I think that the prices of the product go up every year. If one is extremely expensive and ten is absolutely cheap, I rate the product price as six. There is no need to pay anything extra apart from the standard licensing fees attached to the product.
When purchasing licenses for the product, they operate on a user-based licensing model. If you have six users, you purchase licenses accordingly. I find the pricing structure satisfactory, it is around $25 per year. I would rate it seven out of ten.
We pay approximately eight Euro cents a gig. We are platinum partners so we get some very good rates and we pass that on. The eight cents includes our profit. There are no other additional costs, unless you want to include DR.
You can expand the license to add more users. If you want more users you have to purchase a license for the capacity. There is a fee for storage space on the cloud. If the solution was less expensive it would be better.
The pricing is reasonable. However, it depends on the storage that you use. It would be great to have a package that we can use up to a certain size of the backup, this would allow us to know what the price is going to be up to that capacity. There are a lot of options available. There are additional security options you can add, such as malware protection.
Our licensing costs are around $1,000 per month and that includes storage. We have around 15 terabytes. Everyone looks for better pricing, but it's not that bad. They have changed the licensing three times since we started working with them. They're looking to make things simple. The idea is to use less license numbers. Then there's the transparency; we pay according to time on the platform and would like to know the cost, but it's not available. We get the invoice and by then it's too late. We need the information up front.
We use two different types of licenses for our customers. We have a Cyber Cloud backup license and we have on-premises storage. Both can be useful for our customers. The licensing works in nodes. For example, for every node, you have to purchase a license. If I have an Active Directory or a physical server, and I have Microsoft Exchange with a third server, SQL, I will have to purchase three licenses from Acronis. When compared to Barracuda, the license is based on the device's storage. It is more expensive than Acronis initially, but as the licenses increase with Acronis, Barracuda ends up being less expensive.
Technical Product Manager for IT Managed Services at a tech services company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Real User
2021-04-22T17:27:05Z
Apr 22, 2021
There is a one-time purchase of the product. After that, users only have to pay renewals on maintenance and support. I like the licensing model. You are paying for very good value. Everything is well balanced. For me, in this case, the pricing is justified. It's worth the price tag.
Technical Presales - Server & Storage at a computer software company with 51-200 employees
Real User
2020-10-21T04:33:54Z
Oct 21, 2020
It is very cost-effective for the SMB segment, especially for start-ups and smaller environments. It is cost-effective for on-premises and on-cloud deployments in such environments.
Presales (Enterprise Solutions Architect) at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
Real User
2020-07-13T06:55:37Z
Jul 13, 2020
The icing on the cake is the price, as it is quite affordable. The pricing is comparable to the newest solution available on the market, Altaro. They are in the same price range. We don't have hybrid because with that kind of licensing required you will incur twice the expenses. They are very supportive of the price, even when your subscription is due and you have not paid they give you a grace period, they are quite understanding and give you that personal touch.
Acronis Cyber Protect offers a revolutionary approach to cyber protection by integrating data protection with cybersecurity. This integrated method eliminates complexity challenges, delivers better protection against today’s threats, and maximizes efficiency by saving time and money. With its full-stack antimalware protection and comprehensive endpoint management, Acronis Cyber Protect combats advanced cyberattacks with a unique integration of protection technologies while simplifying daily...
I think that the prices of the product go up every year. If one is extremely expensive and ten is absolutely cheap, I rate the product price as six. There is no need to pay anything extra apart from the standard licensing fees attached to the product.
When purchasing licenses for the product, they operate on a user-based licensing model. If you have six users, you purchase licenses accordingly. I find the pricing structure satisfactory, it is around $25 per year. I would rate it seven out of ten.
I rate the pricing a five out of ten. In some aspects, the product is cost-effective.
I rate the pricing a seven out of ten on a scale where one is high, and ten is low.
The tool's subscription costs are monthly. The product's pricing is fair.
It is a low-cost solution. But, its storage cost is high and varies at times. I rate its pricing a two or three.
I would rate the solution’s pricing an eight out of ten. The tool’s subscription is yearly.
The price of Acronis Backup could be reduced, it is expensive.
The price of the solution is reasonable.
We pay approximately eight Euro cents a gig. We are platinum partners so we get some very good rates and we pass that on. The eight cents includes our profit. There are no other additional costs, unless you want to include DR.
I don't handle the pricing aspect. Our product manager deals with that. That said, when talking with them, my understanding is the pricing is good.
We are an MSSP partner for the Acronis Cloud, so we are getting a good price.
The current subscription model of Acronis Backup compared to other backup solutions is not costly.
There are monthly fees to use Acronis Backup.
We have a one-year license for the product, however, I can't speak to the exact cost.
We pay a yearly subscription fee and the pricing is reasonable.
You can expand the license to add more users. If you want more users you have to purchase a license for the capacity. There is a fee for storage space on the cloud. If the solution was less expensive it would be better.
We use the free version that provides very basic functionalities.
The license is a perpetual license. The cost is an area for improvement.
We pay a yearly licensing fee. There are no additional costs to the standard license and fees.
The price could be more competitive.
The pricing is reasonable. However, it depends on the storage that you use. It would be great to have a package that we can use up to a certain size of the backup, this would allow us to know what the price is going to be up to that capacity. There are a lot of options available. There are additional security options you can add, such as malware protection.
The price is reasonable.
Its price is quite friendly on the pocket. You need to pay the licensing cost upfront, and then the support charges are on an annual basis.
Our licensing costs are around $1,000 per month and that includes storage. We have around 15 terabytes. Everyone looks for better pricing, but it's not that bad. They have changed the licensing three times since we started working with them. They're looking to make things simple. The idea is to use less license numbers. Then there's the transparency; we pay according to time on the platform and would like to know the cost, but it's not available. We get the invoice and by then it's too late. We need the information up front.
There is a license required for this solution and it can be on a monthly basis.
We use two different types of licenses for our customers. We have a Cyber Cloud backup license and we have on-premises storage. Both can be useful for our customers. The licensing works in nodes. For example, for every node, you have to purchase a license. If I have an Active Directory or a physical server, and I have Microsoft Exchange with a third server, SQL, I will have to purchase three licenses from Acronis. When compared to Barracuda, the license is based on the device's storage. It is more expensive than Acronis initially, but as the licenses increase with Acronis, Barracuda ends up being less expensive.
There is a one-time purchase of the product. After that, users only have to pay renewals on maintenance and support. I like the licensing model. You are paying for very good value. Everything is well balanced. For me, in this case, the pricing is justified. It's worth the price tag.
The price of the solution is expensive and could be reduced a little.
Licensing fees are billed annually and there are no extra charges.
This is an affordable product and fits within our customers' budgets.
The installation fees are very reasonable and the monthly/annual licensing fees are minimal for the features you get.
It is very cost-effective for the SMB segment, especially for start-ups and smaller environments. It is cost-effective for on-premises and on-cloud deployments in such environments.
The cost of updates is less than $100 USD yearly. If you don't update it then there are no additional charges.
The icing on the cake is the price, as it is quite affordable. The pricing is comparable to the newest solution available on the market, Altaro. They are in the same price range. We don't have hybrid because with that kind of licensing required you will incur twice the expenses. They are very supportive of the price, even when your subscription is due and you have not paid they give you a grace period, they are quite understanding and give you that personal touch.
Our licensing fees are on a yearly basis.