What advice do you have for others considering Nutanix AHV Virtualization?

I advise verifying solutions through a proof of concept in your own environment before making a decision. I rate the overall solution as eight out of ten.

I would definitely recommend Nutanix to others. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

I rate the overall product an eight out of ten.

We've two Nutanix clusters that replicate between each other. One is production and another one is disaster recovery. It has higher availability clusters. We've three nodes on the side, and it's replicated between the two. One of the nodes goes down. The network capabilities of AHV is very good. Everything would be connected. It's all on one singular platform, making management streamlined. There's no need for add-ons; everything you need comes with Nutanix. You won't find yourself constantly adding and using different add-ons, or dealing with the complexities of integrating with Linux. The best implementation is to integrate the Nutanix AHV virtualization framework directly with the hardware and facility infrastructure. This allows you to quickly start using and building new virtual machines in just a couple of hours. It's a seamless process that significantly reduces deployment time. Overall, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

I will recommend the tool to others. It is hardware-agnostic and vendor-agnostic. We work with all technologies. The tool provides a platform to integrate all technologies together. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

The product stands out in the hyper-converged market due to its user-friendly nature. Automation minimizes manual configuration tasks, reducing the operational burden and making it less headache-prone for administrators. In light of recent developments, especially with Broadcom's acquisition of VMware, there's a sense of uncertainty and potential disruption in the market. Broadcom's history, as seen with the Symantec acquisition, raises concerns about the impact on licensing renewals. VMware no longer selling perpetual socket licenses adds to the uncertainty. In such a scenario, Nutanix AHV Virtualization appears to be stable. Unlike VMware, it hasn't undergone frequent changes in ownership. We have small, medium, and enterprise businesses using it. When considering it, it's important to assess third-party integrations. While the product has a mature platform with an expanding ecosystem, it may not be as mature as VMware regarding integrations. Therefore, potential buyers should ensure their desired integrations have native support within the tool's ecosystem. Whether it's an existing backup solution or other third-party products, compatibility checks are crucial before adopting Nutanix AHV Virtualization to avoid any issues with integration. I rate the overall product an eight out of ten.

I recommend thorough research and understanding of its capabilities before making a decision. Consider your specific needs and, if needed, try the community edition for a proof of concept. Overall, I rate the product an 8/10

I recommend using Nutanix AHV (Acropolis Hypervisor) for hyper-converged computing processes because of its simplicity in deployment and configuration. The platform also offers good support and is versatile, supporting various hypervisors such as VMware, Microsoft Hyper-V, and its native AHV. I would rate this product a 9.5 out of 10 overall.

Europeans need to start working with Nutanix as a cost-effective solution. It's more simpler than the other solutions in the market right now. We are now trying to establish a strategic plan with Nutanix more effectively and to be in our portfolio. Nutanix AHV is new in the virtualization market. The company should invest in marketing. I have seen the products on several IT-related websites. Nutanix is also gaining recognition from industry analysts, appearing in the top ten lists of several Gartner. I advise using the tool effectively for your needs with careful sizing considerations. Additionally, professional analysis is crucial in aligning the product with specific service demands. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

The solution's maintenance depends on the project, but I think one person is enough for one cluster. Before choosing Nutanix AHV Virtualization, users should know their workload. Overall, I rate Nutanix AHV Virtualization a seven out of ten.

Instead of creating a storage account and configuring other things, you should be able to create a cloud cluster, deploy it, remove it, and migrate VMs from on-premises to the cloud and vice versa, all within Prism Central in a user-friendly way. You should work more on AWS, GCP, Azure, and Kubernetes integration and services. You can deploy Kubernetes services inside the Nutanix AHV hypervisor. Instead of creating a new system, I think improving the existing Nutanix AHV Virtualization KB document would be more helpful. The KB document has a lot of information, but finding specific solutions to problems can be difficult. For example, if you install a KB fix and an application stops working, you may have to read many documents to find the solution. This can be lengthy, and raising a ticket with Nutanix may be necessary. Finding the needed information would be easier if the KB document were better organized and structured. If you need a protection database server, I recommend Nutanix. It is very fast. However, if you run applications, Nutanix is not the best choice. Other products in the market are better suited for applications. Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.

I believe that Nutanix AHV Virtualization has good features, so the solution is in good shape in the market. I recommend the solution to those who plan to use it. Nutanix AHV Virtualization mostly meets the requirements of its customers. I rate the overall solution a nine out of ten.

I highly recommend using Nutanix to other users. Overall, I would rate the solution a ten out of ten.

Overall, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

I rate the overall solution a seven out of ten.

I definitely recommend it and have done so to many of my peers in the industry. A few of those colleagues were super excited when they got an overview of the product.

The best HCI platform around. I have met the support team and Nutanix has built an excellent support model.  

We're partners. While the solution is largely on-premises, we do have some infrastructure on AWS. I'd rate the solution six out of ten. I would recommend other companies deploy it. It's very powerful, whether it is on-prem or in the cloud.

I rate the solution a ten out of ten, the solution is very good, but it could be cheaper. Nutanix AHV Virtualization is a very good solution, and I recommend it to anyone.

I would recommend this solution to others. Overall it is a good solution. I would rate Nutanix AHV Virtualization a nine out of ten.

Because they have revisions for backup, and their availability, I would rate Nutanix AHV Virtualization an eight out of ten.

I would rate Nutanix AHV as eight out of ten.

I rate Nutanix AHV a seven out of ten.

We are Nutanix partners. I'd rate the solution at a nine out of ten.

I rate Nutanix AHV an eight out of ten.

The customer should learn Linux, but is not necessary, because we are the main stack of operations is done with prism. Its GUI is ideal for user experience, and they don't need to go to CLI to do anything. I would rate Nutanix AHV a nine out of ten. Because every vendor is required to rate it a 10, but I believe that AHV has areas in which they can improve.

It is a free hypervisor. If you don't need all the features then Nutanix AHV is a great alternative hypervisor.

I encourage people to use this solution because we are a partner with them for about four to five years, and we are happy with them. I rate Nutanix AHV a seven out of ten.

I would recommend this solution to others. I rate Nutanix AHV a ten out of ten.

I will recommend it because it is easy to manage, and you don't need to be skilled for that. You don't need any training at all. If you spend one or two days dedicated to Prism, you will get to know everything. This includes how to create VMs, how to manage storage, how to manage the client-server, how to monitor the entire cluster, and there are lots of algorithms available. this means that you don't need to configure things like a Hyper-V or ESXi. I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.

This is a product that is certainly good for some use cases, but it is not the best. It would be better if the compatibility with applications like third-party backup software was improved. I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

We are comparing to the traditional system that had many problems. I think that all of these problems have been resolved with Nutanix AHV. At this time, as I have only been using it for three months, I am not able to say that there is room for improvement, especially since I am judging and basing it on a comparison with the old system. It has addressed all of the issues we were facing. I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.

We use many solutions with Nutanix. We use Nutanix AHV, Nutanix CVM, Nutanix Calm, and more. For normal users, they need a web interface, but for users who are more experienced this solution is the best. I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.

We have many customers using AHV. On a scale of one to ten, I would rate it a nine because it needs a web interface.

There are rumors around the globe that suggest Nutanix cannot be used for heavy software. However, I have tested it on all levels and it performs well. I have used it for big data and it works great. The biggest lesson that I have learned when using this solution is related to the sizing of the system. If you define your requirements accurately then you will not see any issues in terms of performance. This means that it is very important to know what you want and what kind of applications will be hosted on Nutanix. You should also understand the use case for Nutanix, itself. When you understand all of this, it prepares you very well for calculating the resources that will be needed. For me, this is the number one hyper-converged solution. I am a fan of VMware, but I can see that in Nutanix, the internal components combine very harmoniously. There is a huge development team behind Nutanix and they are working daily to develop the product and come out with new technologies. I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.

On a scale from 1 to 10 I would rate it a 9 - I believe there is always room for improvement.

It's a great product. It's relatively easy to use and it works well. Everyone that's moved their machines onto that platform says they are amazed by the performance. It works very well. Performance is good, management of the systems is pretty easy, upgrading and all that stuff is seamless. It's a great platform and I would recommend it to anyone. I would rate it a nine out of ten.

We're using the on-premises deployment model. We're a reseller of the solution. I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.

This is the number one hyper-converged solution in the market. No doubt about it. I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.