Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Tenable.io Container Security Logo

Top 10 Tenable.io Container Security Alternatives

Vendor: Tenable
4.0 out of 5
Post review

Top Tenable.io Container Security Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Tenable.io Container Security based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Wiz, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, and Snyk. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Tenable Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Tenable, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Tenable.io Container Security Logo
Wiz
4.5 out of 5
Tenable.io Container Security Logo
Wiz
4.5 out of 5
Tenable.io Container Security offers a comprehensive approach to threat management and is praised for its cost-effectiveness. In comparison, Wiz excels in advanced security analytics with extensive automation, justifying its higher price. Tenable.io is known for easier deployment, while Wiz provides deeper insights with a steeper learning curve.
Download Tenable.io Container Security vs. Wiz Report
Tenable.io Container Security has a setup cost that is straightforward and singular, while Wiz exhibits a more complex pricing structure. Notably, Tenable.io is recognized for its simplicity, contrasting with Wiz's tiered costs.
View comparison
Pricing
Tenable.io Container Security has a setup cost that is straightforward and singular, while Wiz exhibits a more complex pricing structure. Notably, Tenable.io is recognized for its simplicity, contrasting with Wiz's tiered costs.
Tenable.io Container Security Logo
Tenable.io Container Security Logo
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks
4.2 out of 5
In the container security space, Tenable.io Container Security is known for its ease of use and effective threat detection, while Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks offers comprehensive security features and scalability. In comparison, Tenable.io provides simpler deployment, whereas Prisma Cloud delivers superior ROI for larger organizations.
Download Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs. Tenable.io Container Security Report
Tenable.io Container Security has a moderate setup cost, while Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks tends to have a higher initial investment. Users may find Tenable.io more budget-friendly compared to Prisma Cloud, which offers more extensive features.
View comparison
Pricing
Tenable.io Container Security has a moderate setup cost, while Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks tends to have a higher initial investment. Users may find Tenable.io more budget-friendly compared to Prisma Cloud, which offers more extensive features.
Tenable.io Container Security Logo
Snyk
4.1 out of 5
Tenable.io Container Security Logo
Snyk
4.1 out of 5
Tenable.io Container Security offers affordability and strong support, making it appealing for budget-conscious tech buyers. In comparison, Snyk provides advanced features such as real-time scanning, appealing to those seeking superior functionality. Both excel in deployment and customer service, but Snyk provides more proactive support.
Download Snyk vs. Tenable.io Container Security Report
Tenable.io Container Security has no upfront setup costs while Snyk requires an initial setup fee. This makes Tenable.io potentially more attractive for budget-conscious users compared to Snyk.
View comparison
Pricing
Tenable.io Container Security has no upfront setup costs while Snyk requires an initial setup fee. This makes Tenable.io potentially more attractive for budget-conscious users compared to Snyk.
Tenable.io Container Security Logo
Qualys VMDR
4.1 out of 5
Tenable.io Container Security Logo
Qualys VMDR
4.1 out of 5
Qualys VMDR offers robust vulnerability detection and risk management, while Tenable.io Container Security features deep container scanning and compliance reporting. In comparison, Tenable.io excels in advanced container-specific features, whereas Qualys provides better integration and customer support. Tech buyers should choose based on pricing vs. functionality needs.
Download Qualys VMDR vs. Tenable.io Container Security Report
Qualys VMDR is praised for its streamlined setup costs, while Tenable.io Container Security is notable for its higher initial expense. Users highlight the cost-effectiveness of Qualys VMDR compared to Tenable.io's more significant financial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Qualys VMDR is praised for its streamlined setup costs, while Tenable.io Container Security is notable for its higher initial expense. Users highlight the cost-effectiveness of Qualys VMDR compared to Tenable.io's more significant financial investment.
Tenable.io Container Security Logo
Tenable.io Container Security Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security
4.1 out of 5
Tenable.io excels in vulnerability management and CI/CD pipeline integration, making it a solid choice for comprehensive security needs. In comparison, CrowdStrike Falcon stands out with advanced threat detection and AI-driven analytics, appealing to those needing cutting-edge monitoring and rapid incident response.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security vs. Tenable.io Container Security Report
Tenable.io Container Security has higher setup costs compared to CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, which offers a more cost-effective setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Tenable.io Container Security has higher setup costs compared to CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, which offers a more cost-effective setup.
Tenable.io Container Security Logo
JFrog Xray
4.0 out of 5
Tenable.io Container Security Logo
JFrog Xray
4.0 out of 5
Tenable.io Container Security excels in vulnerability assessment and CI/CD integration. In comparison, JFrog Xray's deep analytical capabilities and package support. Tenable.io could enhance scanning speed, while JFrog Xray needs an intuitive interface. Tenable.io is more cost-effective, and JFrog Xray justifies its price with advanced features.
Download JFrog Xray vs. Tenable.io Container Security Report
Tenable.io Container Security offers a setup process that users find straightforward with minimal costs, while JFrog Xray's setup is often viewed as complex, resulting in higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Tenable.io Container Security offers a setup process that users find straightforward with minimal costs, while JFrog Xray's setup is often viewed as complex, resulting in higher initial expenses.
Tenable.io Container Security Logo
Tenable.io Container Security Logo
Aqua Cloud Security Platform
4.0 out of 5
Tenable.io Container Security excels in vulnerability assessment and integration capabilities. In comparison, Aqua Cloud Security Platform offers advanced runtime protection, image scanning, and compliance features. Tenable.io's affordability and easy deployment contrast with Aqua's higher cost and complex deployment, offering buyers distinct advantages based on specific security needs.
Download Aqua Cloud Security Platform vs. Tenable.io Container Security Report
Tenable.io Container Security is known for its affordable initial setup costs, while Aqua Cloud Security Platform tends to be more expensive. Tenable.io offers a budget-friendly option, whereas Aqua Cloud requires a higher investment for deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
Tenable.io Container Security is known for its affordable initial setup costs, while Aqua Cloud Security Platform tends to be more expensive. Tenable.io offers a budget-friendly option, whereas Aqua Cloud requires a higher investment for deployment.
Tenable.io Container Security Logo
SUSE NeuVector
3.9 out of 5
Tenable.io Container Security Logo
SUSE NeuVector
3.9 out of 5
Tenable.io Container Security is ideal for its robust vulnerability management, automated scanning, competitive pricing, and quick ROI. In comparison, SUSE NeuVector offers superior network security features, runtime protection, and long-term value despite higher costs, catering to those requiring comprehensive container security.
Download SUSE NeuVector vs. Tenable.io Container Security Report
Tenable.io Container Security has a lower setup cost compared to SUSE NeuVector. SUSE NeuVector requires a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Tenable.io Container Security has a lower setup cost compared to SUSE NeuVector. SUSE NeuVector requires a higher initial investment.
Tenable.io Container Security Logo
Tenable.io Container Security Logo
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes
4.1 out of 5
Tenable.io Container Security excels in simplicity and integration, while Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes enhances security policies and threat detection. In comparison, Tenable.io is cost-effective with a quicker ROI, whereas Red Hat's higher cost offers deeper security features and long-term value.
Download Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes vs. Tenable.io Container Security Report
Tenable.io Container Security has a minimal setup cost while Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes involves a more comprehensive initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Tenable.io Container Security has a minimal setup cost while Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes involves a more comprehensive initial investment.
Tenable.io Container Security Logo
Sysdig Secure
4.1 out of 5
Tenable.io Container Security Logo
Sysdig Secure
4.1 out of 5
Tenable.io Container Security excels in deployment and support, offering strong vulnerability assessment and integration capabilities. In comparison, Sysdig Secure provides robust runtime security, policy management, and comprehensive compliance checks. Tech buyers might choose Tenable.io for quick deployment, while Sysdig Secure offers extensive features and adaptable deployment.
Download Sysdig Secure vs. Tenable.io Container Security Report
Tenable.io Container Security has a simpler setup process compared to the more complex setup of Sysdig Secure. Sysdig Secure offers a more detailed initial configuration, while Tenable.io Container Security is quicker to deploy.
View comparison
Pricing
Tenable.io Container Security has a simpler setup process compared to the more complex setup of Sysdig Secure. Sysdig Secure offers a more detailed initial configuration, while Tenable.io Container Security is quicker to deploy.
Tenable.io Container Security Logo
Trivy
4.0 out of 5
Tenable.io Container Security Logo
Trivy
4.0 out of 5

Trivy is used for scanning vulnerabilities in Docker images, Kubernetes clusters, and repositories, ensuring compliance and security standards. Users appreciate its efficiency, quick insights, and ease of integration with CI/CD pipelines. Many highlight its comprehensive scanning capabilities, speed, user-friendly command-line experience, and open-source nature with active community support.

Trivy is an open-source product.
View comparison
Pricing
Trivy is an open-source product.
Tenable.io Container Security Logo
Tenable.io Container Security Logo
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
4.1 out of 5
Tenable.io Container Security offers robust scanning and vulnerability management, making it cost-effective through comprehensive security insights. In comparison, Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) excels with seamless Microsoft integration, scalability, and extensive orchestration, though it may incur higher costs as usage scales.
Download Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) vs. Tenable.io Container Security Report
Tenable.io Container Security has lower setup costs, making it a budget-friendly option, while Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) involves higher initial costs but offers extensive functionalities.
View comparison
Pricing
Tenable.io Container Security has lower setup costs, making it a budget-friendly option, while Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) involves higher initial costs but offers extensive functionalities.
Tenable.io Container Security Logo
Uptycs
4.0 out of 5
Tenable.io Container Security Logo
Uptycs
4.0 out of 5
Uptycs enhances security in cloud-based environments with endpoint detection, compliance, and threat response. Users value its Kubernetes monitoring, real-time incident response, and integration ease. Praised for visibility, log management, and automated compliance, Uptycs receives suggestions for better integration options, setup clarity, enhanced threat detection, and improved customer service.
View comparison
Tenable.io Container Security Logo
CoreOS Clair
4.3 out of 5
Tenable.io Container Security Logo
CoreOS Clair
4.3 out of 5
Tenable.io Container Security focuses on advanced features like CI/CD pipeline integration, automated threat detection, and workflow automation. In comparison, CoreOS Clair offers granular vulnerability scanning and open-source flexibility. Tenable.io requires performance tuning, while CoreOS Clair needs better documentation and wider format support.
Download CoreOS Clair vs. Tenable.io Container Security Report
Tenable.io Container Security involves higher setup costs, while CoreOS Clair offers a more economical setup. Differences in initial investment impact budget planning for these container security solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Tenable.io Container Security involves higher setup costs, while CoreOS Clair offers a more economical setup. Differences in initial investment impact budget planning for these container security solutions.

Related categories

Container Security
Vulnerability Management
Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP)