Architect at a tech services company with 1-10 employees
Real User
Top 5
2024-05-02T20:48:39Z
May 2, 2024
I definitely recommend Okta. Every organization needs workforce productivity as well as customer security. The need is definitely there for any enterprise or organization to protect their identity. Customer security also plays the utmost role in protecting customer data. Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten.
If we wanted to access the Azure portal or any other portal, we used to scan with Authenticator. Once it was approved, we accessed the portals. The product is equivalent to Microsoft’s solution. I used Duo instead of Authenticator to authorize applications. People use Conditional Access Policy. People generally prefer Microsoft because it is free. I will recommend the tool to others. Our recommendations are based on the customer’s requirements, bandwidth, and budget. Overall, I rate the tool an eight out of ten.
People considering the product must not only think about whether the tool will solve their immediate problem. They must think of all the things they want in the future before deploying the tool. Overall, I rate the product a nine out of ten.
Overall, I would rate Okta a nine out of ten because there is always room for improvement. However, it is best in class as far as doing the things it does. And it's something that I've implemented with multiple businesses. And it's really well-regarded. Yes. There are alternatives out there. Like, they all do somewhat different in each thing, whereas Okta seems to really be trying to cover all the bases as far as providing solutions that integrate with people's OSBAP, people's active directory, companies that wanna get serverless, touching on, the zero test network security that they're really kind of playing in the center of that zone.
I'm using the latest version of Okta Customer Identity. My company has a partnership with Okta Customer Identity. Two thousand people use Okta Customer Identity within the company, mostly engineers. Three people take care of the deployment and maintenance of the solution: one junior engineer, one system engineer, and one architect. There's a plan to increase the number of users of Okta Customer Identity in the future. My advice to people looking into implementing the solution is to go ahead and implement it. Okta Customer Identity is a very good technology to work with, with a very knowledgeable support team. You'll get instant support, and the team is very supportive. My rating for Okta Customer Identity is eight out of ten. I'm not scoring it a ten because of some gaps. It's fine for me right now, but in the future, I would like to see improvements in the solution.
I'm just a user, just an employee who is using this identity provider, and it is completely managed by our administrators. I'd recommend the solution to other users. I would rate the solution eight out of ten.
My advice for anybody who is implementing this solution is to make sure that it is properly prepared, as a project. Good preparation is needed so do your homework. I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.
Senior Security Architect South Europe at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
2019-11-07T10:35:00Z
Nov 7, 2019
My advice to others is to be aware of their current infrastructure. The integration points have to be very clear to the customer to facilitate the main integration. Otherwise, it makes things very complex. I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
Okta Customer Identity is an identity service that enables frictionless experience, speed-to-market, centralized management, and internet-scale security. Okta Customer Identity is developer friendly and secure with minimal custom code.
I definitely recommend Okta. Every organization needs workforce productivity as well as customer security. The need is definitely there for any enterprise or organization to protect their identity. Customer security also plays the utmost role in protecting customer data. Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten.
If we wanted to access the Azure portal or any other portal, we used to scan with Authenticator. Once it was approved, we accessed the portals. The product is equivalent to Microsoft’s solution. I used Duo instead of Authenticator to authorize applications. People use Conditional Access Policy. People generally prefer Microsoft because it is free. I will recommend the tool to others. Our recommendations are based on the customer’s requirements, bandwidth, and budget. Overall, I rate the tool an eight out of ten.
People considering the product must not only think about whether the tool will solve their immediate problem. They must think of all the things they want in the future before deploying the tool. Overall, I rate the product a nine out of ten.
Overall, I would rate Okta a nine out of ten because there is always room for improvement. However, it is best in class as far as doing the things it does. And it's something that I've implemented with multiple businesses. And it's really well-regarded. Yes. There are alternatives out there. Like, they all do somewhat different in each thing, whereas Okta seems to really be trying to cover all the bases as far as providing solutions that integrate with people's OSBAP, people's active directory, companies that wanna get serverless, touching on, the zero test network security that they're really kind of playing in the center of that zone.
I'm using the latest version of Okta Customer Identity. My company has a partnership with Okta Customer Identity. Two thousand people use Okta Customer Identity within the company, mostly engineers. Three people take care of the deployment and maintenance of the solution: one junior engineer, one system engineer, and one architect. There's a plan to increase the number of users of Okta Customer Identity in the future. My advice to people looking into implementing the solution is to go ahead and implement it. Okta Customer Identity is a very good technology to work with, with a very knowledgeable support team. You'll get instant support, and the team is very supportive. My rating for Okta Customer Identity is eight out of ten. I'm not scoring it a ten because of some gaps. It's fine for me right now, but in the future, I would like to see improvements in the solution.
I would recommend this solution to others. I rate Okta Customer Identity an eight out of ten.
I'm just a user, just an employee who is using this identity provider, and it is completely managed by our administrators. I'd recommend the solution to other users. I would rate the solution eight out of ten.
My advice for anybody who is implementing this solution is to make sure that it is properly prepared, as a project. Good preparation is needed so do your homework. I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.
I would recommend this solution. I rate Okta Customer Identity a nine out of ten.
I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.
My advice to others is to be aware of their current infrastructure. The integration points have to be very clear to the customer to facilitate the main integration. Otherwise, it makes things very complex. I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
If you are not concerned by the cost and are looking for a secure IAM solution with great stability and excellent support, then go for it.