CIO at a engineering company with 51-200 employees
Real User
Top 20
2024-04-25T14:31:54Z
Apr 25, 2024
The tool is an expensive cloud application. It charges per license. We pay around 50 euros per month for a full user, and for 70 users, we pay around 120,000 euros per year. Maintenance and support are included in the full cloud license.
Chief Financial Officer at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Top 20
2023-02-21T20:44:00Z
Feb 21, 2023
I would rate the pricing of the solution somewhere around six or seven out of ten. I don’t like the SaaS models. Of course, they make the tool powerful enough to run a billion-dollar business. The tool is cheaper than SAP or Core.
We just have a subscription with NetSuite OneWorld. NetSuite OneWorld tends to be pricey. The decision to allocate a budget for this solution ultimately rests with the management and negotiating team, and I am not typically included in these discussions. Nonetheless, the information I've received leads me to believe that it is a costly platform. There are not any additional costs that I am aware of.
Senior NetSuite Administrator at Storyteller Overland
Real User
Top 10
2023-01-06T16:20:24Z
Jan 6, 2023
NetSuite OneWorld is much less expensive for a very small to medium-sized business. Still, when you grow into an enterprise-level company, the price increases, but as long as you plan and know that going in, it's manageable. Generally, NetSuite OneWorld is more expensive than if you just priced the software piece. The solution is slightly more costly than a traditional, on-premise ERP. However, you don't pay for servers, you don't have an IP infrastructure staff to manage it, and you don't have a cost for doing upgrades, so when you look at the long-term cost of ownership, it's about the same as a normal, non-cloud ERP system. Pricing-wise, it's a five out of ten. It could be better or could be worse.
VP of Operations at a manufacturing company with 11-50 employees
Real User
2021-02-24T01:06:37Z
Feb 24, 2021
It's a bit pricey. It's probably at the higher end. I wouldn't say it's exorbitantly expensive, however, it's not inexpensive. It's certainly higher priced than Acumatica. We felt, for what we wanted to do, it was really the best solution and so we were okay with the cost. They did work with us on price. We got some discounts and we worked through some additional things where we got some additional discounts. They did work with us to improve the cost value proposition. That said, it is still on the higher side of some of those other solutions.
Properly size number of users that will need in the medium term, this can generate savings in licensing, that Netsuite can respect for several years, prices vary depending on the type of organization, and implementation services, depends on experience and prestige of implementing Netsuite partner.
A comprehensive web-based solution, NetSuite is the industry's first and only Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) business software that supports your entire company from accounting/enterprise resource planning (ERP) to customer relationship management (CRM), professional services automation (PSA) and eCommerce in a single, integrated and powerful business management software solution.
The tool is an expensive cloud application. It charges per license. We pay around 50 euros per month for a full user, and for 70 users, we pay around 120,000 euros per year. Maintenance and support are included in the full cloud license.
I would rate the pricing of the solution somewhere around six or seven out of ten. I don’t like the SaaS models. Of course, they make the tool powerful enough to run a billion-dollar business. The tool is cheaper than SAP or Core.
We just have a subscription with NetSuite OneWorld. NetSuite OneWorld tends to be pricey. The decision to allocate a budget for this solution ultimately rests with the management and negotiating team, and I am not typically included in these discussions. Nonetheless, the information I've received leads me to believe that it is a costly platform. There are not any additional costs that I am aware of.
NetSuite OneWorld is much less expensive for a very small to medium-sized business. Still, when you grow into an enterprise-level company, the price increases, but as long as you plan and know that going in, it's manageable. Generally, NetSuite OneWorld is more expensive than if you just priced the software piece. The solution is slightly more costly than a traditional, on-premise ERP. However, you don't pay for servers, you don't have an IP infrastructure staff to manage it, and you don't have a cost for doing upgrades, so when you look at the long-term cost of ownership, it's about the same as a normal, non-cloud ERP system. Pricing-wise, it's a five out of ten. It could be better or could be worse.
It's a bit pricey. It's probably at the higher end. I wouldn't say it's exorbitantly expensive, however, it's not inexpensive. It's certainly higher priced than Acumatica. We felt, for what we wanted to do, it was really the best solution and so we were okay with the cost. They did work with us on price. We got some discounts and we worked through some additional things where we got some additional discounts. They did work with us to improve the cost value proposition. That said, it is still on the higher side of some of those other solutions.
Do not try to go it alone. Get a consultant who has been there and listens.
Properly size number of users that will need in the medium term, this can generate savings in licensing, that Netsuite can respect for several years, prices vary depending on the type of organization, and implementation services, depends on experience and prestige of implementing Netsuite partner.