well as high I/O to support VDI users as well as general server type needs. This cluster serves the core of our business.

How has it helped my organization?

StarWind HCA has improved our business by ways of reduced management overhead, increased compute and storage performance, reduced rack space requirements, reduced rack power usage, and improved redundancy.  

The reduced management and improved redundancy are probably the most important as it directly increases the time staff can focus on other tasks  Simply put, StarWind HCA "just works". Furthermore, having ProActive Support as a "second set of eyes" allows us to catch issues without constant "babysitting".

What is most valuable?

We find the improved redundancy, two identical nodes that can focus independently, as well as reduced management both highly valuable.  

The redundancy of two identical nodes that can run alone allows us to have truly "no single point of failure" in our computing and primary storage infrastructure.  This allows us to handle updates or physical server maintenance without a degradation in performance.  

We also appreciate the lack of management needed to handle sync between nodes or just general housekeeping, the nodes just run and work! 

What needs improvement?

The overall product documentation and knowledgebase articles could use some rewriting and clarification. Sometimes the documents reference old versions which are unhelpful. Other documents were written and seem to be translated into English so the writing is not clear. 

I would also appreciate some more technical documents on how the HCA appliances function, how sync occurs, the use of PowerShell on Linux systems, and some other details. None of this would stop me from recommending StarWind though since you rarely need to review documentation.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've used the solution for almost one year.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The stability has been great. We have not had the HCA system fail whatsoever. Minor issues are handled gracefully.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

We see no issues with scalability. I doubt we will outgrow the system, although we do always like it faster. You can add more storage, more RAM, and more nodes as needed.

How are customer service and support?

Service from initial questions and review, to demo, to purchase, and post-purchase support has been great.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We previously used standard computing plus a SAN system. We switched to reduce our rack space requirements and improve redundancy.

How was the initial setup?

The setup was very simple. Support helped every step along the way.

What about the implementation team?

This was done in-house. We have some technical knowledge. Again, support was very helpful.

What was our ROI?

ROI is hard to measure, however, so far, it has paid for itself in reduced management and improved redundancy.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The pricing is very competitive, especially with ProActive support since you gain a "second set of eyes" on the system to monitor for errors which allow staff to not focus on the StarWind cluster all the time.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We evaluated VMware vSAN, however, the cost was too high.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
reviewer1852935 - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Manager at a legal firm with 51-200 employees
User
May 9, 2022
Good replication, cuts down on hardware, and great performance
Pros and Cons
  • "How quickly the StarWind solution replicates also gives us the confidence to know that in the event of catastrophic failure of any piece of hardware, we won't be far behind before things went wrong."
  • "It would be nice if the software told you a new version was available and prompted you to do the upgrade to keep everything up to date."

What is our primary use case?

We migrated away from separate storage, computing, and switches to StarWind to enable us to condense and simplify our environment. 

We rely on StarWind to provide all of our storage, via the flash drives in the box, and the compute in a single solution but also to provide redundancy with its replication to another StarWind box. 

We now host all of our VMWare ESXi environments on the StarWind boxes and we wouldn't look back. We haven't had any real-world failures in the time that we have used StarWind but we have been able to prove it works many times during simulated failures and this gives us the confidence to continue using the platform.

How has it helped my organization?

It cut down the need to run multiple pieces of hardware to achieve the same goal, this also freed up valuable rack space. 

How quickly the StarWind solution replicates also gives us the confidence to know that in the event of catastrophic failure of any piece of hardware, we won't be far behind before things went wrong. 

We also used the move to StarWind to finally move to an all-flash array away from traditional HDDs, the performance improvement was noticeable right away and we are so glad we did so. 

What is most valuable?

The replication between the StarWind boxes. As I stated previously, although we have had no real issues, we have been able to simulate failures and be able to see that the failover kicks in immediately. 

This replication also allows us to perform maintenance easily on the ESXi environment for things such as software updates as we can quickly move all of the computing to a single server and shut the other one down without the need for any downtime during the working day. This means less time out of hours is needed to perform tasks that would have previously meant someone had to work late to complete them.

What needs improvement?

We haven't yet really found anything that we think needs immediate improvement. I am clutching at straws to find something if I am honest so would probably go with product updates. 

It would be nice if the software told you a new version was available and prompted you to do the upgrade to keep everything up to date. At the moment we tend to find out via the support team on the very odd occasion we do have a reason to talk to them. 

Otherwise, we have found it to work flawlessly and without issue. 

For how long have I used the solution?

I've used the solution for three years.

How are customer service and support?

Support is absolutely fantastic; we couldn't rate them highly enough.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is very straightforward. 

What about the implementation team?

StarWind themselves set up calls to help us get the environment going.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
CEO at a tech consulting company with 1-10 employees
User
Apr 21, 2022
Provided better performance and amortization of the implementations we did for clients, making their computer system a stable and agile system
Pros and Cons
  • "It is the perfect solution for hyper-convergence at a fair price. Our customers have Hyper-V and VMware environments, with Windows servers and Linux."
  • "The truth is that the operation and support offered is good, but we consider that the product's usability could improve, as well as the data resynchronization time after an unexpected closure."

What is our primary use case?

We trust StarWind and our customers support that trust. It makes virtualization easy and seamless. StarWind gives us what our companies need for optimal and secure growth. The solutions provided by StarWind can be implemented in any industry like government, education, manufacturing, services, or even ISP solutions. 

It is the perfect solution for hyper-convergence at a fair price. Our customers have Hyper-V and VMware environments, with Windows servers and Linux.

How has it helped my organization?

It works perfectly both in Microsoft Hyper-V virtualization solutions and in VMware virtualization solutions, integrating perfectly with the solutions of said manufacturers. Specifically, most of the solutions that we have implemented have been with Microsoft Hyper-V; its integration is complete.

StarWind provided better performance and amortization of the implementations we did for clients, making their computer system a stable and agile system. The solution is bug-free and highly available

What is most valuable?

For us, the greatest value that StarWind brings to Geyma and its clients is the proactive support of the implementation carried out. They monitor the servers, hardware, and services that are running at all times, notifying us very quickly if there is a problem with the implemented infrastructure and quickly triggering the alarms to be able to apply a quick and simple solution to the problem that may have arisen.

For this reason, we consider it a complete and reliable solution and we offer it to our clients.

What needs improvement?

StarWind can be implemented in any sector that requires high availability, reliability, and performance. The engineering team studies, designs, and reliably makes it available to the market. It is a complete solution.

The product fully meets current needs and I have no doubt that StarWind engineers will develop equally good solutions to meet future needs demanded by the industry.

The truth is that the operation and support offered are good, but we consider that the product's usability could improve, as well as the data resynchronization time after an unexpected closure.

For how long have I used the solution?

We have been partners with StarWind for 8 years. For Geyma and all our clients, what has helped businesses grow is the robustness of the solution, flexibility, high availability, the support offered, and trust in a company that has demonstrated a successful journey. There has been good work in everything they have done

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We previously used HP.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The cost is fair.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We evaluated HP.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
PeerSpot user
IT Manager at a recruiting/HR firm with 11-50 employees
Real User
Dec 15, 2021
Great support and automated monitoring with excellent cost savings
Pros and Cons
  • "The pricing and discounts given by Starwind on the hardware were unmatched."
  • "Shipping options should be explained in detail and offer more white glove delivery options even if it comes at an additional cost for some SMBs without docks."

What is our primary use case?

Our primary use case of the HCA is to provide a Highly Available, clustered virtualization environment to house all of our internally operational VMs. 

We host all of our internal server infrastructure on the HCA utilizing Hyper-V as our virtualization platform. 

The performance of an all SSD storage array allows us to easily and quickly expand our interal servers as needed without worries of performance degradation.  

The largest benefit to our company was to finally be able to have a no single point of failure setup at a pricepoint that was below that of competing enteprise oriented solutions. 

How has it helped my organization?

The HCA appliance replaced aging hardware, formerly cluster-in-a-box solutions, at a savings of over $20,000.00 and provided increased performance and more redundancy. The pricing and discounts given by Starwind on the hardware were unmatched. 

The HCA solution provides increased redundancy in that all storage is duplicated between multiple servers with multiple arrays of drives, rather than depending upon a single storage solution. It also allows us to utilize more cost-effective storage solutions rather than being handcuffed to dual port SSD with their higher price points when the performance far exceeds our needs. 

What is most valuable?

If you stay with a two or three-node solution, the HCA allows you to eliminate implementing a redundant storage network switch solution providing tons of savings on top of the affordable HCA offering. 

Additionally, the server cluster manager web tool provided by Starwind provides fast information at a glance to give you a complete overview of all virtualization, compute, storage, memory, and network resources throughout your network in a single plane of glass. 

The support and automated monitoring is a huge improvement over our previous vendor's offerings as well. It truly feels like we have a point of escalation on any issues and that provides a large amount of comfort to our small team. 

What needs improvement?

Shipping options should be explained in detail and offer more white glove delivery options even if it comes at an additional cost for some SMBs without docks. 

Our only pain point has been dealing with the freight shipping initially not showing up when promised, then showing up unannounced, and then sending us some small fees afterward due to the fact that we made them wait (since we weren't expecting them). Starwind has taken care of all of the fees after the fact, however, and they were more than accomodating in resolving the situation. 

We would like more visibility into the reporting that Starwind uses to monitor our solution for errors. We'd like to be able to receive the same data and notifications that their team receives.

For how long have I used the solution?

We have been using the HCA for almost one year.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

So far, we have had zero downtime. 

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The product is moderately scaleable. It should fit any SMB and works even in larger organizations. The product allows quick additional of multiple nodes. At a certain point, eventually your storage replication might be better served by dedicated sans rather than the VSAN, or it might be beneficial to check out the newer Storage Spaces in DataCenter edition when it comes to storage scaling up. However, I think the VSAN included with the cluster will meet most small and medium sized deployments by just adding more nodes with additional storage when needed. 

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We used cluster-in-a-box from DataON. We switched as they were reaching the end of life and it did not provide an affordable solution to replace it.

How was the initial setup?

The solution offers an easy setup. Support was there to hold hands as needed every step of the way, with a dedicated contact point who took us through the entire process. She was great!

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

We do not have any warnings to share. 

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We looked at options from TrueNas, DataOn, Dell, and HPE. 

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
reviewer1696365 - PeerSpot reviewer
Director Of Information Technology at a transportation company with 51-200 employees
User
Oct 20, 2021
Cost-effective with an increased user experience and better uptime
Pros and Cons
  • "Being able to log on to the GUI to see specific data and usage statistics, executing clones, starting and stopping VMs, etc., is great."
  • "The only issues are when Hyper V itself has limitations and I'd love to see support or enhancement in the area of direct-attached GPU cards."

What is our primary use case?

We use the StarWind HCA primarily and in its entirety to serve as our primary hyper-converged infrastructure in order to serve all of our virtual servers. In this environment, we have an RDSH server farm utilizing GPU cards. We also utilize backup software that connects directly to this environment. Being able to have our entire environment run on a single platform by a single vendor both hardware and software is huge for us. We don't have the time or resources to go to many vendors or have them point to other vendors as issues.

How has it helped my organization?

This solution improved our environment from an increased user experience and administrative experience. We have had much better uptime and product speed since switching to the HCA platform by StarWind. Our organization has required less 3rd party resources and software to provide speed and flexibility to both our IT staff and our end users. The solution specifically allows us to focus more of our time on software development and process changes utilizing the hardware, as opposed to supporting the hardware itself.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable feature is the flexibility of Hypervisor and there is no vendor lock-in including the hardware the system runs on. I find it powerful and I am able to use the StarWind GUI or the Microsoft back-end Hyper-V. Everything works hand in hand and neither side forces me to do something in a specific way. Being able to log on to the GUI to see specific data and usage statistics, executing clones, starting and stopping VMs, etc., is great.  These all seem like minor things but have had major impact on our productivity.

What needs improvement?

I have not had any issues or roadblocks as of yet that require any improvement. Everything that I have needed has been available in the product. 

The only issues are when Hyper V itself has limitations and I'd love to see support or enhancement in the area of direct-attached GPU cards. It would be great to see even more detailed analytics and scheduling reports of such to keep a focus on when and if we need to upgrade the environment.  

It would also be cool to see support in the GUI for more 3rd party add-ons.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've used the solution for almost one year.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We used Scale Computing. We switched due to the fact that we were too restricted with Scale Computing.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

We have found StarWind to be well over 50% more cost effective.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We also looked into Nutanix and Scale.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
reviewer1691742 - PeerSpot reviewer
Server Administrator at a university with 51-200 employees
User
Oct 18, 2021
Great software and support, with an easy initial setup
Pros and Cons
  • "We also opted for 24-hour support monitoring for any issues. They are extremely quick to respond on issues we even cause ourselves such as bumping a network cable."
  • "The management console could use a facelift."

What is our primary use case?

We are using Starwind HCA for a Hyper V failover cluster at our community college. We use our virtual environment to run nearly all operations at our school. It has slowly grown while replacing old physical hardware with virtual machines. It runs all email, file shares, SQL databases, IT management, PR display devices, and network security software we use to protect our environment. It replaced more expensive and difficult to maintain hardware that was not able to perform all tasks Starwind is able to.

How has it helped my organization?

It was much more affordable to replace our aging virtual environment with Starwind HCA than traditional hardware. We needed to come up with a budget-friendly solution to replace our old hardware. The support costs were skyrocketing on the old hardware and the performance was severely lacking. Using Starwind allowed us to replace our existing hardware with much faster hosts - and we benefitted especially from the all-flash storage which gave us a significant performance bump compared to our old environment. Overall, it has been a great implementation. 

What is most valuable?

The hardware is nothing special, just Dell servers, but the real value is in the software and support. Support is knowledgeable and quick to respond to any issues we have. They helped us configure it from the beginning and were there for us through the few issues we had during the initial configuration.

We also opted for 24-hour support monitoring for any issues. They are extremely quick to respond on issues we even cause ourselves such as bumping a network cable.  They can identify the issue and guide us to fix it without downtime.

What needs improvement?

We would like more complete documentation to manage on your own without support - even though they are great to work with. Sometimes I like to have a better knowledge on my own in case an extreme situation happens that needs to be fixed immediately. 

The management console could use a facelift. It appears to do everything needed, but sometimes it is not clear what various options are or do which could be tied back to the documentation. A complete single pane of glass for monitoring would be helpful to self-solve issues without involving support and logs.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been using the solution for two years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The solution is very stable as long as you realize there can be possible split-brain issues with sync if multiple nodes lose power at the same time. This is where the nodes do not know which is the more up to date so they are not sure which way to sync. Support can help resolve the issues should they happen.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Ours is a 3 node, but appears to scale much larger as needed.

How are customer service and support?

Technical support is quick to respond and proactive with our additional support.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

 We used a traditional host and separate SAN for shared storage costs, which were too high to replace.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is easy with Starwind support.

What about the implementation team?

The vendor team configured our environment without issue.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Pricing is all in one. It is nice to bundle everything together for budgeting purposes.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We also looked at Dell HCL, however, it was more expensive and complicated.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Download our free StarWind HyperConverged Appliance Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
Updated: December 2025
Buyer's Guide
Download our free StarWind HyperConverged Appliance Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.