For those considering implementation, if your needs align with traditional MFA or Symantec's Advanced Authentication, it's a highly recommended choice due to its stability and scalability. However, if you seek a more modern MFA solution with extensive user flexibility, such as passwordless options or pattern-based authentication, Symantec may not be the ideal fit. Overall, I would rate it seven out of ten.
I rate Symantec Advanced Authentication a seven out of ten. We have at least two to three customers using this solution, both of which are reasonably big-sized customers. Some customers have it for about 5,000 to 10,000 servers. To those considering implementing this solution, I would advise them to look at what their requirements are. If they want to integrate their active directory, if they want to have an integration with their exchange or application to enable multi-factor authentication, then they need to look into design because architecture is important. Sometimes you can do an architectural level integration at the firewall end, at the load balancer area, and do it in one shot for all applications, rather than going at silos and installing one application, and doing multi-factor authentication for each application. It depends on architecture, so when you are selecting a product, you have to make sure that you do the right architecture.
Learn what your peers think about Symantec Advanced Authentication. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
CA Advanced Authentication provides a secure, user-convenient and cost-effective way to protect online and mobile applications. The solution consists of two components: CA Risk Authentication allows the enterprise to silently and transparently collect data and assess risk based on device identification, location and user behavior, among other factors, and CA Strong Authentication provides a wide variety of software-based, two-factor authentication credentials and technology to make...
For those considering implementation, if your needs align with traditional MFA or Symantec's Advanced Authentication, it's a highly recommended choice due to its stability and scalability. However, if you seek a more modern MFA solution with extensive user flexibility, such as passwordless options or pattern-based authentication, Symantec may not be the ideal fit. Overall, I would rate it seven out of ten.
I rate Symantec Advanced Authentication a seven out of ten. We have at least two to three customers using this solution, both of which are reasonably big-sized customers. Some customers have it for about 5,000 to 10,000 servers. To those considering implementing this solution, I would advise them to look at what their requirements are. If they want to integrate their active directory, if they want to have an integration with their exchange or application to enable multi-factor authentication, then they need to look into design because architecture is important. Sometimes you can do an architectural level integration at the firewall end, at the load balancer area, and do it in one shot for all applications, rather than going at silos and installing one application, and doing multi-factor authentication for each application. It depends on architecture, so when you are selecting a product, you have to make sure that you do the right architecture.