Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
WatchGuard Firebox Logo

Top 10 WatchGuard Firebox Alternatives

Vendor: WatchGuard
4.2 out of 5
Leave a review

Top WatchGuard Firebox Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to WatchGuard Firebox based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Fortinet FortiGate, Netgate pfSense, and CrowdStrike Falcon. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. WatchGuard Firebox surpasses its competitors by offering advanced security features, including real-time threat intelligence, VPN support, and easy scalability, providing unparalleled protection and flexibility for businesses seeking a robust network security solution.

WatchGuard Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with WatchGuard, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Fortinet FortiGate
4.2 out of 5
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Fortinet FortiGate
4.2 out of 5
Fortinet FortiGate excels in high-performance threat protection and advanced security, appealing to those prioritizing comprehensive threat management. In comparison, WatchGuard Firebox stands out for its intuitive controls and affordability, ideal for environments needing versatile application control and cost-effective security.
Download Fortinet FortiGate vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
Fortinet FortiGate offers a more competitive setup cost compared to WatchGuard Firebox, which has a higher initial investment. Fortinet prioritizes affordability, while WatchGuard may justify its cost with additional premium features.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiGate offers a more competitive setup cost compared to WatchGuard Firebox, which has a higher initial investment. Fortinet prioritizes affordability, while WatchGuard may justify its cost with additional premium features.
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Netgate pfSense
4.3 out of 5
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Netgate pfSense
4.3 out of 5
Netgate pfSense offers cost-effectiveness with extensive customization and VPN capabilities, suitable for diverse hardware. In comparison, WatchGuard Firebox provides robust security as an out-of-the-box solution, appealing to users seeking comprehensive network protection and straightforward deployment.
Download Netgate pfSense vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
Netgate pfSense offers a lower setup cost compared to the higher setup expenses of WatchGuard Firebox, highlighting a significant cost-saving advantage for Netgate pfSense users.
View comparison
Pricing
Netgate pfSense offers a lower setup cost compared to the higher setup expenses of WatchGuard Firebox, highlighting a significant cost-saving advantage for Netgate pfSense users.
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon offers exceptional endpoint visibility and AI-driven threat detection, enhancing security through lightweight, cloud-native solutions. In comparison, WatchGuard Firebox excels in network security with robust VPN functionality and layered protection, providing a cost-effective option for comprehensive network management.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
CrowdStrike Falcon has a higher setup cost compared to WatchGuard Firebox, but offers more comprehensive security features. WatchGuard Firebox, with its lower setup cost, focuses on providing essential security services.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon has a higher setup cost compared to WatchGuard Firebox, but offers more comprehensive security features. WatchGuard Firebox, with its lower setup cost, focuses on providing essential security services.
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
OPNsense
4.2 out of 5
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
OPNsense
4.2 out of 5
OPNsense appeals to small businesses with its flexible, cost-effective open-source design. In comparison, WatchGuard Firebox emphasizes robust security and advanced threat protection. OPNsense suits those seeking customization. WatchGuard attracts businesses focused on comprehensive security.
Download OPNsense vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
OPNsense has a lower setup cost with straightforward implementation, while WatchGuard Firebox requires a higher initial investment with potential additional costs for advanced features.
View comparison
Pricing
OPNsense has a lower setup cost with straightforward implementation, while WatchGuard Firebox requires a higher initial investment with potential additional costs for advanced features.
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
4.1 out of 5
WatchGuard Firebox offers intuitive setup and robust security features suited for small to medium businesses. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint excels in integration and comprehensive threat reporting, appealing to businesses invested in Microsoft ecosystems seeking real-time protection across services.
Download Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
WatchGuard Firebox incurs a higher setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, reflecting its extensive hardware configuration requirements. Microsoft Defender offers cost-effective deployment due to its cloud-based nature, simplifying the initial setup process.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
WatchGuard Firebox incurs a higher setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, reflecting its extensive hardware configuration requirements. Microsoft Defender offers cost-effective deployment due to its cloud-based nature, simplifying the initial setup process.
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Sophos XG
4.1 out of 5
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Sophos XG
4.1 out of 5
Sophos XG excels with advanced web, application filters, and centralized management for seamless network integration. In comparison, WatchGuard Firebox offers robust VPN and geographical blocking. Sophos XG suits unified management needs, while WatchGuard Firebox is ideal for comprehensive security with intuitive control.
Download Sophos XG vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
Sophos XG's setup cost is generally higher compared to WatchGuard Firebox, highlighting significant pricing differences between the two products.
View comparison
Pricing
Sophos XG's setup cost is generally higher compared to WatchGuard Firebox, highlighting significant pricing differences between the two products.
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR
4.0 out of 5
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR
4.0 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR provides strong endpoint solutions with detailed forensic analysis and scalability. In comparison, WatchGuard Firebox offers excellent layered security and user-friendly application control, making it ideal for intuitive management and network monitoring, appealing to small to medium enterprises.
Download Fortinet FortiEDR vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
Fortinet FortiEDR involves a one-time setup cost, while WatchGuard Firebox requires a subscription-based fee for setup. Fortinet FortiEDR generally has a higher initial cost compared to the ongoing cost model of WatchGuard Firebox.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiEDR involves a one-time setup cost, while WatchGuard Firebox requires a subscription-based fee for setup. Fortinet FortiEDR generally has a higher initial cost compared to the ongoing cost model of WatchGuard Firebox.
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Darktrace
4.1 out of 5
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Darktrace
4.1 out of 5
Darktrace excels in AI-driven threat detection and reduces false positives, appealing to those seeking advanced security technologies. In comparison, WatchGuard Firebox emphasizes ease of use with features like VPN support, ideal for buyers prioritizing straightforward, cost-effective solutions.
Download Darktrace vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
Darktrace has a higher setup cost compared to WatchGuard Firebox, highlighting a notable difference that might influence budgeting decisions.
View comparison
Pricing
Darktrace has a higher setup cost compared to WatchGuard Firebox, highlighting a notable difference that might influence budgeting decisions.
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Cisco Secure Firewall
4.1 out of 5
Cisco Secure Firewall excels with advanced threat detection and seamless Cisco integration, ideal for comprehensive security needs. In comparison, WatchGuard Firebox offers an intuitive interface and flexible licensing, appealing to businesses seeking efficient management and cost-effective security solutions.
Download Cisco Secure Firewall vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
Cisco Secure Firewall has a higher setup cost but offers advanced security features, while WatchGuard Firebox provides a lower setup cost with a more straightforward installation process.
View comparison
Pricing
Cisco Secure Firewall has a higher setup cost but offers advanced security features, while WatchGuard Firebox provides a lower setup cost with a more straightforward installation process.
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Complete
4.3 out of 5
SentinelOne Singularity Complete provides advanced endpoint protection through features like automated rollback and threat hunting. In comparison, WatchGuard Firebox focuses on integrating firewalls and VPNs, appealing to those prioritizing network security. Each offers distinct advantages for specific security needs.
Download SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
SentinelOne Singularity Complete offers a straightforward setup with minimal cost, while WatchGuard Firebox demands a higher initial investment, highlighting significant differences in setup cost.
View comparison
Pricing
SentinelOne Singularity Complete offers a straightforward setup with minimal cost, while WatchGuard Firebox demands a higher initial investment, highlighting significant differences in setup cost.
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Microsoft Defender XDR
4.2 out of 5
WatchGuard Firebox offers intuitive setup and strong on-premises support. In comparison, Microsoft Defender XDR provides extensive platform protection and cloud compatibility. WatchGuard is cost-effective for SMEs with easy management, while Microsoft suits larger enterprises needing comprehensive integration and threat intelligence.
Download Microsoft Defender XDR vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
WatchGuard Firebox has a straightforward setup with a modest cost, while Microsoft Defender XDR offers more advanced initial deployment options, often resulting in higher setup expenses. These differences highlight distinct approaches in pricing and setup strategies.
View comparison
Pricing
WatchGuard Firebox has a straightforward setup with a modest cost, while Microsoft Defender XDR offers more advanced initial deployment options, often resulting in higher setup expenses. These differences highlight distinct approaches in pricing and setup strategies.
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls
4.3 out of 5
WatchGuard Firebox is praised for its intuitive setup and cost-effective pricing, ideal for small to medium-sized businesses. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls deliver advanced security features and flexible deployments that cater to organizations despite their complexity and higher cost.
Download Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
WatchGuard Firebox offers lower setup costs compared to Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls, which tend to be higher. This cost distinction highlights a key financial difference between the two firewall solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
WatchGuard Firebox offers lower setup costs compared to Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls, which tend to be higher. This cost distinction highlights a key financial difference between the two firewall solutions.
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform
4.2 out of 5
WatchGuard Firebox offers robust VPN setup and easy device management, ideal for on-premises environments. In comparison, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange excels in securing cloud access and Office 365 integration, appealing to organizations with a focus on cloud deployment and zero-trust architecture.
Download WatchGuard Firebox vs. Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform Report
WatchGuard Firebox requires a one-time setup fee, while Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform includes setup costs in its subscription model. Zscaler may have a more predictable pricing structure compared to WatchGuard's initial higher financial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
WatchGuard Firebox requires a one-time setup fee, while Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform includes setup costs in its subscription model. Zscaler may have a more predictable pricing structure compared to WatchGuard's initial higher financial investment.
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Cisco Meraki MX
4.1 out of 5
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Cisco Meraki MX
4.1 out of 5
Cisco Meraki MX's cloud management and advanced features like SD-WAN benefit remote setups. In comparison, WatchGuard Firebox offers a comprehensive security suite with competitive pricing. Both provide strong ROI, but their distinct strengths cater to different enterprise needs.
Download Cisco Meraki MX vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
The Cisco Meraki MX typically involves higher setup costs with more streamlined deployment, whereas the WatchGuard Firebox offers a cost-effective setup option with flexible configuration, highlighting a distinct difference in initial investment versus customization potential.
View comparison
Pricing
The Cisco Meraki MX typically involves higher setup costs with more streamlined deployment, whereas the WatchGuard Firebox offers a cost-effective setup option with flexible configuration, highlighting a distinct difference in initial investment versus customization potential.
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Check Point Quantum Force (NGFW)
4.4 out of 5
WatchGuard Firebox offers user-friendly setup and cost-effective pricing for small businesses. In comparison, Check Point Quantum Force NGFW provides robust security features for enterprises requiring advanced protection, although it involves higher costs and a steeper learning curve.
Download Check Point Quantum Force (NGFW) vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
The setup cost for WatchGuard Firebox is significantly lower, offering a more budget-friendly option, while Check Point Quantum Force (NGFW) incurs a higher initial investment, reflecting its advanced features.
View comparison
Pricing
The setup cost for WatchGuard Firebox is significantly lower, offering a more budget-friendly option, while Check Point Quantum Force (NGFW) incurs a higher initial investment, reflecting its advanced features.
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Huntress Managed EDR
4.7 out of 5
WatchGuard Firebox offers ease of setup with valuable VPN and proxy capabilities. In comparison, Huntress Managed EDR emphasizes proactive threat detection and managed security operations. Firebox prioritizes strong layered security, while Huntress focuses on actionable recommendations and flexible deployment options, appealing to tech buyers for different needs.
Download Huntress Managed EDR vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
WatchGuard Firebox requires an upfront setup cost, while Huntress Managed EDR is known for its straightforward deployment with minimal setup fees. The distinct pricing models highlight WatchGuard's investment-oriented approach versus Huntress's low-entry-cost strategy.
View comparison
Pricing
WatchGuard Firebox requires an upfront setup cost, while Huntress Managed EDR is known for its straightforward deployment with minimal setup fees. The distinct pricing models highlight WatchGuard's investment-oriented approach versus Huntress's low-entry-cost strategy.
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Azure Firewall
3.7 out of 5
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Azure Firewall
3.7 out of 5
WatchGuard Firebox excels in user-friendly setup, especially for VPNs and WiFi integration. In comparison, Azure Firewall offers robust cloud capabilities with seamless Azure service integration, appealing to businesses in Azure's ecosystem seeking scalable threat intelligence and cloud-centric functionality.
Download Azure Firewall vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
WatchGuard Firebox offers a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while Azure Firewall requires a more complex configuration process and higher setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
WatchGuard Firebox offers a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while Azure Firewall requires a more complex configuration process and higher setup expenses.
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Trend Vision One
4.3 out of 5
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Trend Vision One
4.3 out of 5
WatchGuard Firebox offers user-friendly installation and competitive pricing, appealing to businesses seeking cost-effective security solutions. In comparison, Trend Vision One provides comprehensive threat management across various environments, suitable for enterprises prioritizing extensive security coverage despite a higher cost.
Download Trend Vision One vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
WatchGuard Firebox offers a straightforward setup cost, while Trend Vision One incurs a higher initial expenditure. This cost distinction highlights significant pricing differences for businesses considering these cybersecurity solutions.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
WatchGuard Firebox offers a straightforward setup cost, while Trend Vision One incurs a higher initial expenditure. This cost distinction highlights significant pricing differences for businesses considering these cybersecurity solutions.
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint
4.4 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint excels in endpoint security with advanced threat prevention, ideal for organizations needing robust protection. In comparison, WatchGuard Firebox provides all-in-one firewall capabilities, making it optimal for network security in small to medium enterprises seeking comprehensive VPN and layered security solutions.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint typically involves a higher initial setup cost, whereas WatchGuard Firebox offers a more budget-friendly setup, making them appeal to different budget considerations when deciding on endpoint security solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint typically involves a higher initial setup cost, whereas WatchGuard Firebox offers a more budget-friendly setup, making them appeal to different budget considerations when deciding on endpoint security solutions.
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
SonicWall TZ
4.1 out of 5
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
SonicWall TZ
4.1 out of 5
SonicWall TZ is favored for robust features like deep packet inspection, yet has room for improvement in reporting and pricing complexities. In comparison, WatchGuard Firebox excels in comprehensive security features with seamless Active Directory integration but could enhance reporting accuracy and management simplicity.
Download SonicWall TZ vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
SonicWall TZ offers a cost-effective setup, whereas WatchGuard Firebox has a higher initial setup expense.
View comparison
Pricing
SonicWall TZ offers a cost-effective setup, whereas WatchGuard Firebox has a higher initial setup expense.
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform
4.1 out of 5
ESET offers advanced antivirus capabilities appealing to small businesses needing effective virus protection. In comparison, WatchGuard Firebox provides extensive firewall configurations for businesses requiring comprehensive network security, emphasizing VPN support and additional security product integration. Both solutions offer flexibility with deployment and licensing.
Download ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform offers straightforward setup with competitive costs, while WatchGuard Firebox's setup may involve higher expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform offers straightforward setup with competitive costs, while WatchGuard Firebox's setup may involve higher expenses.
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Sophos UTM
4.2 out of 5
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Sophos UTM
4.2 out of 5
Sophos UTM provides advanced security features like Web Application Firewall, making it suitable for various environments. In comparison, WatchGuard Firebox excels in Application Control. Sophos UTM faces complex configuration challenges, while WatchGuard offers cost-effective pricing and rapid customer service.
Download Sophos UTM vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
Sophos UTM has a lower setup cost, whereas WatchGuard Firebox offers more advanced initial configurations with a higher setup cost.
View comparison
Pricing
Sophos UTM has a lower setup cost, whereas WatchGuard Firebox offers more advanced initial configurations with a higher setup cost.
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Intercept X Endpoint
4.2 out of 5
WatchGuard Firebox is praised for easy VPN setup and real-time reporting, ideal for detailed network security. In comparison, Intercept X Endpoint excels with machine learning and anti-ransomware, appealing to those prioritizing advanced threat detection and endpoint protection.
Download Intercept X Endpoint vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
WatchGuard Firebox has a high setup cost compared to Intercept X Endpoint, which is more budget-friendly. Intercept X Endpoint offers a cost-effective setup, positioning it as a more attractive choice for those concerned about initial investments.
View comparison
Pricing
WatchGuard Firebox has a high setup cost compared to Intercept X Endpoint, which is more budget-friendly. Intercept X Endpoint offers a cost-effective setup, positioning it as a more attractive choice for those concerned about initial investments.
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Sophos XGS
4.0 out of 5
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Sophos XGS
4.0 out of 5
WatchGuard Firebox offers easy setup and effective web filtering, ideal for seamless IT management. In comparison, Sophos XGS is praised for its application control and integration with Sophos Central, providing strong security for larger enterprises, making it suitable for diverse network environments.
Download Sophos XGS vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
WatchGuard Firebox setup cost is lower, providing a more budget-friendly option; Sophos XGS, with a higher initial setup cost, offers advanced features that might justify the expense for some organizations.
View comparison
Pricing
WatchGuard Firebox setup cost is lower, providing a more budget-friendly option; Sophos XGS, with a higher initial setup cost, offers advanced features that might justify the expense for some organizations.
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Cynet
4.4 out of 5
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Cynet
4.4 out of 5
Cynet provides extensive mobile control and ease of setup, appealing to those prioritizing user behavior analysis and endpoint protection. In comparison, WatchGuard Firebox's competitive pricing, VPN support, and network integration draw buyers seeking robust security and seamless IT environment compatibility.
Download Cynet vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
Cynet offers a low setup cost, emphasizing affordability, while WatchGuard Firebox requires a higher initial investment, highlighting premium features.
View comparison
Pricing
Cynet offers a low setup cost, emphasizing affordability, while WatchGuard Firebox requires a higher initial investment, highlighting premium features.
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Fortinet FortiGate-VM
4.2 out of 5
Fortinet FortiGate-VM provides robust network security with features like SD-WAN and application control. In comparison, WatchGuard Firebox excels in ease of management and reliable VPNs. Fortinet attracts businesses needing integrated security, while WatchGuard appeals to those prioritizing flexible setup and management.
Download Fortinet FortiGate-VM vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
Fortinet FortiGate-VM typically has a lower setup cost, making it cost-efficient, while WatchGuard Firebox may involve a higher upfront investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiGate-VM typically has a lower setup cost, making it cost-efficient, while WatchGuard Firebox may involve a higher upfront investment.
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone EDR
4.2 out of 5
Bitdefender GravityZone EDR offers versatile security features with cloud management, suitable for diverse environments, and provides cost-effective pricing. In comparison, WatchGuard Firebox, with its robust geolocation and web filtering, ensures competitive pricing ideal for mid-sized companies, focusing primarily on on-premises deployment.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone EDR vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
Bitdefender GravityZone EDR has a lower setup cost, while WatchGuard Firebox offers a more comprehensive initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Bitdefender GravityZone EDR has a lower setup cost, while WatchGuard Firebox offers a more comprehensive initial investment.
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint
3.9 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint offers advanced threat detection with dynamic analysis and custom scripts. In comparison, WatchGuard Firebox provides robust firewall capabilities like intrusion prevention. Carbon Black suits high security needs, while WatchGuard caters to businesses seeking layered security with competitive pricing.
Download VMware Carbon Black Endpoint vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint has a straightforward setup cost, while WatchGuard Firebox presents a more complex cost structure, highlighting a key difference in upfront expenses between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint has a straightforward setup cost, while WatchGuard Firebox presents a more complex cost structure, highlighting a key difference in upfront expenses between the two solutions.
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Juniper SRX Series Firewall
3.9 out of 5
Juniper SRX excels with its integrated routing capabilities, suitable for environments requiring complex networking. In comparison, WatchGuard Firebox is preferred for its ease of management and efficient deployment, making it ideal for users seeking straightforward security solutions with potential cost savings.
Download Juniper SRX Series Firewall vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
Juniper SRX Series Firewall has higher setup costs compared to WatchGuard Firebox, making it a less economical choice for budget-conscious users, while WatchGuard offers affordability without compromising essential features.
View comparison
Pricing
Juniper SRX Series Firewall has higher setup costs compared to WatchGuard Firebox, making it a less economical choice for budget-conscious users, while WatchGuard offers affordability without compromising essential features.
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
SonicWall NSa
3.9 out of 5
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
SonicWall NSa
3.9 out of 5
SonicWall NSa is ideal for those prioritizing deep packet inspection and stable high availability features. In comparison, WatchGuard Firebox excels with real-time bandwidth reporting and smooth WiFi integration, appealing to small businesses seeking user-friendly deployment and comprehensive threat management.
Download SonicWall NSa vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
SonicWall NSa demands a higher initial setup cost, while WatchGuard Firebox presents a more affordable option with reduced expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
SonicWall NSa demands a higher initial setup cost, while WatchGuard Firebox presents a more affordable option with reduced expenses.
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
KerioControl
4.1 out of 5
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
KerioControl
4.1 out of 5
KerioControl offers user-friendly navigation and robust security, ideal for businesses wanting comprehensive solutions. In comparison, WatchGuard Firebox excels in advanced threat detection and integration, appealing to companies needing detailed configurations. Both provide significant ROI, with KerioControl suiting smaller businesses and WatchGuard offering competitive pricing.
Download KerioControl vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
KerioControl has a lower setup cost than WatchGuard Firebox, offering a budget-friendly option, while WatchGuard Firebox provides more comprehensive initial features at a higher initial cost, making it suitable for those needing extensive capabilities from the start.
View comparison
Pricing
KerioControl has a lower setup cost than WatchGuard Firebox, offering a budget-friendly option, while WatchGuard Firebox provides more comprehensive initial features at a higher initial cost, making it suitable for those needing extensive capabilities from the start.
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)
4.4 out of 5
WatchGuard Firebox appeals with competitive pricing and ease of setup for SMBs. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE offers advanced security capabilities and cloud-centric features, ideal for enterprises. Firebox's on-premise strengths contrast with Harmony SASE's scalable cloud solutions, catering to diverse tech needs.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
WatchGuard Firebox involves a higher setup cost compared to Check Point Harmony SASE, which offers a more economical setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
WatchGuard Firebox involves a higher setup cost compared to Check Point Harmony SASE, which offers a more economical setup option.
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Fortinet FortiOS
4.2 out of 5
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Fortinet FortiOS
4.2 out of 5
Tech buyers might choose Fortinet FortiOS for its comprehensive security integration, offering advanced threat protection and seamless interoperability. In comparison, WatchGuard Firebox appeals with its intuitive interfaces and responsive customer service, providing cost-effective solutions, particularly for SMBs seeking flexible deployment options.
Download Fortinet FortiOS vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
Fortinet FortiOS offers a straightforward setup process with moderate costs, while WatchGuard Firebox is known for a higher setup expense and complexity. Fortinet provides more cost-effective initial implementation compared to WatchGuard.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiOS offers a straightforward setup process with moderate costs, while WatchGuard Firebox is known for a higher setup expense and complexity. Fortinet provides more cost-effective initial implementation compared to WatchGuard.
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Untangle NG Firewall
4.3 out of 5
Untangle NG Firewall appeals to businesses seeking hardware independence with flexible installation and easy configuration. In comparison, WatchGuard Firebox offers a robust feature set and excels in security integration, appealing to organizations prioritizing high performance and comprehensive centralized management.
Download Untangle NG Firewall vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
Untangle NG Firewall offers straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while WatchGuard Firebox requires higher upfront investment. This distinction highlights a trade-off between initial expenses and potential long-term security benefits.
View comparison
Pricing
Untangle NG Firewall offers straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while WatchGuard Firebox requires higher upfront investment. This distinction highlights a trade-off between initial expenses and potential long-term security benefits.
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Sangfor NGAF
4.0 out of 5
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Sangfor NGAF
4.0 out of 5
WatchGuard Firebox excels in ease of setup, particularly with VPN features and WebBlocker. In comparison, Sangfor NGAF stands out for its application control and security features. WatchGuard offers competitive pricing over multi-year contracts, while NGAF is a cost-effective choice for smaller enterprises.
Download Sangfor NGAF vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
WatchGuard Firebox has a higher initial setup cost than Sangfor NGAF, which provides a more affordable option for budget-conscious users.
View comparison
Pricing
WatchGuard Firebox has a higher initial setup cost than Sangfor NGAF, which provides a more affordable option for budget-conscious users.
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Stormshield Network Security
3.9 out of 5
Stormshield Network Security attracts buyers with competitive pricing and robust threat prevention suitable for existing infrastructures. In comparison, WatchGuard Firebox offers extensive security features and real-time monitoring, appealing to those seeking advanced solutions worth the investment.
Download Stormshield Network Security vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
Stormshield Network Security has a straightforward setup cost, while WatchGuard Firebox offers flexibility in pricing options.
View comparison
Pricing
Stormshield Network Security has a straightforward setup cost, while WatchGuard Firebox offers flexibility in pricing options.
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Zyxel Unified Security Gateway
3.3 out of 5
WatchGuard Firebox offers comprehensive features, including strong internet security and flexible deployment options, making it ideal for businesses seeking advanced solutions and competitive pricing. In comparison, Zyxel Unified Security Gateway provides lower upfront costs and stable functionality, appealing to budget-conscious users prioritizing simplicity.
Download WatchGuard Firebox vs. Zyxel Unified Security Gateway Report
WatchGuard Firebox involves higher setup costs compared to Zyxel Unified Security Gateway, which offers a more budget-friendly initial outlay. WatchGuard users highlight robust features, whereas Zyxel appeals to cost-conscious customers with its affordable setup pricing.
View comparison
Pricing
WatchGuard Firebox involves higher setup costs compared to Zyxel Unified Security Gateway, which offers a more budget-friendly initial outlay. WatchGuard users highlight robust features, whereas Zyxel appeals to cost-conscious customers with its affordable setup pricing.
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Check Point CloudGuard Network Security
4.3 out of 5
Check Point CloudGuard Network Security emphasizes centralized management and cloud integration for comprehensive security. In comparison, WatchGuard Firebox offers intuitive interfaces and affordability appealing to SMBs. Check Point suits complex environments, while WatchGuard is ideal for cost-conscious users needing straightforward deployment.
Download Check Point CloudGuard Network Security vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
Check Point CloudGuard Network Security has a more complex setup cost, while WatchGuard Firebox is known for its straightforward and economical setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point CloudGuard Network Security has a more complex setup cost, while WatchGuard Firebox is known for its straightforward and economical setup.
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Huawei NGFW
3.6 out of 5
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Huawei NGFW
3.6 out of 5
WatchGuard Firebox offers user-friendly setup, intuitive tools, and robust security features. In comparison, Huawei NGFW focuses on performance with strong antivirus, encryption, and Azure integration. WatchGuard is cost-efficient with flexible pricing, while Huawei is economically priced, attractive for budget-conscious buyers.
Download Huawei NGFW vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
WatchGuard Firebox has a higher initial setup cost compared to Huawei NGFW, which offers a more budget-friendly solution.
View comparison
Pricing
WatchGuard Firebox has a higher initial setup cost compared to Huawei NGFW, which offers a more budget-friendly solution.
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert
4.1 out of 5
WatchGuard Firebox excels in ease of use and network security, appealing to those valuing smooth integration with Active Directory. In comparison, Kaspersky EDR Expert offers comprehensive endpoint protection and advanced threat prevention, making it ideal for organizations prioritizing robust detection and reliable encryption features.
Download Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
WatchGuard Firebox has a straightforward setup cost, while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert involves higher initial expenses, highlighting the disparity in initial financial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
WatchGuard Firebox has a straightforward setup cost, while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert involves higher initial expenses, highlighting the disparity in initial financial investment.
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Barracuda CloudGen Firewall
4.1 out of 5
Barracuda CloudGen Firewall excels in advanced VPN capabilities and routing options, offering robust support for complex deployments. In comparison, WatchGuard Firebox focuses on ease of use and configuration simplicity, appealing to buyers seeking straightforward setup and effective security features.
Download Barracuda CloudGen Firewall vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
Barracuda CloudGen Firewall has a higher setup cost compared to WatchGuard Firebox, highlighting a potential budget consideration. WatchGuard Firebox offers a more affordable initial investment, appealing to those prioritizing cost-effectiveness.
View comparison
Pricing
Barracuda CloudGen Firewall has a higher setup cost compared to WatchGuard Firebox, highlighting a potential budget consideration. WatchGuard Firebox offers a more affordable initial investment, appealing to those prioritizing cost-effectiveness.
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
ESET Inspect
3.8 out of 5
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
ESET Inspect
3.8 out of 5
WatchGuard Firebox appeals to smaller businesses for its straightforward network security and competitive pricing. In comparison, ESET Inspect attracts those seeking advanced endpoint detection and threat intelligence. ESET offers comprehensive security insights while WatchGuard focuses on ease of deployment and budget-friendly solutions.
Download ESET Inspect vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
WatchGuard Firebox has a higher setup cost compared to ESET Inspect, making it a more significant initial investment. However, its robust features may justify the expense for those needing advanced protection.
View comparison
Pricing
WatchGuard Firebox has a higher setup cost compared to ESET Inspect, making it a more significant initial investment. However, its robust features may justify the expense for those needing advanced protection.
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
NetWitness NDR
4.0 out of 5
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
NetWitness NDR
4.0 out of 5
NetWitness NDR excels in advanced network detection and response, appealing to tech buyers focused on threat hunting and analytics. In comparison, WatchGuard Firebox offers comprehensive firewall and network security, favored by those seeking extensive traffic control and threat intelligence within a single tool.
Download NetWitness NDR vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
NetWitness NDR has a significant setup cost, while WatchGuard Firebox is more budget-friendly. The pricing reflects distinct strategic positioning, catering to different business needs and budget considerations.
View comparison
Pricing
NetWitness NDR has a significant setup cost, while WatchGuard Firebox is more budget-friendly. The pricing reflects distinct strategic positioning, catering to different business needs and budget considerations.
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
ESET EDR/XDR
4.0 out of 5
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
ESET EDR/XDR
4.0 out of 5
WatchGuard Firebox attracts buyers with its competitive pricing, ease of deployment, and solid customer support ideal for immediate use. In comparison, ESET EDR/XDR offers superior threat detection and response capabilities, appealing to those prioritizing advanced protection and willing to invest more.
Download ESET EDR/XDR vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
WatchGuard Firebox requires a lower upfront cost, whereas ESET EDR/XDR incurs higher setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
WatchGuard Firebox requires a lower upfront cost, whereas ESET EDR/XDR incurs higher setup expenses.
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Palo Alto Networks PA-Series
4.3 out of 5
WatchGuard Firebox offers ease of setup and management with robust security features, making it cost-effective for smaller businesses. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks PA-Series provides extensive security capabilities and application-based enforcement, justifying its higher cost for enterprises needing advanced threat prevention.
Download Palo Alto Networks PA-Series vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
WatchGuard Firebox offers a low setup cost, making it cost-effective, while Palo Alto Networks PA-Series requires a higher initial investment, reflecting its advanced features and capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
WatchGuard Firebox offers a low setup cost, making it cost-effective, while Palo Alto Networks PA-Series requires a higher initial investment, reflecting its advanced features and capabilities.
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Juniper vSRX
3.9 out of 5
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Juniper vSRX
3.9 out of 5
Juniper vSRX excels with robust threat prevention and virtualization, making it ideal for users with complex needs and existing Juniper infrastructure. In comparison, WatchGuard Firebox offers ease of setup with strong VPN support and advanced threat detection, attracting those prioritizing easy deployment and comprehensive cost-effectiveness.
Download Juniper vSRX vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
Juniper vSRX offers higher initial setup costs but provides robust network security features, while WatchGuard Firebox presents a more budget-friendly setup, appealing to businesses with cost-sensitive considerations.
View comparison
Pricing
Juniper vSRX offers higher initial setup costs but provides robust network security features, while WatchGuard Firebox presents a more budget-friendly setup, appealing to businesses with cost-sensitive considerations.
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Cisco Sourcefire SNORT
3.8 out of 5
Cisco Sourcefire SNORT excels in intrusion detection and pricing, making it ideal for those with technical expertise and seeking customization opportunities. In comparison, WatchGuard Firebox offers a user-friendly experience with advanced security features, catering to those prioritizing ease of use and comprehensive protection.
Download Cisco Sourcefire SNORT vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
Cisco Sourcefire SNORT has a higher setup cost, while WatchGuard Firebox offers a more cost-effective setup, highlighting a key difference between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Cisco Sourcefire SNORT has a higher setup cost, while WatchGuard Firebox offers a more cost-effective setup, highlighting a key difference between the two solutions.
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Smoothwall Firewall
4.5 out of 5
WatchGuard Firebox appeals with cost-effective security, offering threat protection and VPN capabilities. In comparison, Smoothwall Firewall excels with robust content filtering and intuitive management, particularly for educational settings. Smoothwall's superior feature set justifies its higher cost for compliance-focused buyers.
WatchGuard Firebox has a moderate setup cost, while Smoothwall Firewall offers a lower initial expense. This price difference highlights a key consideration for potential users evaluating budget constraints.
View comparison
Pricing
WatchGuard Firebox has a moderate setup cost, while Smoothwall Firewall offers a lower initial expense. This price difference highlights a key consideration for potential users evaluating budget constraints.
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
LANCOM R&S Unified Firewalls
1 out of 5

WatchGuard Firebox excels in pricing and customer support, appealing to budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, LANCOM R&S Unified Firewalls attract those valuing advanced features and integration, enhancing security for complex environments despite higher costs. Both cater to distinct network security needs effectively.

WatchGuard Firebox requires a higher setup cost than LANCOM R&S Unified Firewalls, which offers a more cost-effective initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
WatchGuard Firebox requires a higher setup cost than LANCOM R&S Unified Firewalls, which offers a more cost-effective initial investment.

Related categories

Firewalls
Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)
Anti-Malware Tools