How the tool streamlines user access control in our customer's organization is something that totally depends on how the customer wants it. There is a two-way access or request list. Access control is managed by two-way access, and if we talk about the application access, it i s managed by either zero sign-on or single sign-on. Integration with the target application exposes multiple ways of integrating the applications for the single sign-on. Also, it is easy to use third-party governance like a fingerprint or a face scanner, as it is easy to implement them in a single sign-on. If we talk about Saviynt, I would say it is a good product, but Oracle Identity Governance is better than any other solution. Role change is like RBAC and request-based, so it totally depends on the client and how they want the product. If they want the role changes or the department changes or anything to happen, all the major changes take place after a role or a department of the user change, and still, it can be easily managed with Oracle products. Role is something the role of the entity or the role assigned to the identity. Upgrading and making changes to the product is very difficult. It is difficult when you are upgrading the product because sometimes you cannot directly upgrade from one version to another version. You have to go to the lower version and then upgrade to the higher version, which is the biggest drawback of Oracle products. Currently, there is not much AI in the tool, but Oracle is planning to go for it and it is expected to be released in 2026. I recommend the tool to others, especially if the customers have the complex requirements. If there are no complex requirements, I will suggest such people go for the Saviynt or SailPoint. I rate the tool an eight out of ten.
Overall, I would rate the solution a five out of ten. If you're familiar with Oracle Identity Governance, you can easily transition to other IDM tools because of its complexity. But once you understand it, you'll grasp the concepts well.
I can recommend Oracle Identity Governance to individuals working in the telecom domain and banking users. It is also a product that is a requirement for compliance processes. Overall, I rate this solution an eight out of ten.
I generally use the Oracle suite of products which includes Oracle Identity and Access Management and Oracle Identity Governance. My company has almost three thousand users of Oracle Identity Governance. My advice to anyone looking into implementing Oracle Identity Governance is to go for it because the solution has very good stability and scalability. I'd recommend it to large organizations because Oracle Identity Governance can handle large volumes of data. If anyone wants to try plug-and-play solutions such as SailPoint and One Identity, I wouldn't discourage it, and I'd recommend those solutions for midsized organizations. I'm rating Oracle Identity Governance as seven out of ten. It's suitable for large organizations, and it has very good scalability and stability. You can also easily integrate Oracle Identity Governance with non-Oracle products such as Microsoft products, but configuring and implementing the solution is complex, so I'm scoring it a seven. My company is an Oracle customer.
Identity and Access Management Senior Consultant at NEORIS
Consultant
2022-08-19T16:16:07Z
Aug 19, 2022
It's important to be aware of the identity and access management process by reading the documentation. Before implementation, it's important to prepare an environment to install the solution for an indication of how it should be installed. I rate this product seven out of 10.
This is a good solution, but you need the expertise to be able to implement it. At least one FTE is needed to manage the platform. I rate Oracle Identity Governance an eight out of ten.
My company is using Oracle Identity Management, now called Oracle Identity Governance. Right now, I would not recommend Oracle Identity Governance because there are new and very good tools available in the market. My rating for Oracle Identity Governance is six out of ten.
Partner at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Real User
2021-12-15T23:26:00Z
Dec 15, 2021
I rate Oracle Identity Governance six out of 10. If you're planning to use Identity Governance, you need to learn Java to fully meet your business requirements.
Identity and Access Management Consultant at a energy/utilities company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Real User
2021-04-12T14:07:36Z
Apr 12, 2021
I would tell potential users that many other products are much easier to implement than this solution. On a scale from one to ten, I would give Oracle Identity Governance a six.
Owner at a manufacturing company with 11-50 employees
Real User
2021-02-26T17:44:55Z
Feb 26, 2021
My advice is to train the teams on identity management concepts and the Oracle solution specifically. Have them take advantage of all the training that's available, and plan the implementation in phases. It has good features but it's complicated. I would rate Oracle Identity Governance a seven out of ten.
IT Architecture Manager at a retailer with 10,001+ employees
Real User
2020-11-29T05:34:00Z
Nov 29, 2020
With Oracle, you could do something for a million people but you need to make sure to do it right which isn't so easy. You need people and partners from Oracle for help. It's a good product but even good products need people to implement and maintain them especially during migration. You need senior people to help. I would recommend Oracle for a large implementation. My advice would be to solve the integration problem. Solve the way they interact when information is distributed. Properly distribute the customer's information. Understand that it is very difficult to implement. Make sure to understand the application and understand the legalities of the country that you're working in. Most people start in the last stage. They pay a lot of money and the process could take three to four years. They pay a lot of money but don't use the product as a service. The problem is inexperience. I would rate Oracle Identity Governance a six out of ten. There is a lot missing. If it's not missing, it's complex. If you want to implement something, you won't end up doing it because it's too complex or expensive.
I would recommend this solution but it really depends what you're looking for and what will suit your needs. I can recommend it for users who are looking for the RBAC implementation, which should be the strongest one. If you're not looking for that then there are other options. I would rate this solution an eight out of 10.
Technical Project Manager at a computer software company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Real User
2020-09-21T06:33:00Z
Sep 21, 2020
The suitability of this product depends on the organizational budget and plan, which includes the roadmap to having an IAM solution. In summary, they are not great, but not poor either. My biggest complaint is about the costs. I would rate this solution a six out of ten.
Security & Solution Architect at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Real User
2019-09-27T04:38:00Z
Sep 27, 2019
We use the on-premises deployment model. I would not recommend the solution. Oracle is really pushing people to go to their cloud version. So you can not really get a proper on-premises solution. It's also a horrible price and for every single connector you want to have, or that you have to get, you have to pay and pay and pay. It is very expensive for what it does. Oracle did not put any effort into the features and implementation of their product. They just put layers on layers on layers. It's very difficult for a developer to extend the full scenario of features of this product. I would rate the solution four out of ten.
In the current setup, within our network, I would not rate it too high. It's maybe a six or a seven out of ten. Although, it might be related to the performance of our network. It's a good product as such, but you need to be aware that you need some people who are having the knowledge.
We are very happy with the performance of the platform. My advice for anyone thinking about implementing this solution is to first consider the scope and make sure it's clear; the scope and the features that you want to implement. You need full visibility because the suite of features are complex and you have to be clear on what you want to implement. On a scale of one to ten, ten being the best, I'd rate the product an 8 out of 10.
Oracle Identity Governance (OIG) is a very versatile and robust enterprise identity management solution that offers functional and business performance competence by supplying centralized administration and total automation of identity and client provisioning events throughout the organization and user applications. Oracle Identity Governance monitors the complete identity and role process to satisfy rapidly changing business and complex compliance regulations and quickly delivers critical...
How the tool streamlines user access control in our customer's organization is something that totally depends on how the customer wants it. There is a two-way access or request list. Access control is managed by two-way access, and if we talk about the application access, it i s managed by either zero sign-on or single sign-on. Integration with the target application exposes multiple ways of integrating the applications for the single sign-on. Also, it is easy to use third-party governance like a fingerprint or a face scanner, as it is easy to implement them in a single sign-on. If we talk about Saviynt, I would say it is a good product, but Oracle Identity Governance is better than any other solution. Role change is like RBAC and request-based, so it totally depends on the client and how they want the product. If they want the role changes or the department changes or anything to happen, all the major changes take place after a role or a department of the user change, and still, it can be easily managed with Oracle products. Role is something the role of the entity or the role assigned to the identity. Upgrading and making changes to the product is very difficult. It is difficult when you are upgrading the product because sometimes you cannot directly upgrade from one version to another version. You have to go to the lower version and then upgrade to the higher version, which is the biggest drawback of Oracle products. Currently, there is not much AI in the tool, but Oracle is planning to go for it and it is expected to be released in 2026. I recommend the tool to others, especially if the customers have the complex requirements. If there are no complex requirements, I will suggest such people go for the Saviynt or SailPoint. I rate the tool an eight out of ten.
Overall, I would rate the solution a five out of ten. If you're familiar with Oracle Identity Governance, you can easily transition to other IDM tools because of its complexity. But once you understand it, you'll grasp the concepts well.
I can recommend Oracle Identity Governance to individuals working in the telecom domain and banking users. It is also a product that is a requirement for compliance processes. Overall, I rate this solution an eight out of ten.
I generally use the Oracle suite of products which includes Oracle Identity and Access Management and Oracle Identity Governance. My company has almost three thousand users of Oracle Identity Governance. My advice to anyone looking into implementing Oracle Identity Governance is to go for it because the solution has very good stability and scalability. I'd recommend it to large organizations because Oracle Identity Governance can handle large volumes of data. If anyone wants to try plug-and-play solutions such as SailPoint and One Identity, I wouldn't discourage it, and I'd recommend those solutions for midsized organizations. I'm rating Oracle Identity Governance as seven out of ten. It's suitable for large organizations, and it has very good scalability and stability. You can also easily integrate Oracle Identity Governance with non-Oracle products such as Microsoft products, but configuring and implementing the solution is complex, so I'm scoring it a seven. My company is an Oracle customer.
It's important to be aware of the identity and access management process by reading the documentation. Before implementation, it's important to prepare an environment to install the solution for an indication of how it should be installed. I rate this product seven out of 10.
This is a good solution, but you need the expertise to be able to implement it. At least one FTE is needed to manage the platform. I rate Oracle Identity Governance an eight out of ten.
My company is using Oracle Identity Management, now called Oracle Identity Governance. Right now, I would not recommend Oracle Identity Governance because there are new and very good tools available in the market. My rating for Oracle Identity Governance is six out of ten.
I would rate Oracle Identity Governance a 6 out of 10.
I rate Oracle Identity Governance six out of 10. If you're planning to use Identity Governance, you need to learn Java to fully meet your business requirements.
I would tell potential users that many other products are much easier to implement than this solution. On a scale from one to ten, I would give Oracle Identity Governance a six.
My advice is to train the teams on identity management concepts and the Oracle solution specifically. Have them take advantage of all the training that's available, and plan the implementation in phases. It has good features but it's complicated. I would rate Oracle Identity Governance a seven out of ten.
With Oracle, you could do something for a million people but you need to make sure to do it right which isn't so easy. You need people and partners from Oracle for help. It's a good product but even good products need people to implement and maintain them especially during migration. You need senior people to help. I would recommend Oracle for a large implementation. My advice would be to solve the integration problem. Solve the way they interact when information is distributed. Properly distribute the customer's information. Understand that it is very difficult to implement. Make sure to understand the application and understand the legalities of the country that you're working in. Most people start in the last stage. They pay a lot of money and the process could take three to four years. They pay a lot of money but don't use the product as a service. The problem is inexperience. I would rate Oracle Identity Governance a six out of ten. There is a lot missing. If it's not missing, it's complex. If you want to implement something, you won't end up doing it because it's too complex or expensive.
I would recommend this solution but it really depends what you're looking for and what will suit your needs. I can recommend it for users who are looking for the RBAC implementation, which should be the strongest one. If you're not looking for that then there are other options. I would rate this solution an eight out of 10.
The suitability of this product depends on the organizational budget and plan, which includes the roadmap to having an IAM solution. In summary, they are not great, but not poor either. My biggest complaint is about the costs. I would rate this solution a six out of ten.
We use the on-premises deployment model. I would not recommend the solution. Oracle is really pushing people to go to their cloud version. So you can not really get a proper on-premises solution. It's also a horrible price and for every single connector you want to have, or that you have to get, you have to pay and pay and pay. It is very expensive for what it does. Oracle did not put any effort into the features and implementation of their product. They just put layers on layers on layers. It's very difficult for a developer to extend the full scenario of features of this product. I would rate the solution four out of ten.
In the current setup, within our network, I would not rate it too high. It's maybe a six or a seven out of ten. Although, it might be related to the performance of our network. It's a good product as such, but you need to be aware that you need some people who are having the knowledge.
We are very happy with the performance of the platform. My advice for anyone thinking about implementing this solution is to first consider the scope and make sure it's clear; the scope and the features that you want to implement. You need full visibility because the suite of features are complex and you have to be clear on what you want to implement. On a scale of one to ten, ten being the best, I'd rate the product an 8 out of 10.