I am a developer. We use the product because our CEO has a connection in Tanium. Our company is a partner. I researched and created some documents about agent and agent release. Overall, I rate the tool an eight out of ten.
My advice to others would be that they should use Tanium. As you see in the market, you will find out that for Tanium, when you compare through its SCCM, there are only a few openings in Tanium. But as you will see, the SCCM market is a huge market. As a vulnerability tool, I rate Tanium a ten out of ten. If you ask for the applications, it would be six to seven out of ten. Overall, I rate Tanium a six out of ten.
Tanium is not a difficult solution to maintain, and a specific team was responsible for its maintenance. I suggest being aware of the tool's limitations. Overall, I rate Tanium five out of ten.
Founder at a construction company with 11-50 employees
Real User
2022-09-02T01:05:48Z
Sep 2, 2022
Some of the current topics of interest include software as a service based on cyber risk and cyber security. But I would say that would be the most, one of the most prevalent. I would suggest doing your due diligence. I am an independent consultant. I would rate Tanium a seven out of ten.
Cybersecurity Business & Technology Consultant at Capgemini
Real User
2022-03-31T19:53:00Z
Mar 31, 2022
Try the solution on a reduced scale to get used to the interface so that you don't make mistakes that can be harmful to your environment. On a scale from one to ten, I would rate Tanium at seven.
IT Security Manager at a transportation company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
2021-04-09T22:12:57Z
Apr 9, 2021
I'm a customer and end-user. We are using the most current version of the solution in our organization at this time. I'm not sure how the solution is typically deployed. It's great for inventory and even incident response. It's right up there with some other top-notch products. However, in terms of the implementation, getting everything on board, all that sort of thing, a company initially setting it up is going to need help troubleshooting. I would advise a company takes the time to definitely engage with some sort of professional services. It's going to be required. I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.
Channel Director at a tech services company with 1-10 employees
Real User
2020-07-22T08:17:26Z
Jul 22, 2020
I would recommend the solution for what it is, but not for what it is not. It's actually lacking one major feature and that is mobility which is very important. The lack of this software is why I wouldn't recommend Tanium but in terms of security, deployment and installation, the solution is fine. I would rate this solution a seven out of 10.
From a tool perspective, it is capable. I do not want to comment on how efficient it is because ultimately, I'm not aware of its capability. My opinion is that it is definitely a capable tool and it all depends on planning. It's about how to plan your implementation and leverage its available features. It is very fast. Asset discovery is also very fast. I would rate Tanium a nine out of ten. Most of the time, agent-relative issues have to be more equipped with self-healing features. At times, the agent is there, but for some reason, it doesn't report a status. It gives certain problems that are obviously agent-based.
Threat Intelligence at a university with 10,001+ employees
Real User
2019-03-11T07:21:00Z
Mar 11, 2019
We use it pretty regularly on quite a large scale. I don't think I've heard anyone have any major complaints so far, just the little things. We have been growing quite a bit, so we have been trying out bigger solutions. From a maturity standpoint, we have been bringing in new environments relatively quickly and adding to our existing ones. So, scalability has been a big deal for us. Try it out. The best way to test any of these technologies is implement them with real data. See how your environment works with each network and compare them.
I am a developer. We use the product because our CEO has a connection in Tanium. Our company is a partner. I researched and created some documents about agent and agent release. Overall, I rate the tool an eight out of ten.
I advise others to go through the product's documentation. It is very helpful. I rate it an eight out of ten. They could improve the UI.
My advice to others would be that they should use Tanium. As you see in the market, you will find out that for Tanium, when you compare through its SCCM, there are only a few openings in Tanium. But as you will see, the SCCM market is a huge market. As a vulnerability tool, I rate Tanium a ten out of ten. If you ask for the applications, it would be six to seven out of ten. Overall, I rate Tanium a six out of ten.
Tanium is not a difficult solution to maintain, and a specific team was responsible for its maintenance. I suggest being aware of the tool's limitations. Overall, I rate Tanium five out of ten.
Some of the current topics of interest include software as a service based on cyber risk and cyber security. But I would say that would be the most, one of the most prevalent. I would suggest doing your due diligence. I am an independent consultant. I would rate Tanium a seven out of ten.
I rate Tanium an eight out of ten.
Try the solution on a reduced scale to get used to the interface so that you don't make mistakes that can be harmful to your environment. On a scale from one to ten, I would rate Tanium at seven.
I rate Tanium a six out of ten.
I'm a customer and end-user. We are using the most current version of the solution in our organization at this time. I'm not sure how the solution is typically deployed. It's great for inventory and even incident response. It's right up there with some other top-notch products. However, in terms of the implementation, getting everything on board, all that sort of thing, a company initially setting it up is going to need help troubleshooting. I would advise a company takes the time to definitely engage with some sort of professional services. It's going to be required. I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.
I would recommend the solution for what it is, but not for what it is not. It's actually lacking one major feature and that is mobility which is very important. The lack of this software is why I wouldn't recommend Tanium but in terms of security, deployment and installation, the solution is fine. I would rate this solution a seven out of 10.
From a tool perspective, it is capable. I do not want to comment on how efficient it is because ultimately, I'm not aware of its capability. My opinion is that it is definitely a capable tool and it all depends on planning. It's about how to plan your implementation and leverage its available features. It is very fast. Asset discovery is also very fast. I would rate Tanium a nine out of ten. Most of the time, agent-relative issues have to be more equipped with self-healing features. At times, the agent is there, but for some reason, it doesn't report a status. It gives certain problems that are obviously agent-based.
We use it pretty regularly on quite a large scale. I don't think I've heard anyone have any major complaints so far, just the little things. We have been growing quite a bit, so we have been trying out bigger solutions. From a maturity standpoint, we have been bringing in new environments relatively quickly and adding to our existing ones. So, scalability has been a big deal for us. Try it out. The best way to test any of these technologies is implement them with real data. See how your environment works with each network and compare them.