The pricing is based on how much data is ingested, not on the number of rows. The tool's features expand with higher licensing tiers, such as enterprise or business critical, which provide more secure options. The pricing is reasonable, allowing small companies to operate at a cost below forty thousand a year while larger companies experience diminishing costs per data unit as usage increases, projected not to exceed one hundred thousand per month.
The pricing is sensible and depends on the data ingestion quotas. The standard enterprise allows for advanced development, while the free tier offers a limited feature set. High security options require a business-critical license.
Fivetran has a pricing model that scales the more data sources you add. When you have a lot of workflows and complex use cases, pricing goes down as you use it more. That's a very good feature of its pricing. Fivetran might be a bit pricey for a very limited or small number of data sources that might be easily collected in other forms. The pricing gets better the bigger you are.
The licensing costs are extremely high for the usage of somebody who has one GB or two GB of usage per day for real-time traffic. There are many other players in the market which are similarly priced or competitively priced. On average per month, it used to come around 12,000-15,000 USD, which is very high.
We started an annual subscription for HVR, and Fivetran acquired it in March last year. They have the same pricing model based on monthly active rows of data migrated.
The pricing model is okay and mid to large companies will not have an issue with it. The pricing is good for small companies but there is an upfront cost. The solution does not offer a free tier. Smaller companies with tight budgets might want to opt for an open-source product or one that offers a free tier.
Sr. Director of BI and Analytics at a healthcare company with 501-1,000 employees
Real User
2022-11-29T20:31:01Z
Nov 29, 2022
We started off with just our credit card and we made payments. Now we're on a separate and negotiated contract. The pricing generally can be very expensive and a little bit opaque, but they can be negotiated down because it is a SA solution. They've changed the pricing model. They do it by monthly rows now, I think. Also, their pricing practices, when we experienced them, were not very good. They would automatically renew a contract without negotiation, which is not good practice from a client perspective. I would say they're a little bit on the expensive side, and their contract process is not particularly good, but there is a lot of potential flexibility.
Fivetran, the global leader in data movement, is trusted by companies like OpenAI, LVMH, Pfizer, Verizon and Spotify to centralize data from SaaS applications, databases, files, and other sources into cloud destinations, including data lakes. With high-performance pipelines, seamless interoperability, and enterprise-grade security, Fivetran empowers organizations to modernize their data infrastructure, power analytics and AI, ensure compliance, and achieve...
The cost is high for using Fivetran.
The pricing is based on how much data is ingested, not on the number of rows. The tool's features expand with higher licensing tiers, such as enterprise or business critical, which provide more secure options. The pricing is reasonable, allowing small companies to operate at a cost below forty thousand a year while larger companies experience diminishing costs per data unit as usage increases, projected not to exceed one hundred thousand per month.
The pricing is sensible and depends on the data ingestion quotas. The standard enterprise allows for advanced development, while the free tier offers a limited feature set. High security options require a business-critical license.
I rate the pricing a six out of ten.
Fivetran has a pricing model that scales the more data sources you add. When you have a lot of workflows and complex use cases, pricing goes down as you use it more. That's a very good feature of its pricing. Fivetran might be a bit pricey for a very limited or small number of data sources that might be easily collected in other forms. The pricing gets better the bigger you are.
The solution has good pricing. I rate the pricing a six out of ten.
The licensing costs are extremely high for the usage of somebody who has one GB or two GB of usage per day for real-time traffic. There are many other players in the market which are similarly priced or competitively priced. On average per month, it used to come around 12,000-15,000 USD, which is very high.
We started an annual subscription for HVR, and Fivetran acquired it in March last year. They have the same pricing model based on monthly active rows of data migrated.
The pricing model is okay and mid to large companies will not have an issue with it. The pricing is good for small companies but there is an upfront cost. The solution does not offer a free tier. Smaller companies with tight budgets might want to opt for an open-source product or one that offers a free tier.
We started off with just our credit card and we made payments. Now we're on a separate and negotiated contract. The pricing generally can be very expensive and a little bit opaque, but they can be negotiated down because it is a SA solution. They've changed the pricing model. They do it by monthly rows now, I think. Also, their pricing practices, when we experienced them, were not very good. They would automatically renew a contract without negotiation, which is not good practice from a client perspective. I would say they're a little bit on the expensive side, and their contract process is not particularly good, but there is a lot of potential flexibility.
Wee pay between $20,000 and $30,000 a year for Fivetran.