If a community edition is available during the initial phase, we could use it to demonstrate the capabilities and set it up on the client's premises. Additionally, if we were to consider the cloud side, the accessibility of the cloud platform is currently limited. If such an option were available, it would be greatly appreciated. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.
Manager at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 20
2023-09-08T05:53:28Z
Sep 8, 2023
The on-premise version of Nintex Workflow was good for the workload that we were using. However, the trend has changed, and now all the features are available on the cloud, not on-premise. So we have to move to the cloud. We are cost-sensitive, so we can't just move the tool to the cloud directly. We need to evaluate and understand our requirements first. And since we are in the pharma industry, we need to make sure that the software is compliant with Part 11 regulations. For Nintex and other products, we need to develop them with those features in mind. So, that's an additional layer of customization that is required for all these platforms. That's why we are looking for a ready-made product that is compliant with Part 11 and FDA regulations. So it will be easier for us, and it will reduce the need for customization. So in that sense, we are basically evaluating the different options. It was never a key factor for us, but we are not happy with Nintex, so that's why we are not considering it. This is the product we have been using for the past 6-7 years, and it was one of the best ones because it integrated well with SharePoint. We hardly had to do any customizations in SharePoint because everything was created locally. If I consider the standard version, I would rate it eight out of ten. However, the enterprise version has some additional features that I would like to use, but the cost in not so fair. So if I factor in the cost, I would rate it lower, maybe around seven out of ten.
I give the solution a nine out of ten. We have around 2,000 current users and are expanding to 2,500 next year. Although Nintex Workflow is a great product, we need to assess our capabilities before integrating it with a Microsoft application. It's worth noting that Microsoft's application is actually less expensive than Nintex Workflow. Nintex Workflow is at the top end of the price range.
We're just customers and end-users. We don't have a business relationship with the company. I am using the latest version of the solution, whichever it is. I'm not sure of the exact name of the version. I don't know how the product compares with other solutions other than the older versions of Workflow such as SharePoint Designer. I know that with Online, SharePoint Online, there are other workflow management tools that you can use if you would like to. In general, I would rate the solution at an eight out of ten. We're mostly happy with it.
Senior Manager - Reporting and Analytics at a financial services firm with 201-500 employees
Real User
2020-10-11T08:58:19Z
Oct 11, 2020
We are planning to decommission this product for use and we are still exploring other products. I would recommend some other tools rather than this. I would rate Nintex Workflow a seven out of ten.
This is a very good solution, and our client is very happy with it. We were able to meet all of the requirements for functionality that were specified, and we did not experience challenges where we had to compromise on functionality. Nintex will give you what you want to achieve. As long as you have the discipline to check at every stage and ensure that you are working towards what you want to achieve, you will be successful. I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.
Technical Architect at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
2019-05-16T16:17:00Z
May 16, 2019
This is a good solution for mid-scale deployment and mid-scale usage, but as the usage increases, the issues along with it also increase. I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.
Nintex Process Platform automates processes such as approvals, vendor requests, and leave management, optimizing workflows in sectors like government, banking, and HR.
Nintex Process Platform streamlines collaboration and integrates seamlessly with Microsoft tools. It supports account management, loan origination, claims reimbursement, and public e-services, while also assisting with onboarding, resource management, and compliance workflows. Users benefit from its ease of maintenance,...
If a community edition is available during the initial phase, we could use it to demonstrate the capabilities and set it up on the client's premises. Additionally, if we were to consider the cloud side, the accessibility of the cloud platform is currently limited. If such an option were available, it would be greatly appreciated. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.
The on-premise version of Nintex Workflow was good for the workload that we were using. However, the trend has changed, and now all the features are available on the cloud, not on-premise. So we have to move to the cloud. We are cost-sensitive, so we can't just move the tool to the cloud directly. We need to evaluate and understand our requirements first. And since we are in the pharma industry, we need to make sure that the software is compliant with Part 11 regulations. For Nintex and other products, we need to develop them with those features in mind. So, that's an additional layer of customization that is required for all these platforms. That's why we are looking for a ready-made product that is compliant with Part 11 and FDA regulations. So it will be easier for us, and it will reduce the need for customization. So in that sense, we are basically evaluating the different options. It was never a key factor for us, but we are not happy with Nintex, so that's why we are not considering it. This is the product we have been using for the past 6-7 years, and it was one of the best ones because it integrated well with SharePoint. We hardly had to do any customizations in SharePoint because everything was created locally. If I consider the standard version, I would rate it eight out of ten. However, the enterprise version has some additional features that I would like to use, but the cost in not so fair. So if I factor in the cost, I would rate it lower, maybe around seven out of ten.
To those planning to use it, I think it's a good tool to start with. I rate the overall solution an eight out of ten.
I give the solution a nine out of ten. We have around 2,000 current users and are expanding to 2,500 next year. Although Nintex Workflow is a great product, we need to assess our capabilities before integrating it with a Microsoft application. It's worth noting that Microsoft's application is actually less expensive than Nintex Workflow. Nintex Workflow is at the top end of the price range.
Nintex Workflow is user-friendly and saves time I would rate Nintex Workflow a ten out of ten.
I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.
I would recommend this solution to others. I rate Nintex Workflow a nine out of ten.
We're just customers and end-users. We don't have a business relationship with the company. I am using the latest version of the solution, whichever it is. I'm not sure of the exact name of the version. I don't know how the product compares with other solutions other than the older versions of Workflow such as SharePoint Designer. I know that with Online, SharePoint Online, there are other workflow management tools that you can use if you would like to. In general, I would rate the solution at an eight out of ten. We're mostly happy with it.
We are planning to decommission this product for use and we are still exploring other products. I would recommend some other tools rather than this. I would rate Nintex Workflow a seven out of ten.
This is a very good solution, and our client is very happy with it. We were able to meet all of the requirements for functionality that were specified, and we did not experience challenges where we had to compromise on functionality. Nintex will give you what you want to achieve. As long as you have the discipline to check at every stage and ensure that you are working towards what you want to achieve, you will be successful. I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.
This is a good solution for mid-scale deployment and mid-scale usage, but as the usage increases, the issues along with it also increase. I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.