Site Reliability Engineer (AWS) at KFin Technologies Ltd
Real User
Top 20
2024-10-29T07:19:00Z
Oct 29, 2024
The approximate cost for ETL jobs is about 0.44 USD, which is mostly covered by the company. Employees do not purchase AWS Glue solutions individually.
On an organizational level, the pricing of AWS Glue does not pose a concern. It is in line with other ETL tools in the market. However, AWS Glue's cost to free-tier users is an issue because it is not entirely free, even for trial purposes.
AVP at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 5
2024-06-21T06:35:50Z
Jun 21, 2024
The costs of the tool are huge, especially when moving from the source to the datalake. I rate the tool an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is expensive, and ten is expensive. I cannot have any predictability factor regarding the costs associated with the tool.
The solution is expensive. It has a pay-as-you-go model. Whatever you are using, you are paying for that. I rate the product’s pricing a six out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive.
Price-wise, the solution is adequate, and we have no issues with it. We believe that the cost is justified given the number of users and the features it provides. Overall, it can be considered an average-priced tool. I would rate the solution a six or seven on a scale of one to ten, with ten being very expensive. Specifically, I rate its pricing a six out of ten.
AWS Glue is a high-priced solution that bills the client $150,000 to $250,000 annually. That's just the starting price because it's a small data sample, but if it hits over three hundred million users, the cost will probably go up almost thirty times more.
The overall cost of AWS Glue could be better. It cost approximately $1,000 a month. There is paid support available from AWS Glue. If the cost of AWS Glue was 50 percent less then we would not move to another solution.
ECM CONSULTANT/ARCHITECT/SOFTWARE DEVELOPER, DELUXE MN at a tech services company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Real User
2021-12-02T16:14:50Z
Dec 2, 2021
With AWS Glue, you pay more, but if you want to process the data, with speed and performance, you need the correct EC2 instances. There is a price to pay. It doesn't come free. Technical support is a paid service, and which subscription you have is dependent on that. You must pay one of them, and it ranges from $15,000 to $25,000 per year. You sign up for a level of service, and it does not come for free. As previously stated, everything is based on performance, ELAs. It was very expensive, at that time. If a company wants to pay the money, it makes my job easier. However, if the company or enterprise does not have the funds to pay for it, then it is a hassle.
Its price is good. We pay as we go or based on the usage, which is a good thing for us because it is simple to forecast for the tool. It is also good in terms of the financial planning of the company, and it is a good way to estimate the cost. It is also simple for our clients. In my opinion, it is one of the best tools in the market for ETL processes because of the fact that you pay as you use, which separates it from other big tools such as PowerCenter, Pentaho Data Integration, and Talend.
Team Lead at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
Real User
2020-10-14T06:36:55Z
Oct 14, 2020
It is not expensive. AWS Glue works on the serverless architecture. We get charged for the time the server is up. For our use case, we have to use it once in a day, and it is not expensive for us.
Senior Software Engineer at a consumer goods company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
2020-09-03T07:49:46Z
Sep 3, 2020
The pricing is a bit higher than other solutions like Athena and EC2. If the pricing becomes more scaled or flexible, it will be good because you have to pay 44 cents just for one DPU for an hour. If you increase DPUs to 5 or 10, the pricing gets multiplied. There are also some time limits like 0 to 10 minutes or 10 to 20 minutes. If the pricing is according to the minutes, it would be better because you have to limit your job to 10 minutes or 20 minutes.
AWS Glue is a serverless cloud data integration tool that facilitates the discovery, preparation, movement, and integration of data from multiple sources for machine learning (ML), analytics, and application development. The solution includes additional productivity and data ops tooling for running jobs, implementing business workflows, and authoring.
AWS Glue allows users to connect to more than 70 diverse data sources and manage data in a centralized data catalog. The solution facilitates...
The approximate cost for ETL jobs is about 0.44 USD, which is mostly covered by the company. Employees do not purchase AWS Glue solutions individually.
On an organizational level, the pricing of AWS Glue does not pose a concern. It is in line with other ETL tools in the market. However, AWS Glue's cost to free-tier users is an issue because it is not entirely free, even for trial purposes.
The costs of the tool are huge, especially when moving from the source to the datalake. I rate the tool an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is expensive, and ten is expensive. I cannot have any predictability factor regarding the costs associated with the tool.
The solution's pricing is pay-as-you-go. If you are using the solution for an enterprise business, it will be expensive.
The solution is expensive. It has a pay-as-you-go model. Whatever you are using, you are paying for that. I rate the product’s pricing a six out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive.
I rate the tool's pricing a four out of ten.
It is an expensive product. I rate its pricing a nine out of ten.
AWS Glue is not a licensed solution. AWS Glue follows a pay-as-you-go model, wherein the cost of the data you use will be counted as a monthly bill.
I rate the product's pricing a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is a high price, and ten is a low price.
The pricing is a bit higher than EMR. EMR is a managed Hadoop and Spark platform. AWS Glue has a higher price.
Price-wise, the solution is adequate, and we have no issues with it. We believe that the cost is justified given the number of users and the features it provides. Overall, it can be considered an average-priced tool. I would rate the solution a six or seven on a scale of one to ten, with ten being very expensive. Specifically, I rate its pricing a six out of ten.
The pricing depends on the usage, such as the number of users, computers, and the time jobs run.
AWS Glue is a high-priced solution that bills the client $150,000 to $250,000 annually. That's just the starting price because it's a small data sample, but if it hits over three hundred million users, the cost will probably go up almost thirty times more.
I was not involved in the cost negotiation process.
The current cost is around forty to fifty thousand a month.
The overall cost of AWS Glue could be better. It cost approximately $1,000 a month. There is paid support available from AWS Glue. If the cost of AWS Glue was 50 percent less then we would not move to another solution.
AWS Glue uses a pay-as-you-go approach which is helpful. The price of the overall solution is low and is a great advantage.
The price is very good. It's enticing people to move to the cloud. That said, I do not have exact information on pricing.
AWS Glue is quite costly, especially for small organizations. The licensing fee is around $200 per year.
This solution is affordable and there is an option to pay for the solution based on your usage.
With AWS Glue, you pay more, but if you want to process the data, with speed and performance, you need the correct EC2 instances. There is a price to pay. It doesn't come free. Technical support is a paid service, and which subscription you have is dependent on that. You must pay one of them, and it ranges from $15,000 to $25,000 per year. You sign up for a level of service, and it does not come for free. As previously stated, everything is based on performance, ELAs. It was very expensive, at that time. If a company wants to pay the money, it makes my job easier. However, if the company or enterprise does not have the funds to pay for it, then it is a hassle.
I consider the the price to be standard-plus when it comes to optimal usage.
Its price is good. We pay as we go or based on the usage, which is a good thing for us because it is simple to forecast for the tool. It is also good in terms of the financial planning of the company, and it is a good way to estimate the cost. It is also simple for our clients. In my opinion, it is one of the best tools in the market for ETL processes because of the fact that you pay as you use, which separates it from other big tools such as PowerCenter, Pentaho Data Integration, and Talend.
It is not expensive. AWS Glue works on the serverless architecture. We get charged for the time the server is up. For our use case, we have to use it once in a day, and it is not expensive for us.
The pricing is a bit higher than other solutions like Athena and EC2. If the pricing becomes more scaled or flexible, it will be good because you have to pay 44 cents just for one DPU for an hour. If you increase DPUs to 5 or 10, the pricing gets multiplied. There are also some time limits like 0 to 10 minutes or 10 to 20 minutes. If the pricing is according to the minutes, it would be better because you have to limit your job to 10 minutes or 20 minutes.