When it comes to advise for customers, I recommend not being too fast to use new release versions for scanning, and instead using a productive regime on a productive system. Another point to consider is when users want to get the best commercial offer, they should fully understand the critical resources, which will result in the best price. This is a practical piece of advice for customers. In summary, Fudo PAM is a great solution, and based on feedback from customers, it has been very well received. Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten.
I would rate the solution as seven out of ten. My advice is that Fudo works best for small and medium businesses. The architecture isn't very good for enterprises.
Information Technology Security Specialist at BornaNetworkManagers
Reseller
2020-09-16T08:18:38Z
Sep 16, 2020
Right now we are encouraging our customers to use Fudo PAM because it is the only product in PAM technology that we have to offer them. Because we have looked into it, we are convinced that Fudo PAM is better than WALLIX. Living in Iran and providing security products is really the core of a business such as ours. On a scale from one to ten (where one is the worst and ten is the best), I would rate Fudo PAM as an eight-out-of-ten. It gets and eight because, from my research, I think there are some ways that WALLIX is better than the Fudo. So in that way, Fudo has places where it can improve. We are judging that by our technical research, so I am not sure about it first hand as we have not actually used WALLIX.
We are in the process of migrating from version 4.0 to version 4.2. This is a solution that I recommend because it is a simple privileged access management system that is done very well. They're a company that directs all of their efforts to this specific goal and they do it great. I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
What is Privileged Access Management? Privileged access management (PAM) oversees requirements of critical, private accounts living in an enterprise’s IT infrastructure.
When it comes to advise for customers, I recommend not being too fast to use new release versions for scanning, and instead using a productive regime on a productive system. Another point to consider is when users want to get the best commercial offer, they should fully understand the critical resources, which will result in the best price. This is a practical piece of advice for customers. In summary, Fudo PAM is a great solution, and based on feedback from customers, it has been very well received. Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten.
I would rate the solution as seven out of ten. My advice is that Fudo works best for small and medium businesses. The architecture isn't very good for enterprises.
Right now we are encouraging our customers to use Fudo PAM because it is the only product in PAM technology that we have to offer them. Because we have looked into it, we are convinced that Fudo PAM is better than WALLIX. Living in Iran and providing security products is really the core of a business such as ours. On a scale from one to ten (where one is the worst and ten is the best), I would rate Fudo PAM as an eight-out-of-ten. It gets and eight because, from my research, I think there are some ways that WALLIX is better than the Fudo. So in that way, Fudo has places where it can improve. We are judging that by our technical research, so I am not sure about it first hand as we have not actually used WALLIX.
I would rate Fudo Privileged Access Management at a nine out of ten.
We are in the process of migrating from version 4.0 to version 4.2. This is a solution that I recommend because it is a simple privileged access management system that is done very well. They're a company that directs all of their efforts to this specific goal and they do it great. I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.